Use the coordinate convention
In this convention the Heisenberg group over a prime field has the product
The subset is an Abelian subgroup of order : the middle coordinate in a product is , which is symmetric in the factors. Also lies in . The map is a surjective group homomorphism to the additive group of , with kernel of a group homomorphism . Hence is a normal subgroup of subgroup index , and its left cosets are exactly the level sets of .
For odd , an explicit group isomorphism from to the additive group is
The term in matrix multiplication cancels the cross term in . Thus is an elementary abelian group, isomorphic to .
General affine group 2026-10-14
The group of maps of a finite-dimensional vector space, with invertible. Identifying the underlying points with a regular elementary abelian group identifies its normalizer in the symmetric group with this semidirect product.
Group of order eight Created 2026-10-05 Updated 2026-10-06
Up to group isomorphism, the groups of order eight are , , , and , with here denoting the eight-element dihedral group. An element of order eight gives the first case. If every nonidentity element has order two the group is an elementary abelian group. Otherwise, after excluding elements of order eight, a cyclic subgroup of order four has index two; an element outside it either commutes with its generator or inverts it. In the latter case its square is either the identity or the central involution, giving the dihedral group or quaternion group.
For an odd prime number , a finite p-group that is a product of cyclic subgroups is a powerful p-group. Indeed, has exponent of a finite group and the same minimal generator number . Its cyclic factorization gives , while its Frattini quotient has order . Thus , is an elementary abelian group, and . The condition on the number of factors is essential: the nonabelian Heisenberg group over has exponent and is a product of three cyclic subgroups, although its minimal generator number is two.
A nontrivial minimal normal subgroup of a finite solvable group is abelian: its commutator subgroup is characteristic, and minimality plus solvability excludes . A nontrivial Sylow subgroup of this abelian group is characteristic, so minimality makes a p-group. The characteristic subgroup of pth powers is proper, hence trivial by minimality. Therefore is an elementary abelian group.
Let denote the irreducible characters of finite-dimensional complex group representations of . A generalized character, or virtual character, is an integral linear combination of these irreducible characters. A class function is a function constant on conjugacy classes. For class functions use the character inner product
A p-elementary group is a direct product of groups , where is a p-group and is a cyclic group of order coprime to . An elementary subgroup is a subgroup of this form for some prime . Either factor may be trivial. This notion is different from an elementary abelian group.
Brauer's characterization of characters says that a complex class function on is a generalized character exactly when its restriction to every elementary subgroup is a generalized character there. Equivalently,
The character orthogonality relations make these inner products the coefficients of the restrictions in their irreducible bases. The theorem detects the integral character lattice. An ordinary character of a representation additionally requires every global irreducible coefficient to be nonnegative; integrality alone characterizes virtual characters, not necessarily actual representations.
Since the two-transitive group action is primitive, the orbits of any nontrivial normal subgroup form only the single block . Thus is transitive. If is regular, identify with by . Then , , and conjugation by gives automorphisms of . The two-transitive group action makes these automorphisms transitive on . All nonidentity elements therefore have the same order, which must be a prime : a suitable power of an element of composite order would have a smaller nontrivial order. Cauchy's theorem for finite groups now shows .
The center of a group of prime-power order is nontrivial and is a characteristic subgroup. The transitive conjugation action on nonidentity elements therefore forces . Hence is an elementary abelian group, which we identify with the additive vector space . Conjugation by is linear on this vector space. It is faithful: an element fixing and centralizing fixes every , hence is the identity permutation. Consequently
Here the general affine group acts by translations followed by invertible linear maps.
For each , the elementary abelian group is spanned by the images of . We construct exponents so that equals the ordered product to successively greater precision. Suppose this product agrees with modulo ; initially this is automatic for . Its error modulo can be expressed using the images of . Add the corresponding digits to the exponents . Since , moving each new factor past the other factors changes nothing modulo . The new ordered product therefore agrees with modulo . Termination of the lower p-series proves
No uniqueness of this factorization is asserted for a redundant generating tuple.
The printed converse is false without an additional condition. For any odd , take the Heisenberg group with
Every element is uniquely , with , so is a product of three cyclic subgroups. For strictly upper triangular, and
in characteristic , including . Therefore , whereas . This finite p-group is not powerful, disproving the literal request in the authoritative PDF.
A precise nearby correction is the minimal cyclic factorization criterion for powerful p-groups: require a product of cyclic subgroups, where is the minimal generator number. To prove it, put and . The quotient has exponent and still has minimal generator number , because . Each cyclic factor has image of order at most , so . But by the Burnside basis theorem. Consequently , is an elementary abelian group, and . A product of exactly cyclic subgroups is powerful. A direct product of cyclic groups is also powerful, since it is abelian; neither stronger hypothesis appears in the printed converse.
Take , whose irreducible polynomial is . Since the characteristic is not two, satisfies and . Irreducibility makes nonzero and nonsquare. If another quadratic extension is with , an isomorphism sends to , with . Squaring gives . Linear independence of forces , so and is a square. Conversely, if , sending to gives an isomorphism. If itself is a square, the target is just and cannot be isomorphic; the square-ratio condition also fails.
The multiquadratic field is the splitting field of , a product of separable quadratic polynomials: each has distinct roots because and the characteristic is not two. Even if factors repeat, this splitting field is a separable normal extension, and therefore Galois. Each automorphism sends to , and these signs determine it, embedding its Galois group into . Every subgroup of this elementary abelian group is for some .
For a quadratic intermediate field, its fixing subgroup has index two and is the kernel of a nontrivial one-dimensional character . The coordinate sign characters span the dual of : a linear functional on the subspace extends to the ambient space by extending a basis. Hence for some subset . Set . Then , so is fixed by but not by all of , and . Thus is quadratic and equals the fixed field of . This constructs all quadratic subfields of a multiquadratic extension:
For odd , a subgroup is powerfully embedded in if , where . The condition implies normality since . The group is a powerful p-group if , equivalently if itself is powerfully embedded. For a finite p-group, the Burnside basis theorem gives , and . Thus for powerful , .
We prove by induction on , with the trivial group immediate. The supplied embedding result applied to makes powerfully embedded, and hence powerful. It is a proper subgroup when , because is proper in a nontrivial finite p-group. Set
All the displayed quotients are elementary abelian. The supplied onto homomorphism , , is therefore linear. Write , , , and .
Since embeds in , . Also
Here is the iterated-power convention, valid for powerful groups. Hence the natural map is defined. The image under this map of the subspace contains , because for every its power lies in . It follows that
The exact sequence consists of elementary abelian groups, and . By induction inside , . Therefore
This proves , including subgroups that are not themselves powerful.
The rank of a profinite group is , where is its least topological generator number. If has finite rank then every closed subgroup, including the open subgroup , has no larger rank. Conversely suppose has rank . Its normal core is an open normal subgroup: there are finitely many conjugates because has finite index. It has rank at most .
For every closed , the subgroup is normal in and has at most topological generators. The quotient embeds in the finite group . A finite group of order at most has at most generators: in a minimal sequential generating list every strict enlargement at least doubles the subgroup order. Lift such quotient generators and adjoin generators of . Their closed generated subgroup contains the group homomorphism kernel and maps onto the quotient, so equals . Consequently
Thus an open subgroup has finite rank exactly when the whole profinite group does.
Let a finite group act on a set . For , define its stabilizer subgroup and its group orbit . The map
is well-defined, because multiplying on the right by an element fixing does not change its image. It is onto by the definition of the orbit. If , then , so ; hence it is one-to-one. Every coset has elements and the cosets partition . This proves the orbit-stabilizer theorem:
For a group element , its cyclic subgroup has elements. Apply the theorem to the action of on its left cosets , whose stabilizer at is . It follows that
This is the needed case of Lagrange's theorem, obtained directly from the action.
To prove Cauchy's theorem for finite groups, let be a prime divisor of and consider
The first entries are arbitrary and determine the last, so is divisible by . Cyclically rotate the entries. This preserves the product constraint even if is nonabelian, since
Thus a cyclic group of order acts on . By the orbit-stabilizer theorem, its orbits have size one or . Its fixed tuples are exactly with . If is their number, counting the remaining size- orbits gives . The identity provides one fixed tuple, so and a nonidentity with exists. The order of this divides : division of by its order and minimality of that order prove this directly. Since is prime and , the order is exactly . This is the cyclic-tuple proof of Cauchy theorem.
Now suppose every nonidentity element has order two. Then every element equals its inverse, and for any ,
Thus group of exponent two is abelian applies. Starting from the identity subgroup, choose an element outside the subgroup already generated. Because the group is abelian and that element squares to the identity, adjoining it doubles the subgroup: it is the disjoint union of the old subgroup and its translate by the new element. Repeating until the finite group is exhausted shows . Conversely the direct product of groups has order and every nonidentity element has order two. Therefore
The case is the trivial group and satisfies the condition vacuously. These finite examples are elementary abelian groups of exponent two.
An infinite example is the group of all binary sequences, with coordinatewise addition modulo two:
Every sequence added to itself is zero, so every nonzero sequence has order exactly two. The sequences having a single in coordinate are all distinct, proving that the group is infinite.
For a profinite group, its profinite Frattini subgroup is
Use for an empty intersection. This is a closed normal subgroup, invariant under continuous group automorphisms, since these automorphisms permute the maximal open subgroups. Let . If , its image certainly topologically generates . Conversely, suppose . For , the open normal subgroup basis of a profinite group gives with : choose a sufficiently small neighbourhood disjoint from the closed subgroup . The proper subgroup of the finite group lies in a maximal proper subgroup. Its preimage is a maximal proper open subgroup of , contains , and contains . Since is compact and therefore closed, density of the image of in would force , contradicting . Generation can therefore be tested modulo the profinite Frattini subgroup.
For a finite p-group, every maximal proper subgroup is normal and has index . One proof uses the normalizer condition for finite p-groups: maximality forces its normalizer to be the whole group, and its simple -group quotient has order . Therefore every such maximal subgroup contains powers and group commutators. Conversely, the quotient by the algebraic is an elementary abelian p-group; its nonzero elements are separated by linear maps to . Their kernels give maximal subgroups. This proves the finite Frattini subgroup formula.
Now take a pro-p group and put , retaining the closure of the algebraically generated subgroups. A maximal open subgroup is the preimage of a maximal subgroup of a finite -group quotient, so it contains . If , some finite quotient of the profinite group detects . That quotient is elementary abelian, and a linear functional nonzero at gives a continuous group homomorphism whose kernel is a maximal open subgroup missing . Hence
The closure bar is present in the original PDF; the converted TeX fraction is an extraction error.
For the finite-index assertion, first pass from the arbitrary abstract subgroup to its normal core of a subgroup . The action on the finitely many cosets of shows , without assuming that or is closed. Write with , and let . By Lagrange theorem, . For , the quotient is a finite p-group of order, say, . Choose an integer with . Then
so for every such . The set is the continuous image of the compact space , hence is closed. Consequently . Every element of the abstract finite quotient thus has order dividing . By Cauchy theorem for groups, no prime other than divides its order. Therefore , and its divisor , are powers of . This proof does not assume continuity of the finite quotient map.
To prove openness under finite generation, first establish commutator collection with fixed generators in nilpotent groups. If a nilpotent group is generated by , every element of is
Induct on the nilpotency class . The assertion is trivial for . Apply the induction hypothesis in ; the remaining error lies in the central subgroup . Since commutators in this last layer are central, collecting against words in the expresses the error as with . Also . Thus replacing each by multiplies the desired product by precisely that central error, proving the formula.
Let now topologically generate . Every finite continuous quotient is a nilpotent group, so the formula holds there with these fixed generators. For , the sets of tuples solving are nonempty closed subsets of a compact space. They have the finite intersection property, by replacing finitely many by their intersection. A common tuple solves the equality in . It follows that the algebraic commutator subgroup is the compact image of under this product map, and is closed.
Its quotient is a topologically finitely generated abelian pro-p group. The continuous map taking to is onto, because its compact image contains a dense generating subgroup. Therefore is generated as an elementary abelian group by at most elements, and is compact. The preimage of is closed of finite index, hence open: its complement is a finite union of closed cosets. The finite-index result and the maximal-subgroup property of finite p-groups show that any abstract index- subgroup of is normal. It contains this open subgroup, so is itself open.
Finally, a finite-index normal subgroup has finite -group quotient. If , choose a normal index- subgroup in that quotient and call its preimage . The preceding argument makes open. An open subgroup of a finitely generated pro-p group is finitely generated: intersect a finitely generated dense abstract subgroup with , use the Schreier lemma, and observe that the intersection is dense in the open subgroup . Induction on now makes open in , hence in . Returning to the normal core of a subgroup, is a union of open cosets of . Every finite-index subgroup of a finitely generated pro-p group is open.
A topological group module is a topological abelian group with a jointly continuous action of by group automorphisms. Its continuous cochains with topological coefficients are
with pointwise addition. The inhomogeneous differential is
For , this means . Continuity of multiplication and of the action ensures that preserves continuous cochains. Expanding gives cancellation in pairs: the two orders of multiplying neighbouring arguments agree by associativity, and the two ways of applying the action agree by its action law. Thus . The cocycles are and the coboundaries are , with . Define
For general topological coefficients this is an algebraic quotient of the continuous cochains; its optional quotient topology need not be Hausdorff. For discrete coefficients it is the usual continuous cohomology of a profinite group. In degree zero it is the subgroup of invariant elements.
Give the discrete prime field its trivial -action. The one-cocycle condition becomes and every one-coboundary is zero. Hence
Every such group homomorphism kills powers and group commutators, hence their closure , and every continuous functional on the quotient pulls back. If is topologically finitely generated, is a finite elementary abelian group. To verify finiteness without assuming it, the closure of a subgroup generated by elements of this abelian exponent- quotient has at most elements; a finite subgroup is already closed. Thus is a finite-dimensional vector space. Question 2 says that a generating family of is minimal precisely when its images give a basis of . The dual space has the same finite dimension. This proves
There is a genuine missing hypothesis if the printed assertion is read for arbitrary pro-p groups and means the least cardinality of any dense generating family. Here is an explicit infinite-rank failure of the first-cohomology generator formula. Let and . Enumerate the finite binary strings as and define if is a prefix of , and otherwise. For finitely many distinct sequences , choose long enough prefixes to distinguish each individually. The corresponding project onto the coordinate unit vectors of , so surjects onto every finite coordinate projection and is dense in the product topology. No finite family can generate densely, since a finitely generated abelian exponent- subgroup is finite and closed. Thus . On the other hand, continuity of a linear functional to means its kernel contains a basic neighbourhood, so it depends on finitely many coordinates. The coordinate projections are consequently a basis of the continuous dual space, giving
The unrestricted infinite-rank formula is false. A convention requiring a generating basis tending to the identity is different from the printed unrestricted topological generator count; the finite-rank identity proved above has no such ambiguity.
For finite , a free pro-p group is characterized by the universal property that every map to a pro-p group extends uniquely to a continuous group homomorphism . It is the pro-p completion of the abstract free group on : each map to a finite -group factors through one of the defining finite quotients, and passing to the inverse limit gives the extension to any pro-p group; uniqueness follows from density. This unrestricted universal property can also define the completion on an arbitrary set . When using an infinite basis required to tend to the identity, one instead imposes the universal property only for maps tending to the identity. Only the finite-rank version is needed for the following argument.
A finite pro-p presentation is an isomorphism
There are finitely many generators and finitely many relators, and the denominator is their closed normal closure. The relators are elements of the free pro-p group; they may be limits of ordinary words. That distinction is important when writing conjugation relations below.
Now suppose has a finite pro-p presentation with generators and relators . The quotient is a finite p-group. Choose a finite finite pro-p presentation . Such a presentation exists, for example by using its entire finite multiplication table. Lift the quotient generators to . For every , choose elements of the free pro-p group on the that map respectively to and in . Choose mapping to , which lies in . Form the finite finite pro-p presentation
All listed relations hold in , giving a continuous surjective group homomorphism : its compact image contains and maps onto .
Let be the closed subgroup of topologically generated by the . Both conjugation directions were included, so each normalizes . The also normalize it, and its closed normalizer contains the generators of . Thus . The relations give a continuous surjection . Its composite with induced by fixes every , and hence is the identity. Therefore the surjection is injective as well, so . On quotienting by , the conjugation and kernel relations disappear, and the remaining presentation is exactly . Thus is an isomorphism. The kernel of lies in and meets trivially, so is trivial. Consequently , proving
For a finite group, define the Frattini subgroup by
the intersection is when there are no maximal subgroups, which for a finite group happens only for . A second definition is the set of non-generators: an element such that always implies .
If and , put in a maximal subgroup . Then , so . Conversely, if , some maximal subgroup omits it; maximality gives , although . This proves equivalence.
Every group automorphism permutes maximal subgroups, so is a characteristic subgroup, in particular a normal subgroup. Also
a proper would lie in a maximal subgroup containing both factors.
Set and take a Sylow subgroup of . For , normality of makes a Sylow subgroup of . Conjugating inside therefore gives the Frattini argument factorization . The preceding generating property forces . Thus every Sylow subgroup of is normal, and part (i) shows that is a nilpotent group.
Now suppose is a finite p-group. The normalizer condition makes every maximal subgroup normal: and maximality force . The quotient has no proper nontrivial subgroup, hence is cyclic of prime order; its p-power order makes that prime . Consequently every such contains
where the two factors are the commutator subgroup and the subgroup generated by pth powers. Thus .
The quotient is an elementary abelian group, hence a vector space over . If , extend the nonzero vector to a basis and choose a linear functional nonzero on it. Its kernel pulls back to a subgroup of index , a maximal subgroup omitting . Therefore , proving
The two factors in the last formula are multiplied; the superscripted expression in the TeX aid is not the formula printed in the PDF.
Choose a complement to the fixed -dimensional vector subspace . With column vectors and the decomposition , its parabolic stabilizer of a subspace is
The arbitrary upper-right block forms a normal elementary abelian group. The block-diagonal matrices form a complement, acting on it by . Thus
With row vectors the off-diagonal block is transposed; the subgroup description is the same after the convention change.
The rank of a transitive permutation group is the number of orbits of a stabilizer subgroup, not the rank of a matrix. For , the invariant of its -orbit is . This invariant is complete. Choose a basis of , extend it to a basis of , then add a basis of a complement of in , and extend the resulting independent vectors to a basis of . For with the same intersection dimension , do the same. The map between these adapted bases preserves and sends to .
Each value occurs: in a basis with , take
The hypothesis guarantees all these vectors exist. Hence
If a nonidentity power belongs to , reduce modulo so that . There is an integer with , and therefore , a contradiction. Thus
Now suppose that is abelian and finite. Start with , and whenever , choose . The multiplication map
is a group homomorphism because all elements commute. It is surjective by construction and injective because the intersection of its two factors is trivial: implies lies in that intersection. Hence , and its order is times the previous order. Strict growth and finiteness ensure that the construction ends at . Therefore
where is the number of factors, possibly zero. This is an elementary abelian group, obtained by an explicit direct product of groups construction.
Lagrange's theorem for finite groups states that for a subgroup of a finite group , . For , two powers among coincide, giving for some positive . The least such exponent is the order of a group element, and the cyclic subgroup generated by consists of the distinct powers . Apply Lagrange's theorem for finite groups to obtain .
Cauchy's theorem for finite groups states that if a prime divides the order of a finite group, the group contains an element of order .
The classification of a group of order eight is
Here denotes the dihedral group of order eight, not a group of order sixteen. To prove exhaustiveness, every element order is or . An element of order eight generates the whole group, giving .
If no element has order four or eight, every nonidentity element is an involution. Since while and , we have . Choose an involution , another outside , and then outside the four-element subgroup . The factors commute and each added factor has trivial intersection with the preceding subgroup. The internal direct product theorem gives , an elementary abelian group.
Otherwise choose of order four and set . It has index two, so is normal. Choose . The two cosets show that generate and that . There is no element of order eight, so is either or .
If is abelian and , the internal direct product theorem yields . If instead , let ; commutativity gives and , producing the same direct product.
If is nonabelian, conjugation by is a nonidentity group automorphism of : otherwise would commute and hence so would all of . Thus . With these are the relations of ; with they are the relations of the quaternion group . In either presentation every word reduces to , , . The standard eight-element model maps onto , and equal orders make that group homomorphism an isomorphism.
Finally group isomorphisms preserve element orders. The following numbers of elements distinguish all five possibilities:
GroupOrder 1Order 2Order 4Order 8
1124
1340
1700
1520
1160
Thus the list is both exhaustive and pairwise non-isomorphic.
Regard bit strings as the elementary abelian group under bitwise exclusive or. The promise says
Thus is constant exactly on the cosets of and distinct between them. Determining the hidden subgroup determines its nonzero element , so this is Simon's problem as an instance of the hidden subgroup problem.