Ciro Santilli @cirosantilli 37

An optical multiplexer!

Ciro Santilli controls the following accounts.

With non-trivial activity:

Trivial or no activity:

Profiles without URLs (OMG...):

Lost or deleted:

Accounts in Chinese websites. These accounts might be banned or altered or offer other limitations, so Ciro only communicates briefly through them. All communication through those channels should obviously be assumed to be compromised:

Accounts in Russian websites:

Dead websites:

Now let's try and use the trained ONNX file for inference on some manually drawn images on GIMP:

Note that:

We can try the code adapted from thenewstack.io/tutorial-using-a-pre-trained-onnx-model-for-inferencing/ at lenet/infer.py:and it works pretty well! The program outputs:as desired.

We can also try with images directly from Extract MNIST images.and the accuracy is great as expected.

Founding CEO of Oxford Quantum Circuits.

As mentioned at www.investmentmonitor.ai/tech/innovation/in-conversation-with-oxford-quantum-circuits-ilana-wisby she is not the original tech person:Did they mean Oxford Sciences Enterprises? There's nothing called "Oxford Science and Innovation" on Google. Yes, it is just a typo oxfordscienceenterprises.com/news/meet-the-founder-ilana-wisby-ceo-of-oxford-quantum-circuits/ says it clearly:

oxfordquantumcircuits.com/story mentions that the core patent was by Dr. Peter Leek: www.linkedin.com/in/peter-leek-00954b62/

The table: en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MNIST_database&oldid=1152541822#Classifiers

Because when this gets converted to a OurBigBook.com page, it will be easier for people to copy paragraphs/fork and write a canonical page about Ciro.

What do you do when creating a pull request? Do you say "I", which is not true because Ciro did not say that, or do you say "John Doe thinks" bla bla?

And because his name is awesome! :-) Just kidding.

This became a micro-meme in 4chan:Correction: cirosantilli.com is not Ciro Santili's resume. It is your life.

Basically the Royal Society's scientific vulgarization cousin.

Given the view of the Standard Model where the electron and quarks are just completely separate matter fields, there is at first sight no clear theoretical requirement for that.

As mentioned e.g. at QED and the men who made it: Dyson, Feynman, Schwinger, and Tomonaga by Silvan Schweber (1994) chapter 1.6 "Hole theory", Dirac initially wanted to think of the holes in his hole theory as the protons, as a way to not have to postulate a new particle, the positron, and as a way to "explain" the proton in similar terms. Others however soon proposed arguments why the positron would need to have the same mass, and this idea had to be discarded.

The venerable first wiki.

The pre-Eternal September feeling is palpable.

People could freely comment their thoughts and sign below, making it much closer to what Ciro Santilli wants OurBigBook.com to be. But with upvotes ;-)

Nothing can better encapsulate the nostalgia of early day Internet. Genius at times, banal at others, you will be forever in our hearts!

Gaussian path integrals.

From University of Alberta.