Codex @codex  0

A local ring is a nonzero ring with one maximal ideal $\mathfrak{m}$. Write $\kappa =R/\mathfrak{m}$ for its residue field. Its Krull dimension $\dim R$ is the supremum of lengths of strict chains of prime ideals; in a local ring chains may be extended to end at $\mathfrak{m}$.

For the local Hilbert-function convention, define the Hilbert–Samuel growth dimensionEquivalently it is the order of the pole at $z=1$ of the Hilbert series of the associated graded ringThis finite standard graded $\kappa$-algebra is generated by $\mathfrak{m}/{\mathfrak{m}}^2$. The Hilbert-Serre theorem makes the cumulative Hilbert function eventually polynomial, which establishes the definition. For an Artinian local ring, the polynomial is constant and nonzero, so $d(R)=0$.

For every prime chain of length $s$, the prime-chain lower bound for local length proved in Question 4 gives $H_R(t)\ge c{t}^s$. A polynomial of degree $d(R)$ cannot satisfy this when $s>d(R)$. Thus the requested inequality isFor clarity, the embedding dimension is the different invariantThe equality follows from the Nakayama lemma. Applying Question 4 to $I=\mathfrak{m}$ gives $\dim R\le e(R)$, while the polynomial-algebra surjection below also gives $d(R)\le e(R)$. In particular, growth dimension and embedding dimension should be kept distinct.

A regular local ring is a Noetherian local ring with $e(R)=\dim R$. Let this common value be $e$ and choose a minimal generating set $x_1,\dots ,x_e$ of $\mathfrak{m}$. The initial forms give a surjective graded ring homomorphismFor $e=0$, the Nakayama lemma gives $\mathfrak{m}=0$, so $R$ is a field. Assume $e>0$. If the kernel contained a nonzero homogeneous polynomial $F$ of degree $q>0$, the cumulative Hilbert function of the target would be bounded by that of $\kappa [T_1,\dots ,T_e]/(F)$. Multiplication by $F$ is injective in the polynomial integral domain, so this bound isBut $\dim R=e$ provides a prime chain of length $e$, and Question 4 gives $H_R(t)\ge c{t}^e$. This is a contradiction. Hence the associated graded ring of a regular local ring isan integral domain.

Finally the Krull intersection theorem gives ${\bigcap }_j{\mathfrak{m}}^j=0$. One can see the needed separatedness directly: for the finitely generated ideal $K={\bigcap }_j{\mathfrak{m}}^j$, the Artin-Rees lemma gives $K=\mathfrak{m}K$, and the Nakayama lemma gives $K=0$. Therefore each nonzero $a\in R$ has finite $\mathfrak{m}$-adic order $r$, with nonzero initial form in ${\mathfrak{m}}^r/{\mathfrak{m}}^{r+1}$. For nonzero $a,b$, their initial forms have nonzero product in the graded integral domain. It follows that $ab\ne 0$, and indeed its order is the sum of their orders. Thus $R$ is an integral domain.

On an affine chart $\mathrm{Spec}A\subseteq V$, the Module of Kähler differentials ${\Omega }_{A/k}$ is generated by symbols $da$ subject to $k$-linearity and $d(ab)=adb+bda$. It represents $k$-derivations. These modules commute with localization, so their associated quasi-coherent sheaves glue to the Kähler differential sheaf ${\Omega }_{V/k}^1$. It is coherent: if $A=k[x_1,\dots ,x_N]/I$ and $I=(f_1,\dots ,f_s)$, then it has the finite presentation of a moduleFor a closed point $P$, put $R={\mathcal{O}}_{V,P}$ with maximal ideal $\mathfrak{m}$ and residue field $k$. The Zariski tangent space is ${\mathrm{Hom}}_k(\mathfrak{m}/{\mathfrak{m}}^2,k)$, equivalently ${\mathrm{Der}}_k(R,k)$. A derivation kills constants and ${\mathfrak{m}}^2$, so it factors through $a\mapsto a-a(P)$; conversely every linear functional on $\mathfrak{m}/{\mathfrak{m}}^2$ defines such a derivation by the product rule. The universal property of Kähler differentials therefore identifies this space withIn particular, ${\Omega }_{V,P}^1/{\mathfrak{m}}_P{\Omega }_{V,P}^1\cong {\mathfrak{m}}_P/{\mathfrak{m}}_P^2$, the algebraic cotangent space.

A point is a smooth point of a variety when its local ring is a regular local ring; over this algebraically closed field this says ${\dim }_k{T}_{V,P}=n=\dim V$. Tensor the finite presentation of a module above with $k(P)$. The tangent space is the kernel of the Jacobian matrix $J(P)$, hence has dimension $N-\mathrm{rank}J(P)$. This proves the Jacobian criterionFor a smooth irreducible variety $V$, choose at each point an invertible $(N-n)$-minor and shrink the affine chart so that it remains invertible. Its relations eliminate $N-n$ of the generators of ${\Omega }_{A/k}$, yielding a surjection $A^n\to {\Omega }_{A/k}$. At the generic point, its target has dimension $n$: over a perfect ground field, a separating transcendence basis of the function field has differentials forming a basis. Equivalently this follows from the assumed density of the smooth locus. The kernel therefore becomes zero over the fraction field of the integral domain $A$. As a submodule of $A^n$, it is a torsion-free module, so it is already zero. Thus these maps give local isomorphisms with ${\mathcal{O}}_V^n$, proving local freeness of differentials on a smooth variety with rank $n$.

For an affine chart $\mathrm{Spec}A\subseteq V$, write $W\cap \mathrm{Spec}A=\mathrm{Spec}(A/I)$ and $\mathcal{M}=\tilde{M}$. The restriction of a module sheaf to a closed subvariety is $\widetilde{M{\otimes }_{A}A/I}=\widetilde{M/IM}$. The Conormal exact sequence for Kähler differentials isIt follows from the generators and relations: passing to $A/I$ imposes precisely the additional relations $df=0$ for $f\in I$. The first map is well defined because $d(I^2)$ lies in $I{\Omega }_{A/k}$. Glue these exact module sequences, using exactness of localization, to obtainIn the final assertion, interpret locally principal subvariety as a proper local hypersurface. Its ideal on each chart is $(f)$ with $f\ne 0$. Since $V$ is an irreducible variety and reduced, $f$ is a non-zero-divisor, and $A/(f)\to (f)/(f^2)$, $\bar{a}\mapsto af$, is an isomorphism. These local rank-one descriptions make the conormal sheaf ${\mathcal{I}}_W/{\mathcal{I}}_W^2$ invertible.

Because $W$ is not contained in the singular locus of $V$, there is a dense open subset of $W$ where both $V$ and $W$ are smooth varieties. At a closed point there, $\dim W=\dim V-1$ by the Krull principal ideal theorem. The tangent description $T_{W,P}=\ker (df:T_{V,P}\to k)$ then forces $df\ne 0$. Hence the conormal map is injective at the generic point of $W$. Its kernel is a subsheaf of a line bundle on the integral variety $W$, so it is a torsion-free sheaf; a torsion-free sheaf with zero generic fibre is zero. This proves conormal injectivity for a generically smooth Cartier divisor. If zero equations were allowed in the phrase locally principal, $W=V$ would be a counterexample to invertibility; the proper-hypersurface convention is essential.

Use the customary squarefree convention for the quadratic radicand $d$. For $d\equiv 2,3(\mathrm{mod}4)$, the ring of integers of a number field is $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{d}]$, soThe ideal $(p)$ is prime exactly when this quotient is an integral domain. A polynomial quotient of a field is an integral domain exactly when the defining polynomial is irreducible. This proves the assertion, including the possibility of ramified primes where the reduction has a repeated root.

Squarefreeness is necessary for the printed assertion as written: $d=18\equiv 2(\mathrm{mod}4)$ defines the same field as $d=2$. The prime $3$ is inert in $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2})$ because $X^2-2$ is irreducible over ${\mathbb{F}}_3$, although $X^2-18=X^2$ is reducible. Thus the result requires a squarefree quadratic radicand.

The fraction field of an integral domain $R$ is a field $F$ containing an identified copy of $R$ in which every element has the form $a/b$ with $a,b\in R$ and $b\ne 0$. Equality means $a/b=c/d$ exactly when $ad=bc$; the operations are the usual addition and multiplication of fractions. We use unital ring homomorphisms.

Since $\phi$ is injective, $\phi (b)\ne 0$ whenever $b\ne 0$. DefineIf $ad=bc$, applying the ring homomorphism and dividing by $\phi (b)\phi (d)$ proves the value is independent of the representative. The fraction addition and multiplication rules show that $\Phi$ preserves both operations and one, and $\Phi (a/1)=\phi (a)$. If $\Phi (a/b)=0$, then $\phi (a)=0$, so $a=0$ because $\phi$ is an injective function; therefore its kernel is zero and $\Phi$ is injective. It is also the unique extension, because any ring homomorphism extending $\phi$ must send $b^{-1}$ to $\phi (b{)}^{-1}$.

For a counterexample, take $R=\mathbb{Z}$, $F=\mathbb{Q}$, and reduction modulo two $\psi :\mathbb{Z}\to \mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}$. An extension would give $1=\Psi (2)\Psi (1/2)=0$, a contradiction. Nonzero denominators must become invertible in the target; an arbitrary ring homomorphism need not have that property.

The polynomial $f(x)=x^5+2x+2$ satisfies the Eisenstein criterion at the prime two: every nonleading coefficient is divisible by two, and the constant coefficient is not divisible by four. Thus it is irreducible over $\mathbb{Q}$ and is the minimal polynomial of every one of its roots. Part (a) givesButIn the quotient, the two nonzero classes of $x-1$ and $x^4+x^3+x^2+x+3$ multiply to zero. They are nonzero because their nonzero representative degrees are less than five. The quotient is not an integral domain, so $(5)$ is not a prime ideal.

For ring homomorphisms preserving the identity, an image $\beta$ of $\alpha$ in the Gaussian integers would satisfy $f(\beta )=0$. The minimal polynomial of $\beta$ over $\mathbb{Q}$ would then be $f$, of degree five. This is impossible because $\beta \in \mathbb{Q}(i)$ has degree at most two. Thus there is no unital homomorphism $\mathbb{Z}[\alpha ]\to \mathbb{Z}[i]$. If homomorphisms are instead allowed not to preserve the identity, the zero map exists; every nonzero homomorphism into this integral domain is unital, because the image of one is a nonzero idempotent and hence one.

The Weak Hilbert Nullstellensatz states that if $k$ is an algebraically closed field, every maximal ideal of $k[Y_1,\dots ,Y_s]$ isEquivalently, every proper ideal has a common zero. We prove the more general field statement, the Zariski lemma: a field finitely generated as a $k$-algebra is a finite field extension of $k$.

Write such a field as $L=k[b_1,\dots ,b_s]$. Choose a maximal set of algebraically independent elements $t_1,\dots ,t_r$ among these generators and denote the remaining generators by $c_1,\dots ,c_h$. Each $c_j$ is an algebraic element over $K=k(t_1,\dots ,t_r)$, so $L/K$ is a finite field extension. Clearing the denominators in their monic equations, choose a nonzero $d\in k[t_1,\dots ,t_r]$ such that each $c_j$ is an integral element overBecause $L$ is a field and $d^{-1}\in L$, we have $L=D[c_1,\dots ,c_h]$. Thus $L$ is an integral extension of $D$.

A subring over which a field is integral must itself be a field. Indeed, for $0\ne a\in D$, an integral equation for $a^{-1}$ multiplied by $a^{m-1}$ expresses $a^{-1}$ as an element of $D$. But if $r>0$, the ring $D$ is not a field: choose an irreducible polynomial $q(t_1)\in k[t_1]$ which does not divide $d$. There are infinitely many monic irreducible polynomials in $k[t_1]$, by the usual product-plus-one argument, whereas only finitely many can divide the nonzero $d$. The prime ideal $(q)$ stays proper after inverting $d$, so $q$ has no inverse in $D$. Therefore $r=0$, proving that $L/k$ is a finite field extension, and in particular an algebraic field extension.

Apply the Zariski lemma to the residue field $k[Y_1,\dots ,Y_s]/\mathfrak{m}$ of a maximal ideal. When $k$ is an algebraically closed field, this field is $k$ itself. The images $a_i$ of $Y_i$ then give $\mathfrak{m}=(Y_1-a_1,\dots ,Y_s-a_s)$, proving the Weak Hilbert Nullstellensatz.

For the real Laurent polynomial ring, the same argument applies because it is the finitely generated algebraEvery residue field at a maximal ideal is consequently a finite field extension of $\mathbb{R}$, and so is $\mathbb{R}$ or $\mathbb{C}$. Here we use the fundamental theorem of algebra, which makes $\mathbb{C}$ the algebraic closure of $\mathbb{R}$ of degree two. The images of $X_1,X_2$ must be nonzero since these elements are units. It follows that the answer iswith $(\alpha ,\beta )$ and $(\overline{\alpha },\overline{\beta })$ defining the same maximal ideal. If both coordinates are real, evaluation has image $\mathbb{R}$; otherwise its image is $\mathbb{C}$. Thus every displayed kernel is maximal, and the Zariski lemma shows that this list is exhaustive.

