Suppose the quotient group is a cyclic group, generated by . For any , there are integers and such that
Since lie in the center of a group, they commute with every element, in particular with each other and with the integer powers of a group element . Therefore
As were arbitrary, is an abelian group. This is the cyclic quotient by the center.
The specified set is the center of a group . It contains . If and , then
so . From , multiplying on the left and right by gives , so . Hence is a subgroup.
For and , the defining commutativity gives . Thus the image of each element of under conjugation is in , and indeed . Consequently is a normal subgroup of .
The orbit of under conjugation is its conjugacy class
It contains by using , so the conjugacy classes cover . If , then , and the group action identity shows that conjugating either element further gives the same orbit; hence . If and intersect at , this gives . Thus distinct conjugacy classes are disjoint and the conjugacy classes form a partition of a set .
Write . If is the identity element of , then . Also, for ,
The middle equality uses associativity and the inverse element rule . Thus this is a left group action, the conjugation action of on itself.
Suppose there were only finitely many prime numbers. There is at least one, namely , so this finite set would have a largest element . The integer is greater than and therefore has a prime factor : for example, its least divisor greater than must be a prime number, since any proper factor of that divisor would contradict minimality.
By ii, , contradicting the choice of . Therefore there are infinitely many prime numbers, proving Euclid's theorem by orders of group elements in finite multiplicative groups.
The multiplicative group of a finite field has group order : its elements are exactly the nonzero residue classes. For any prime factor of , i and Lagrange's theorem therefore imply
Since and are positive integers, , and hence
This applies to every prime factor, including repeated prime factors viewed as the same prime number.
If the prime number divides , then , because is odd. Thus the residue of is an element of the multiplicative group of a finite field , and .
Let be its order of a group element. The integer division writes with . Then , so minimality of gives . Hence divides . Since is a prime number, or . The former would give , which would mean divides , an impossibility. Consequently
If , choose ordinary addition on , giving the additive group of integers. Every power function is the unique identity function on the singleton , so the group action axioms hold:
Thus ordinary addition supplies the required group operation on . Together with ii, existence is equivalent to being the trivial group.
Suppose an arbitrary binary operation makes a group and makes a left group action on . For any group action, each acting element induces a bijection: the function induced by its inverse element is its inverse function.
In particular, the acting element whose underlying integer is must induce a bijection . But its power function is
a constant function. This is injective only when all elements of equal . Therefore
This proves the power-map group action obstruction for every possible ; it never assumes that is ordinary integer multiplication, or that the integer is the acting identity element.
Fix . The integer powers of a group element satisfy
For nonnegative integers these rules follow by associativity and counting factors; negative integers are handled by , and opposite signs by cancellation of adjacent inverse elements. All factors are powers of the same element, so no abelian group assumption is involved.
It follows that is a group homomorphism from the additive group of integers to , and
The homomorphism uses ordinary addition on ; composition of the power functions corresponds to ordinary multiplication of exponents.
Let the finite set contain distinct left cosets. By i, they form a disjoint partition of a set , and by ii each has elements. If is also finite, counting this finite disjoint set union gives
Thus is a finite group. This is the counting argument behind Lagrange's theorem.
For and , define
If then , so this function is well defined. Its inverse function is , since successive left translation in a group by and cancels. Thus
In particular every left coset has the same cardinality as .
Each left coset is nonempty, since it contains , and every lies in its own left coset. Suppose and intersect, say with . Then
Since is a subgroup, , and . The reversed relation gives . Thus any two left cosets are either equal or disjoint, and together they cover . Therefore is a partition of a set . No finiteness or normal subgroup assumption is needed.
The shift , , is injective, so . It is not surjective: the least natural number is missing from its image of a function, whether starts at zero or one. For every , the image of a function of is contained in the image of a function of , so .
The identity function belongs to and is its identity element under function composition; any group structure using that operation would have this same identity element. Since has no right inverse element, is not a group under function composition. It is a monoid, since injectivity is preserved by function composition.
An injective function from a finite set to itself is surjective: its image of a function contains as many distinct elements as the entire set, so it cannot omit one. Thus every element of is a bijection, and conversely every bijection is injective. Hence
It is a group under function composition by i.
For any , choose with . By ii, as well. Associativity and the right identity element property now give
Thus is also a left identity element. The given binary operation is closed on and associative, is a two-sided identity element, and each has the two-sided inverse element . All group axioms hold, so is a group. This is the one-sided group axioms criterion.
Suppose . Using only associativity and the given right identity element property,
Thus is an idempotent element of a semigroup. By i it equals , proving
No left identity element or cancellation law is needed for this deduction.
Suppose . Choose with , using the given right inverse element property. Multiply the idempotent relation on the right by . By associativity and the given right identity element property,
Thus the only idempotent element of a semigroup is . This argument uses no cancellation and does not assume a left identity element.
For each , left translation in a group is a bijection, with inverse function . Thus belongs to . For , associativity of the group operation gives
Hence is a group homomorphism. If , evaluation at the identity element gives . Therefore
This is the left regular representation used in Cayley's theorem.
For a singleton , the symmetric group contains only the identity function. For a two-element set, it contains the identity function and the transposition exchanging the two elements; the latter squares to the identity function. In both cases all elements commute, so the group is Abelian.
If contains three distinct elements , define the transpositions and , fixing every other element of . They are bijections, even when is infinite. With function composition read from right to left,
Thus they do not commute, so the symmetric group is not Abelian. Since is nonempty, this proves

Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project

Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
We have two killer features:
  1. topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculus
    Articles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
    • a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
    • a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
    This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.
    Figure 1.
    Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page
    . View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivative
  2. local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:
    This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
    Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally.
    Video 3.
    Edit locally and publish demo
    . Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension.
  3. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook-media/master/feature/x/hilbert-space-arrow.png
  4. Infinitely deep tables of contents:
    Figure 6.
    Dynamic article tree with infinitely deep table of contents
    .
    Descendant pages can also show up as toplevel e.g.: ourbigbook.com/cirosantilli/chordate-subclade
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact