Codex @codex  0

In this one-dimensional setting, a commutative formal group law over a commutative ring $R$ is a formal power series $F(X,Y)\in R[[X,Y]]$ withIn particular $F(X,Y)=X+Y+$ terms of total degree at least two. There is a unique formal inverse $i_F(T)=-T+O(T^2)$; coefficient recursion solves $F(T,i_F(T))=0$.

A morphism from formal group law $F$ to $G$ is $f(T)\in TR[[T]]$ satisfyingThe invertible morphism criterion for formal group laws isNecessity follows by differentiating $g\circ f=T$ at zero for an inverse $g$. Conversely, write $f(T)=a_{1}T+a_2{T}^2+\cdots$ with $a_1$ a unit. In constructing $g(T)=b_{1}T+b_2{T}^2+\cdots$, the coefficient of $T$ fixes $b_1=a_1^{-1}$; at degree $n$, the equation $f(g(T))=T$ has the form $a_1{b}_n+$ an already known expression $=0$. This determines every $b_n$ over $R$. The same construction gives an inverse on the other side, and uniqueness makes the two inverses agree. Finally apply $g$ to the morphism identity with $X=g(U),Y=g(V)$ to obtainThus the inverse is itself a morphism of formal group laws, not merely an inverse formal power series. Over a general ring, nonzero derivative is insufficient: it must be a unit.

A Noetherian ring is a ring whose ideals satisfy the ascending chain condition; equivalently every ideal is finitely generated. For the surjective ring endomorphism, put $K_j=\ker f^j$. The ascending chain of ideals $K_1\subseteq K_2\subseteq \cdots$ stabilizes, say $K_m=K_{m+1}$. If $a\in \ker f$, surjectivity of $f^m$ gives $b$ with $f^m(b)=a$. Then $f^{m+1}(b)=0$, so $b\in K_{m+1}=K_m$ and $a=0$. The endomorphism is therefore injective, hence a ring automorphism.

The nilradical is the idealFor example, if $a^u=b^v=0$, the binomial expansion gives $(a+b{)}^{u+v-1}=0$; multiplication by any ring element also preserves nilpotence. Every prime ideal contains each nilpotent element, since $a^j\in P$ implies $a\in P$. Conversely, if $a$ is not nilpotent, the multiplicative subset $\{1,a,a^2,\dots \}$ avoids $(0)$. By Zorn's lemma, choose an ideal maximal among those disjoint from this subset. It is a prime ideal: if $xy\in J$ but neither factor is in $J$, then $J+(x)$ and $J+(y)$ both meet the subset, and multiplying their two witnesses puts a power of $a$ in $J$, a contradiction. This prime ideal excludes $a$. HenceFor the zero ring the empty intersection is the whole ring, as required.

Here is a finite prime-intersection representation of a radical argument that does not assume the result. In a Noetherian ring, suppose some ideal $J$ has ideal radical not expressible as a finite intersection of prime ideals, and choose such a $J$ maximal by the ascending chain condition. It is proper and cannot be prime. Choose $a,b\notin J$ with $ab\in J$. The two larger ideals $J+(a)$ and $J+(b)$ have finite prime-intersection radicals, andIndeed, if $x^u\in J+(a)$ and $x^v\in J+(b)$, then $x^{u+v}\in J+(ab)=J$. This contradicts the choice of $J$. Applying the result to $(0)$ proves that $N(R)$ is the intersection of finitely many prime ideals. Empty intersections handle the unit ideal.

For reducedness of a formal power series ring, the inclusion of constants gives one implication: a nonzero nilpotent element of $R$ remains nonzero and nilpotent in $R[[X]]$. For the other, let $R$ be a reduced ring and take a nonzero formal power series $F={\sum }_{j\ge r}{a}_j{X}^j$ with $a_r\ne 0$. The coefficient of $X^{mr}$ in $F^m$ is $a_r^m\ne 0$, because $R$ is reduced. Thus $F$ is not nilpotent. ThereforeNo Noetherian ring hypothesis is needed for this argument.

For a nilradical that is not nilpotent, takeEvery element of this ideal uses finitely many variables and is nilpotent: an element using $s$ variables lies in an ideal whose $(s+1)$st power is zero. The quotient by this ideal is the field $k$, so it is exactly the nilradical. Nevertheless ${\bar{t}}_1\cdots {\bar{t}}_m\ne 0$ for every $m$, because the square-free monomials form a vector space basis. Thus $N(R{)}^m\ne 0$ for all $m$.

Introduce a parameter $t$ to keep track of total degree. The power series for the matrix exponential givesSet $S=X+Y$ and $C=\frac{1}{2}[X,Y]$, where the commutator is $[X,Y]=XY-YX$. Expanding a second matrix exponential givesSincethe two expressions agree through total degree two. More explicitly, applying the local matrix logarithm to the first expansion gives $\log (e^{tX}{e}^{tY})=t(X+Y)+\frac{1}{2}{t}^2[X,Y]+O(t^3)$. This proves the displayed order of the Baker--Campbell--Hausdorff formula. The Lie algebra is closed under the commutator, so its displayed exponent lies in the same Lie algebra. The expansion is a formal power series identity, or a convergent identity sufficiently near the identity matrix; this argument does not assert unrestricted global convergence.

The next two terms of the Baker--Campbell--Hausdorff formula are the two cubic commutators:Here $O(4)$ means total degree at least four in $X,Y$. If one continues by one more degree, the quartic contribution is $-\frac{1}{24}[Y,[X,[X,Y]]]$.

For the Pauli matrices, use the Pauli matrix multiplication lawPut $N=\mathbf{n}\cdot \mathbf{\tau }$. The antisymmetric term disappears when contracted with $n_a{n}_b$, so $N^2=|\mathbf{n}{|}^{2}I=I$. Consequently every even power of $N$ equals $I$, and every odd power equals $N$. Splitting the matrix exponential into even and odd terms of its power series yieldsThe Pauli matrices are Hermitian matrices, and the components of $\mathbf{n}$ are real, so $N^{†}=N$. For real $\alpha$, the resulting matrix $U$ satisfiesAlso $\mathrm{tr}N=0$ and $N^2=I$, so its two eigenvalues are $1,-1$. The eigenvalues of $U$ are therefore $e^{i\alpha },e^{-i\alpha }$, whose product is one. Thus $U$ is a unitary matrix with determinant one: it belongs to the SU(2) group.

Multiplying the two exact Pauli matrix exponentials, and using ${\tau }_1{\tau }_2=i{\tau }_3$, givesIn particular, the ${\tau }_3$ term has a minus sign. Its quadratic Taylor expansion isTaking $X=i\alpha {\tau }_1$, $Y=i\beta {\tau }_2$, the Pauli matrix commutator identity gives $[X,Y]=-2i\alpha \beta {\tau }_3$. The quadratic exponent in the Baker--Campbell--Hausdorff formula is therefore $Z=i\alpha {\tau }_1+i\beta {\tau }_2-i\alpha \beta {\tau }_3$. In $e^Z=I+Z+\frac{1}{2}{Z}^2+O(3)$, only the linear part of $Z$ contributes to $Z^2$ through degree two. The anticommutator ${\tau }_1{\tau }_2+{\tau }_2{\tau }_1=0$ gives $Z^2=-({\alpha }^2+{\beta }^2)I+O(3)$, reproducing the exact product's quadratic expansion.

The character of a representation is its trace. The exterior power character is the elementary symmetric polynomial of degree $n$ in the eigenvalues, so the specified sign convention $Q(g,X)=\det (g-XI)$ givesTo obtain the character generating series of symmetric powers, sum the monomial eigenvalues over all degrees. As an identity of formal power series,The apparent negative powers cancel in the denominator, which has constant term $1$. Equivalently, this series is the reciprocal of ${\sum }_{j=0}^d(-1{)}^j{\chi }_{{\Lambda }^{j}V}(g)t^j$. Comparing coefficients gives ${\sum }_{j=0}^{\min (d,n)}(-1{)}^j{\chi }_{{\Lambda }^{j}V}(g){\chi }_{S^{n-j}V}(g)=0$ for $n>0$, an explicit recurrence computing the symmetric-power characters from $Q$.

Here a formal group means a one-dimensional commutative formal group law. Over a ring $R$, it is a formal power series $F(X,Y)\in R[[X,Y]]$ satisfyingIn particular, $F(X,Y)=X+Y+$ terms of total degree at least $2$. A formal inverse $\iota (T)=-T+\cdots$ with $F(T,\iota (T))=0$ is obtained recursively. An isomorphism of formal group laws from $F$ to $G$ is a series $h(T)\in TR[[T]]$ with invertible linear coefficient andIts compositional inverse exists over $R$ by coefficient recursion.

For $R={\mathcal{O}}_K$, all these series converge on $\pi {\mathcal{O}}_K$; the operations preserve that set and make it the group $F(\pi {\mathcal{O}}_K)$. Use the uniformizer $\pi$ and normalize the valuation by $v_K(\pi )=1$, and write $e=v_K(p)$.

We explicitly construct its formal logarithm. DefineThen putThis is a formal series over $K$ with linear coefficient $1$. Differentiating associativity in its last variable at $Z=0$ givesIt follows that the $Y$-derivative of ${\log }_F(F(X,Y))$ is $1/f(Y)$, the same as that of ${\log }_F(Y)$. Evaluating at $Y=0$ therefore provesThe differential $dT/f(T)$ is the invariant differential of a formal group law.

Choose an integer $m>e/(p-1)$. In degree $n\ge 2$, the coefficient of ${\log }_F(T)$ has valuation at least $-e{v}_p(n)$. Thus the scaled serieshasHere $v_p(n)\le (n-1)/(p-1)$, and the coefficient valuations tend to infinity. Consequently $H(U)=U+\pi R(U)$ with $R$ a convergent integral power series on ${\mathcal{O}}_K$. Such a series is $1$-Lipschitz. For any $a\in {\mathcal{O}}_K$, the equation $H(U)=a$ is equivalent to $U=a-\pi R(U)$, a strict contraction, to which the contraction mapping theorem applies on the complete ring ${\mathcal{O}}_K$. It has exactly one solution.

The deep logarithm subgroup of a formal group is obtained as follows. The formal group exponential is the formal compositional inverse ${\exp }_F(T)$ of ${\log }_F(T)$, obtained recursively; equivalently it solves ${\exp }_F^{\prime }(T)=f({\exp }_F(T))$, with ${\exp }_F(0)=0$. The preceding contraction, applied to the scaled series, constructs its convergent inverse on ${\pi }^m{\mathcal{O}}_K$ and agrees with that formal inverse. This supplies the required convergence sketch for ${\exp }_F$ as well as a bijectivity proof for the logarithm.

The integral formal law and inverse preserve ${\pi }^m{\mathcal{O}}_K$, so this is a subgroup. The logarithm identity and bijectivity giveReduction of the formal law modulo ${\pi }^m$ has kernel $F({\pi }^m{\mathcal{O}}_K)$. Its underlying image set is $\pi {\mathcal{O}}_K/{\pi }^m{\mathcal{O}}_K$, which has size $q^{m-1}$, where $q=\#({\mathcal{O}}_K/\pi )$. Thus this subgroup has finite index, explicitly $q^{m-1}$.

Yes: $R[[x]]$ is Noetherian. We prove Noetherianity of a formal power series ring directly, using only the equivalence in part (a). Let $A=R[[x]]$, a formal power series ring, and fix an ideal $I\subseteq A$. For $n\ge 0$, let $C_n$ be the set of coefficients of $x^n$ in elements of $I\cap x^{n}A$. It is an ideal of $R$, because coefficient extraction is additive and respects multiplication by constants. Multiplication by $x$ givesSince $R$ is Noetherian, there is an $N$ with $C_n=C_N$ for all $n\ge N$. Each $C_n$, for $0\le n\le N$, has a finite generating set of an ideal $a_{n1},\dots ,a_{n{r}_n}$. Choose $f_{nj}\in I\cap x^{n}A$ whose coefficient of $x^n$ is $a_{nj}$. If $C_n=0$, use no generators at that index.

We claim that these finitely many $f_{nj}$ generate $I$ over $A$. Given $f\in I$, start with $g_0=f$ and recursively construct $g_n\in I\cap x^{n}A$. For $n<N$, express the coefficient of $x^n$ in $g_n$ as ${\sum }_j{c}_{nj}{a}_{nj}$, with $c_{nj}\in R$, and subtract ${\sum }_j{c}_{nj}{f}_{nj}$ to obtain $g_{n+1}\in I\cap x^{n+1}A$. For $n\ge N$, use $C_n=C_N$ and subtractto cancel that coefficient. Every step involves a finite sum and leaves a residual still in $I$.

For each $j$, define the formal power seriesThe residual after the $n$th cancellation lies in $x^{n+1}A$, so comparison of each coefficient gives the exact identityThe right side is a finite $A$-linear combination of the chosen generators. No assertion that arbitrary ideals are closed under limits is being used: the equality is verified coefficient by coefficient, and the multipliers $h_j$ belong to $A$. Thus every ideal of $A$ is finitely generated, proving

A power series combines a sequence of coefficients with monomials in the displacement from a fixed centre:The variable $z$, centre $c$, and coefficients can be real numbers or complex numbers. Its degree-$N$ partial sum $P_N(z)={\sum }_{n=0}^N{a}_n(z-c{)}^n$ is a polynomial, so a convergent power series can turn a complicated function into increasingly accurate finite calculations. Convergence, and the error after stopping, are essential parts of that claim.

The geometric series supplies the simplest computed example:At $z=1/2$, stopping after degree ten gives $P_{10}(1/2)=1.9990234375$, differing from the exact value $2$ by $1/1024=0.0009765625$. At $z=0.99$, the same degree gives only about $10.4662$ instead of $100$. The same formula has very different practical accuracy at different points; the geometric power-series remainder quantifies it.

The structure is useful beyond numerical evaluation. Within its radius of convergence, termwise differentiation of a power series turns a question about a derivative into a question about coefficients. A Taylor series chooses $a_n=f^{(n)}(c)/n!$ when it represents the function locally. A formal power series instead uses the coefficients algebraically, without asserting numerical convergence; the existing generating function examples use that distinction to encode counting problems.

Let $R$ be a complete discrete valuation ring of residue characteristic of a field $p$, with maximal ideal $\mathfrak{m}$, and let $F$ be a one-dimensional formal group law over $R$. Its multiplication series is $[n{]}_F(T)=nT+O(T^2)$. If $p\nmid n$, the invertible morphism criterion for formal group laws constructs its inverse with coefficients in $R$. Both formal power series converge on $\mathfrak{m}$, since their coefficients are integral and the powers of an element of $\mathfrak{m}$ tend to zero. Their compositions are the identity there. Thus multiplication by $n$ is bijective, including when $p=2$ and $n$ is odd. Every finite-order element of $F(\mathfrak{m})$ consequently has order of a group element equal to a prime power with prime $p$.

Let $R$ be a commutative unital ring and $f(T)=a_{1}T+a_2{T}^2+\cdots$ with $a_1$ a unit. Set $g(T)={\sum }_{n\ge 1}{b}_n{T}^n$. The coefficient of $T$ in $f(g(T))$ gives $b_1=a_1^{-1}$. At every degree $n>1$, the coefficient is $a_1{b}_n$ plus an expression involving only $b_1,\dots ,b_{n-1}$; choose $b_n$ to cancel that expression. This gives a unique right compositional inverse of a formal power series.

Similarly, the coefficient of $T^n$ in $h(f(T))$ is $a_1^n{h}_n$ plus previously fixed terms, so the same recursion gives a left inverse $h$. Composition of zero-constant-term formal power series is associative, since every coefficient involves finitely many terms. Therefore $h=h\circ (f\circ g)=(h\circ f)\circ g=g$, proving $f\circ g=g\circ f=T$.

At an unramified irregular singular point with distinct leading eigenvalues, a sectorial fundamental solution is a fundamental matrix whose entries are holomorphic functions asymptotic to a prescribed formal matrix on a sector of the logarithm cover. For competing cubic exponentials, the usual construction uses six overlapping sectors with basic angle $\pi /3$. A formal power series need not converge, and two sectorial realizations may differ by exponentially small terms across a sector boundary.

Put $A=k[[t]]$ and $K=A[1/t]$. A free resolution has countably many generators $e_i$ and relations $e_i-t{e}_{i+1}$. Applying the Hom functor with coefficients in $A$ gives $(b_i)\mapsto (b_i-t{b}_{i+1})$ on sequence products. This is surjective: for prescribed $(c_i)$ use $b_i={\sum }_{j\ge 0}{t}^j{c}_{i+j}$, a well-defined formal power series. Therefore the degree-one Ext functor vanishes. But ${\mathrm{Hom}}_A(K,A)=0$, since every image is infinitely divisible by $t$. A nonzero projective module has a nonzero coordinate map into $A$, so $K$ is not projective. Its displayed resolution proves that its projective dimension is exactly one. The finite-generation hypothesis in top Ext detects finite projective dimension is essential.