The exponential function is strictly positive, so the zero level set is determined entirely by its prefactor:
This is a rectangular hyperbola with branches in the first and third quadrants.
For real solutions with , the square root requires . First retain the solution , which would be lost by dividing by a square root of .
For , use the homogeneous first-order differential equation substitution , so , and . The equation becomes
This is now a separable differential equation. Integration gives . Since , the positive solutions satisfy
The implicit family is sufficient here because only parts (a) and (b) request an explicit expression. It also shows why the nonnegative choice of matters: denotes the positive square root.
The original PDF has in the denominator and on the left. Rearrange it into the differential form
The cross partial derivatives of its coefficients are both four, so it is an exact differential form. Integrating its first coefficient in gives a potential . Matching gives . Therefore an implicit general solution is
Differentiating verifies . A solution graph is understood only on intervals where its denominator is nonzero; the printed quotient does not define a derivative when .
For , divide by to obtain , a first-order linear ordinary differential equation. An integrating factor is on either interval not crossing zero, since the product rule gives
Integration and division by give the explicit general solution
The original equation would read at zero, so no solution can include that point.
By De Moivre's theorem, is the real part of . Writing and , the binomial theorem gives
Use the Pythagorean trigonometric identity and expand:
Therefore
Using the exponential definition of hyperbolic tangent, set :
Here , so the resulting points are not poles. Taking all values of the complex logarithm gives . Thus
Equivalently , so these are exactly the imaginary-axis solutions of .
The factor has modulus and principal argument . Multiplication by adds to its complex argument, while the real factor halves its modulus. Hence
Taking the principal logarithm for gives
This complex number lies in the second quadrant. Its modulus follows from the sum of squared components, and its principal argument follows by the second-quadrant correction:
All arguments of this fixed add integer multiples of to the displayed one.
If is interpreted as the multivalued complex logarithm, there is instead a family , where and . Then , and the principal argument is for , or for . This records the logarithm-branch choice that the paper leaves implicit.
The two derivatives are and , both equal to six at . Their common tangent line through is , or . Setting gives its intersection with the vertical axis:
The same chain rule gives and . Substituting these and part (a) into the partial differential equation gives
Thus every twice-differentiable profile gives a solution on .
For real coordinates, work on . The chain rule gives and . Therefore
The derivatives on the right are with respect to . Behaviour at requires separate regularity of the composed function.
Here , the unit normal vector is , and . The square has , so its outward flux is

There are unlisted articles, also show them or only show them.