Fourier's law ($\mathbf{q}=-k\nabla T$)

Fourier's law predicts the local conductive heat flux from the local temperature gradient. In a continuum approximation with isotropic thermal conductivity $k>0$, its vector form and one-dimensional form areThe heat flux $q$ has units $\mathrm{W}{\mathrm{m}}^{-2}$, the temperature gradient has units $\mathrm{K}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$ and the thermal conductivity has units $\mathrm{W}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}{\mathrm{K}}^{-1}$. The rate of heat transfer $\dot{Q}$ has units $\mathrm{W}$. These units distinguish a local material response from the total power crossing a surface.

The minus sign makes heat flow toward lower temperature: for $k>0$, $\mathbf{q}\cdot \nabla T=-k|\nabla T{|}^2\le 0$. In the worked bar in thermal conduction, $dT/dx=-200\mathrm{K}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$ therefore gives $q=+400\mathrm{W}{\mathrm{m}}^{-2}$. Reversing the end temperatures reverses the heat flux. A zero temperature gradient gives zero conductive heat flux in this model.

Fourier's law is a constitutive relation expressing measured material behavior; it is not a consequence of conservation of energy alone. It applies locally and does not require a steady state. The straight-line bar solution additionally assumes constant thermal conductivity, constant cross-sectional area, no sources or side losses, and fixed end temperatures. Anisotropic materials require the directional response described by the thermal conductivity tensor. The scalar $k$ used in the examples expresses the stated isotropy assumption. ^[ref]

Historically, Joseph Fourier's Théorie analytique de la chaleur was published in 1822. In Chapter II, article 112, he writes the heat crossing a spherical surface as the product of thermal conductivity, elapsed time, surface area and the negative radial temperature gradient; article 113 balances the incoming and outgoing heat to obtain the heat equation for a sphere. The enduring idea is this connection between a local flow rule and a global prediction of changing temperature. ^{[ref] [ref]}

Thermal conductivity is the material response coefficient in Fourier's law. For an isotropic material it is a scalar $k$, with units $\mathrm{W}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}{\mathrm{K}}^{-1}$; larger positive $k$ means a larger conductive heat flux for the same temperature gradient. It can depend on temperature and composition. Direction-dependent response in an anisotropic material is described by a thermal conductivity tensor. The two worked examples use stipulated positive constants, rather than measured values for named materials.

Thermal conductivity describes material response, whereas thermal resistance also includes geometry: for the steady bar, $R_{\mathrm{th}}=L/(kA)$. Doubling $k$ at fixed length, cross-sectional area and end temperatures halves thermal resistance and doubles the rate of heat transfer. Doubling length changes thermal resistance without changing the material's thermal conductivity. This distinction lets a designer improve cooling either by choosing a higher thermal conductivity or by shortening and widening the path. It also explains why the less conductive layer in thermal resistance takes the greater temperature drop.

Thermal diffusivity answers a different question: how rapidly a temperature disturbance spreads. Its usual model $\kappa =k/(\rho c_p)$ also involves mass density $\rho$ and specific heat capacity $c_p$, so equal thermal conductivities need not imply equal rates of warming.

In an isotropic near-equilibrium quasiparticle transport picture, an angular average of squared velocity components supplies the factor1/3. Mode-resolved heat capacities times $v_g^2\tau$ then sum to thermal conductivity. Replacing them by $C⟨v⟩\ell /3$ is a characteristic-scale approximation, not an exact product of separately chosen averages. A solid can use this kinetic structure because mobile phonon and electron excitations transport energy even when the constituent atoms remain localized.

The Wiedemann-Franz law relates the electronic thermal conductivity of a normal degenerate metal to its electrical conductivity:An isotropic kinetic theory estimate gives $K_e=c_e{v}_F^2{\tau }_Q/3$. With electronic heat capacity density $c_e={\pi }^{2}n{k}_B^{2}T/(2E_F)$, $v_F^2=2E_F/m^{\ast }$ and $\sigma =n{e}^2{\tau }_{\sigma }/m^{\ast }$, the ratio is $L_0{\tau }_Q/{\tau }_{\sigma }$. Approximately elastic scattering with a smooth energy dependence gives equal heat and charge relaxation times. Inelastic electron-phonon scattering can make them different; the law also concerns the electronic contribution, not additional lattice heat conduction.^[ref]

For a degenerate isotropic parabolic electron band, electrical conductivity is $\sigma =n{e}^2{\tau }_{\sigma }/m$ and electronic thermal conductivity is ${\kappa }_e={\pi }^{2}n{k}_B^{2}T{\tau }_{\kappa }/(3m)$. Their ratio is ${\kappa }_e/(\sigma T)=L_0{\tau }_{\kappa }/{\tau }_{\sigma }$, where $L_0=({\pi }^2/3)(k_B/e{)}^2$ is the Lorenz number. Nearly elastic scattering that relaxes charge and heat currents similarly gives ${\tau }_{\kappa }\simeq {\tau }_{\sigma }$ and the Wiedemann-Franz law. Inelastic scattering can relax heat current and directed momentum differently, invalidating the simplest identification even in a good metal.

The Lorenz number is the ratio $L=K_e/(\sigma T)$. The Sommerfeld value $L_0=({\pi }^2/3)(k_B/e{)}^2\simeq 2.44\times 10^{-8}\mathrm{W}\mathrm{\Omega }{\mathrm{K}}^{-2}$ applies under the assumptions of the Wiedemann-Franz law. The ratio must use electronic thermal conductivity if lattice heat flow is appreciable.

The thermal conductivity tensor maps a temperature gradient to the negative heat-flux density. In passive reciprocal conduction it is symmetric positive definite. This permits direction-dependent transport while ensuring positive dissipated energy.