An immersion has differential of rank , equivalently linearly independent . It has isothermal coordinates when its first fundamental form has , . A minimal surface has zero mean curvature.
For an isothermal immersion, differentiation of and gives
and similarly its scalar product with is zero. Its normal component is . The given mean curvature formula reduces to , so
Thus an isothermal immersion is minimal exactly when each coordinate is a harmonic function.
An explicit example is the Enneper surface, parametrized on by
Every coordinate has zero Laplacian. Direct differentiation gives and . Thus it is an isothermal immersion and is minimal everywhere.
It is not an open subset of any of the three listed surfaces. The parameter points and both map to , but their tangent planes differ: while . A plane, catenoid, or helicoid is an embedded smooth surface with a unique tangent plane at each point. If our whole image lay in any one of them, both rank- tangent planes at this point would have to equal its tangent plane, a contradiction.
The Euler totient function counts integers with . The Möbius function has , is zero when a prime square divides , and equals when is a product of distinct primes. Consequently
because for the sum over squarefree divisors is .
The Möbius inversion formula is . Substituting the divisor sum defining and collecting the coefficient of gives
This proof uses only finite sums, so no convergence hypothesis is needed.
Classifying by their greatest common divisor with gives : the class with greatest common divisor contains exactly integers. Applying the Möbius inversion formula yields
The Riemann zeta function is for . Absolute convergence justifies multiplication of Dirichlet series. The divisor identity for the Möbius function gives there. For both factors below converge absolutely, and their Dirichlet convolution is the Euler totient function:
A covering map is a continuous surjection for which each point has an open neighbourhood with a disjoint union of open sets, each mapped homeomorphically onto . A connected simply connected covering space is a universal cover.
There is a necessary connectedness qualification in the printed conclusion. Let be the path component of in . Then : one inclusion follows by projecting paths, and the other by lifting a path in from . Thus the asserted surjection onto all of requires to be path connected. Without it, take to be the identity of and to be two disjoint intervals; a selected component cannot cover both.
To prove the assertion about a component of a pulled-back universal cover, choose an evenly covered neighbourhood in . Local path connectedness of supplies a path-connected relatively open neighbourhood . Each inverse sheet over is path connected, so it lies wholly in or is disjoint from it. These sheets evenly cover under . Therefore is a covering map.
Under the classification of connected covering spaces, its subgroup consists of based loops in whose lifts close at . A loop viewed in closes in the universal cover exactly when its class in is trivial. Hence the subgroup is
Here , so the subgroup formula itself needs no change. Injectivity of the covering's induced fundamental-group map is the usual homotopy-lifting property.

Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project

Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
We have two killer features:
  1. topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculus
    Articles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
    • a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
    • a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
    This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.
    Figure 1.
    Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page
    . View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivative
  2. local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:
    This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
    Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally.
    Video 3.
    Edit locally and publish demo
    . Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension.
  3. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook-media/master/feature/x/hilbert-space-arrow.png
  4. Infinitely deep tables of contents:
    Figure 6.
    Dynamic article tree with infinitely deep table of contents
    .
    Descendant pages can also show up as toplevel e.g.: ourbigbook.com/cirosantilli/chordate-subclade
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact