Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 iii Paper 5 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
For a profinite group, its profinite Frattini subgroup isUse for an empty intersection. This is a closed normal subgroup, invariant under continuous group automorphisms, since these automorphisms permute the maximal open subgroups. Let . If , its image certainly topologically generates . Conversely, suppose . For , the open normal subgroup basis of a profinite group gives with : choose a sufficiently small neighbourhood disjoint from the closed subgroup . The proper subgroup of the finite group lies in a maximal proper subgroup. Its preimage is a maximal proper open subgroup of , contains , and contains . Since is compact and therefore closed, density of the image of in would force , contradicting . Generation can therefore be tested modulo the profinite Frattini subgroup.
For a finite p-group, every maximal proper subgroup is normal and has index . One proof uses the normalizer condition for finite p-groups: maximality forces its normalizer to be the whole group, and its simple -group quotient has order . Therefore every such maximal subgroup contains powers and group commutators. Conversely, the quotient by the algebraic is an elementary abelian p-group; its nonzero elements are separated by linear maps to . Their kernels give maximal subgroups. This proves the finite Frattini subgroup formula.
Now take a pro-p group and put , retaining the closure of the algebraically generated subgroups. A maximal open subgroup is the preimage of a maximal subgroup of a finite -group quotient, so it contains . If , some finite quotient of the profinite group detects . That quotient is elementary abelian, and a linear functional nonzero at gives a continuous group homomorphism whose kernel is a maximal open subgroup missing . HenceThe closure bar is present in the original PDF; the converted TeX fraction is an extraction error.
For the finite-index assertion, first pass from the arbitrary abstract subgroup to its normal core of a subgroup . The action on the finitely many cosets of shows , without assuming that or is closed. Write with , and let . By Lagrange theorem, . For , the quotient is a finite p-group of order, say, . Choose an integer with . Thenso for every such . The set is the continuous image of the compact space , hence is closed. Consequently . Every element of the abstract finite quotient thus has order dividing . By Cauchy theorem for groups, no prime other than divides its order. Therefore , and its divisor , are powers of . This proof does not assume continuity of the finite quotient map.
To prove openness under finite generation, first establish commutator collection with fixed generators in nilpotent groups. If a nilpotent group is generated by , every element of isInduct on the nilpotency class . The assertion is trivial for . Apply the induction hypothesis in ; the remaining error lies in the central subgroup . Since commutators in this last layer are central, collecting against words in the expresses the error as with . Also . Thus replacing each by multiplies the desired product by precisely that central error, proving the formula.
Let now topologically generate . Every finite continuous quotient is a nilpotent group, so the formula holds there with these fixed generators. For , the sets of tuples solving are nonempty closed subsets of a compact space. They have the finite intersection property, by replacing finitely many by their intersection. A common tuple solves the equality in . It follows that the algebraic commutator subgroup is the compact image of under this product map, and is closed.
Its quotient is a topologically finitely generated abelian pro-p group. The continuous map taking to is onto, because its compact image contains a dense generating subgroup. Therefore is generated as an elementary abelian group by at most elements, and is compact. The preimage of is closed of finite index, hence open: its complement is a finite union of closed cosets. The finite-index result and the maximal-subgroup property of finite p-groups show that any abstract index- subgroup of is normal. It contains this open subgroup, so is itself open.
Finally, a finite-index normal subgroup has finite -group quotient. If , choose a normal index- subgroup in that quotient and call its preimage . The preceding argument makes open. An open subgroup of a finitely generated pro-p group is finitely generated: intersect a finitely generated dense abstract subgroup with , use the Schreier lemma, and observe that the intersection is dense in the open subgroup . Induction on now makes open in , hence in . Returning to the normal core of a subgroup, is a union of open cosets of . Every finite-index subgroup of a finitely generated pro-p group is open.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 iii Paper 5 3 Solution 2026-10-14
Here is odd. For a finite p-group, write . A powerfully embedded subgroup satisfies ; this also makes normal, since every conjugate of an element of differs from it by an element of . A powerful p-group is one with , namely one powerfully embedded in itself. Use and throughout.
The lower p-series is defined byEach quotient is an elementary abelian p-group, and . These are generated subgroups, without closure bars, because the group is finite.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 iii Paper 5 5 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
A topological group module is a topological abelian group with a jointly continuous action of by group automorphisms. Its continuous cochains with topological coefficients arewith pointwise addition. The inhomogeneous differential isFor , this means . Continuity of multiplication and of the action ensures that preserves continuous cochains. Expanding gives cancellation in pairs: the two orders of multiplying neighbouring arguments agree by associativity, and the two ways of applying the action agree by its action law. Thus . The cocycles are and the coboundaries are , with . DefineFor general topological coefficients this is an algebraic quotient of the continuous cochains; its optional quotient topology need not be Hausdorff. For discrete coefficients it is the usual continuous cohomology of a profinite group. In degree zero it is the subgroup of invariant elements.
Give the discrete prime field its trivial -action. The one-cocycle condition becomes and every one-coboundary is zero. HenceEvery such group homomorphism kills powers and group commutators, hence their closure , and every continuous functional on the quotient pulls back. If is topologically finitely generated, is a finite elementary abelian group. To verify finiteness without assuming it, the closure of a subgroup generated by elements of this abelian exponent- quotient has at most elements; a finite subgroup is already closed. Thus is a finite-dimensional vector space. Question 2 says that a generating family of is minimal precisely when its images give a basis of . The dual space has the same finite dimension. This proves
There is a genuine missing hypothesis if the printed assertion is read for arbitrary pro-p groups and means the least cardinality of any dense generating family. Here is an explicit infinite-rank failure of the first-cohomology generator formula. Let and . Enumerate the finite binary strings as and define if is a prefix of , and otherwise. For finitely many distinct sequences , choose long enough prefixes to distinguish each individually. The corresponding project onto the coordinate unit vectors of , so surjects onto every finite coordinate projection and is dense in the product topology. No finite family can generate densely, since a finitely generated abelian exponent- subgroup is finite and closed. Thus . On the other hand, continuity of a linear functional to means its kernel contains a basic neighbourhood, so it depends on finitely many coordinates. The coordinate projections are consequently a basis of the continuous dual space, givingThe unrestricted infinite-rank formula is false. A convention requiring a generating basis tending to the identity is different from the printed unrestricted topological generator count; the finite-rank identity proved above has no such ambiguity.
For finite , a free pro-p group is characterized by the universal property that every map to a pro-p group extends uniquely to a continuous group homomorphism . It is the pro-p completion of the abstract free group on : each map to a finite -group factors through one of the defining finite quotients, and passing to the inverse limit gives the extension to any pro-p group; uniqueness follows from density. This unrestricted universal property can also define the completion on an arbitrary set . When using an infinite basis required to tend to the identity, one instead imposes the universal property only for maps tending to the identity. Only the finite-rank version is needed for the following argument.
A finite pro-p presentation is an isomorphismThere are finitely many generators and finitely many relators, and the denominator is their closed normal closure. The relators are elements of the free pro-p group; they may be limits of ordinary words. That distinction is important when writing conjugation relations below.
Now suppose has a finite pro-p presentation with generators and relators . The quotient is a finite p-group. Choose a finite finite pro-p presentation . Such a presentation exists, for example by using its entire finite multiplication table. Lift the quotient generators to . For every , choose elements of the free pro-p group on the that map respectively to and in . Choose mapping to , which lies in . Form the finite finite pro-p presentationAll listed relations hold in , giving a continuous surjective group homomorphism : its compact image contains and maps onto .
Let be the closed subgroup of topologically generated by the . Both conjugation directions were included, so each normalizes . The also normalize it, and its closed normalizer contains the generators of . Thus . The relations give a continuous surjection . Its composite with induced by fixes every , and hence is the identity. Therefore the surjection is injective as well, so . On quotienting by , the conjugation and kernel relations disappear, and the remaining presentation is exactly . Thus is an isomorphism. The kernel of lies in and meets trivially, so is trivial. Consequently , proving
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 iii Paper 4 1 iii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
For a subset of a finite p-group, its images span the Frattini quotient precisely when . By the generating property proved in part (ii), this is equivalent to .
If is a minimal generating set of a group, its images must be an irredundant spanning set in the vector space . A linear dependence would express one image using the others; those other images would still span, so the other elements would still generate , a contradiction. Thus the images form a basis. Conversely lifts of a basis generate , and deleting a lift destroys spanning and hence generation.
This proves the Burnside basis theorem, including equality of sizes for every inclusion-minimal generating set of a group:Inclusion-minimal generating sets of a group need not have equal sizes in arbitrary finite groups; the elementary-abelian Frattini quotient is the essential p-group feature.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 iii Paper 4 1 ii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
For a finite group, define the Frattini subgroup bythe intersection is when there are no maximal subgroups, which for a finite group happens only for . A second definition is the set of non-generators: an element such that always implies .
If and , put in a maximal subgroup . Then , so . Conversely, if , some maximal subgroup omits it; maximality gives , although . This proves equivalence.
Every group automorphism permutes maximal subgroups, so is a characteristic subgroup, in particular a normal subgroup. Alsoa proper would lie in a maximal subgroup containing both factors.
Set and take a Sylow subgroup of . For , normality of makes a Sylow subgroup of . Conjugating inside therefore gives the Frattini argument factorization . The preceding generating property forces . Thus every Sylow subgroup of is normal, and part (i) shows that is a nilpotent group.
Now suppose is a finite p-group. The normalizer condition makes every maximal subgroup normal: and maximality force . The quotient has no proper nontrivial subgroup, hence is cyclic of prime order; its p-power order makes that prime . Consequently every such containswhere the two factors are the commutator subgroup and the subgroup generated by pth powers. Thus .
The quotient is an elementary abelian group, hence a vector space over . If , extend the nonzero vector to a basis and choose a linear functional nonzero on it. Its kernel pulls back to a subgroup of index , a maximal subgroup omitting . Therefore , provingThe two factors in the last formula are multiplied; the superscripted expression in the TeX aid is not the formula printed in the PDF.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 iii Paper 4 1 i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
A nilpotent group has a finite central seriesEquivalently the upper central series, defined by , reaches .
We first prove the normalizer condition for nilpotent groups. If , choose the least with . Then , and an element satisfies . Thus normalizes , giving .
Let be a Sylow subgroup of a finite nilpotent , and write . If , the normalizer condition gives some . The subgroups and are both Sylow subgroups of , so Sylow theorem supplies with . But then , forcing , a contradiction. Therefore every Sylow subgroup is a normal subgroup of .
For normal Sylow subgroups at different primes, . They commute, have coprime orders, and their product has order . Multiplication consequently gives an isomorphism from their external direct product of groups onto .
Conversely, a nontrivial finite p-group has nontrivial center of a group: its class equation has every noncentral conjugacy-class size divisible by , so is a positive multiple of . Induction on order, applied to , gives a central series for . Finite direct products of these central series give a central series for the product, padding shorter series by the full factor. Thus the finite nilpotent group decomposition is
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2013 ia Paper 3 8D Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-07
For a nontrivial finite p-group of order with , partition into conjugacy classes. A noncentral class has size , a positive power of larger than one by Lagrange's theorem. The class equation therefore saysThe center of a group contains the identity, so , proving its nontriviality. The positive-exponent qualification matters: the one-element group has no nonidentity central element.
If , its center of a group has order or . In the first case, the quotient group has prime order and is cyclic. Whenever a central quotient group is cyclic, writing all elements as with central shows that they commute: . Thus that case would already make Abelian and its center of a group all of , a contradiction. Hence every group of order is Abelian.
If there is an element of order , it is a generator of a group for , giving . Otherwise every nonidentity element has order . Pick and . Their cyclic subgroups have trivial intersection, and they commute; the distinct products exhaust . Hence the classification of groups of order p squared isBoth groups exist and are nonisomorphic, since only the first has an element of order .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 ia Paper 3 8D a Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-06
The identity belongs to the center of a group. If commute with every , then does too; rearranging also shows that commutes with . Hence is a subgroup. Moreover for , so it is a normal subgroup.
Suppose . The conjugation action partitions into conjugacy classes. The orbit-stabilizer theorem gives class size , where is the centralizer of . By Lagrange's theorem, this size is a power of ; it is one exactly when is central. Thus the class equation has the formIt follows that . Since the identity is central, , and thereforeThis is the nontrivial-centre property of a finite p-group.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 ia Paper 3 7D Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-06
For a group action of a finite group on a set and a point , the orbit-stabilizer theorem iswhere is the stabilizer subgroup. The map is well defined because elements of the same coset act identically on . If , then , so their cosets agree; every orbit point has the form , giving surjectivity. This is a bijection. Lagrange's theorem, for any subgroup , yields the counting formula.
Apply the conjugation action of the finite p-group to its nontrivial normal subgroup . Normality ensures the action stays inside . The singleton orbits of a group action are exactly the elements of . Every larger orbit of a group action has size a positive power of , by the orbit-stabilizer theorem and Lagrange's theorem. ThereforeSince is nontrivial, its order is divisible by . The intersection contains the identity and has cardinality a positive multiple of , so it contains a nonidentity element. This proves the central intersection property of normal subgroups of finite p-groups.
For the proper subgroup , let act by left multiplication on the left cosets . A coset is fixed by every exactly when . Both groups have the same finite size, so this inclusion is equality; the fixed cosets are precisely those with . Hence their number is . All non-singleton orbits of a group action have size divisible by , soSince is proper, is a positive power of greater than one. The fixed-coset count is nonzero, because itself is fixed, and is divisible by . Therefore the normalizer strictly contains :This is the normalizer condition for finite p-groups. The proof also covers , whose action fixes all cosets.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 ii Paper 4 20G c Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-03
Now let be prime and put and . The Eisenstein criterion applied at gives , while the discriminant of elements of a number field of its power basis iswhere . By the discriminant-index formula for an integral lattice, every prime dividing must therefore be .
Suppose . The finite abelian group is then a nontrivial finite p-group, so it contains an element of order . Consequently there is an such thatwith some not divisible by .
The polynomial is Eisenstein, so total ramification from an Eisenstein polynomial gives a unique prime ideal above with normalized discrete valuationLet be the least index for which . The term has valuation ; every earlier term has valuation at least , and every later term with coefficient prime to has a distinct, larger valuation. The non-Archimedean valuation therefore givesThis contradicts , since an algebraic integer has nonnegative valuation at every prime ideal. Thus , and
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 ib Paper 1 10G a Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-29
The group is a nontrivial finite p-group, so the nontrivial center of a finite p-group gives . If , then is already a nontrivial proper normal subgroup, so is not a simple group. If , then is abelian. By Cauchy's theorem for finite groups, it has a subgroup of order ; every subgroup of an abelian group is normal, and this subgroup is nontrivial and proper because . Thus in every case
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 ii Paper 2 19I b ii Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-03
Using the commutation relations, every element has a normal formOn squaring, equal generators cancel and every interchange contributes only the central element , so . There are at most normal forms, and every element has order dividing four. Hence is a finite p-group with , of order at most .
Powerfully embedded subgroup 2026-10-14
A normal subgroup is powerfully embedded in a finite p-group or pro-p group if for odd , or for ; use closed generated subgroups in the pro-p group case. The condition implies that is a powerful p-group. For odd , both and remain powerfully embedded.
Powerful p-group 2026-10-14
A finite p-group is powerful if for odd , or for . Here powers denote generated subgroups. The same definition applies to pro-p groups using closed power and commutator subgroups. Its Frattini subgroup is . For odd , successive power layers admit linear correction of roots, which makes every element of an actual th power.
Power lifting in a powerful p-group 2026-10-14
For odd , set and . Powerful embedding gives . Modulo , commutators with are central and have exponent dividing , so when . Also the power map is a surjective homomorphism. First find a root modulo , then multiply it by successive corrections in . The process terminates for a finite p-group, and converges for a pro-p group with separated power filtration. This proves that the generated power subgroup consists of actual powers.
Pro-p completion 2026-10-14
The inverse limit of the quotients of an abstract group by its normal subgroups of finite -power index. Maps to pro-p groups factor uniquely through the canonical dense image in this completion. Unlike profinite completion, only finite p-groups are used.
p-subgroup 2026-10-14
Every abstract subgroup of finite index in a finitely generated pro-p group is open. Fixed-generator commutator collection in nilpotent groups makes the abstract commutator subgroup closed. The resulting abelian quotient is a quotient of a finite power of the p-adic integers, so its subgroup of th powers is closed and of finite index. Thus the algebraic is open and every abstract index- subgroup is open. An arbitrary finite quotient is a finite p-group; induction on its order, using a normal subgroup of index and the Schreier lemma, gives the assertion. The normal core reduces nonnormal finite-index subgroups to this case.