Topics (384k) Articles (398k) Users (410) Discussions (242) Comments (383) Files (13k) New article
Past exam of the quantum field theory course of the University of Oxford 2024 1 d Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-25
Choose the zero of energy so that the translation-invariant vacuum state has . A one-particle state of rest mass obeys the relativistic energy-momentum relationThe translation covariance of a quantum field in c remains valid for the full interacting four-momentum operator. Acting its exponential functions on the two momentum eigenstates givesHere . A different additive vacuum energy must be subtracted consistently from both energy eigenvalues before identifying the physical .
Past exam of the quantum field theory course of the University of Oxford 2024 1 c Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-25
For a small real time displacement , the unitary time evolution operator is . The corresponding Heisenberg picture field transformation is conjugation by its inverse:Here a gives .
Likewise let , with the paper's sign for its spatial translation operator. From b,These are precisely the first-order Taylor expansions. Since and commute in this translation-invariant theory, the finite result is
Past exam of the quantum field theory course of the University of Oxford 2024 1 b Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-25
Both a particle and its antiparticle carry the momentum of their mode label. Thus the normal-ordered total momentum operator isThe canonical commutation relations giveThe minus sign in the antiparticle mode label is essential: both terms in the printed mode expansion of a free field contain . Hence
Past exam of the quantum field theory course of the University of Oxford 2024 1 a Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-25
Write . The canonical commutation relations and the product rule for a commutator giveThe other-species terms vanish. Integrating the Dirac delta distributions in the Hamiltonian therefore giveswhere . Consequently the complex scalar field satisfiesDirect differentiation of the time factors gives the same expression, proving the Heisenberg equation of motion
Past exam of the quantum field theory course of the University of Oxford 2023 3 e Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-25
First conjugate the Dirac equation: . A matrix taking into another solution of the same Dirac equation must obeyBecause anticommutes with the real and commutes with the purely imaginary , a unitary choice isAny constant overall phase is equally valid. To verify invariance of the action, rather than only of its equation, keep the fermion exchange signs. Define the charge-conjugation matrix . It obeysFor a classical Grassmann field, interchanging two components contributes a minus sign; equivalently use normal ordering for quantum fermionic operators. ThusandThe last term integrates to a boundary term, vanishing with the usual decay or compatible boundary conditions. Both the kinetic term and the Dirac mass term therefore leave invariant under charge conjugation. Treating the components as commuting numbers would give the wrong mass-bilinear sign; the fermion statistics is essential.
Past exam of the quantum field theory course of the University of Oxford 2023 3 d Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-25
The specified time reversal includes complex conjugating ; omitting that operation changes the answer. Put , , and . As in c, the Dirac adjoint in the source's transformed bilinear is . The conjugated Dirac operator has coefficient matricesCombining these coefficients with the chain rule signs and the Clifford algebra gives, without summing over ,For example the time coefficient is , and the second spatial coefficient is . Thus the kinetic term is invariant. The real Dirac mass term again reverses sign since . The spacetime integration has unit absolute Jacobian determinant, soEach operation reverses the sign of the mass, while their composition reverses it twice and preserves the kinetic term. In an operator formulation the complex conjugation of coefficients expresses the antiunitary operator character of time reversal; the transformation must not be treated as an ordinary unitary substitution with all 's held fixed. These statements concern the stated free action.
Past exam of the quantum field theory course of the University of Oxford 2023 3 c Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-25
Put and . Since and , the Dirac adjoint transforms asThe chain rule gives , with and no sum in this formula. The Clifford algebra givesMultiplication by therefore restores each kinetic term:However, the Dirac scalar bilinear changes sign because :Changing variables in the action has unit absolute Jacobian determinant. HenceA nonzero Dirac mass term for this single two-component field breaks parity symmetry in quantum field theory with the specified transformation.
Past exam of the quantum field theory course of the University of Oxford 2023 3 b Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-25
A parity symmetry in quantum field theory reverses spatial orientation, so its spatial matrix must lie in the determinant- component of the orthogonal group. In two spatial dimensions, reversing both coordinates gives , which has determinant and is a rotation through in the special orthogonal group in two dimensions. It cannot test a discrete orientation-reversing symmetry independent of ordinary rotations. Reflecting one coordinate, for example , has determinant and supplies the required parity symmetry in quantum field theory.
