Topics (282k) Articles (291k) Users (352) Discussions (237) Comments (383) Files (8k) New article
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 ii Paper 4 23G i Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Use the usual hypothesis that the ground field has characteristic different from two, and work over its algebraic closure for the geometric points. This hypothesis is necessary for the smooth elliptic-curve calculation: in characteristic two, the displayed cubic model can be singular even when its three roots are distinct.
Homogenization givesAt this says , soTo compute the pole orders on a smooth cubic in Weierstrass form, work in the chart , writing and . The equation is . Its derivative in at is one on the left after bringing the right side across, so is a local parameter. The equation gives . Consequently and have poles of orders two and three at .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 ii Paper 4 18H ii Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
The previous permutation calculation shows that every automorphism either preserves separately or interchanges them. Their sum and product are therefore fixed by the Galois group and belong to , proving the quadratic assertion.
For the depressed cubic, , , and . Using givesand henceAlso . The desired polynomial isIts discriminant is , where . Here is a square in , since .
One can justify the group criterion directly even when one resolvent vanishes. The nonzero root-difference producthas and changes sign exactly under odd root permutations. It is fixed by the entire group exactly when the group is contained in . If is a square in , then equals one of its two square roots in ; conversely, a fixed lies in . ThereforeSeparability ensures , and the characteristic hypotheses ensure that all divisions and the sign argument are valid.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 ii Paper 4 18H i Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
The irreducible cubic is separable, and its Galois group acts transitively on its three roots. The only transitive subgroups of areFor the cycle , the Lagrange resolvent for a cubic obeys . A transposition interchanging sends to . Since , these scalars are fixed by every automorphism. Thus the two possibilities for the image set areThese are descriptions of sets, so coincident values or a zero resolvent are not being asserted distinct.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 ii Paper 3 35C iii Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 ii Paper 3 35C ii Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Let . The Maxwell relations giveSetting gives , hence . Also , and the volume differential gives . Evaluating along constant pressure therefore yields . Eliminate to obtainThese derivatives are taken at fixed particle number, in a thermodynamically regular stable phase.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 ii Paper 3 35C i Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
The one-particle partition function isThe classical indistinguishable noninteracting gas has ; for labeled particles omit , which changes none of the requested derivatives. With ,The allowed equation of state gives , so the enthalpy is and , at fixed particle number.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 ii Paper 3 30E b Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Set . The Schrödinger equation and its conjugate givesince and . In the Wigner transform, integration by parts turns into , yielding the free transport equationAlong its characteristics , the value is constant. ThusFor rapidly decreasing smooth data every integration by parts is justified; weaker data follow distributionally.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 ii Paper 3 30E a Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Use with inverse factor . The Fourier transform of the Schrödinger equation gives , hence . To invert the multiplier, first damp it by . The Gaussian integral in each coordinate givesLet , with the branch continuous from positive real damping. The fundamental solution of a linear differential operator isFor Schwartz initial data this convolution and Fourier derivation are justified directly; the multiplier tends to one as and has modulus one, giving the initial data and a unitary extension to . The kernel itself is interpreted through the displayed Abel regularization.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 ii Paper 3 2F iii Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
If the polynomials converge uniformly on the full annulus to , their limit is continuous and equals on the slit annulus by part (ii). That subset is dense in the full annulus, so everywhere. The Cauchy integral theorem and uniform convergence on the unit circle then give
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 ii Paper 3 2F ii Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Choose the argument in on the slit annulus and letThese compact sets increase to the slit annulus, and each has connected complement: the omitted angular corridor joins the inner disk to the outside of the outer disk. The polynomial Runge theorem says that a function holomorphic near a compact set with connected complement can be approximated uniformly there by polynomials. Choose with . Every compact subset of the slit annulus has positive distance from the removed positive ray, so for all sufficiently large . Hence uniformly on every such compact subset.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 ii Paper 3 2F i Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Take the holomorphic function on a neighborhood of the annulus. Every polynomial has integral zero around the unit circle by the Cauchy integral theorem, while . Uniform convergence on the annulus would imply convergence of these contour integrals, since their difference is bounded by times the uniform error. Thus uniform polynomial approximation on the full annulus need not exist.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 ii Paper 3 26I c Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Let count second-fork arrivals. Its independent increment over is Poisson, andobtained by evaluating . If is even, the next second-fork arrival goes to B, so no B arrival requires zero new arrivals. If it is odd, the next goes to C, so up to one new arrival is allowed. Reverse these alternatives for C. ThereforeAt these reduce to the distinct initial-delay survivors; as , both non-Poisson probabilities approach the equilibrium-delay survivor from part (b).
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 ii Paper 3 26I b Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
For a renewal holding time with mean , the equilibrium residual-life distribution has survivor . For C, and also the common long-run B/C renewal structure, and the Erlang survivor giveFor A the exponential law is already its own equilibrium delay.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 ii Paper 3 26I a Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Assume the first-fork choices are independent Bernoulli routings, as in Poisson thinning. Put . Cars assigned to A form a Poisson process of rate , also an ordinary renewal process with independent exponential holding times of rate . The stream to the second fork is an independent Poisson process of rate .
B receives its odd-numbered arrivals. Its initial delay is exponential of rate , followed by independent Erlang distributions of shape two and rate between successive B arrivals. Thus B is a delayed renewal process, not Poisson. C receives the even-numbered arrivals: its first and all subsequent holding times are independent Erlang, so C is an ordinary renewal process, not Poisson. Their holding-time density and survivor are and . Both have asymptotic rate ; equality of these mean rates with A does not make the processes Poisson.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 ii Paper 3 24H iii Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
At , each of the given ambient rotations fixes , rotates its tangent plane and preserves the local surface. Naturality of the shape operator under that rotation makes commute with every planar rotation. A symmetric real two-by-two operator commuting with all rotations is scalar, so every point of is an umbilical point. The trace-free part of the shape operator is continuous. Density therefore makes it zero everywhere on .
Locally write . The Codazzi equation gives for tangent fields ; choosing independent fields proves . Thus the surface is locally a plane if , or has constant spherical centersince its differential is . A change of normal reverses both and , leaving this center unchanged, so these local descriptions patch across the connected surface. In the flat case the whole surface lies in one plane, where a regular surface without boundary is open; a nonempty such set cannot also be compact and closed. Hence the flat case is excluded. In the other case lies on one sphere of radius . Its inclusion in that sphere is locally open, since both have dimension two, and its compactness makes the image closed. Connectedness of the sphere forces the image to be the entire sphere. Therefore is a sphere.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 ii Paper 3 24H ii Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
The shape operator is the self-adjoint tangent map , using a locally chosen unit normal. Its eigenvalues are the principal curvatures, and their eigenvectors give the principal directions. At an umbilical point they coincide, so and every tangent direction is principal. Reversing the normal changes both curvature signs but does not change the principal directions or umbilicity.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 ii Paper 3 24H i Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
The Theorema Egregium states that Gaussian curvature is determined by the first fundamental form, and therefore preserved by local isometries. For a local surface parametrization , write , choose a unit normal , and set . Decomposing the second derivatives into tangent and normal parts givesCommute the third partial derivatives of and take tangent components. The terms involving derivatives of are normal; the tangent terms give the Gauss equationwhere is computed from derivatives and products of the displayed Christoffel symbols, using . For example the tangent term from differentiating is , which produces exactly the difference of the two products on the right. ConsequentlyThe last expression depends only on and its derivatives. Pulling back under a local isometry therefore preserves , proving the theorem.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 ii Paper 3 23G ii Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Work geometrically over an algebraic closure; the degree and ramification do not change under this base extension. The coordinate squaring map lands in because its defining equation pulls back to that of . Above a generic target point with all coordinates nonzero there are square-root choices, identified in pairs by simultaneous sign change. HenceThe effective sign-change group is . At a point with all coordinates nonzero its stabilizer is trivial, and the squaring map is locally étale, since characteristic is not two. Thus there. If one coordinate is zero, a sign change of that coordinate fixes the point, giving stabilizer order two. More explicitly, if , use as a local parameter; the curve equation has nonzero derivative in the other coordinate, so this is valid, and the corresponding target parameter is . ThereforeTwo coordinates cannot vanish on either curve. For each vanishing coordinate, the other-coordinate ratio solves , giving eight distinct points; there are 24 ramification points. As a check, the smooth plane-curve genera are and , and Riemann-Hurwitz formula gives .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 ii Paper 3 23G i Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
At a smooth point of an irreducible curve, the local ring is a discrete valuation ring. A local parameter is an element generating its maximal ideal; its order at is one. Embed the projective target as a closed subvariety of . Write the rational map generically as with , and let be the smallest finite valuation of the nonzero coordinates at . Multiplying by makes every coordinate regular at and at least one a unit. These functions are regular on some common neighborhood of and have no common zero after shrinking, so define a morphism to . The defining homogeneous equations of the target vanish generically and hence identically on this neighborhood. Thus the rational map extends to the projective target at .
For a nonprojective target, from rationally to cannot extend at zero: a regular extension would give there, impossible. In dimension two the morphism on cannot extend to zero, because its constant values along the two punctured coordinate axes are different. This shows why both projectivity of the target and smooth one-dimensional source were used.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 ii Paper 3 1G ii Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
The continued fraction starts , since has integer part . Its next continued fraction convergent is . Direct substitution gives
Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project
Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
Intro to OurBigBook
. Source. We have two killer features:
- topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculusArticles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
- a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
- a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.Figure 1. Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page. View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivativeVideo 2. OurBigBook Web topics demo. Source. - local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
- to OurBigBook.com to get awesome multi-user features like topics and likes
- as HTML files to a static website, which you can host yourself for free on many external providers like GitHub Pages, and remain in full control
Figure 2. You can publish local OurBigBook lightweight markup files to either OurBigBook.com or as a static website.Figure 3. Visual Studio Code extension installation.Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally. Video 3. Edit locally and publish demo. Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension. - Infinitely deep tables of contents:
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact





