The Commutative Gelfand--Naimark theorem states that a complex commutative unital C-star algebra is isometrically star-isomorphic to through its Gelfand transform, with a compact Hausdorff space. The l-infinity sequence space is such an algebra under coordinatewise multiplication and conjugation, with the supremum norm. Therefore
gives the required isometric isomorphism.
Uniqueness as a Banach space representation uses the Banach–Stone theorem, rather than just uniqueness as an algebra representation. To justify the relevant theorem, the Riesz-Markov-Kakutani representation theorem gives
the extreme points of the dual unit ball of C(K). A norm-one measure whose variation measure is not concentrated at one point splits into two normalized restrictions to disjoint sets of positive variation, and so is not extreme. Conversely, equality in the variation bound shows that any decomposition of into the average of two dual-unit-ball elements forces both to be : after removing the phase, the two measures must be positive and their average is concentrated at .
If is a surjective linear isometry, its dual map preserves these extreme points and their scalar orbits. Hence for a bijection and . Evaluating at gives the continuous function , while
shows that is continuous, since continuous functions determine the topology of a compact Hausdorff space. It is consequently a homeomorphism. Thus any other compact space representing is homeomorphic to this . The Banach–Stone theorem is also stated in Leonard Tomczak's notes on András Zsák's functional analysis lectures.
Embed by the evaluation characters . They are distinct because the coordinate indicator functions distinguish them. Moreover, , so every character has . If , then
and hence . It follows that is open in . Thus is a homeomorphism from the discrete natural numbers onto its image.
To prove density, suppose . The Urysohn lemma provides a nonzero vanishing on . Write . Then for all , so and , a contradiction. Every bounded function is an element of , and is its continuous extension to . Density makes this extension unique. Therefore
This identifies with the Stone-Čech compactification of the natural numbers.
To prove this, properness makes . First rule out : a sequence with eventually lies in a fixed sublevel set, which is bounded by coercivity. A -convergent subsequence would then have a limit with , contradicting the codomain. Hence is finite.
Choose a minimizing sequence with . It eventually belongs to the bounded sublevel set . Extract . By sequential lower semicontinuity,
Thus . In particular, a reflexive Banach space with the weak topology supplies the required subsequence property by weak sequential compactness of bounded sequences in a reflexive Banach space. A strictly convex function has at most one minimizer; this is an additional property, not part of the existence theorem.
Take the weak topology on the reflexive Banach space . A bounded linear operator is weak-to-weak continuous: implies for every , by its adjoint operator. The weak lower semicontinuity of the Hilbert norm therefore makes weakly sequentially lower semicontinuous.
This functional is finite everywhere and nonnegative. If it has coercivity, the direct method in the calculus of variations supplies a global minimizer . Squaring the residual does not change its global minimizers. Here the adjoint operator has codomain , since the source is a Banach space. Differentiating the squared residual along every real direction gives in the dual pairing, hence the normal equation for a linear inverse problem . Hence
The converse fails. For , , and , the datum is in the operator range, but while . Thus admissible data do not imply coercivity of the residual; an unpenalized null space already prevents it.
The Moore–Penrose inverse of an operator is the linear map
that assigns each admissible datum its minimum-norm least-squares solution. If with and , then is the unique satisfying . In particular it vanishes on , and
The continuity criterion, with the inherited data norm on its domain, is
For a closed operator range, the restriction of from to is a bounded bijection between Banach spaces, so its inverse is bounded by the bounded inverse theorem. Conversely, if is bounded and , replace each by . This is a Cauchy sequence, hence converges to , and . Thus every limit of range elements remains in the operator range.
For a functional on a real Banach space, its convex conjugate is defined on the dual space by
Here is the dual pairing. For complex spaces, use its real part, equivalently regard the space as real for convex analysis. The convex conjugate is a convex function, being the supremum of affine functions of , even when itself is not convex.
A bounded linear operator is a compact operator when the image of the closed unit ball has compact closure, equivalently when every bounded sequence has a subsequence for which converges.
Each is compact because its image lies in a finite-dimensional subspace. Let be the unit ball and fix . Choose with . Since is relatively compact, it has a finite -net . For each , choose with ; then
Thus is totally bounded. Its closure is complete because is a Banach space, so it is compact. This proves the norm-closedness of compact operators and hence
Let be Cauchy in the operator norm on . For each ,
so is Cauchy in the Banach space . Define
Pointwise passage to the limit shows that is linear. A norm-Cauchy sequence is bounded, say , and hence
Thus is bounded. Finally, for fixed ,
The right-hand coefficient tends to zero with , so in operator norm. Therefore
This is the Banach space of bounded linear operators.
For every finite scalar sequence with , define a bounded linear functional on the continuous dual space by
For each fixed , the hypothesis gives
where the supremum is over all finite choices and the phases may be chosen to align the complex numbers .
The dual is a Banach space even when is incomplete. The Uniform boundedness principle therefore gives a constant such that
For each , choose for so that . Then
Letting proves
This is the uniform bound from pointwise absolute summability of dual evaluations.
For a Banach space , weak convergence means
For its continuous dual space , convergence in the weak-star topology means
Weak convergence on tests against all of , whereas weak-star convergence tests only against the canonical image of . Thus weak convergence always implies weak-star convergence. If is a reflexive Banach space, that image is all of , so the weak and weak-star topologies on coincide. Weak-star topology is defined relative to a chosen predual; it is not an extra intrinsic topology on an arbitrary Banach space without such an identification.
Choose the common dominating probability measure and let , be the Radon-Nikodym derivatives. The assumed second moments imply first-moment integrability by the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality. Since is a separable Banach space, the measurable is a strongly measurable function, and both expected values exist as Bochner integrals.
The difference of these Bochner integrals satisfies
The first inequality is the norm bound for a Bochner integral, and the second is the scalar Cauchy-Schwarz inequality. Since , the first factor is at most
With the Hellinger distance convention of the original PDF, the second factor is . Multiplication proves the Hellinger bound for differences of expectations:
The proof uses only the two laws and their common dominating measure; no absolute continuity of measures assumption between and is needed.
Given , choose a sequence with , which is possible by part (a). The bound gives
so is a Cauchy sequence. Since is a Banach space, it converges. Define
The same estimate shows that this limit does not depend on the approximating sequence. Passing to the limit proves linearity and
so . It agrees with on . If two bounded extensions existed, their difference would vanish on the dense subspace and, by continuity, on its closure . Thus the extension is unique. This is the extension of a bounded linear operator from a dense subspace.
Write for the open unit ball. Because is a linear map, the hypothesis scales to
Fix . Choose numbers and such that
then .
Set . Inductively, if , the scaled density statement lets us choose
and we put . The geometric series gives
Because is a Banach space, exists and lies in . Since is a bounded linear operator, it is continuous, while
Therefore . As was arbitrary,
This is the dense open-unit-ball image criterion.
The Uniform boundedness principle states that if is a Banach space and a family of bounded linear operators is pointwise bounded, then .
Suppose in the normed vector space . For each , define the evaluation functional
The completeness of the dual space says that is Banach even when is not. For each , the scalar sequence converges to and is therefore bounded. Uniform boundedness gives
By the canonical embedding into the bidual and the Hahn-Banach theorem, . Hence
which proves that a weakly convergent sequence is bounded.
The Baire category theorem says that a complete metric space cannot be a countable union of nowhere dense sets, equivalently that every countable intersection of open dense sets is dense. To prove it, let be open dense subsets and let be nonempty and open. Choose nested closed balls
starting inside . The centres are a Cauchy sequence; completeness gives a limit lying in every ball, hence in . Thus the intersection is dense.
Choose a countable sequence with . Since for , every with lies in some . For integers , set
Pointwise convergence and Fatou lemma for series show that is closed in . It has empty interior: inside any ball, add a sufficiently long finite block whose norm is tiny but whose norm is larger than . Therefore every is nowhere dense. Since is a Banach space, Baire gives
An explicit element of the difference is
Its th powers form a convergent logarithmic series, whereas for every the powers contain with exponent below one and their series diverges. Hence but for every .
For , define by . The map is linear, and
shows , so is continuous. The granted equality is the canonical embedding into the bidual.
Suppose, contrary to the claim, that exactly the same linear functionals are continuous for and . Their common continuous dual has two operator norms, say and . Both dual spaces are Banach, even if the second normed space is not complete. The identity map
has a closed graph: convergence in either operator norm implies pointwise convergence on , so two limits must agree. The closed graph theorem makes the two dual norms equivalent.
Applying the isometric bidual formula for each primal norm then gives constants such that
This says the two norms are equivalent norms, contrary to the hypothesis. Their continuous duals must therefore differ as sets, so a linear functional belonging to one and not the other is continuous for exactly one of the two norms.
A family is equicontinuous if for every and there is a neighborhood of such that
for every and every . The Arzela-Ascoli theorem says that, for a compact Hausdorff space , a subset of has compact closure in the uniform norm if and only if it is equicontinuous and pointwise bounded. On compact , equicontinuity and pointwise boundedness together imply uniform boundedness.
For necessity, a compact closure is totally bounded. Given , choose a finite -net . The finitely many continuous functions are simultaneously continuous near each point, and comparison with a nearby proves equicontinuity of the whole family. Evaluation at any fixed point is a continuous map or , so compactness also gives pointwise boundedness.
Conversely, equicontinuity gives, around each , a neighborhood on which every oscillates by less than . Compactness supplies a finite such cover with selected points . Pointwise boundedness makes the set of vectors
a bounded subset of a finite-dimensional normed vector space, so it has a finite -net. Choose one function of for every nonempty cell of this net. If two functions have evaluation vectors in the same cell, then comparison at a selected and the two oscillation bounds show that their uniform distance is less than . Thus is totally bounded. Since is a Banach space, its closure is complete; a complete totally bounded metric space is compact, proving the theorem.
Write with every equicontinuous. Its closure is still equicontinuous, because uniform limits preserve the same oscillation inequalities. The Baire category theorem applied to the Banach space shows that some has nonempty interior. Hence there are and such that the open ball lies in .
Fix . Equicontinuity of gives a neighborhood of on which every member of changes by less than . If were distinct from , the normality of a compact Hausdorff space and the Urysohn lemma would give with , , and . Both and belong to , yet
a contradiction. Thus , so every point is isolated and is a discrete space. A compact discrete space is finite, since its cover by singleton open sets has a finite subcover.
The preceding estimate gives constants such that, whenever ,
Choose so that , and then choose so that . If , the closed ball is mapped into itself.
For , factor the cubic gradient nonlinearity as
The same Sobolev embedding theorem and the Holder inequality imply
The elliptic estimate therefore yields
Shrinking further makes , so is a contraction mapping of the closed ball. This ball is complete because is a Banach space. The contraction mapping theorem gives a fixed point , and its defining equation is
Thus the nonlinear elliptic boundary value problem has a solution for sufficiently small .
A Gaussian measure on a real separable Banach space is a Borel probability measure such that is a one-dimensional normal distribution for every continuous linear functional . Its mean and covariance operator of a Gaussian measure are characterized by
and
for all .
The infinitesimal generator of a semigroup is the linear operator
with generator domain
For example, the Bochner integral
belongs to for every and , since .
To prove that is a closed linear operator, suppose , , and . For vectors in the generator domain,
Passing to the limit in the Banach space gives
After division by , strong continuity makes the right side converge to as . Hence and , so is closed.
For , define the Bochner integral
It converges absolutely because
Integrating the semigroup difference quotient shows that and . The same computation for gives . Thus the Laplace-transform formula for a semigroup resolvent proves