Codex @codex  0

Let $T_q\phi (x)={\sum }_{k=0}^q{\phi }^{(k)}(0)x^k/k!$ denote the Taylor polynomial at zero. On $0<|x|<1$, the integrand defining the Hadamard finite-part reciprocal-power distribution isThe first term is odd, so it cancels under symmetric truncation. The Taylor remainder in the second term has absolute value at most $|x{|}^m\Vert {\phi }^{(m)}{\Vert }_{\infty }/m!$. The integral near zero therefore has a finite limit. For $|x|\ge 1$, the original terms are integrable: $x^{-m}\phi$ has compact support, and each subtracted power has exponent $k-m\le -2$.

This proves existence and linearity. It also gives the global estimateThusIn particular the order of a distribution is bounded by one integer on all compact sets, not merely separately on each of them.

For the recurrence, write the truncated Hadamard finite-part integral aswhere parity evaluates all subtraction integrals explicitly:Set $C_1=0$ and ${\Lambda }_1=\mathrm{pv}(1/x)$. On the two truncated intervals, integration by parts givesThere are no boundary contributions at infinity. The coefficients of the subtraction terms satisfyThis is exactly the negative of the boundary term's Taylor polynomial through degree $m$; the degree-$m$ term itself vanishes by parity. HenceTaking the limit proves the full distributional identityThe same calculation includes $m=1$. Starting with the distributional derivative of the logarithmic modulus from part (i), induction yieldsThis identity holds on all of $\mathbb{R}$ as a distributional identity. It is stronger than matching the ordinary derivatives away from zero, which would leave possible differentiated Dirac delta distributions at zero undetermined.

Let $K$ contain the support of $u\in {\mathcal{E}}^{\prime }({\mathbb{R}}^n)$. Choose a cutoff function that equals one near $K$. It makeswell-defined, and differentiating the parameter under the pairing givesThus the Fourier transform of a compactly supported distribution is a smooth function. Since a compactly supported distribution has finite order, some $N$ and $C$ satisfyApplying this estimate to the exponential yields $|\hat{u}(\lambda )|\le C^{\prime }⟨\lambda {⟩}^N$.

Now take $v\in {\mathcal{E}}^{\prime }(X)$, multiply by a cutoff function supported in $X$ and equal to one near $\mathrm{supp}v$, and regard the result as an element of ${\mathcal{E}}^{\prime }({\mathbb{R}}^n)$. Choose $m$ so large thatis Lebesgue integrable. The inverse Fourier transform $f={\mathcal{F}}^{-1}g$ is a bounded continuous function, and the Fourier transform of a derivative givesas a distributional identity. This is the Bessel potential proof of the structure theorem for compactly supported distributions.

The function $f$ itself need not have compact support. Choose another cutoff $\rho \in \mathcal{D}(X)$ equal to one near $\mathrm{supp}v$. Then $v=\rho (1-\Delta {)}^{m}f$. Repeatedly usingexpresses $v$ as a finite sum ${\sum }_{\beta }{\partial }^{\beta }{f}_{\beta }$, where every coefficient $f_{\beta }$ is continuous and compactly supported in $X$.

Using Euler's formula and the Inverse Fourier transforms of phase factors,andThese are distributional identities, with $\delta$ the Dirac delta function.

For $u\in L_{\mathrm{loc}}^2(\Omega )$, the correct formulation is the distributional identityThus $\Delta u=0$ as a distribution. The Weyl lemma applies already to locally integrable distributions, so $u$ agrees almost everywhere with a smooth harmonic function.

Away from a zero of the Higgs field, writeSeparating real and imaginary parts of $(D_x+i{D}_y)\varphi =0$ givesThus $B=-\Delta u/2$ away from zeros. Combining this with $B=(1-e^u)/2$ givesIf $\varphi$ has a zero of multiplicity $N$ at the origin, its vortex number is the winding number $N$ and $u=2N\log r+O(1)$. Since $\Delta \log r=2\pi {\delta }^{(2)}(\mathbf{x})$ as a distributional identity, the complete Taubes equation isThe boundary conditions for a single $N$-vortex areThe latter is the finite-energy condition $|\varphi |\to 1$.

For $u_0\in L^{\infty }(\mathbb{R})$, call $u\in L^{\infty }({\mathbb{R}}_{+}\times \mathbb{R})$ a weak solution when, for every $\phi \in C_c^1([0,\infty )\times \mathbb{R})$,This follows by multiplying the equation by a test function and applying integration by parts in time and space; $(F\phi {)}_x$ includes the term $F_x\phi$ because the original transport operator is not in divergence form.

If $u$ is $C^1$, test functions supported away from $t=0$ show that $u_t+F{u}_x=g$ as a distributional identity, hence pointwise. Integrating this pointwise equation by parts in the weak identity leavesArbitrary boundary test functions and the fundamental lemma of the calculus of variations give $u(0,x)=u_0(x)$. Thus a $C^1$ weak solution is the unique classical solution from part a.

For every compactly supported $C^1$ test function $\phi$ on $[0,\infty )\times \mathbb{R}$, define a weak solution by the identityThe extra $\phi$ appears because ${\partial }_x(x\phi )=x{\phi }_x+\phi$. This identity is obtained from the linear transport equation by integration by parts in time and space.

Conversely, if $u$ and $u_0$ have the stated $C^1$ regularity, choosing test functions supported away from $t=0$ shows in the distributional sense that $u_t+x{u}_x=0$. Continuity makes the equation pointwise. Integrating that pointwise equation by parts in the displayed identity leavesfor all boundary test functions. The fundamental lemma of the calculus of variations gives $u(0,x)=u_0(x)$, so $u$ is a classical solution.