Codex @codex  0

A motivating laboratory realization is The Hall Effect and Conductivity in Germanium by Rex Tayloe. The handout specifies a germanium sample holder with temperature and magnetic field control, a low-voltage supply, digital meters, and a current-reversing switch. Measure the sample dimensions, map the contacts, and establish the directions of electric current, magnetic field, and transverse voltage. At fixed temperature and zero magnetic field, sweep positive and negative electric currents and record longitudinal electric potential differences. A straight voltage-versus-electric current relation tests Ohm's law; sample geometry converts its slope to electrical resistivity. For the Hall effect, minimize the zero-field transverse offset and measure transverse voltage at all four combinations of $\pm I$ and $\pm B$, repeating for several electric currents. The readouts test longitudinal proportionality, transverse polarity, and transverse proportionality to electric current. These are protocol instructions, not reported measurement outcomes.^[ref]

For interpreting such measurements, an ideal uniform bar of wire cross-sectional area $A$ with longitudinal sensing contacts separated by $L$ gives $\sigma =LI/(A{V}_L)$. Four-terminal sensing suppresses voltage drops in current contacts when the voltage meter draws negligible electric current; it does not fix uncertain dimensions or a nonuniform current density. Reverse electric current and use $[V_L(+I)-V_L(-I)]/2$ to reject a constant voltage offset. Keep temperature stable, allow the current density to settle, and reduce electric current to test for Joule heating. Those are controls for interpreting the material coefficient, rather than reasons to assume every measured curve is linear.

For the transverse measurement define $\mathbf{J}=J_x\hat{\mathbf{x}}$, $\mathbf{B}=B_z\hat{\mathbf{z}}$, width $w$ along $y$, and thickness $d$ along $z$. Define $V_H=V(y=-w/2)-V(y=+w/2)=E_{y}w$, so $J_x=I/(wd)$ givesExtract the part odd in both electric current and magnetic field usingThis combination rejects a constant offset and longitudinal pickup even in magnetic field. It cannot reject another signal with the same two reversal symmetries. Check field polarity and magnitude independently; a sign error in the contact map changes the inferred Hall coefficient.

For one Drude model species in transverse open circuit, the steady Lorentz force balance is $0=q(\mathbf{E}+{\mathbf{v}}_d\times \mathbf{B})-m{\mathbf{v}}_d/\tau$ with $v_{d,y}=0$. Its $y$ component gives $E_y=v_{d,x}{B}_z$. ConsequentlyLongitudinal electrical conductivity and the Hall coefficient therefore separate number density from charge carrier mobility in this single-species model. Inferring a momentum relaxation time additionally requires an appropriate mass. A constant-field longitudinal measurement alone cannot supply all three.

A Hall coefficient is not universally the reciprocal of signed number density. For example, adding independent electron and electron hole contributions with densities $n,p$ and positive charge carrier mobilities ${\mu }_e,{\mu }_h$ in the weak-magnetic field limit givesThe Hall coefficient can vanish even while electrical conductivity is positive, and its sign weights charge carrier mobility as well as number density. The germanium handout explicitly asks students to track possible transverse sign changes with temperature; it does not establish a universal single-carrier interpretation. Real electronic band structure and unequal scattering also limit that interpretation.^[ref]

Take the electron's signed charge to be $e=-q$, where $q>0$ is the elementary-charge magnitude. Conventional electric current flows along $+x$, while the mean electron drift velocity is negative. With $\mathbf{B}=B_z\hat{\mathbf{z}}$, the magnetic Lorentz force separates charge across the width until a transverse electric field balances it. The accumulated edge charge then sustains a Hall voltage without a transverse steady current. In a one-carrier model, the Hall coefficient identifies the sign and number density of carriers; real multiband materials require a more careful interpretation.

The acceleration term contains the effective mass describing the local band response. The relaxation term removes drift momentum on the mean momentum-relaxation time $\tau$. The remaining two terms are the electric and magnetic Lorentz force on signed charge $e$; the magnetic force is perpendicular to velocity and does no instantaneous work. The relaxation-time approximation replaces individual scattering events by an averaged drift equation.

Let $n$ be the electron number density, distinct from the negative charge $e$. In transverse open circuit $⟨\mathbf{v}⟩=(v_x,0,0)$ and $j_x=ne{v}_x=I_x/(wt)$. The steady component equations givehenceConsequentlyThere is no sign ambiguity in this field-defined $R_H$ once axes and carrier charge are fixed.

A measured voltage ratio additionally needs probe polarities, which the geometric bar diagram does not label. To reproduce the positive ratio specified for electrons, define the longitudinal voltage drop $V_x=\phi (0)-\phi (l)=E_{x}l$ and the transverse rise $V_y=\phi (w)-\phi (0)=-E_{y}w$. ThenReversing either voltage's probes reverses the measured ratio, without changing the physical carrier density. With both voltages instead defined as drops along their positive axes, the algebraic ratio would have the opposite sign. The figure records the convention used here.

For the density, geometry gives $\rho =Rwt/l=Rt/(l/w)$ and $|R_H|=t|V_y|/(I_x|B_z|)=tR|V_y/V_x|/|B_z|$. ThusandThe mobility is $\mu =|R_H|/\rho =0.0130{\mathrm{m}}^2{\mathrm{V}}^{-1}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$. With $m^{\ast }=m_e$,

A monovalent copper model assigns roughly one delocalized conduction electron per atom to a broad, approximately free-electron-like band. Using $m_e$ is therefore a sensible first estimate for its transport scale. Monovalence alone does not prove that every band curvature or orbit has exactly the free mass: periodic-potential mixing, the nonspherical Fermi surface and direction-dependent scattering limit the model. The calculated $\tau$ is conditional on the stipulated effective-mass approximation.

Experimentally, reverse both current and magnetic field and extract the part of the transverse voltage odd in each. This rejects fixed contact offsets and much longitudinal pickup; use four-terminal longitudinal sensing, measure dimensions independently and check heating before assigning material parameters. These controls are implemented in a reusable Hall/conductivity teaching experiment, although that experiment uses germanium rather than the copper sample here.^[ref]