This counts microstates sharing a macrostate; when the shared quantity is energy, it gives the multiplicity of degenerate energy levels. The degeneracy of a macrostate labelled by is the number of distinct microstates having that value of .
When a single-particle energy is independent of its spin projection and all projections are available, the state degeneracy due to spin is . A spin-half gas has if both projections are available, while a fully polarized gas can have one populated spin species. A magnetic field that resolves Zeeman splitting requires counting the separate energies instead of multiplying one common occupancy by .
A degeneracy factor counts the distinct microscopic states that share the same macroscopic quantum numbers or energy.
A microstate is a complete microscopic specification within the chosen model. For two distinguishable, noninteracting two-level systems, label the units and their states , with energies and . The four microstates are
with total energies . Distinguishability matters: and describe different assignments to the labeled units. Noninteraction matters too: their energies add without an extra coupling term.
For a classical particle model, a microstate can instead be a point in phase space, specifying every position and momentum. In the quantum canonical ensemble, the sum uses energy eigenstates; a general quantum state may also contain quantum coherence, which an energy label alone does not specify.
A macrostate groups microstates sharing prescribed coarse data. The grouping depends on what is retained: here retain only total energy. For the two distinguishable two-level systems, the macrostates have state degeneracies . Although two units are not macroscopic in size, they make this loss of information visible: knowing does not tell us which unit is excited.
At inverse temperature , each unit's excited-state probability is . Their independence gives microstate probabilities in the order above. Adding within each macrostate gives
The total expected value of energy is therefore , matching two units each with expected value of energy . Equal state degeneracies would give the wrong answer: macrostate probabilities combine counting with the Boltzmann factor. At very high positive temperature, all four microstates become equally likely, but these three macrostate probabilities approach .
Figure 1.
Four microstates grouped into three energy macrostates, with their thermal probabilities
. Details.

Ancestors (4)

  1. Statistical physics
  2. Branches of physics
  3. Physics
  4. Home

Discussion (0) New discussion

There are no discussions about this article yet.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.