For part (a), fix and consider the line segment
The convex set contains this entire segment. For
we have and
If , then for all sufficiently small positive , contradicting the hypothesis on . Thus
For part (b), is compact, and the product of the coordinates is a continuous function. The extreme value theorem therefore supplies maximizing that product. Assume every and apply part (a) to the convex set
It contains , and maximality of makes every coordinate product at most one. Hence
If is another maximizer, its coordinates are positive and . The arithmetic-geometric mean inequality gives
while the displayed inequality gives the reverse bound. Equality in the arithmetic-geometric mean inequality forces every . Therefore the maximizer is unique.
The intermediate value theorem states that if is continuous and lies between and , then some satisfies .
Assume and let
The least-upper-bound property makes well defined. If , continuity gives points immediately to the right of in , contradicting that is an upper bound. If , continuity gives a left neighborhood of disjoint from , contradicting the definition of the supremum. Thus . The endpoint and reversed-order cases follow directly or by replacing with .
The mean value theorem states that if is continuous on and differentiable on , then some satisfies
For the functions in the question, the definition of the derivative makes continuous at and continuous at , with
If the middle secant slope equals , take . If it exceeds , the intermediate value theorem applied to gives with , and we take . If it is below , apply the theorem to to obtain with , and take . In every case
The mean value theorem on this subinterval then produces with
This is the Darboux theorem for derivatives for the stated pair of derivative values.
Choose a basis of the finite-dimensional vector space and let be the maximum absolute coordinate. For any norm , the triangle inequality gives
so is continuous in the coordinate topology. On the compact set , the positive continuous function attains a positive minimum and a finite maximum . By absolute homogeneity,
This proves the equivalence of norms in finite dimensions: every norm is equivalent to the maximum norm, and transitivity of these inequalities proves that any two norms on a finite-dimensional vector space are Lipschitz equivalent.
No. For each , , whereas for every . The pointwise limit on is therefore
This limit is not continuous at . Since every is continuous, the uniform limit theorem rules out uniform convergence. Directly, for , whose supremum over is for every .
A sequence of functions converges uniformly to when, for every , there is an such that
for every . Equivalently, in the supremum norm.
Yes. Fix and . Uniform convergence gives such that for every . Since the continuous function is continuous at , there is a such that implies . The triangle inequality then gives
This proves the uniform limit theorem: is continuous.
If such a continuous function existed, the inverse images
would be closed, would cover , and would contain and respectively. Part (b) gives a point in , which is impossible.
Let and be the probability laws of and . The hypothesis says
for every compactly supported continuous function . The theorem that compactly supported continuous functions determine a finite Borel measure gives . Hence and have the same law.
A real-valued process is a standard Brownian motion if:
A family is equicontinuous if for every and there is a neighborhood of such that
for every and every . The Arzela-Ascoli theorem says that, for a compact Hausdorff space , a subset of has compact closure in the uniform norm if and only if it is equicontinuous and pointwise bounded. On compact , equicontinuity and pointwise boundedness together imply uniform boundedness.
For necessity, a compact closure is totally bounded. Given , choose a finite -net . The finitely many continuous functions are simultaneously continuous near each point, and comparison with a nearby proves equicontinuity of the whole family. Evaluation at any fixed point is a continuous map or , so compactness also gives pointwise boundedness.
Conversely, equicontinuity gives, around each , a neighborhood on which every oscillates by less than . Compactness supplies a finite such cover with selected points . Pointwise boundedness makes the set of vectors
a bounded subset of a finite-dimensional normed vector space, so it has a finite -net. Choose one function of for every nonempty cell of this net. If two functions have evaluation vectors in the same cell, then comparison at a selected and the two oscillation bounds show that their uniform distance is less than . Thus is totally bounded. Since is a Banach space, its closure is complete; a complete totally bounded metric space is compact, proving the theorem.
A subset of a metric space is nowhere dense when the interior of its closure is empty. One form of the Baire category theorem says that a nonempty complete metric space cannot be a countable union of nowhere dense closed sets; equivalently, a countable intersection of dense open sets is dense.
Fix and work in the complete interval . For define the closed set
The sets are closed by the continuity of , and the assumed pointwise convergence gives . The Baire category theorem therefore gives an and a nonempty open interval contained in .
The intervals overlap once , which holds for every sufficiently large natural number . Their union consequently contains a half-line. Every sufficiently large can therefore be written as with and , and then . Since was arbitrary, as .
It suffices by part a to treat a nondecreasing right-continuous integrator, whose increments define a finite Lebesgue–Stieltjes measure on . Let be the left-endpoint step approximation on the dyadic intervals. The displayed sum is exactly
The continuous function is uniformly continuous on the compact interval, so . Therefore
Apply this separately to and to obtain the asserted Lebesgue-Stieltjes integral limit.
The events decrease, and an open path from reaches every exactly when the open cluster of is infinite. Therefore continuity from above of a measure gives
Each depends on finitely many sites, so is a polynomial and hence continuous. Given , choose with . For , monotonicity and the finite-event continuity yield
Thus from the right.
A problem is well posed in the sense of Hadamard when a solution exists for every admissible datum, is unique, and depends continuously on the datum. It is ill posed if any one of these three properties fails.
For the inverse problem , a regularization of an inverse problem is a family of bounded maps that approximate the generally unbounded Moore–Penrose inverse of an operator . It is a convergent regularization of an inverse problem if there is a parameter rule such that
as for every .
The following four assumptions are sufficient, with statements understood for -almost every and every :
The first two assumptions give . The last two allow the dominated convergence theorem to prove continuity of the normalized posterior density, which is equivalent to continuity in total variation distance.
The noise has the product Laplace distribution density
which is normalized because . By translation invariance of Lebesgue measure, the conditional law of has density
Hence an associated likelihood function is
The map is measurable because is measurable and vector subtraction is continuous. Composition with the continuous norm and exponential functions proves that is jointly measurable.
If , the same upper-half-plane contour calculation gives
If , the pole lies below the real integration contour. Closing upward encloses no pole, so Jordan lemma and the Cauchy integral theorem give
Hence at a real point the upper and lower boundary values satisfy
Thus crossing from the upper half-plane to the lower half-plane produces the negative of this jump.
An analytic continuation must be holomorphic, hence continuous, across every point where it is defined. The undeformed real-axis formula for has the nonzero jump above, while the continuation constructed in part (c) retains below the axis. Therefore cannot be the analytic continuation of .
Since is simply connected, write
for an entire function . If were bounded above, then
would be bounded, so the Liouville theorem would make constant. Its derivative would then vanish, whence and would be constant. Applying the same argument to rules out a lower bound. Thus a nonconstant is unbounded both above and below.
Given any , choose with
The restriction of to the line segment from to is continuous, so the intermediate value theorem supplies a point on that segment where . Therefore
This proves the surjectivity of a nonconstant entire harmonic function.
A family of continuous functions on a compact space is equicontinuous if, for every and every , there is a neighbourhood of such that for every in and every in . The Arzela-Ascoli theorem says that has compact closure in with the uniform norm if and only if it is equicontinuous and pointwise bounded.
Apply Arzela-Ascoli theorem on . Pointwise boundedness and equicontinuity give a subsequence converging uniformly there. Successively extract subsequences for , and take the diagonal subsequence. It converges uniformly on every closed bounded interval. Its limits on nested intervals agree, so they define on the real numbers; the locally uniform limit of continuous functions is continuous.
Fix and . Since is compact in the uniform norm, choose a finite -net . By continuity, there is a neighbourhood of on which for every . For in , choose with . The triangle inequality gives on , uniformly in . Thus is equicontinuous.