In three spatial dimensions, has determinant , so simultaneous inversion of all three coordinates is the standard choice. A single-coordinate reflection also reverses orientation there, and differs from by a proper rotation through . Thus, in a rotationally invariant theory, it tests the same discrete symmetry. The word is in the source specifies conventional representatives: the essential distinction is orientation reversal, rather than a unique choice of axis. Both transformations preserve the ordinary spatial integration measure through the absolute value of their Jacobian determinants.
Past exam of the quantum field theory course of the University of Oxford 2023 3 a Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-25
In terms of the Pauli matrices, , , . The Pauli matrix multiplication law implies and for . ConsequentlyThese diagonal and off-diagonal cases are exactly the Clifford algebra relationThe identity matrix is implicit on the right-hand side in the source. Useful conventions for the remaining parts are , for , and , , .
Past exam of the quantum field theory course of the University of Oxford 2023 2 b Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-25
The two complex scalar fields have scalar propagatorscontractions of two unconjugated fields or two conjugated fields vanish. Draw an arrow on each line in the direction of positive conserved charge flow: a solid line carries one unit and a dashed line two units. A particle arrow follows its physical momentum; an antiparticle arrow opposes it.
There are two conjugate three-leg interaction vertices, both with Feynman rule : one has a charge-two arrow entering and two charge-one arrows leaving, and the other reverses every arrow. These describe the two conjugate terms and . The two identical attachments cancel the in the Lagrangian density. All crossed assignments are obtained by moving external lines between initial and final states while maintaining the arrows. There is no interaction vertex with three equal-sign charges.
Each interaction vertex conserves four-momentum, supplying with all momenta entering. Integrate each independent loop momentum with and divide by the Feynman-diagram symmetry factor. No minus sign is assigned to a closed scalar loop. These rules are for after amputating external lines and removing the overall four-momentum conservation factor.
Past exam of the quantum field theory course of the University of Oxford 2023 2 a Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-25 Updated 2026-11-05
For nonzero real , the continuous internal symmetry of a classical field theory is the global U(1) symmetryThe kinetic terms and mass terms are invariant separately, while the phases in cancel. Independent phase rotations would instead require modulo , leaving one connected circle. Simultaneous complex conjugation is also a discrete symmetry, reversing the continuous charge; including it gives for generic parameters. At the continuous symmetry enlarges to .
The Noether current with particles assigned positive charges isFor example, put and . The Euler-Lagrange equations give and , with the factor already included in . Their sum vanishes. The Noether charge is conserved and, after normal ordering, countsThus a particle carries two units of the same conserved charge carried by a particle; their antiparticles carry the negatives. The interaction permits conversion of one particle into two particles when allowed by conservation of energy, while preserving this weighted number.
Past exam of the quantum field theory course of the University of Oxford 2023 1 e Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-25
The additional six-leg interaction vertex has Feynman rule . Since both interactions lack derivatives, the graph identity still gives , with . The difference is that a one-vertex contraction of the phi-six theory can leave four external legs: choosing the contracted pair gives . Its quartic interaction correction isConsequently a one-loop quartic interaction counterterm is now necessary:The one-loop mass counterterm from c is unchanged. Contracting four legs of a single six-leg interaction vertex gives double contractions, hence a two-loop raw self-energy . Its subtraction must include the quartic interaction counterterm insertion, rather than subtracting this raw expression in isolation.
All divergent field-dependent coefficients are most simply organized by the normal-ordering subtraction scheme in two dimensions. With , express a potential normal ordered at mass in ordinary fields:Thus its divergent subtraction coefficients, in this scheme, areIndeed the two-loop self-energy terms are , which the displayed mass counterterm cancels. The constant terms only affect vacuum energy. After removing all one-vertex self-contractions, every remaining subgraph is ultraviolet finite. Additional finite on-shell renormalization scheme adjustments are subject to the same qualification as d.
Past exam of the quantum field theory course of the University of Oxford 2023 1 d Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-25
Let count internal lines, independent loops, and interaction vertices of a connected Feynman diagram. The graph identity and the two inverse powers from each scalar propagator give its superficial degree of divergence:The same formula applies to every connected subgraph. Graphs with have negative superficial degree of divergence, but this alone does not remove a possible ultraviolet subdivergence. A one-vertex subgraph with external legs in the quartic scalar field theory can diverge only by a tadpole diagram, whose subtraction was fixed in c. Subtract every such tadpole diagram; every remaining loop subgraph then has and negative superficial degree of divergence. Its ultraviolet divergence is absent. Equivalently, normal ordering the quartic interaction removes all self-contractions at a single interaction vertex. Thus no new divergent field-dependent counterterm structure is needed, and in a normal-ordering subtraction scheme in two dimensions the one-loop mass subtraction exhausts these divergent coefficients.
The literal assertion that there are no further counterterm contributions in the on-shell renormalization scheme is stronger and generally false. A concrete counterexample is the two-loop sunset diagram. After analytic continuation below its three-particle threshold, the magnitude of its self-energy at contains the strictly positive finite integralThe integrable corners do not spoil convergence. Its nonzero value shifts the pole mass, requiring an additional finite mass counterterm if is to remain the exact pole mass; its derivative can likewise change the pole residue. These are compatible with the power counting result. If vacuum diagrams are retained rather than divided out in normalized correlation functions, a separate constant vacuum energy counterterm is also required: the one-vertex double-loop vacuum diagram is already divergent. The claim about the mass subtraction concerns field-dependent counterterms and normalized correlation functions.
Past exam of the quantum field theory course of the University of Oxford 2023 1 c Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-25
Write , , and define the mass counterterm as a squared-mass coefficient:With the self-energy convention in b, the inverse scalar propagator is . Requiring the pole mass to equal therefore gives the on-shell renormalization scheme conditionAt one loop order, ; hence a unit pole residue also gives , andThe mass counterterm Feynman rule is , cancelling the tadpole diagram. A convention defining a positive mass subtraction by instead has ; specifying this convention avoids a spurious sign disagreement.
There is no one-loop wave-function renormalization because the tadpole diagram is independent of momentum. Each one-loop four-point bubble diagram has two scalar propagators, so its large Euclidean loop momentum integral behaves as and is ultraviolet finite. Thus no divergent quartic interaction counterterm is required. Finite coupling redefinitions remain possible. At higher loop orders, finite wave-function renormalization may be needed if unit pole residue is imposed; power counting only rules out its ultraviolet divergence.
Past exam of the quantum field theory course of the University of Oxford 2023 1 b Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-25
The one-loop one-particle irreducible correction is a tadpole diagram: two external lines meet one quartic interaction and the other two legs are joined. Interchanging the two ends of its loop gives the symmetry factor .
Original scalar diagrams: the two-dimensional tadpole, charge-conserving light-scalar exchange, and heavy-scalar box amplitudes. Dashed lines carry charge two; solid lines carry charge one.
Details. Define the self-energy by an insertion and a full scalar propagator before counterterms. The supplied cutoff regularization integral givesThusIt has no external momentum dependence. The correction to the unamputated two-point correlation function in momentum space isThe positive sign of raises the unrenormalized squared pole mass for .
Past exam of the quantum field theory course of the University of Oxford 2023 1 a Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-25
Use , the Minkowski metric , and . The momentum-space Feynman rules for the real scalar field areAt each interaction vertex impose two-dimensional momentum conservation; before removing the overall conservation factor this is . Integrate each independent loop momentum with , and divide a Feynman diagram by its symmetry factor. External lines carry the same scalar propagator in an unamputated two-point correlation function; they are removed in an amputated scattering amplitude.
The quadratic action is inverted with the Feynman i-epsilon prescription to obtain the scalar propagator. Expanding the Dyson series gives per insertion; the attachments in the Wick theorem cancel the factorial. Fourier integration over the insertion point supplies the momentum conservation factor. Automorphisms that leave the labelled external attachments fixed account for the remaining symmetry factor. In two spacetime dimensions the mass dimensions are and .
Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project
Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
Intro to OurBigBook
. Source. We have two killer features:
- topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculusArticles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
- a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
- a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.Figure 1. Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page. View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivativeVideo 2. OurBigBook Web topics demo. Source. - local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
- to OurBigBook.com to get awesome multi-user features like topics and likes
- as HTML files to a static website, which you can host yourself for free on many external providers like GitHub Pages, and remain in full control
Figure 2. You can publish local OurBigBook lightweight markup files to either OurBigBook.com or as a static website.Figure 3. Visual Studio Code extension installation.Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally. Video 3. Edit locally and publish demo. Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension. - Infinitely deep tables of contents:
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact






