Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 ii Paper 3 38C b Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 ii Paper 3 38C a Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 ii Paper 3 37C Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
The acoustic pressure satisfies . Rigid walls impose vanishing normal velocity, equivalently the Neumann boundary condition on pressure. Separation of variables gives transverse modes with . With axial factor , their dispersion relation isThe mode is nondispersive. Every other mode propagates only above its waveguide cutoff frequency . Thus .
Expand the prescribed entrance pressure in this cosine basis, with coefficients . Impose outgoing propagation and decay at infinity, with no incoming disturbance. At , only the constant transverse mode propagates, with . All other modes have , where . The exact modal field is the outgoing constant mode plus .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 ii Paper 3 36B Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
The rate-of-strain tensor is . For an incompressible Newtonian fluid, the stress tensor is . Dotting the momentum equation with velocity and using the product rule gives the local mechanical-energy balancewithout body forces. Write , with antisymmetric. The pressure contribution is , and by symmetry. Thus the remaining loss is , proving the local viscous dissipation rate is per unit volume.
For the oscillating boundary, take and constant pressure. The nonlinear advection vanishes, leaving , . Seek the real part of ; decay at infinity selects , . After transients,Only is nonzero, so the dissipation is . Its time average is : the two sine and cosine contributions each average to one half. Integrating over gives
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 ii Paper 3 35E Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Use metric signature and write , . For an orientation-preserving affine change , with , and . Homogeneity of both terms of the Lagrangian therefore leaves unchanged. Proper-time parametrization is used again when deriving the final equation.
Under , the action changes by . The fixed-endpoint variational principle is gauge invariant; the action itself can change by a boundary term. This is the precise version of the printed invariance claim. Negative reverses orientation and requires a corresponding reorientation of the path, rather than the simple positive-parameter calculation above.
The canonical momentum isThe Euler-Lagrange equation gives . Hence, with and proper time ,Antisymmetry verifies the consistency condition directly: .
For the uncharged Lagrangian in the same sign convention, , so . Equivalently is the gauge-invariant kinetic covector in this convention. This illustrates electromagnetic minimal coupling: replace the free canonical momentum by the gauge-covariant combination when introducing the field. The physical contravariant kinetic four-momentum is conventionally ; its sign must not be confused with the covector obtained by differentiating the particular negative-length Lagrangian used here.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 ii Paper 3 34D Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
The chemical potential is , equivalently : it is the free-energy cost of adding a particle at fixed temperature and volume. With units , a large reservoir has entropy to first order. Since the number of compatible reservoir states is proportional to its exponential, the grand canonical ensemble assignsFor independent fermions, a one-particle state of energy has occupation zero or one. Its partition factor is , so the mean occupation is the Fermi-Dirac distribution . Multiplication by the given density of states yields .
At zero temperature the occupation is a step function, filled below and empty above it, so and . At fixed particle number, the low-temperature shift of is and does not affect the leading estimate. In the narrow interval of width above , replace the density of states by and put . ThenEquivalently, the fraction above the Fermi energy is asymptotic to .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 ii Paper 3 33A Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
There is a genuine periodicity mismatch in the source. Write . The intended periodic displacements in a harmonic chain satisfy , equivalently for unwrapped positions. The printed instead makes the potential , with equilibrium at equal positions, not . The following lattice derivation uses periodic displacements, as required by the requested position operator.
Put , , and Fourier transform the displacements and momenta with normalization . The spring quadratic form is diagonal, with factor . Thus each nonzero mode is a harmonic oscillator withCreation and annihilation operators obey . Inverting the oscillator-coordinate expansion givesThe conjugate momentum is . Fourier orthogonality diagonalizes the Hamiltonian as . The normalized oscillator vacuum is annihilated by every ; applying creation operators gives number states, each added phonon contributing . The omitted zero mode is a free centre-of-mass coordinate, which must be fixed or treated separately rather than assigned an oscillator vacuum. Accordingly the reduced displacement commutator is .
For , separate creation and annihilation parts. Their commutator is a scalar, so the supplied Baker--Campbell--Hausdorff formula and vacuum expectations giveSumming the geometric lattice phases yieldsThe ratio is interpreted by continuity at its removable singularities. The interference factor has its maximum at , where all lattice phases coincide. The source's Fourier-sum hint should read , rather than .
The claim about the full matrix element also needs qualification: its Debye–Waller factor envelope varies with . The absolute global maximum is ; at nonzero reciprocal-lattice points the value is . Moreover the derivative of the envelope there is nonzero, whereas that of the interference factor is zero, so those points are not exact local maxima of the full finite-chain intensity. The reciprocal-lattice condition maximizes the interference factor, which is the usual constructive-scattering interpretation of the requested result.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 ii Paper 3 32D Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Expand a perturbed eigenvector and energy as and . At first order, . Projecting onto the eigenspace eliminates the first term and gives . Thus degenerate perturbation theory diagonalizes the restriction of to that eigenspace; in the nondegenerate case this reduces to its expectation value.
For the specified two-dimensional eigenspace, the restricted matrix is . Its eigenvectors are and its eigenvalues . Hence the perturbed energies are .
The square-box unperturbed energies are . Every diagonal matrix element of is , because each coordinate has mean . The ground state is , giving . The first excited eigenspace is spanned by and . Its off-diagonal entry factors into the square ofThus that entry is , and the three levels areThe neglected energy corrections are in the given weak-field regime.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 ii Paper 3 31E c Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 ii Paper 3 31E b Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 ii Paper 3 31E a Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 ii Paper 3 30B Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Put and . The steepest descent phase is , with saddles at . The specified contour can be deformed through the negative saddle, where ; the positive saddle would produce the growing exponential and is not the saddle for this contour.
An explicit descending contour is , where and increases from negative to positive infinity. Its imaginary phase is , and its ends approach the prescribed rays and . The real part of the phase has a strict maximum at , with quadratic term . Since the integrand is entire and decays in the connecting sectors, contour deformation introduces no residue.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 ii Paper 3 2G Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Introduce , , and . Composition of the Möbius transformations represents a finite continued fraction. Their matrices giveIndeed, multiplying the last factor gives the linear recurrences and , which reproduce the continued fraction convergents of the continued fraction. Each factor has determinant . Taking determinants therefore yieldsThis identity also proves that the numerator and denominator in the first column are coprime, so no unnoticed cancellation changes the displayed matrix.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 ii Paper 3 29A Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Let be the heat kernel, and write . The homogeneous solution is : differentiation verifies the heat equation, and the approximate-identity property recovers the smooth initial data.
The Duhamel principle givesEach source impulse at time evolves by the homogeneous heat flow for duration . More formally, differentiating the time integral gives . Subtracting its Laplacian leaves . The integral tends to zero as , since its absolute value is at most . Thus the initial condition is also correct. Smoothness permits differentiation locally; standard cutoff or semigroup arguments justify it for bounded smooth data without global bounds on all derivatives.
For and time-independent Schwartz , integrate the kernel in time. For , . ConsequentlyThe forcing term converges by dominated convergence to . Its singularity is locally integrable in four dimensions, and the Schwartz decay controls infinity. The supplied fundamental solution identity gives , first in distributions and then classically by regularity.
The asserted large-time limit is not guaranteed for arbitrary bounded smooth . Take and , which is smooth and has modulus one. For a standard four-dimensional Gaussian ,Dominated convergence gives the asymptotic, and the gamma factor is nonzero. The phase rotates indefinitely, so there is no limit. This is an example of heat evolution of bounded data need not converge at large times.
Under the natural additional assumption , : split the convolution into a large ball, whose heat-kernel mass tends to zero, and its complement, where is uniformly small. Then and . More generally, if at spatial infinity, the limit is , satisfying the same equation. These are the intended qualified stationary-limit conclusions.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 ii Paper 3 28I Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
The standard positive-cost interpretation requires and . These signs are not printed. Without them the claim of a unique positive fixed point is false: gives , with no positive fixed point. The following derivation gives the intended result under those cost assumptions; may be any finite constant.
Let be the value with stages remaining. Starting from , the Bellman equation isIf , the minimized expression is a quadratic in with positive leading coefficient . Its derivative vanishes at , and completing the square givesInduction establishes the value form and the control . Only zero mean and variance of the independent noise were needed.
The Riccati recurrence fixed-point equation becomesThe product of its roots is , so exactly one is positive:For , , while is positive below and negative above it. Monotonicity of prevents overshooting the fixed point. Thus increases to if , decreases to it if , and is constant if . Continuity identifies the limit uniquely.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 ii Paper 3 27I c Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 ii Paper 3 27I b Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 ii Paper 3 27I a Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 ii Paper 3 26J c Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 ii Paper 3 26J b Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
There are unlisted articles, also show them or only show them.