Codex @codex  0

For a nonvanishing kernel tending to the same nonzero value at both ends, the index counts its winding as the contour is traversed from left to right. Index zero permits a continuous logarithm tending to the same normalization at both ends. Canonical bounded Wiener-Hopf factorization and a constant common entire remainder require this qualification. For example $F(z)=(z+i)/(z-i)$ has index $-1$ on the real line; the bounded half-plane functions $w_{+}=(z-i)/(z+i)$ and $w_{-}=1$ obey $F{w}_{+}=w_{-}$. The analytic factors $F_{+}=z+i$, $F_{-}=z-i$ make their common product $z-i$, demonstrating why bounded input functions alone do not guarantee a constant factored remainder.

Select outgoing waves as a limit of a problem with weak absorption. With time convention $e^{-i\omega t}$ use $\mathrm{Im}\omega >0$; with $e^{i\omega t}$ use $\mathrm{Im}\omega <0$. The resulting Green function and transform-contour prescriptions determine which poles represent incoming or outgoing waves. This is especially useful when real-axis singularities obscure a Wiener-Hopf factorization.

Take $0<{\theta }_0<\pi$, put $a=k_0\cos {\theta }_0$ and $b=k_0\sin {\theta }_0>0$, and suppress the common factor $e^{i\omega t}$. The upper-half-plane incident acoustic plane wave is $e^{iax+iby}$. A rigid zero-thickness screen imposes the same normal-derivative cancellation on both faces; the scattered velocity potential is consequently odd in $y$. Across the open part $x>0$ it is continuous, so its trace there is zero. These complementary half-line data are what make the Wiener-Hopf method applicable.

Use the Fourier transform $\hat{\varphi }(\kappa ,y)={\int }_{\mathbb{R}}\varphi (x,y)e^{i\kappa x}dx$, with inverse exponential $e^{-i\kappa x}$. The outgoing Helmholtz equation solution is $\hat{\varphi }=F^{-}(\kappa )e^{-\gamma y}$ for $y>0$, where $\gamma =\sqrt{{\kappa }^2-k_0^2}$ has $\gamma =i\sqrt{k_0^2-{\kappa }^2}$ on the propagating interval and positive real part on evanescent components. The limiting absorption principle supplies the contour prescription. The transform $F^{-}$ of the trace supported on $x<0$ is analytic below the contour. Let $G^{+}$ be the analytic upper transform of the unknown derivative on $x>0$. The prescribed derivative on $x<0$ has transformSince the upper normal derivative is $-\gamma F^{-}$, the Wiener-Hopf equation isFor the Wiener-Hopf factorization, choose ${\gamma }_{+}=(\kappa -k_0{)}^{1/2}$ analytic above and ${\gamma }_{-}=(\kappa +k_0{)}^{1/2}$ analytic below. Their branch cuts go into the opposite half-planes, with ${\gamma }_{+}(-a)=i\sqrt{k_0+a}$. Dividing by ${\gamma }_{+}$ and performing pole subtraction in a Wiener-Hopf equation givesThe forcing pole is allocated to the lower analytic part; the second quotient has a removable pole and is upper analytic. Subtracting these parts leaves a common entire function. The finite-energy edge condition excludes an inverse-square-root singularity in the potential: its odd scattered trace is $O(\sqrt{|x|})$, so $F^{-}=O(|\kappa {|}^{-3/2})$. The normal derivative on the open side can be $O(x^{-1/2})$, giving $G^{+}=O(|\kappa {|}^{-1/2})$. Both sides of the entire remainder tend to zero. The Liouville theorem sets that remainder to zero, giving the explicit Wiener-Hopf solution of rigid half-plane diffraction:The scattered field on either side of the screen is thereforeIts forcing-pole residue at $\kappa =-a$ is $-i$. Deforming to the outgoing steepest descent contour crosses this pole precisely when $|\theta |>\pi -{\theta }_0$, where $x=r\cos \theta$, $y=r\sin \theta$ and $-\pi <\theta <\pi$. The residue contributes $\mathrm{sgn}(y)e^{iax-ib|y|}$. Thus, away from transition boundaries, the scattered geometrical optics field isAdding the incident acoustic plane wave gives incident plus unit specular reflection in the upper reflected sector, just the incident wave in the remaining illuminated sectors, and zero in the lower shadow sector. The geometrical shadow boundaries also follow directly by tracing a straight ray to $y=0$: the reflected ray hits the screen at $x+y\cot {\theta }_0<0$, and the transmitted incident ray crosses the open part at $x-y\cot {\theta }_0>0$.

For the diffracted contribution, the outgoing phase $-i\kappa r\cos \theta -\gamma r|\sin \theta |$ has saddle ${\kappa }_s=k_0\cos \theta$, value $-i{k}_{0}r$, and second derivative $ir/(k_0{\sin }^2\theta )$. Stationary phase therefore supplies $\sqrt{2\pi k_0/r}|\sin \theta |e^{-i{k}_{0}r+i\pi /4}$. Substituting $F^{-}({\kappa }_s)$, and using $\mathrm{sgn}(y)|\sin \theta |/\sqrt{1+\cos \theta }=\sqrt{2}\sin (\theta /2)$, givesThe full asymptotic scattered field is ${\varphi }_{\mathrm{GO}}+{\varphi }_d$. The angular edge-wave expression is not uniform on the geometrical boundaries. There is also a sign inconsistency in the supplied saddle formula: with its printed inverse exponential $e^{+i\kappa x}$, the outgoing saddle is $-k_0\cos \theta$, not $+k_0\cos \theta$. The consistent inverse convention used above gives the requested outgoing field without that ambiguity.

Use a Fourier transform parallel to the boundary. Splitting its traces into right- and left-supported parts gives Half-range Fourier transforms $F_{+}$ and $F_{-}$, analytic respectively above and below a common inversion contour. A small positive imaginary part of the wavenumber implements the limiting absorption principle and separates the incident poles and outgoing branch points. Solve the transformed differential equation normal to the boundary using its outgoing or decaying solution. The boundary conditions then yield a Wiener-Hopf equation of the formFactor its Wiener-Hopf kernel as $K=K_{+}{K}_{-}$, with each factor analytic and nonzero in its designated half-plane. Divide by $K_{-}$ and split $H/K_{-}=H_{+}+H_{-}$, allocating poles according to the incident-wave prescription. ThenThe two sides continue to a common entire function. Their growth at infinity, inherited from the field's edge behavior, determines that function, usually a constant or a polynomial; in a decaying case it is zero. Solve for the unknown transforms and apply Fourier inversion, preserving the outgoing contour prescription.

The principal analytic results used are as follows. The Paley–Wiener theorem and its half-line Laplace-transform version relate support on a half-line to holomorphy in a half-plane, with growth or square-integrability bounds. The Cauchy integral formula and Sokhotski–Plemelj theorem provide additive splitting: a Cauchy integral of a sufficiently decaying jump has upper and lower boundary values with that prescribed difference. Applying the same construction to a continuous logarithm of a nonvanishing scalar Wiener-Hopf kernel gives Wiener-Hopf factorization when its winding number is zero; a nonzero index requires an explicit index factor. The identity theorem gives analytic continuation across the common strip. Finally Liouville's theorem makes a bounded entire function constant; its polynomial-growth extension bounds the possible degree. The physical edge and radiation conditions select the remaining constants. Zeros, branch cuts, nonzero index and insufficient decay must be accounted for rather than discarded during splitting.

Suppress the common time factor $e^{i\omega t}$ and use the Fourier transform conventionA right Half-range Fourier transform is analytic above its convergence line and a left transform below it. For the limiting absorption principle with this time convention take $\omega ={\omega }_r-i\epsilon$, ${\omega }_r>0$, $\epsilon >0$, before taking $\epsilon \downarrow 0$. SetThis is the outgoing acoustic square-root branch: at a propagating real wavenumber, $\gamma \to i\sqrt{{\omega }_r^2-k^2}$. Put $J=[\tilde{\varphi }{]}_{y=-0}^{y=+0}$ and $d^{+}={\partial }_y{\Phi }^{+}(k,0)$. Across the fluid part of $y=0$, the field and its normal derivative are continuous; on the sheet both sides have the same normal velocity. The outgoing Helmholtz equation solutions therefore have equal normal derivatives and opposite scattered traces:The jump $J$ is supported on $x<0$, and so is a minus transform.

The linear fluid equation $i\omega v_y=-{\partial }_y{\rho }^{\prime }$ and the sheet velocity $v_y=i\omega \eta$ imply ${\partial }_y{\rho }^{\prime }={\omega }^2\eta$ on either face. The incident contribution to the left derivative transform is $\omega \sin {\theta }_0/(k+\omega \cos {\theta }_0)$. Writing ${\eta }^{-}={\int }_{-\infty }^0{e}^{ikx}\eta (x)dx$, it follows thatThe upward net pressure is lower minus upper, hence $P=-J$ in transform space. If $s={\eta }^{\prime }(0)$, the pinned endpoint givesCombining these identities gives the Wiener-Hopf equationThis is the plane-wave forcing of a pinned elastic half-sheet.

Let $b=\omega \sqrt{m/T}$ and assume initially that the distinguished points are distinct. Besides the branch points $\pm \omega$, $K$ has simple poles at $\pm b$. Its physical-sheet zeros $\pm k_s$ solve the fluid-loaded dispersion relationFor real positive frequency there is exactly one positive real root $k_s>\max ({\omega }_r,{\omega }_r\sqrt{m/T})$: the left side increases strictly from zero to infinity on that interval. Equivalently, with $q=\gamma (k_s)>0$, $T{q}^3+(T-m){\omega }_r^{2}q-2{\omega }_r^2=0$. Its other roots have negative real part and do not belong to this outgoing sheet. Continue $k_s$ with small absorption; $+\omega ,+b,+k_s$ lie below the real line and their negative partners above it. The Wiener-Hopf factorization assigns the lower branch cut and pole to $K^{+}$, and the upper branch cut and pole to $K^{-}$. The continued $K^{+}$ has a zero at $+k_s$, and $K^{-}$ at $-k_s$; these are poles of their reciprocals, rather than poles of the factors. Branch cuts can be drawn away from the real line into the corresponding half-planes.

For this standard assignment a common strip of analyticity and nonvanishing isThe strip shrinks to the real contour as absorption is removed. The factors continue meromorphically beyond their designated half-planes; the allocation of the poles and branch points is part of the radiation condition. The incident pole $-\omega \cos {\theta }_0$ belongs above the inversion contour. For incidence with $0<{\theta }_0<\pi /2$ the real contour is a direct choice. Other nongrazing angles are obtained by analytic continuation with the incident pole kept on its prescribed side, deforming the contour locally if necessary. Coincident distinguished points and grazing incidence are treated by the corresponding limits, not by dividing by a coincident pole.

Divide the Wiener-Hopf equation by $K^{+}$ and use pole subtraction in a Wiener-Hopf equation. With $a=\omega \cos {\theta }_0$, the minus part of $F/K^{+}$ isIndeed these are exactly the incident-pole and upper bare-sheet-pole residues. At the lower bare-sheet pole $+b$, the forcing pole is canceled by the pole of $K^{+}$ before splitting. Thus $B^{+}=F/K^{+}-B^{-}$ is analytic on the plus side of the contour. The separated equation isWith the stipulated $E=0$,The scattered field is consequentlyThe full time-dependent density perturbation is the incident field plus $e^{i\omega t}\varphi$. The two traces at $y=0$ follow by limiting from above and below. A constant rescaling of the two factors does not change this field.

To determine the endpoint slope, reconstruct the sheet transform using the fluid condition:At $+b$ the continued $K^{+}$ has residue $-{\omega }^2/(2Tb{K}^{-}(b))$. Therefore the derivative transform $d^{+}$ generically has the lower-plane poleThis pole produces a forbidden incoming bare-sheet wave in the reconstructed displacement: $e^{i\omega t-ibx}$ travels towards the endpoint from $x=-\infty$. A minus transform of the specified outgoing solution must be analytic there. The incoming-pole cancellation at a pinned membrane edge is preciselyFor generic parameters this determinesThe lower pole is removed; the upper zero $-k_s$ of $K^{-}$ can still produce the legitimate outgoing evanescent acoustic surface wave, whose phase travels to negative $x$. This distinction separates the spurious bare-sheet wave from the coupled fluid-loaded mode. No explicit factorization has been used.

Suppress the common time factor $e^{i\omega t}$, take $\omega >0$, and fix the spatial Fourier transform conventionA plus transform is supported on $x>0$ and analytic above $\Gamma$; a minus transform is supported on $x<0$ and analytic below it. For the outgoing radiation condition with this time convention, initially take $k_0=\omega /c_0-i\epsilon$, $\epsilon >0$, and pass to the limit at the end. Thus $+k_0$ lies below the contour and $-k_0$ above it.

Choose $\gamma =(k^2-k_0^2{)}^{1/2}$ to have positive real part on the real transform line. Its branch cuts run from $+k_0$ into the lower half-plane and from $-k_0$ into the upper half-plane, without crossing $\Gamma$; downward and upward vertical rays are suitable. In the zero-absorption limit, $\gamma >0$ for real $|k|>k_0$ and $\gamma =+i\sqrt{k_0^2-k^2}$ between the branch points. This ensures that $e^{-\gamma |y|}$ represents decay or outgoing radiation, rather than an incoming exterior field.

Evenness in $y$ and the Helmholtz equation give the transformed fieldsAt $y=b$, the one-sided normal derivatives of the scattered field agree for $x<0$, because that part of the interface is open. For $x>0$ they both vanish by rigidity. Their common trace is therefore a minus function, denoted $V^{-}(k)={\partial }_y{\Phi }^{-}{|}_{y=b}$. ConsequentlyThe jump in the total scattered transform isFor $x<0$, continuity of the total mass density requires the scattered jump to cancel the incident jump, so $\varphi (b^{+})-\varphi (b^{-})=e^{i{k}_{0}x}$. Its minus transform is $-i/(k+k_0)$. The unknown plate-side jump is the plus function $J^{+}=[{\Phi }^{+}{]}_{b^{-}}^{b^{+}}$. Thus $J=J^{+}-i/(k+k_0)$, and the Wiener-Hopf equation follows:

Use the Wiener-Hopf factorization $L=L^{+}{L}^{-}$, with factors analytic and nonzero in their designated half-planes. Their analytic continuations allocate outgoing modal zeros to $L^{+}$ below the contour, and the opposite zeros to $L^{-}$ above it. Set $C=L^{+}(-k_0)$. Multiplication by $L^{+}$ and pole subtraction giveThe pole in the upper expression is removable by its numerator. The two expressions analytically continue to the common entire function, which is zero under the stipulated edge/growth assumption. Henceand the transformed fields areA constant reciprocal rescaling of the factors does not alter $C{L}^{-}$ or the physical field.

Inside the guide, $\cosh (\gamma y)$ and $\gamma \sinh (\gamma b)$ are even entire functions of $\gamma$, while $L^{-}$ is analytic in the lower half-plane. Thus continuation across the lower branch cut changes none of the interior transform: that cut is removable. The exterior expression retains the cut, corresponding to radiation into the open exterior.

For $x>0$, the inverse-transform contour closes downwards, clockwise. Away from modal cutoffs, its enclosed singularities are the outgoing simple poleswith positive real part for propagating modes and negative imaginary part for decaying modes; $k_0$ is the $n=0$ root. The opposite roots lie above the contour or cancel against zeros of $L^{-}$. Symmetry excludes odd transverse modes. At $n\ge 1$, $\gamma =in\pi /b$, and differentiation of $D(k)=\gamma \sinh (\gamma b)$ givesEach inverse-transform contribution is $-i$ times its residue. Therefore the outgoing modes of an open rigid acoustic waveguide areThe original time factor multiplies this expression. Thus every cut-on mode propagates in the positive $x$ direction; cut-off modes are evanescent waves decaying into the guide, not additional backward waves. Strictly, a complete mode sum includes these evanescent modes as well as propagating ones. The displayed simple-pole amplitudes apply away from exact cutoffs; cutoff values use the outgoing limiting-absorption continuation before taking the limit. The reflected plane-wave amplitude relative to the unit incident wave is $A_0$ above. It has the expected negative sign in the long-wavelength leading kernel approximation $L\simeq b(k^2-k_0^2)$.

Linearity permits subtraction of the incident acoustic membrane wave. The scattered pressure solves the homogeneous Helmholtz equation, and the kinematic relation defines its line displacement ${\eta }^{\prime }$ on both halves. On $x<0$, subtracting the incident elastic membrane equation gives the scattered dynamic equation. On $x>0$, there is no elastic membrane, so the total pressure jump must vanish, giving $[p^{\prime }]=-[p_I]$. The pinned endpoint has $\eta (0)=0$, hence ${\eta }^{\prime }(0)=-1$, rather than zero.

Use full and Half-range Fourier transforms with the same $e^{ikx}$ convention as part (a), and putWrite $P^{-}$ for the left transform of the upper scattered pressure, $P^{+}$ for its right transform, and ${\eta }^{\pm }$ for the corresponding transforms of ${\eta }^{\prime }$. Outgoing antisymmetry in $y$ impliesThe second relation comes from the prescribed pressure cancellation on $x>0$.

The endpoint terms in the left Fourier transform of ${\eta }_{xx}^{\prime }$ are crucial:Thus $2P^{-}=a{\eta }^{-}+TA+iT(k+k_I)$. Eliminating ${\eta }^{-}$ gives the Wiener-Hopf equationThere is a defect in the printed right side: with the stated incident exponential, pressure jump, and pinned total displacement, it omits the incident endpoint term and has the opposite sign on the incident-pressure term. The displayed corrected equation follows directly from both boundary traces. The given right side cannot be derived with these definitions. Using $a(k_I)=-2\beta /{\gamma }_I$, an especially useful equivalent form isThe correction is necessary for the reconstructed pressure to satisfy the original physical boundary conditions.

For Wiener-Hopf factorization, take $K=K^{+}{K}^{-}$ with the plus factor analytic and nonzero in the upper half-plane and the minus factor analytic and nonzero in the lower half-plane. Singularities listed next refer to continuation out of each factor's own analytic half-plane. Let $b=\omega \sqrt{m/T}$, so $a=-T(k-b)(k+b)$ and $b$ lies below the real axis. Generically $K^{+}$ inherits the pole at $b$ and the square-root branch point at $k_0$, while $K^{-}$ inherits the pole at $-b$ and the branch point at $-k_0$. The kernel is finite but nonanalytic at the acoustic branch points: its local behavior is a constant plus a square-root term, not an inverse-square-root divergence. Coincident branch points and poles require a limiting treatment.

Zeros of $K$ are the fluid-loaded dispersion relation roots. Lower-half-plane roots, including the incoming guided root $k_I$, belong to the continued $K^{+}$; upper-half-plane roots, including the reflected root $-k_I$ for the even kernel, belong to the continued $K^{-}$. The roots represent membrane-guided modes; the branch cuts represent radiated acoustic waves. Only roots on the selected outgoing sheet are included, not spurious roots created by squaring the dispersion relation. No explicit factorization is required.

Here is an explicit solution in terms of those factors. DefineThe pole of $B$ at $-b$ has residue $C$; the pole at $b$ is canceled by the pole of $K^{+}$. Thus $B^{\pm }$ have the required respective analyticity. Divide the corrected Wiener-Hopf equation by $K^{+}$ and split its right side as $F^{+}+F^{-}$, whereThe difference quotient in $F^{-}$ is removable at $k_I$ and is analytic below. Moving the plus and minus terms to opposite sides yields the common entire function. With the assumed $E(k)=0$, the solution isCombining $P^{-}$ with the known $P^{+}$ gives the full scattered pressure transformThe requested pressure integral, for $y\ne 0$, is consequentlyThe real contour $\mathcal{C}$ uses the causal continuation $\mathrm{Im}\omega <0$; its undamped limit retains the induced pole and branch-cut prescriptions. The residue theorem shows that upper-half-plane zeros of $K^{-}$ yield left-going scattered elastic membrane modes. On the right, the lower incident-pole residue of the scattered integral cancels $p_I$ at the open line, as required.

Finally reconstruct the left scattered displacement:For a generic unspecified $A$, this has a lower-half-plane pole at the bare elastic membrane wavenumber $b$. Such a pole is incompatible with analyticity of an outgoing left-supported scattered displacement: it would represent an additional right-going incoming elastic membrane contribution. It must be removed. Its residue is $-[2P^{-}(b)-TA-iT(b+k_I)]/(2Tb)$, so the incoming-pole cancellation at a pinned membrane edge condition isSince $P^{-}$ is linear in $A$, this fixes the endpoint slope generically. Explicitly it isThe physical lower incident pole of the total displacement is already prescribed by ${\eta }_I$; it must not be confused with this removable spurious pole of the scattered field.

Letbe the root with positive real and positive imaginary parts. More explicitly, with $r_j=\sqrt{{\kappa }_j^4+{ϵ}^2}$,Decay at each infinity and continuity at zero force $y=A{e}^{-i{q}_{0}x}$ for $x<0$ and $y=A{e}^{i{q}_{1}x}$ for $x>0$. The derivative jump is $i(q_1+q_0)A=1$, soThe two roots lie in the first quadrant, so their sum cannot vanish.

Integrating the differential equation twice by parts on each half-line givesTheir sum is the stated identity with right side one. Equivalently the global distributional equation is $y^{\prime \prime }+{\kappa }^{2}y={\delta }_0$, since the derivative has jump one.

The direct half-transforms areHere ${\hat{y}}_{+}$ is analytic above its lower-half-plane pole $-q_1$, while ${\hat{y}}_{-}$ is analytic below its upper-half-plane pole $q_0$.

To recover the same result from the transform identity alone, use Wiener-Hopf factorization:Multiply by $(q_1+k)/(q_0+k)$. The coefficient of ${\hat{y}}_{-}$ becomes $(q_0-k)/(q_1-k)$, analytic and zero-free in the lower half-plane, while the coefficient of ${\hat{y}}_{+}$ is analytic and zero-free in the upper half-plane. Split the right side asThe first term is analytic above and the second below. Equating the separated functions and using their decay at infinity fixes the entire remainder to zero, yielding the boxed ${\hat{y}}_{+}$, with the branches fixed before factorization.

First state the normalization needed for the displayed logarithmic factorization: choose a continuous holomorphic function branch $L=\log F$ in the strip that tends to zero at both horizontal ends and has sufficient decay for its Cauchy integrals. In particular the index of the kernel along a horizontal line must be zero.

Choose $\alpha <c_{+}<c_{-}<\beta$ and let ${\Gamma }_{\pm }=\{\xi +i{c}_{\pm }:\xi \in \mathbb{R}\}$, both oriented from left to right. PutThe first is analytic above the lower line and the second below the upper line. On the region between the lines, closing a rectangle gives $C_{+}L-C_{-}L=L$: the lower horizontal side is traversed forward and the upper side backward. HenceThe equation $F{w}_{+}=w_{-}$ becomes $F_{+}{w}_{+}=F_{-}{w}_{-}$ on the overlap region. With the canonical bounded factors normalized at infinity, these two products glue to a bounded entire function. Part (a) givesThis is Wiener-Hopf factorization with the quotient convention used in this question.

The source hypotheses require a qualification: nonvanishing in the strip and $F\to 1$ do not by themselves force index zero or a logarithm tending to zero at both ends. For exampleis analytic and nonzero for $|\mathrm{Im}z|<1/2$, tends to one at both ends, but winds once around zero along the real line. A logarithm continued along that line changes by $2\pi i$, so it cannot have the stated normalization at both ends. One must first separate the index factor, or allow appropriately subtracted factors and a correspondingly different common-function growth class. The displayed constant conclusion follows under the canonical zero-index assumptions above; it is not an unconditional consequence of the two printed properties of $F$. This is the issue measured by the Index of a Wiener-Hopf kernel.

Extend $f$ to be zero for $x<0$. Define $h(x)=0$ for $x>0$ andThen the full-line equation is $K\ast f=f+h$. Use the Fourier transform conventionUnder the corresponding growth bounds, the positive-support transform is analytic above a horizontal line and the negative-support transform below a horizontal line. If both functions have suitable subexponential growth, the basic domains are respectively the upper and lower half-planes; exponential decay can enlarge these to overlapping strips. The convolution theorem gives $(\bar{K}-1)\bar{f}=\bar{h}$.

The Wiener-Hopf method factors $\bar{K}-1$ into functions analytic and nonzero in the respective domains. After multiplicative or additive separation, the two sides continue to one entire function, whose growth determines a polynomial by Liouville's theorem. Real-axis zeros must be assigned consistently with the inversion contour, rather than divided out without specifying a side.

For $K=e^{-|x|}$, direct integration gives $\bar{K}=2/(1+k^2)$, soRearrange the Wiener-Hopf factorization asThe left side has the positive-support analytic continuation and the right side the negative-support one. Their $O(1)$ growth, from the supplied $O(k^{-1})$ bounds, makes the common continued function a constant $C$. ConsequentlyFor this kernel, $h$ on the negative axis is a multiple of $e^x$, so the latter transform is analytic for $\mathrm{Im}k<1$. The common strip can therefore be chosen as $0<\mathrm{Im}k<1$. In particular the inversion line must pass above both real poles $k=\pm 1$ of $\bar{f}$.

Set $C=iA$. ThenThis is the transform, on $\mathrm{Im}k>0$, ofEquivalently, Fourier inversion closed below the inversion line for $x>0$ picks up the two real poles with clockwise orientation.

As a direct check, let $G(x)={\int }_0^{\infty }{e}^{-|x-t|}f(t)dt$. Since $(d^2/d{x}^2)e^{-|x|}=e^{-|x|}-2{\delta }_0$, the equation $G=f$ gives $f^{\prime \prime }=-f$. At zero, differentiation of the integral gives $G^{\prime }(0)=G(0)$, so $f^{\prime }(0)=f(0)$; this sets the sine and cosine coefficients equal. Direct substitution, or the transforms above, then verifies the full integral equation, not merely its differentiated form.

For the standard canonical Wiener-Hopf factorization, first assume the nonzero kernel has Index of a Wiener-Hopf kernel zero and a continuous analytic logarithm $\ell =\log F$ tending to zero at both ends of the strip, with sufficient decay for the Cauchy projections. Choose $\alpha <a<b<\beta$. Let ${\Gamma }_{+}$ be the line $\mathrm{Im}\zeta =a$ oriented left to right, with its factor used above that line; let ${\Gamma }_{-}$ be the line $\mathrm{Im}\zeta =b$ oriented left to right, with its factor used below that line.

For $a<\mathrm{Im}z<b$, closing the rectangle between the two lines and using the Cauchy integral formula givesThus $F=F_{+}/F_{-}$. Multiplying $F{w}_{+}=w_{-}$ gives $F_{+}{w}_{+}=F_{-}{w}_{-}$ in the overlap. The canonical factors are analytic, nonzero, and normalized at infinity in their respective half-planes, so part (a) yieldsContours may be shifted within the strip without changing their factors on the appropriate side. When necessary, a subtracted Cauchy kernel fixes convergence and the common normalization constant.

The printed hypotheses omit the index and factor-growth qualifications; $F\to 1$ alone does not ensure them. An explicit counterexample is $F(z)=(z+i)/(z-i)$ on $-1/2<\mathrm{Im}z<1/2$, with $w_{+}=(z-i)/(z+i)$ and $w_{-}=1$. Both $w$ functions are analytic and bounded at infinity in their prescribed half-planes, and the relation holds. If admissible analytic factors made their common product a nonzero constant, $w_{-}=1$ would force $F_{-}$ constant and hence $F_{+}$ proportional to $F$, impossible because $F$ has a pole at $i$ in the plus half-plane. The natural factors $F_{+}=z+i$, $F_{-}=z-i$ instead give the nonconstant common polynomial $z-i$. Thus the boxed constant conclusion is the intended index-zero result, not a consequence of the literal assumptions alone.