For , the adjacent binomial coefficients obey
Since and , the sign is determined by the numerator:
The printed codomain is inconsistent with the displayed map: , and when is odd, . With the usual extension for , is a function , and for ; the positive range above remains unchanged. Without that extension, the natural domain is .[ref]
Apply the factorial formula for the binomial coefficients:
For or , the same equality holds with the conventional zero value when the lower index exceeds the upper index.
There are ordered selections without replacement. Each unordered -element subset occurs in exactly orders, so the binomial coefficient is
One precise specification of its domain, codomain, and map is
Here , and includes the single empty selection. The actual values on are positive, so is also a valid codomain. For fixed , one can instead use the function with .
Try a linear function . The functional equation becomes for all , so must be a root of a polynomial . Its two roots of a polynomial give
For either choice, proves the required equality directly. The positive coefficient is the golden ratio.
Seek an affine function . Its function composition with itself is
Equating coefficients requires and . Because and , either choice or has . Thus two valid functions are
Substitution into verifies each answer. These provide the requested maps; no assumption that every possible solution is affine function is needed.
If , applying the function gives . Since , this implies , proving injectivity. Also every is the image of , because , proving surjectivity.
Thus is a bijection and its inverse function is itself:
Such a function is an involution.
We use a double inclusion proof. First, let . If , then , since otherwise . Hence in this case . If , then , since otherwise . Hence in this case . This proves the first set inclusion.
Conversely, an element of belongs to neither nor . An element of also belongs to neither set difference. Thus every element of lies outside , proving the reverse set inclusion. Therefore
Using set difference as an intersection with a complement of a set, and using double negation, gives
Interchanging the two sets simply interchanges the two terms of this union, whose commutativity gives
Every complement of a set is taken in the same universal set . Apply De Morgan's laws for propositional logic to the membership propositions. For every ,
Equality of membership for every element proves the set identities
The set difference consists of elements belonging to the first set but not the second:
The symmetric difference consists of elements belonging to exactly one of the two sets:
In particular, the two sets in this union are disjoint sets.
The standard normal distribution has mean zero and variance one, so . Part (iv) therefore gives
Using the second moment from part (iii),
By the density formula for expected value,
For the standard normal distribution, the integrand in the second moment is even, so
Comparing these two integrals gives
Since , the function is strictly increasing on its support. For ,
and for . Differentiating the cumulative distribution function gives
The density value at the single point is immaterial. Hence has an exponential distribution with rate . Direct integration by parts, or its standard expected value, yields
Since is nonnegative, for . For , use to obtain
Thus the cumulative distribution function is
In particular it tends to one as , confirming normalization of this unit-scale Rayleigh distribution.
We need . Indeed, if , the function is negative on ; if , the improper integral diverges at zero; and if , its support interval is empty. For ,
Setting this equal to one gives the unique admissible value
On this interval , so both requirements for a probability density function are met.
The cosine function is positive on and negative on . Thus any nonzero makes negative on an interval of positive length. Taking makes the total definite integral zero. Hence
Normalization alone would suggest , but that candidate still violates nonnegativity and therefore is not a probability density function.
A probability density function must be nonnegative and have definite integral one. Here
Therefore
This value is positive, so the nonnegativity requirement also holds.

Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project

Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
We have two killer features:
  1. topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculus
    Articles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
    • a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
    • a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
    This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.
    Figure 1.
    Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page
    . View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivative
  2. local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:
    This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
    Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally.
    Video 3.
    Edit locally and publish demo
    . Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension.
  3. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook-media/master/feature/x/hilbert-space-arrow.png
  4. Infinitely deep tables of contents:
    Figure 6.
    Dynamic article tree with infinitely deep table of contents
    .
    Descendant pages can also show up as toplevel e.g.: ourbigbook.com/cirosantilli/chordate-subclade
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact