For a plane domain, the following are equivalent descriptions of a simply connected domain: every based loop contracts in the domain with its basepoint fixed; any two paths with the same endpoints are homotopic while those endpoints stay fixed; its complement in the Riemann sphere is connected; every holomorphic function has a single-valued primitive; and every nowhere-zero holomorphic function has a holomorphic logarithm. The complement must be taken in the extended plane, including infinity. An equivalent winding number formulation is that every closed curve has index zero about every point outside the domain.
Here is a direct equivalence proof for the first two topological formulations. If all paths with given endpoints are homotopic relative to those endpoints, apply this to a loop based at and the constant path at , obtaining a contraction. Conversely, let join to . The loop contracts with basepoint fixed. Concatenating this contraction with produces a homotopy from to , relative to . The middle retracing excursion contracts by shortening its traversal in both directions, giving a homotopy from that first path to . Hence and are homotopic relative to their endpoints. Planar domains are path-connected, so no extra path-component condition is needed.
The analytic descriptions follow from path independence of the holomorphic integral. Local primitives exist on discs by integrating power series; a homotopy can be subdivided into pieces lying in such discs, and local path integrals cancel along its common edges. Thus integrals over homotopic paths agree, giving a global primitive. Applied to for a nowhere-zero function, a primitive makes constant and hence supplies a holomorphic logarithm. These observations are also the tools used in the mapping proof below.
The Riemann mapping theorem states that every nonempty simply connected proper domain admits a conformal bijection onto the unit disc. Given , there is exactly one such map with and . The exclusion of the whole plane is necessary: an entire map into the disc would be constant by Liouville's theorem.
An extremal proof has the following concrete steps. First construct an injective bounded holomorphic map. Choose and a holomorphic square root of . It is injective, since equality of its values implies equality of their squares. Its image is disjoint from its negative: would imply and then , impossible. If , choose with ; the disc is omitted. Therefore is injective and bounded. Scaling it and applying an automorphism of the unit disk gives a map into the disc taking to zero; a rotation makes its derivative positive.
Let consist of all injective maps with this normalization. It is nonempty. The derivative at is bounded above by the Cauchy integral formula on a small disc compactly contained in . Choose with derivatives tending to their positive supremum . Boundedness, the Cauchy estimates and a diagonal Arzelà-Ascoli theorem argument give a subsequence converging locally uniformly to ; this is the bounded-family form of the Montel theorem. Then , , and the maximum modulus principle puts its image in the open disc. The limit is injective: if distinct had , apply Hurwitz's theorem near to , which has no zero there; the limit would vanish identically, contradicting .
Finally suppose is omitted by . It is nonzero since . Let and choose a holomorphic square root of . It is injective and takes values in the disc. Put , so , and normalize by a rotation. The new map's derivative magnitude at is
This square-root improvement of a normalized conformal map contradicts extremality. Thus is onto. Two normalized bijections differ by a disc automorphism fixing zero; Schwarz lemma applied to it and its inverse makes it a rotation, and positivity of the normalized derivatives forces that rotation to be the identity. This completes the requested proof outline.
On the right half-plane a single-valued holomorphic logarithm is , with , and its derivative is . Thus
This proves the conclusion directly from the integral definition of the winding number, without appealing to its homotopy invariance.
The zero-prescription claim requires a closed discrete subset, meaning no accumulation in . If “discrete” means only that each listed point is isolated, it is false: is a discrete subset, but any holomorphic function vanishing there is identically zero by the identity theorem for holomorphic functions, and then has additional zeros. In the usual zero-set interpretation, discreteness includes local finiteness. We prove the claim with this necessary interpretation.
First choose an increasing compact exhaustion of by relatively filled sets: every component of meets . Such an exhaustion is obtained by exhausting with finite unions of small closed squares lying in , then adding all complementary components relatively compact in . The filled sets remain compact in : a complementary component containing a point within distance of the complement could join that complement through a ball disjoint from , and hence would not be filled. Their boundedness follows by using a disk containing the initial compact. Nesting can be ensured by enlarging each stage first. This is also the geometric description of the holomorphic convex hull proved below.
A finite prescribed set is realized by a finite product of linear factors. For an infinite closed discrete subset, enumerate the distinct points as . Every compact contains only finitely many of them, so there are indices with . Finitely many initial factors can be handled without an approximation requirement. For the remaining factors, let be the complementary component containing . It also contains a point or infinity. Join to by an arc in that component, or to infinity by a ray-like arc. Define
Each is a holomorphic function on , has exactly one simple zero, at , and no other zeros there.
The arc is disjoint from , and has a holomorphic logarithm near that compact. To justify the logarithm, any closed curve avoiding the arc has equal winding numbers about its finite endpoints, so the integral of around it is zero. For a ray to infinity the winding number about is zero. A primitive of , adjusted by a constant on each component, supplies the logarithm.
The Runge theorem proved in Question 4 approximates uniformly on by : all needed finite poles can be chosen outside because every complementary component meets its complement. Choose the error small enough that
Each still has exactly the simple zero . On every fixed compact, all sufficiently late factors satisfy the summable bound above. Hence their infinite product converges locally uniformly. It has a nonzero tail because, once , its logarithmic tails satisfy and converge absolutely. Thus multiplying by the finitely many earlier factors gives a holomorphic function with precisely the prescribed zeros, and no additional zeros. Repeating a factor to any prescribed finite positive multiplicity gives the corresponding multiplicity version. This is prescribed zeros in a plane domain via Runge approximation, not an invocation of the existence theorem being asked for.
For the specified infinite product, put . On any compact annulus ,
The logarithmic-tail estimate therefore proves locally uniform convergence on and nonvanishing wherever no individual factor vanishes. At a zero of one factor, the product is zero and the remaining product converges to a nonzero value. Consequently
All these zeros are simple and distinct: their moduli distinguish the two strings and their indices. At the reciprocal factors are undefined, so the given expression has no convergence value there. The infinite sequence of zeros tending to zero also rules out continuation across that point as a holomorphic function.
Set . Absolute local convergence allows reindexing:
Since , for every . No division by a vanishing factor is involved, so the identity also holds at all the zeros.
Choose centred charts so the coordinate expression satisfies . On a component where the map is nonconstant, the identity theorem makes nonconstant. Its Taylor expansion factors as , with and . In a sufficiently small disc, choose a holomorphic logarithm of , and hence a holomorphic th root with . The function has nonzero derivative at zero. The holomorphic inverse function theorem, which says that a holomorphic function with nonzero derivative has a holomorphic local inverse, makes it a valid new source coordinate. In that coordinate,
If the map is bijective, local injectivity forces : for , a small nonzero value has distinct preimages in this local disc. The inverse is therefore holomorphic in a neighbourhood of every point, and the local inverses agree, proving the map is biholomorphic. The nonconstant hypothesis must apply to the component containing if disconnected Riemann surfaces are allowed; otherwise a constant component is an exception to the proposed local form.
The complement of is nonempty and closed. Take points in that complement with . This sequence is bounded, so a subsequence converges to a point . Continuity of distance gives .
Put . On the indicated exterior region , and lies in the right half-plane. Its principal holomorphic logarithm is therefore the power series
On each compact subset of that region, , so the series has locally uniform convergence by comparison with . It does not converge uniformly on the whole region: choose with . Then ; as , tends to minus infinity while each fixed partial sum stays bounded. In particular, the remainder after any fixed number of terms is unbounded.
The boundary-adapted holomorphic zero factor is holomorphic throughout , since its only possible denominator singularity is at . The exponential never vanishes, so its only zero is , and
On , cancellation of the first logarithmic terms gives a holomorphic logarithm of this zero-free restriction with
Choose so that the final bound is smaller than the prescribed error. This logarithm is only asserted on the exterior region; a function with a zero cannot have a logarithm on all of .
For each , construct a boundary-adapted holomorphic zero factor whose logarithmic error is smaller than . If is compact, write . For all sufficiently large , for every . Hence converges absolutely and uniformly on after discarding finitely many terms. Consequently
is a holomorphic function. Its tail is the exponential of a convergent logarithmic sum and is nonzero. The finite initial product has precisely its prescribed simple zeros. Since , only finitely many lie in any compact subset of , and this proves that has exactly the desired simple zeros.
For the final meromorphic function assertion, poles escaping to infinity need additional care: a locally finite pole sequence need not satisfy . Here is the required extension of the product argument. Split the distinct poles into two sets according as
In the first set, for each the poles with are in a bounded closed subset lying at least from the complement. Local finiteness makes this a finite set. Thus the boundary distances tend to zero. In the second set, poles in are at least from the complement, so there are finitely many of them. Thus their moduli tend to infinity.
Use the preceding factors for the first set. For the second set use the Weierstrass elementary factors
For these have the same logarithmic-tail bound as above. If a pole has order , choose the factor's error smaller than and raise it to the power . A possible pole at zero is handled by a finite polynomial factor. On every compact subset the resulting logarithmic tails are uniformly summable, so their product is holomorphic with zeros of exactly the pole orders and no other zeros. If is the original meromorphic function, the product extends holomorphically across every pole. Writing that extension as gives the concise conclusion
A hyperbolic Riemann surface in potential theory is a noncompact Riemann surface admitting a positive Green function on a Riemann surface. With pole , this is a positive function harmonic off , having local form plus a harmonic function in a coordinate , and obtained as the minimal such positive function by exhaustion. This is a noncircular definition for the present proof. For a simply connected surface it is equivalent to disk conformal type; for arbitrary surfaces potential-theoretic hyperbolicity and disk universal-cover type should be distinguished.
The unit disk is an example. At pole zero its function is : it is positive in the punctured disk, harmonic there, has the correct logarithmic singularity, and tends to zero at the boundary. If another positive function has the same singularity and is harmonic elsewhere, subtract and apply the maximum principle for harmonic functions on disks of radius ; the boundary lower bound is . Letting shows that the other function dominates . Thus is indeed the positive Green function on a Riemann surface. At a general pole it is
Here is a Green-function exhaustion proof of disk uniformization. The main analytic idea is to build conformal maps on bordered disks from their Green functions and pass to an extremal limit. The positive global Green function prevents that limit from becoming constant.
First exhaust the noncompact simply connected surface by relatively compact domains containing , each with a smooth Jordan boundary. This topological step does not use conformal uniformization: take regular neighborhoods of finitely many coordinate disks covering successive compact sets and fill bounded complementary components. Simple connectedness and the Jordan curve theorem make the filled neighborhoods topological disks; enlarge them to be nested.
Each has a zero-boundary Green function on a Riemann surface . One analytic construction, independent of conformal uniformization, is as follows. Equip the compact bordered domain with a smooth conformal metric. Multiply by a smooth cutoff function equal to one near and zero near the boundary; call the result . Distributionally
where is smooth and supported away from . Solve with zero boundary data. This auxiliary Dirichlet problem can be obtained by minimizing over functions with zero boundary trace: the Poincaré inequality gives coercivity, minimization in a Hilbert space gives a weak solution, and interior and smooth-boundary elliptic regularity give a smooth solution. Then is harmonic away from , has the logarithmic pole, and vanishes at the boundary. It is positive by the maximum principle for harmonic functions, applied after removing a sufficiently small circle around its positive pole. This construction uses ordinary linear elliptic existence, not the desired uniformization theorem. Equivalently, the same bordered-domain Green functions can be constructed by the Perron method for the Dirichlet problem using local logarithmic barriers.
On choose local harmonic conjugates . Their period around the pole is , and every closed loop is homologous to an integer multiple of that loop. Therefore
is a single-valued holomorphic function. It extends across with one simple zero and has no others. Since , ; since on the boundary, there. Thus is proper. For any , choose a smooth interior contour sufficiently close to the boundary that everywhere on it. The contour surrounds and all possible preimages of , because throughout a thin boundary collar. By Rouché's theorem, has the same number of zeros inside as , namely one. Hence is onto and one-to-one, with nonzero derivative: it is a biholomorphism from to the disk.
Write near
Multiply by a unit constant so that, in the fixed coordinate, . Domain monotonicity gives : their difference is harmonic even at and nonnegative on . The global positive Green function on a Riemann surface similarly majorizes every . Comparing the regular parts shows that increases and is bounded above by the finite regular part of at . Consequently
On each fixed compact subdomain, the are eventually bounded holomorphic functions. Montel theorem and a diagonal subsequence therefore give a locally uniform convergence limit with and . The maximum modulus principle keeps its values strictly inside the disk. It is injective: for fixed , the functions have no zeros away from ; Hurwitz's theorem implies that their nonconstant limit has no other zeros. This is the locally uniform limit of univalent functions argument.
There is also an extremality property. For any holomorphic function with , the function is a disk self-map fixing zero. The Schwarz lemma gives . Passing to the limit yields .
Finally suppose omits . Necessarily . Apply the disk Möbius transformation . The nowhere-zero function has a global holomorphic logarithm because is simply connected, hence a holomorphic square root . It maps into the disk and . Normalize it by setting , so . Direct differentiation gives
The strict inequality follows from . This contradicts extremality. Therefore omits no point, and we conclude
For the unrestricted zero sequence, introduce the Weierstrass elementary factors
For , cancellation of the first terms of the logarithm power series gives a holomorphic logarithm of the factor:
Define the canonical product
Fix any compact disc . Since , eventually uniformly on this disc. The tail logarithms are then bounded by , a summable bound independent of . Their sum is holomorphic by locally uniform convergence of holomorphic functions, and its exponential is nowhere zero. Multiplication by the finite initial product therefore gives an entire function. Each factor has a simple zero exactly at its specified , the exponential factor has none, and a tail beginning beyond any given compact disc is nonvanishing there. Thus has precisely the prescribed zeros and no others, each simple, and . This proves the required existence without an assumption on .
For the final, unheaded product request, suppose now that . On , all sufficiently late factors have , so part (a) bounds their principal complex logarithms by . The logarithms converge absolutely and uniformly; infinite product convergence from logarithmic tails proves that
is entire and again has exactly the prescribed simple zeros. For its finite partial products,
Passing to the limit proves
In particular is an entire function of exponential type. This argument uses a valid modulus estimate and does not require the false logarithm assertion in part (c).
For a positive integer , a Dirichlet character modulo is a group homomorphism , extended periodically to the integers and set equal to zero on integers not coprime to . Its nonzero values are roots of unity. For , its Dirichlet L-function is the absolutely convergent Dirichlet series
Complete multiplicativity of proves the Euler product by expanding each factor as a geometric series and applying unique integer factorization; absolute convergence justifies these rearrangements.
Suppose is a nonprincipal Dirichlet character. Choose a unit with . Multiplication by permutes a complete residue system, so , and the sum is zero. Consequently is bounded: complete periods contribute zero and the remaining incomplete period has at most terms. The Abel summation formula gives, initially for ,
For the integral converges, locally uniformly together with its derivatives in , because on a compact set with the differentiated integrands are bounded by constants times . Thus holomorphy of a Dirichlet series from bounded partial sums proves
For a nonreal , the character is also nonprincipal. The supplied logarithmic Euler product yields, for real ,
At a prime dividing the numerator is . At every other prime put ; then the numerator is . This Euler product positivity for L-function nonvanishing proves that the product inside the logarithm is at least one. If , its holomorphy would give . Meanwhile is bounded near one and the Riemann zeta function has a simple pole there. The product would therefore be and tend to zero, a contradiction.
For a real nonprincipal , suppose instead that . The product would then be holomorphic on the whole half-plane , because the zero cancels the only zeta pole there. In it has coefficients
These are nonnegative zeta-times-real-L coefficients. They are multiplicative, and their prime-power values are if , one or zero according as is even or odd if , and one if . In particular and for every .
The Taylor series of the assumed holomorphic about converges in the disk . Termwise differentiation of its absolutely convergent Dirichlet series at gives . Evaluate the Taylor series at and apply the Tonelli theorem to the resulting nonnegative terms:
This contradicts holomorphy at . The argument is the positive-coefficient mechanism of the Landau theorem for a Dirichlet series with nonnegative coefficients, with the needed step proved explicitly. Combining the real and nonreal cases gives the nonvanishing of a nonprincipal Dirichlet L-function at one:
Now let be coprime to . The Dirichlet theorem on primes in arithmetic progressions asserts that infinitely many prime numbers satisfy . To prove it, separate the first-power terms in the given logarithmic Euler product:
For , the remainder is bounded uniformly by
For a nonprincipal character, holomorphy and nonvanishing near one give a local holomorphic logarithm. Along a short real interval to the right of one, this logarithm and the supplied continuous logarithm differ by a fixed integer multiple of . Hence the prime-character sum near one is bounded:
For the principal Dirichlet character ,
The latter follows from the simple zeta pole and the bounded remainder. Finally Orthogonality of Dirichlet characters gives
Here is the Euler totient function. The right-hand side tends to infinity as , whereas a finite set of primes would give a bounded left-hand side. Therefore
For a nonzero holomorphic function, isolated boundary zeros produce only integrable logarithmic singularities: locally a zero of multiplicity contributes plus a bounded term. Thus the circle means below are well-defined. The identically zero function may be assigned .
1. Multiplication. The pointwise identity gives by integration, with the same extended interpretation if a factor is identically zero.
2. Zero-free normalized functions. Compactness lets us choose a slightly larger open disc on which is holomorphic and zero-free. On this simply connected disc, has a holomorphic primitive normalized by . Differentiating shows it is constant and equal to , so and is a holomorphic logarithm of . The Cauchy integral formula gives
Taking real parts, using , proves . For a zero-free function with arbitrary nonzero value at zero, applying this to gives .
3. Disc factors. For ,
as follows by expansion and . The denominator's possible zero is at , outside the closed disc; when it is constant. Thus the given Blaschke factor is holomorphic on a neighbourhood of the disc, has modulus one on its boundary and satisfies .
For the general formula, a nonzero entire function has finitely many zeros in the compact disc: an infinite set would have an accumulation point in a holomorphic neighbourhood and the identity theorem would make the function zero identically. List its interior zeros with multiplicities. When , divide by their factors to obtain a holomorphic function zero-free on a neighbourhood of the disc. The preceding parts give , while . Hence Jensen's formula is
The source does not explicitly rule out a zero at zero in this general step. If its order there is and with , the correct version is
Thus a formula using alone requires the indicated nonzero-centre assumption.
Finally, the lattice hypothesis forces quadratic exponential growth. For , all integer pairs with lie inside the disc of radius . Excluding zero, there are at least such points, and each contributes at least to Jensen's sum. Therefore
for boundary-zero-free radii, with the additional nonnegative term if needed. For all sufficiently large such radii, this is at least . Choose avoiding zero moduli and choose on each circle where is maximal. The logarithm of this circle maximum is at least the logarithmic circle mean, so
This proves lattice zeros force quadratic exponential growth; the smaller constant makes the required inequality strict.
The Schwarz-Pick lemma says that every holomorphic self-map of the unit disc contracts pseudohyperbolic distance and therefore hyperbolic distance:
Its infinitesimal form is
Equality for distinct points in the distance inequality, or at one point in the derivative inequality, holds exactly when is a disc Möbius transformation.
For completeness, first prove the Schwarz lemma. If is holomorphic and , the quotient extends holomorphically at zero. On its modulus is at most . The maximum modulus principle, followed by , gives and . Equality at a nonzero point or in the derivative forces that quotient to be a constant of modulus one, again by the maximum modulus principle; hence .
Now let and apply this result to , which fixes zero. The modulus inequality is exactly the displayed distance inequality, and is increasing in , giving hyperbolic contraction. Also and , so the chain rule proves the derivative inequality. The equality statement follows from the rotation case of the Schwarz lemma after undoing the two automorphisms. Conversely a disc automorphism preserves the distance and attains equality.
There is a maximum of the derivative modulus in the given annulus family, which is nonempty because it contains the constant function one. Indeed the functions are bounded by , and Cauchy estimates bound their derivatives at zero. Take a sequence whose derivative moduli approach the finite supremum. By Montel theorem it has a subsequence converging locally uniformly to a holomorphic function , with and . The upper equality cannot occur at an interior point, because the maximum modulus principle would force a constant of modulus , contrary to . The lower equality is excluded by applying the same argument to , which is holomorphic because . Thus the limit still maps into the open annulus. Locally uniform convergence gives convergence of derivatives by the Cauchy integral formula, so this limit attains the supremum.
To compute it and all extremizers, the nonvanishing function on the simply connected disc has a holomorphic logarithm with . One can construct it by integrating from zero; differentiation shows is constant, hence one. Its real part obeys . The map
is a biholomorphism from this vertical strip onto the disc. To check the inverse explicitly, for the ratio has positive real part, so its logarithm with value zero at zero has imaginary part in . Therefore
has real part between minus one and one, and direct substitution gives . The strip restriction removes the period ambiguity of the tangent, so these are inverse maps.
Applying the Schwarz lemma to gives . Since , the exact maximum is
It is attained by . The equality case requires , and hence all maximizing functions are
Their derivatives are , so the extremizer is not unique: there is exactly this circle of distinct functions, with the parameter considered modulo . This is the extremal derivative of a disc map into a symmetric annulus for .
For , the Euler products are
The Dirichlet character is completely multiplicative, and unique prime factorization expands each finite product into the terms of the corresponding Dirichlet series supported on those primes. Absolute convergence permits passage to all primes. More strongly, the absolutely convergent Euler product logarithm gives
since the sum of absolute values is bounded by .
We prove nonvanishing of a nonprincipal Dirichlet L-function at one, including real Dirichlet characters. If is nonprincipal modulo , periodicity and the given Orthogonality of Dirichlet characters bound by . Partial summation gives
which is holomorphic for by locally uniform convergence, including after differentiation. The principal Dirichlet character instead has
with a simple pole at one.
For a nonreal Dirichlet character, consider . For real , its Euler product logarithm is
The given character inversion with makes each inner sum either or zero, so . If for a nonreal Dirichlet character, then as well, since their values at real are conjugate. These are two distinct factors. All nonprincipal factors are holomorphic at one, and only the principal factor has a simple pole. Their two zeros would force , a contradiction.
For a real nonprincipal Dirichlet character, suppose . Then is holomorphic throughout : the supplied continuation of the Riemann zeta function has no other pole there, and the zero cancels the pole at one. On its Dirichlet series has coefficients
To check the sign explicitly, for a prime power the local sum is if , is for even and for odd if , and is if . Multiplication over prime factors proves nonnegativity and . Also , so termwise derivatives at are justified by absolute convergence:
The disc lies in . Its Taylor series therefore converges at , and Tonelli theorem gives
This contradicts holomorphy at . It is the positive-coefficient argument behind the Landau theorem for a Dirichlet series with nonnegative coefficients, proved here rather than invoked. Thus for every nonprincipal Dirichlet character.
It remains to detect the primes. For real , the Euler product logarithm satisfies
uniformly as : terms with are bounded in absolute value by . For a nonprincipal Dirichlet character, a holomorphic logarithm of exists near one by the nonvanishing just proved. On a short real interval it differs from the Euler product logarithm by a fixed multiple of , so the prime sum stays bounded. For the principal Dirichlet character, the simple pole instead gives
Applying the supplied Orthogonality of Dirichlet characters for a reduced residue class now yields
The right side tends to infinity, whereas a finite set of primes would give a bounded left side. Therefore every residue class coprime to contains infinitely many primes, proving the Dirichlet theorem on primes in arithmetic progressions.
We use the Dirichlet density form of the Chebotarev density theorem, the version directly proved by the permitted information at . If is a finite Galois extension of number fields with group and is a conjugacy class, let be the unramified prime ideals of whose Frobenius conjugacy class is . Then
The same conclusion holds for a union of conjugacy classes, replacing by the size of that union. The denominator may equivalently be the sum over all primes of . Here and below is real. This specifies the density being proved; an unweighted prime-counting asymptotic is a stronger formulation and is not being inferred merely from a limit at one.
First establish the necessary pole for a general base field. The Dedekind zeta function as a permutation Artin L-function gives it using exactly the allowed assumptions. Take a finite normal closure of , and let be the permutation representation on . Its trivial constituent has multiplicity one: an invariant function on the transitive set of embeddings is constant. At a rational prime, a basis of consists of the sums over inertia orbits of embeddings. Frobenius automorphism permutes these orbit sums. Within the decomposition-group orbit belonging to a prime of , the resulting cycle has length , because the residue embeddings are permuted cyclically by finite-field Frobenius. A cycle of length has determinant . Consequently the local factor of an Artin L-function gives
including at ramified primes. Decomposing gives
All factors after are holomorphic and nonzero at one by the allowed hypothesis. Thus has a simple pole there and
This argument also explains why the trivial relative Artin L-function is , rather than always the Riemann zeta function.
Now let be an irreducible character of , of degree . At an unramified prime the Euler product has local factor , where is a Frobenius representative. The eigenvalues of are roots of unity, since has finite order. Expanding the logarithm for therefore gives
where the finitely many ramified local factors contribute a function bounded as . They are nonzero and finite near one because their eigenvalues have modulus one while .
The terms are uniformly bounded. Indeed , and for and ,
There are at most primes of above each rational prime and each has norm at least that prime. Hence . Isolating proves the character prime sums in the Chebotarev proof identity
For nontrivial , the allowed holomorphy and nonvanishing at one give a local holomorphic logarithm and a bounded right side. The logarithm specified by the Euler series differs from that local branch by a constant multiple of on the real interval near one, so it too is bounded. For the trivial character, the right side is by the pole of . Thus
Expand the conjugacy-class indicator by character orthogonality. For ,
To see the coefficient, take its inner product with : . The irreducible characters form an orthonormal basis of class functions, so this is the full expansion. Substituting the prime-sum estimates leaves only the trivial character's logarithmic term:
Division by the diverging logarithm proves the theorem. The same trivial-character calculation shows that all primes of have density one; adding or removing finitely many primes does not change a Dirichlet density.
There is a necessary qualification for the final polynomial application: the printed claim is false for degree one. For example, is monic and irreducible in , yet has the root zero modulo every prime. We prove the intended assertion for degree .
Let be the splitting field of the monic irreducible polynomial over , and let be its roots. The Galois group acts transitively on . There is a derangement in a transitive group action: count the pairs satisfying . The orbit-stabilizer theorem gives
If every fixed at least one root, the identity, which fixes , would make this sum at least , a contradiction. Therefore some fixes no root, and neither does any conjugate of .
For completeness, relate this group action to reduction without assuming the desired splitting result. All roots are algebraic integers, since the polynomial is monic. Exclude the finitely many primes ramifying in or dividing the nonzero polynomial discriminant. At a prime over any remaining , the roots reduce to distinct elements of and give all roots of the reduced polynomial. Arithmetic Frobenius permutes them by . A reduced root belongs to exactly when it is fixed by this map. Because reduction is injective on the original root set, this happens exactly when the Frobenius permutation fixes an original root. This proves the Frobenius permutation and roots modulo a prime criterion.
The Chebotarev density theorem assigns the conjugacy class of our fixed-point-free the positive Dirichlet density . All but finitely many of these primes have rootless reduction, so there are infinitely many. More precisely, applying the same argument to the union of all fixed-point-free classes gives
Suppose has a local maximum at . If , the nonnegativity of the modulus forces throughout a neighbourhood, and the identity theorem for holomorphic functions makes it zero on that connected component.
If , take . Then , and continuity gives a disk around on which . This lies within the given half-plane for a branch of the holomorphic logarithm. On define
Composition preserves holomorphy, and the real logarithm is strictly increasing, so has a local maximum at . Part (i) forces to be constant on the disk. Exponentiating gives , hence is constant there and, by the identity theorem for holomorphic functions, on the whole connected component. Therefore
This proves the maximum modulus principle by the requested logarithm argument. Multiplication by is what puts the image in the supplied logarithm branch; no global logarithm of is assumed.
The Riemann mapping theorem asserts that a nonempty simply connected domain is biholomorphic to the unit disk . More precisely, for each there is a unique biholomorphism satisfying and . We prove existence through an extremal derivative, deriving the compactness and injectivity steps rather than assuming special lemmas for the theorem.
First construct a bounded univalent function on . Choose and a holomorphic logarithm of , which exists by the permitted logarithm result on the translated simply connected domain. Put
Then , so is univalent and never zero. Its image is open, and : equality would imply after squaring and then .
Fix and choose with . It follows that is disjoint from , so throughout . Hence
is a univalent function with . For , define
The identity
and the inverse show directly that is an automorphism of the unit disk. Apply to and then a rotation to make its nonzero derivative at positive. The family of univalent maps with value zero and positive derivative at is therefore nonempty.
Let
It is positive. Choose with . The Cauchy estimate gives for every , so is finite. Take a sequence with .
We now justify a locally uniform convergence subsequence. On any compact subset of , the bound and the Cauchy estimate on slightly larger interior disks give a uniform derivative bound. They therefore give equicontinuity. Apply the Arzelà-Ascoli theorem on a compact exhaustion of , then take a diagonal subsequence for locally uniform convergence. Its limit is holomorphic: pass to the limit in the Cauchy integral formula on every small interior circle. The same formula for derivatives gives
Thus is nonconstant. Initially , and the maximum modulus principle improves this to everywhere.
For completeness, the needed locally uniform limit of univalent functions argument is short. If and , the nonconstant holomorphic function has an isolated zero at . Choose a small closed disk around excluding , with no zero on its boundary. Uniform convergence there gives . The Rouche theorem then makes have a zero inside that disk for all sufficiently large . Its only possible zero, by injectivity of , is , outside the disk. This contradiction proves injectivity of . Therefore and attains the supremum .
It remains to prove surjectivity. Suppose is omitted by ; since , necessarily . The domain is simply connected, because both constituent maps are homeomorphisms onto their images, and it excludes zero. The permitted holomorphic logarithm gives a holomorphic square root
This maps into and is univalent, since equality of its values implies equality after squaring and hence equality of the original arguments. Write . Then and . Normalize again with and a rotation. Its derivative magnitude is
The strict inequality follows from . This square-root improvement of a normalized conformal map contradicts extremality. Thus . An injective holomorphic map has nonzero derivative and a holomorphic local inverse; these inverses agree, so the resulting bijection is biholomorphic. We have proved existence.
For uniqueness, two normalized maps give an automorphism of the unit disk fixing zero. Apply the Schwarz lemma, proved in the next part, to this automorphism and its inverse. Both inequalities force equality, so the equality case makes it a rotation. Its derivative at zero is the positive real number , forcing that rotation to be the identity. Therefore
The proper-domain hypothesis is necessary: a bounded entire holomorphic function has derivative at most on disks of arbitrarily large radius by the Cauchy estimate, and hence is constant. Conversely, a domain biholomorphic to the disk is simply connected because the map is a homeomorphism.
A connection on a vector bundle is a complex-linear map from smooth sections to vector-bundle-valued one-forms satisfying
Choose a locally finite trivializing cover, its componentwise flat connections on a vector bundle , and a subordinate smooth partition of unity . The formula is globally meaningful: each weighted term extends by zero outside its chart. Its Leibniz rule follows from , proving every smooth complex vector bundle admits a connection.
Extend the connection on a vector bundle to bundle-valued differential forms by
The curvature form of a connection is . Applying this twice to shows that the terms cancel, so is tensorial and defines an -valued two-form. With column coordinates for sections and connection one-form , the local expression is . Direct expansion on an arbitrary bundle-valued form gives
The terms containing a derivative of the argument cancel by the graded Leibniz rule. Thus Cartan curvature matrix equation is
Here multiplication includes matrix multiplication and the exterior product of form entries. For a frame change , the connection one-form and curvature form of a connection transform as
The trace is consequently frame independent. Also
the diagonal terms vanish and the off-diagonal terms cancel in pairs. Locally , and hence . The local primitives need not agree, but the two-form does. We obtain a global closed two-form .
The determinant connection on is defined intrinsically by
where the differential-form coefficient of is placed first. In a local frame, only the diagonal components contribute to the derivative of , so its connection one-form is . A line-bundle connection has curvature , because a scalar one-form wedges with itself to zero. Therefore
To see independence of the de Rham cohomology class, write , a globally defined endomorphism-valued one-form. The curvature difference formula and the same trace cancellations give the trace curvature transgression
Their difference is globally an exact differential form, so their de Rham cohomology classes coincide.
For the Hermitian metric on a holomorphic vector bundle, use the displayed ordering of the local matrices and put . The identity gives
The plus sign comes from applying the graded Leibniz rule to the one-form . By the derivative formula for a determinant,
The Hermitian positive-definite matrix has positive real determinant, so this logarithm is an ordinary smooth real function. The trace of Chern curvature in these conventions is therefore
It is locally an exact differential form and in particular closed.
A holomorphic local frame change multiplies by . A nowhere-zero holomorphic function has a local holomorphic logarithm, so . Thus the preceding expression for is independent of the frame and glues globally. For two Hermitian metrics on a holomorphic vector bundle, the function
is globally defined because the frame-change factors cancel. Their two-forms differ by . Hence the class of is independent of the metric. The two-form is generally imaginary-valued; the metric independence statement is in complex de Rham cohomology, or equivalently for the real form .
We prove the Kahane-Katznelson divergence theorem through an explicit small-norm block construction. Let be normalized Lebesgue measure on the circle.
First establish the compact-set Fourier amplification lemma. If a compact set satisfies
we can make a trigonometric polynomial with , supported in any sufficiently high interval of positive frequencies, whose partial prefix has magnitude greater than on .
To construct it, choose a smooth nonnegative function equal to one near , with values at most one and mean
Outer regularity and a smooth cutoff give this choice; the stipulated bound on leaves room between the two exponentials. The Schwarz integral on the unit disk
has positive real part in the disk, , and boundary real part . Its holomorphic logarithm
satisfies and . On , the boundary value has . Smoothness of makes continuous at the boundary, and its positive boundary real part near makes continuous there.
Choose a radius just below one, then truncate the Taylor series of at that radius. This gives an analytic polynomial with zero constant term, degree , and
The radial function is analytic beyond the closed unit disk, so the Taylor truncation is uniform on the whole circle. For , put
Its frequencies lie between and , all positive. Its prefix through frequency includes exactly the negative-frequency half of shifted into this interval:
Consequently on , whereas . Increasing places the entire block above any previously used frequency.
We next use compact batching of a small open set to handle an arbitrary null set, without assuming that it is compact or a countable union of compact null sets. Set
For each , choose an open with . Decompose into countably many closed subarcs with pairwise disjoint interiors: subdivide each open component into closed pieces accumulating only at its excluded endpoints. Group these subarcs into finite successive batches . After batch , include enough pieces that the remaining total length is less than . Require each batch endpoint in the enumeration to increase. Then
Each batch is compact; endpoints shared by pieces have zero measure and do not affect the estimates.
Enumerate the pairs in diagonal order. Apply the block lemma with target to each , and shift its spectrum above all preceding blocks. Denote the resulting polynomial by and set
Since , this series is uniformly convergent and defines a continuous complex-valued function.
Fix . For every there is a with . The difference between the Fourier partial sum just before that block and the sum at its midpoint has magnitude greater than : previous blocks cancel in the difference, and future blocks have not yet entered. As , these cutoffs tend to infinity. At least one of the two partial sums therefore has magnitude greater than . The Fourier partial sums are unbounded, hence not Cauchy, at . We have proved
This establishes divergence on every prescribed null set, including dense nonclosed null sets; it does not assert that the divergence set is exactly .
For infinite products, a nonzero limiting product requires that its factors tend to one. A useful sufficient condition is
After finitely many factors, and the principal holomorphic logarithm satisfies . Therefore the sum of logarithms converges, and exponentiating it gives a finite nonzero product. The same argument on compact sets proves infinite product convergence from logarithmic tails: a locally uniformly absolutely convergent tail of holomorphic logarithms gives a holomorphic nonvanishing tail product. Finite factors then determine all zeros and their orders.
The Weierstrass elementary factors are
For ,
Their only zero is a simple zero at .
Work with entire functions on . As usual for prescribed exact zero orders, the distinct zero locations must have consistent multiplicities. The literal statement allows repeated locations with conflicting orders; that cannot be true, for example if the same point is prescribed order one and order two. Remove consistent repetitions rather than adding their orders, and separate a possible zero at the origin.
List the distinct nonzero locations as , with prescribed orders , and write for the prescribed order at zero, or zero if the origin is not prescribed. Choose large enough that
Then the Weierstrass factorization theorem construction is
On every compact set, for all sufficiently large because . Its logarithmic tail is bounded by
Thus the product converges locally uniformly, is entire, and has exactly the specified zeros with exactly their orders. At a prescribed zero, only its own finite factor vanishes; all other finite factors and the tail product are nonzero.
Without escape to infinity the conclusion fails in general. Distinct proposed zeros accumulate at zero. The identity theorem would force an entire function with those zeros to vanish identically, which does not have precisely the prescribed isolated zeros. A finite zero set can of course be realized by a polynomial.
For entire functions with the same zero divisor, the quotient extends through every common zero by cancelling equal local powers. It is entire and nowhere zero. Hence is entire and has a primitive on the simply connected plane. Choose with and put
The derivative of vanishes, and its value at zero is one. Therefore
If also , then everywhere. The continuous difference takes values in the discrete set and so is constant on the connected plane:
The whole-plane hypothesis matters: a zero-free holomorphic quotient on a multiply connected domain need not possess a global holomorphic logarithm.
For every closed piecewise smooth curve in , the winding number of about zero is the integer
If for a holomorphic th root, is nowhere zero, and
Thus is divisible by every for which a root exists. An infinite subset of the positive integers is unbounded, so a fixed integer divisible by all those must be zero. Hence all periods of the holomorphic function vanish.
Fix . Since a domain is connected and open, its points can be joined by piecewise smooth paths. Vanishing periods make
independent of path. It is a holomorphic primitive with . Differentiating gives , so . Choose a complex number with . Then
This constructs a global holomorphic logarithm without requiring to be simply connected.
Extend the Dirichlet character periodically to all integers, putting when . Its Dirichlet L-function, initially on , is
The Euler product follows from unique prime factorization and absolute convergence; a Dirichlet character is completely multiplicative on this extension. Write for the principal Dirichlet character, equal to one on units and zero elsewhere.
For a nonprincipal Dirichlet character , character orthogonality gives . Explicitly, multiplication by a unit with permutes the unit residues and multiplies this sum by , forcing it to vanish. For set
The numerator is at zero and the denominator is , so is bounded, indeed analytic, near zero; it decays exponentially at infinity. Initially for , absolute convergence justifies
This Mellin transform integral is holomorphic for , locally uniformly in , and division by the Gamma function proves the requested analytic continuation to the left of the line one.
In fact, the same argument proves Mellin continuation of a nonprincipal Dirichlet L-function to the entire plane. If at zero, subtract this Taylor polynomial on and add its explicit integrals:
The last integral is holomorphic on . Its possible simple poles at nonpositive integers cancel against zeros of . Letting increase shows that is an entire function, without any primitivity assumption.
For real , use the absolutely convergent Euler product logarithm
The higher-power remainder has the uniform estimate
For a nonprincipal Dirichlet character , invoke the allowed nonvanishing of a nonprincipal Dirichlet L-function at one. Its holomorphy and nonvanishing give a holomorphic logarithm on a small disk about one. On the connected real interval , differs from this logarithm by a fixed element of : the difference is continuous with exponential one. Thus the prime-character sum near one is bounded. This branch argument is needed for complex-valued Dirichlet characters.
For ,
The finite product has a positive limit as , and the residue-one pole of the Riemann zeta function gives
Here for nonprincipal Dirichlet characters means bounded complex magnitude.
Finally, for a residue class coprime to , Orthogonality of Dirichlet characters gives
Only primes not dividing occur, so the character orthogonality applies to every term. This sum diverges as . A finite collection of primes would give a bounded sum, a contradiction. Every reduced residue class contains infinitely many primes. This is the Dirichlet theorem on primes in arithmetic progressions; the coprimality hypothesis is essential.
Before the Loewner swallowing time , put and . The Itô formula applied to the holomorphic logarithm in the complex upper half-plane gives
Taking imaginary parts yields the SLE angle process
For the drift vanishes, so
is a continuous local martingale. Since , every localized stopped version is a bounded true martingale. After resolving the lifetime issue below, the dominated convergence theorem applied to conditional expectations removes localization and gives a true bounded martingale.
For completeness, there is no finite lifetime ambiguity for a fixed interior in this parameter range. The preceding Bessel process and Conformal Markov property of SLE argument gives a simple trace staying in the interior, so no point is swallowed in a disconnected pocket. If were finite, the trace would have to reach , forcing the Loewner conformal radius to tend to zero by the Koebe quarter theorem. But
The Dambis-Dubins-Schwarz theorem says that a bounded continuous local martingale cannot have infinite quadratic variation before a finite terminal time: that would require a Brownian motion to stay in a bounded interval for all clock times. Therefore cannot tend to zero at a finite , a contradiction. Thus almost surely for each fixed . This proves the SLE4 angle martingale assertion: the angle is a bounded continuous martingale. In particular . The upper-half-plane branch of the argument is used throughout.