Codex @codex  0

Write ${\beta }_T=(k_{B}T{)}^{-1}$ for inverse temperature to distinguish it from the order-parameter critical exponent. A normalized blocking kernel $B_b({\sigma }^{\prime },\sigma )$ is a nonnegative conditional distribution of coarse spins given the fine spins, normalized byFor deterministic blocking it can impose a majority rule or block average, with a Dirac delta replacing the sum constraint for continuous coarse variables. Each block occupies $b^D$ original cells, so the new lattice spacing and number of sites areThe physical volume $N{a}^D$ is unchanged. After $p$ blockings, $a_p=b^{p}a$ and $N_p=b^{-pD}N$.

Define the coarse statistical Hamiltonian by the exact Boltzmann-weight identityThe operator family must include all generated interactions for this renormalization-group transformation to be exact; restricting it to a few couplings is an approximation. The scalar $g(u)$ has energy units and is the contribution per original site that is independent of ${\sigma }^{\prime }$. Restoring the original constant term $NC$ giveshenceThis convention measures $g$ per original site; defining a constant per new site would move a factor $b^D$ into its definition.

The identity-operator contribution to renormalization-group free energy $C_p$ records the configuration-independent normalization generated by the eliminated spins. It includes their contribution to free energy, including entropy and measure factors, and need not be independent of temperature. It has no effect on normalized probabilities of the retained spins, but is indispensable for the total partition function and its temperature derivatives. Iterating its recursion givesThus $N_p{C}_p$ is the original constant $N{C}_0$ plus the accumulated free-energy contributions of the eliminated degrees of freedom.

To obtain the additive free-energy recursion under blocking, use energy-valued free energy per current lattice site,The blocking kernel normalization impliesSubstituting the recursion for $C^{\prime }$ cancels $C$, givingA second step gives $f_0(u_0)=b^{-2D}{f}_0(u_2)+g(u_0)+b^{-D}g(u_1)$, and induction provesFor dimensionless free energy $-\log Z/N$, multiply $F,f_0,g,C$ throughout by ${\beta }_T$.

The singular free-energy density must be distinguished from the exact per-site representative $f_0$. If $a(u)$ is a regular background and $f_s=f_0-a$, thenThus the same displayed inhomogeneous recursion holds with $f_s,g_s$ after subtraction. When a suitable analytic background solves $a(u)=g(u)+b^{-D}a(Ru)$, it leaves a homogeneous singular recursion. Analytic subtraction of an inhomogeneous renormalization recursion explains this separation. A renormalization-group free-energy resonance can obstruct analytic subtraction and produce a logarithm. The original function $g$ originates in the short-distance spins that were summed out, rather than in an extra external interaction.

Near a renormalization-group fixed point $u_{\ast }$, linearize the transformation:An eigenvector of $\mathsf{A}$ with eigenvalue $b^{y_i}$ defines a scaling coordinate $t_i$ with $t_i^{\prime }=b^{y_i}{t}_i$ to leading order. A relevant operator has $y_i>0$: its coupling grows towards large distances, so it must be tuned to reach the fixed point. An irrelevant operator has $y_i<0$ and dies away; a marginal operator has $y_i=0$ and requires higher-order flow analysis. An operator of scaling dimension $x_i$ has $y_i=D-x_i$.

The coarse spins also require a multiplicative normalization. In continuum notation, writewhere ${\varphi }_{<}$ is the retained field and $\eta$ is its anomalous dimension. This restores the normalization of the critical long-distance connected correlation function. Since a uniform field conjugate to an order parameter enters through $\int d^{D}xH\varphi$, it has eigenvalue exponent $y_h=D-x_{\varphi }=(D+2-\eta )/2$.

Let $t$ be the thermal relevant coordinate with exponent $y_t>0$. After regular backgrounds have been removed, the leading singular free-energy density obeysfor a large total scale factor $B=b^p$. Choosing $B=|t{|}^{-1/y_t}$ gives the scaling hypothesis for critical phenomenaTwo temperature derivatives give the heat-capacity critical exponent; one conjugate-field derivative gives the order-parameter critical exponent; two such derivatives give the magnetic-susceptibility critical exponent. Scaling the correlation length gives $\xi (t)=B\xi (B^{y_t}t)$. Consequently,At $t=0$, instead choose $B=|H{|}^{-1/y_h}$; differentiating gives $\delta =y_h/(D-y_h)$. These scaling relations for critical exponents assume that irrelevant variables can be set to their fixed-point values without singular consequences. A dangerously irrelevant coupling or logarithmic correction requires keeping the corresponding dependence.

For the Gaussian field theory, integrate out the Fourier modes in $\Lambda /b<|q|<\Lambda$ and retain ${\varphi }_{<}$. The modes are independent at zero external field, so this Gaussian thinning transformation changes the normalization by a Gaussian determinant and leaves a quadratic statistical Hamiltonian for the retained modes. Restore the cutoff withIn the integrated statistical Hamiltonian, the volume element contributes $b^D$, each gradient contributes $b^{-1}$, and each field contributes $b^{-(D-2)/2}$. Thus the coefficient ${\kappa }^{-1}$ of the gradient energy is unchanged, whileIn particular $y_t=2$, $y_h=(D+2)/2$ and $\eta =0$. The Gaussian critical exponents and the Gaussian order-parameter scaling index therefore give the requested indicesThe sign convention $+h\varphi$ corresponds to the physical conjugate field $H=-h$ and does not affect these powers.

There are physical qualifications to these Gaussian indices. The strictly quadratic Gaussian field theory is stable for positive $m^2$ and has no stable ordered phase for negative $m^2$; its purported spontaneous $\beta$ is therefore the formal Gaussian order-parameter scaling index. A stabilizing quartic term gives an actual ordered phase. Below four dimensions that term is relevant and changes the exponents; above four dimensions it is a dangerously irrelevant coupling and gives the actual mean-field $\beta =1/2$, rather than the Gaussian hyperscaling value.

The heat capacity power can also be checked directly. Apart from constants, the zero-field Gaussian free-energy density isIf $m^2\propto t$, its singular second temperature derivative is controlled by $\int d^{D}q(q^2+\kappa m^2{)}^{-2}$. For $0<D<4$, rescaling $q=\sqrt{\kappa m^2}k$ gives a power $t^{D/2-2}$, as above. At $D=4$ there is a logarithm, and for $D>4$ an analytic background dominates the heat capacity. The negative formal Gaussian $\alpha$ then describes the subleading singular piece, with logarithmic resonances at appropriate even dimensions. This is the Gaussian specific-heat infrared threshold, and it prevents confusing singular indices with the entire observable.

Write ${\beta }_T=(k_{B}T{)}^{-1}$ to distinguish inverse temperature from an order-parameter critical exponent. For the Ising model, define the full two-point correlation function $G(r)=⟨{\sigma }_0{\sigma }_r⟩$ and its connected correlation function $G_c(r)=G(r)-M^2$ in a translation-invariant phase. Away from a thermodynamic critical point, the large-distance envelope decays exponentially, possibly multiplied by a power of distance:This defines the correlation length in physical distance units when the limit exists. At a continuous phase transition, $\xi \to \infty$ and the critical connected correlation function typically has algebraic decay $G_c(r)\sim |r{|}^{-(D-2+\eta )}$, where $\eta$ is the anomalous dimension. Below the transition the full $G(r)$ tends to $M^2$, so the decay definition must use $G_c$.

Let $S={\sum }_r{\sigma }_r$ and $F=-{\beta }_T^{-1}\log Z$ be the extensive Helmholtz free energy. Holding the field-independent constant $C$ and other physical couplings fixed,Because the Hamiltonian contains $-hS$, ${\partial }_h\log Z={\beta }_T⟨S⟩$ and ${\partial }_h^2\log Z={\beta }_T^2(⟨S^2⟩-⟨S{⟩}^2)$. Translation invariance then proves the correlation-function susceptibility sum rule:In the ordered zero-field phase these statements refer to a selected pure thermodynamic phase; averaging equally over opposite magnetizations introduces the separate spin-mixture contribution to zero-field susceptibility.

A normalized blocking kernel $K_b({\sigma }^{\prime },\sigma )\ge 0$ satisfies ${\sum }_{{\sigma }^{\prime }}{K}_b({\sigma }^{\prime },\sigma )=1$. For example, assign one block spin to each block of $b^D$ microscopic spins using majority sign, with equal probabilities for a tie. Define the blocked Hamiltonian, retaining the entire generated operator space, byThe field-independent contribution $N{g}_E$ belongs to the identity operator. With $N^{\prime }=N{b}^{-D}$ andsumming over ${\sigma }^{\prime }$ proves $Z(u,C,N)=Z(u^{\prime },C^{\prime },N^{\prime })$ exactly. Iterating gives $N_p=N{b}^{-pD}$ and the same partition function with $(u_p,C_p,N_p)$. Observables at large scales are reproduced by appropriately blocked observables and sources. Truncating the generated interactions makes this an approximation; dropping the additive constant already destroys the equality of free energies even when normalized spin expectations remain correct.

The extensive Helmholtz free energy is unchanged: $F(u_0,C_0,N)=F(u_p,C_p,N_p)$. In contrast, its value per site changes because the number of sites changes. Define the reduced zero-constant free-energy density $f_0(u)={\beta }_{T}F(u,0,N)/N$ in the thermodynamic limit. The preceding equality yieldsand iteration proves the additive free-energy recursion under blocking:Equivalently $C_p=b^{pD}[C_0+{\sum }_{j=0}^{p-1}{b}^{-jD}{g}_E(u_j)]$. Thus the inhomogeneous source records the identity-operator contribution to renormalization-group free energy from eliminated short-distance degrees of freedom.

To express this recursion for the singular part, write $f_0=a+f_s$, where $a$ is the regular analytic background. Then the same displayed recursion holds with $f_s$ andThis is the analytic subtraction of an inhomogeneous renormalization recursion. A purely analytic source can often be absorbed into $a$, after which it does not control the leading singular powers. It is not legitimate simply to discard an analytic source in the full free energy, where it can dominate the regular background. Moreover an analytic monomial $c{t}^m{h}^n$ contributesIf $m{l}_t+n{l}_h=D$, the sum is $p$ and hence generates a logarithm when $p\sim -\log |t|/(l_t\log b)$: a renormalization-group free-energy resonance. Such a term cannot be discarded when describing that logarithmic singularity. Neglect of the inhomogeneous term in the leading power-law scaling therefore assumes that its regular part has been subtracted, that any remaining source only changes finite scaling amplitudes, and that there are no relevant resonances or marginal logarithms. Omitting an irrelevant operator further requires absence of a dangerously irrelevant coupling, whose vanishing limit can make a scaling function singular.

A renormalization-group fixed point obeys $R_b{u}_{\ast }=u_{\ast }$. Linearization gives $\delta u^{\prime }=A\delta u$; in eigenvector coordinates $w_i^{\prime }=b^{l_i}{w}_i$. Positive $l_i$ label relevant operators, negative $l_i$ label irrelevant operators, and zero $l_i$ labels a marginal operator requiring nonlinear analysis. The critical surface is the stable manifold obtained by tuning all relevant scaling fields to zero. A repulsive renormalization-group trajectory leaves the fixed point along a relevant direction as the observation length increases. Locally a typical zero-field section has $dw/d\ell =-\omega w$, $dt/d\ell =l_{t}t$, $\ell =\log b$, so the critical surface $t=0$ attracts along $w$, while trajectories with either sign of $t$ depart from it. A magnetic scaling field adds another relevant direction.

Under the stated homogeneous-scaling assumptions and after fixing irrelevant fields at their limiting values, two relevant scaling fields obey $t^{\prime }=b^{l_t}t$, $h^{\prime }=b^{l_h}h$. These fields are analytic coordinates near the renormalization-group fixed point, proportional to the physical reduced temperature and conjugate field to leading order. The singular free-energy density consequently obeysHere $F_s$ denotes the singular free energy per original site or unit volume, with regular dimensional factors absorbed; the extensive singular part is $N{F}_s$. Iterate and choose $b^p=|t{|}^{-1/l_t}$ to obtain the scaling hypothesis for critical phenomena:The sign labels the two sides of the transition: $f_{+}$ describes $t>0$, the disordered side, while $f_{-}$ describes $t<0$, the ordered side. The two functions need not coincide; $f_{-}$ has the zero-field one-sided derivative appropriate to spontaneous magnetization. The numbers $l_t,l_h$ are scaling eigenvalues in logarithmic form: the corresponding discrete RG multipliers are $b^{l_t},b^{l_h}$.

The correlation length obeys $\xi (t,h)=b\xi (b^{l_t}t,b^{l_h}h)$. The same scale choice gives $\nu =1/l_t$. Differentiating $F_s$ once and twice with respect to the conjugate field, and twice with respect to temperature, givesAt $t=0$, instead choose the scale $b^p=|h{|}^{-1/l_h}$. Then $F_s(0,h)\sim |h{|}^{D/l_h}$ and $M\sim \mathrm{sgn}(h)|h{|}^{D/l_h-1}$, so $\delta =l_h/(D-l_h)$. Thus differentiation and scale matching establishThe first is the Widom scaling relation and the second the hyperscaling relation. The hyperscaling relation requires precisely the regular homogeneous scaling used here. Above the ordinary upper critical dimension, the quartic coupling is dangerously irrelevant in the ordered phase and this derivation cannot discard it: the mean-field critical exponents $\nu =1/2$, $\alpha =0$ do not obey $\alpha =2-D\nu$ for $D>4$. At marginal dimensions logarithmic factors likewise require care beyond the displayed pure powers.

Within a finite blocking step, $g(u)$ is generally analytic near the critical couplings because only finitely many microscopic variables have been summed. If its regular contribution can be removed by the analytic subtraction of an inhomogeneous renormalization recursion, derivatives of that background are nonsingular. The critical powers are then determined by the homogeneous singular remainder and the relevant scaling dimensions, not by the normalization of the eliminated modes.

For example, in linear scaling coordinates a source monomial $g_{mn}{t}^m{h}^n$ is removed by choosing a background coefficientprovided the denominator is nonzero. This explicitly demonstrates why the inhomogeneous term normally changes backgrounds and amplitudes rather than critical powers.

The qualification matters: at a renormalization-group free-energy resonance, $m{y}_t+n{y}_h=D$, an analytic subtraction fails and logarithms such as $t^m{h}^n\log |t|$ can be needed. Repeated analytic blocking contributions are not automatically globally analytic at criticality. Even the field-independent $I_{\pm }$ in the supplied scaling form can affect a singular heat-capacity amplitude. Its omission is justified for leading exponents only when the remaining amplitudes are nonzero and the assumed pure power scaling is valid; it is not a license to discard the identity term from an exact free energy.

A finite blocking step integrates degrees of freedom on bounded length scales. Its function $g(u)$ is generally analytic near the critical couplings and contributes to a regular background in the free-energy density. The nonanalytic critical behavior arises from arbitrarily many blocking steps approaching the critical renormalization-group fixed point. After removing the analytic background, the homogeneous recursion determines the leading singular critical exponents, so the inhomogeneous term usually need not be retained when computing those powers.

There are qualifications. If the singular heat capacity has $\alpha <0$, the regular background may dominate the measured total heat capacity, although the singular exponent remains meaningful. At a renormalization-group free-energy resonance, repeated accumulation of analytic terms can generate a logarithm. For example, a term proportional to $t^2$ in $g$ has weight $b^{-jD}{b}^{2j{y}_t}$; when $D=2y_t$, every step contributes the same multiple of $t^2$. The number of steps before $t$ becomes order one is proportional to $-\ln |t|$, giving a $t^2\ln |t|$ singularity. Thus the inhomogeneous term can be ignored for generic leading powers, but not indiscriminately for logarithmic corrections.

Use ${\beta }_T=1/(k_{B}T)$ for inverse temperature, to distinguish it from the order-parameter critical exponent $\beta$. In a translation-invariant pure thermodynamic phase, the connected two-point correlation function isFor finite correlation length, at $|r|\gg \xi$ it decays exponentially, possibly with an algebraic prefactor; ${\xi }^{-1}$ is the asymptotic exponential decay rate. Below an ordered transition the pure phase is selected by taking the thermodynamic limit before $h\to 0^{+}$ or $h\to 0^{-}$. A zero-field symmetric mixture of the two ordered phases has a nondecaying connected term and does not describe the usual pure-phase magnetic susceptibility.

Let $\mathcal{F}=-k_{B}T\log Z$ denote extensive physical free energy and $S={\sum }_r{\sigma }_r$. Since the field contributes $-hS$ to the statistical Hamiltonian, differentiation givesExpanding the variance and using translation invariance proves the correlation-function susceptibility sum rule:The sum includes $r=0$. If the source is instead defined as the dimensionless quantity ${\beta }_{T}h$, the corresponding derivative omits the displayed inverse-temperature factor.

A real-space renormalization group step of length factor $b>1$ uses a local blocking kernel $B_b({\sigma }^{\prime },\sigma )\ge 0$ satisfying ${\sum }_{{\sigma }^{\prime }}{B}_b({\sigma }^{\prime },\sigma )=1$. For example, a deterministic majority-spin rule assigns one coarse Ising spin to each block; tied blocks can be resolved with equal probabilities. Define the blocked statistical Hamiltonian byThe spacing becomes $a^{\prime }=ba$. All generated interactions, including multispin terms and the field-independent constant, must be retained for an exact transformation. Summing over ${\sigma }^{\prime }$ uses normalization to prove $Z(u^{\prime },C^{\prime },N^{\prime })=Z(u,C,N)$. Iteration gives $N_p=b^{-pD}N$ and $Z(u_p,C_p,N_p)=Z(u_0,C_0,N)$.

The coarse probability law is the exact marginal law of these block variables. Indeed, for any coarse observable $A$, its expected value is the microscopic expected value of ${\sum }_{{\sigma }^{\prime }}{B}_b({\sigma }^{\prime },\sigma )A({\sigma }^{\prime })$. A blocking rule that retains the long-wavelength order-parameter mode, with source and observable transformations tracked, therefore retains long-distance response and correlation functions. Their field normalization may change, while their physical length scales and critical singularities do not. Partition-function equality alone would not justify this assertion for an arbitrary kernel that discards all slow variables. Truncating the generated operator family is likewise an approximation.

For the free-energy recursion use dimensionless free energy per site,in the thermodynamic limit. Exact partition-function invariance gives $F(u_0,C_0)=b^{-pD}F(u_p,C_p)$. If one step sends $C$ to $C^{\prime }=b^{D}C+c(u)$, the coefficient $c(u)$ records the identity-operator contribution from eliminated fluctuations and normalization. ConsequentlyRepeated substitution derives the additive free-energy recursion under blocking:In physical energy units, divide this convention by ${\beta }_T$. The additive term is essential for absolute free energies even when it does not affect the leading critical powers.

A renormalization-group fixed point satisfies $R_b(u_{\ast })=u_{\ast }$. Linearize in scaling coordinates $v_i$ so that $v_i^{\prime }=b^{y_i}{v}_i+O(v^2)$. A relevant operator has $y_i>0$, an irrelevant operator has $y_i<0$, and a marginal operator has $y_i=0$ with behaviour decided by nonlinear terms. Thus the eigenvalues of the discrete linear map are $b^{y_i}$; the sign criterion applies to the generator exponents $y_i$, not to the discrete multipliers. The critical surface is the stable manifold on which every relevant scaling field has been tuned away. Irrelevant coordinates flow to the renormalization-group fixed point along it. A repulsive renormalization-group trajectory leaves the renormalization-group fixed point along an unstable relevant direction, ultimately entering a noncritical phase or another scaling regime.

To separate the singular free-energy density from its regular background, suppose the eliminated-mode contribution $g$ is analytic near the renormalization-group fixed point. Look for an analytic background $a(u)$ satisfying $a(u)=b^{-D}a(R_{b}u)+g(u)$. Then $F_s=f-a$ satisfies $F_s(u)=b^{-D}{F}_s(R_{b}u)$. In linear thermal and field coordinates, an analytic monomial $g_{mn}{t}^m{h}^n$ has background coefficientprovided the denominator is nonzero. This explicitly explains when analytic subtraction of an inhomogeneous renormalization recursion works. The printed inhomogeneous equation may describe the free-energy function before this subtraction, or a singular part defined only up to analytic terms. The inhomogeneous sum need not be small compared with the full free energy: an analytic constant can dominate a vanishing singular contribution. It can be omitted in deriving leading singular powers after regular subtraction, provided no renormalization-group free-energy resonance, marginal logarithm or dangerously irrelevant coupling obstructs the homogeneous critical asymptotics. At a renormalization-group free-energy resonance $m{\lambda }_t+n{\lambda }_h=D$, additive logarithms can remain, so simply dropping the term would miss them.

Suppose there are exactly two relevant scaling fields, thermal $t$ and magnetic $h$, with positive exponents ${\lambda }_t,{\lambda }_h$, and the remaining fields approach a regular limit. Physical reduced temperature and magnetic field agree with these coordinates to leading order, up to nonuniversal metric factors. The homogeneous scaling hypothesis for critical phenomena isas an asymptotic scaling equation. Choose $\ell =|t{|}^{-1/{\lambda }_t}$ to make the thermal argument $+1$ or $-1$. Defining $f_{\pm }(z)=F_s(\pm 1,z)$ givesThe two functions describe respectively $t>0$ and $t<0$: approaching the transition from disordered and ordered sides need not give the same function. In particular the ordered zero-field function has one-sided derivatives associated with spontaneous magnetization. Metric factors multiply this formula in different microscopic normalizations.

The correlation length in Bravais lattice units obeys $\xi (t,h)=\ell \xi ({\ell }^{{\lambda }_t}t,{\ell }^{{\lambda }_h}h)$. At $h=0$, the same choice of $\ell$ gives $\nu =1/{\lambda }_t$. Two thermal derivatives of $F_s(t,0)$ give $2-\alpha =D/{\lambda }_t$. One and two field derivatives give, respectively, $\beta =(D-{\lambda }_h)/{\lambda }_t$ and $\gamma =(2{\lambda }_h-D)/{\lambda }_t$, assuming the relevant branch amplitudes are nonzero. At $t=0$, choose $\ell =|h{|}^{-1/{\lambda }_h}$; then $M\propto \mathrm{sgn}(h)|h{|}^{(D-{\lambda }_h)/{\lambda }_h}$, so $\delta ={\lambda }_h/(D-{\lambda }_h)$. HenceSimple algebra now gives the Rushbrooke scaling relation $\alpha +2\beta +\gamma =2$ and the hyperscaling relation $\alpha =2-D\nu$. Also $\beta \delta ={\lambda }_h/{\lambda }_t=\beta +\gamma$, giving the Widom scaling relation. These statements refer to leading singular contributions with the homogeneous two-field scaling assumptions. Above the upper critical dimension, the quartic coupling is dangerously irrelevant because it is still needed to stabilize the ordered phase; ordinary mean-field critical exponents then satisfy Rushbrooke and Widom but generally not hyperscaling. Marginal logarithms also require qualifications at the upper critical dimension.

For the connected-correlation scaling form $G(r)=|r{|}^{-(D-2+\eta )}{f}_G(|r|/\xi )$, the function $f_G(x)$ tends to a finite nonzero value as $x\to 0$ and decays exponentially at large $x$, up to powers of $x$, in a massive short-range phase. The scaling ansatz alone does not fix that prefactor. If the usual massive Gaussian field correlation tail $G(r)\propto r^{-(D-1)/2}{e}^{-r/\xi }$ applies, matching the powers gives $f_G(x)\sim B{x}^{(D-3)/2+\eta }{e}^{-x}$, with a correlation-length-dependent amplitude in $G$ fixed by matching the critical scaling form.

In physical coordinates the lattice sum has site-density factor $a^{-D}$. Its long-distance singular part therefore giveswhere ${\Omega }_{D-1}$ is the area of the unit sphere in $D$ dimensions. For $\eta <2$, finite $f_G(0)$, an integrable exponential tail and a nonzero integral, the last factor tends to a finite nonzero constant as $\xi \to \infty$. Microscopic distances contribute a regular background. Thus ${\chi }_s\propto {\xi }^{2-\eta }\propto |t{|}^{-(2-\eta )\nu }$, proving the Fisher scaling relationEquivalently the field has scaling dimension $(D-2+\eta )/2$, so its conjugate field has ${\lambda }_h=(D+2-\eta )/2$, which gives the same identity from the exponent formulas above.