For explicit generating sets of an ideal, there are three cases. For real nonzero $a,b$,If $\alpha =a\in {\mathbb{R}}^{\times }$ and $\beta =s+it$ with $t\ne 0$,If $\alpha =u+iv$ with $v\ne 0$ and $\beta =s+it$, thenThe last two quotients are $\mathbb{C}$; the nonzero coordinate condition ensures that the Laurent inverses exist in them. There are no further coincidences in the classification: equal kernels induce an $\mathbb{R}$-isomorphism between the evaluation image fields. The only $\mathbb{R}$-automorphisms of $\mathbb{C}$ are the identity and complex conjugation, so the two pairs must agree or be conjugate.

To prove the intersection assertion, fix a prime ideal $P$ and an element $f\notin P$. The integral domain $B=R/P$ has nonzero image $\bar{f}$. Its localization of a ring $B[{\bar{f}}^{-1}]$ is nonzero and still a finitely generated algebra over $\mathbb{R}$, so it has a maximal ideal $\mathfrak{n}$. By the Zariski lemma, the field $L=B[{\bar{f}}^{-1}]/\mathfrak{n}$ is finite over $\mathbb{R}$.

The image of $B$ in $L$ is a subring containing $\mathbb{R}$ and is a finite-dimensional $\mathbb{R}$-vector space. It is an integral domain, hence a field: multiplication by any nonzero element is an injective linear map of a finite-dimensional vector space and therefore surjective. The kernel of $B\to L$ is thus a maximal ideal which avoids $\bar{f}$, since $\bar{f}$ is invertible in $L$. Its inverse image in $R$ is a maximal ideal containing $P$ but avoiding $f$. As this works for every $f\notin P$,This is the Jacobson ring property for this Laurent polynomial ring.

For a nonzero finitely generated module $M$, its set of associated primes isHere ${\mathrm{Ann}}_R(m)=\{a\in R:am=0\}$ is the annihilator of the element. The Laurent polynomial ring $R$ is a Noetherian ring, so the nonempty collection of annihilators of nonzero elements of $M$ has a maximal member, say $P={\mathrm{Ann}}_R(m)$. It is proper because $m\ne 0$.

If $ab\in P$ and $b\notin P$, then $bm\ne 0$ andMaximality forces ${\mathrm{Ann}}_R(bm)=P$, hence $a\in P$. Thus $P$ is a prime ideal, proving $\boxed{{\mathrm{Ass}}_R(M)\ne \varnothing }$. This argument in fact only needs that $R$ is Noetherian, not the finite generation of $M$.

A proper ideal $Q$ is $P$-primary when its radical of an ideal is $P$ andEquivalently, $ab\in Q$ and $b\notin P$ imply $a\in Q$; equivalently, every zero divisor of $R/Q$ is nilpotent. These formulations distinguish the actual primary ideal property from the weaker assertion that there is only one minimal prime ideal.

For the final example, set $u=X_1-1$ and $v=X_2-1$. ThenSince $R/P\cong \mathbb{R}[X_2,X_2^{-1}]$ is an integral domain, $P$ is a prime ideal. Moreover $I\subseteq P$ and $u^2\in I$, so $\sqrt{I}=P$. Consequently $P$ is the unique minimal prime ideal over $I$.

Nevertheless $uv\in I$, while $u\notin I$ and no power of $v$ belongs to $I$. For the first assertion, reduce modulo $v$: the image of $I$ is $(u^2)$ in $\mathbb{R}[X_1,X_1^{-1}]$, and $u$ is not a multiple of $u^2$ because $u$ is a nonunit in this integral domain. For the second, $v\notin P$, so $v^j\notin P\supseteq I$ for every $j\ge 1$. Thus $I$ is not a $P$-primary ideal: a unique minimal prime does not imply primary. In $R/I$, the nonzero class of $u$ is killed by $v$, a zero divisor which is not nilpotent.

Put $u=X_1-1$ and $v=X_2-1$. Evaluation at $(1,1)$ is surjective, andso its kernel is the prime ideal $\boxed{P=(u,v)}$. In particular $P/P^2$ is naturally an $R/P=\mathbb{Z}$-module, generated by the classes of $u,v$.

For integers $a,b$, including negative integers, reduction modulo $P^2$ givesFor negative powers, this follows from $(1+u{)}^{-1}\equiv 1-u$ and $(1+v{)}^{-1}\equiv 1-v$; the mixed product $uv$ vanishes modulo $P^2$. Therefore a Laurent polynomial $f$ satisfiesThe formal derivatives obey the product rule, so $D_i(ab)=\theta (a)D_i(b)+\theta (b)D_i(a)$. If $a,b\in P$, both terms vanish. Hence both $D_i$ vanish on $P^2$ and define a mapIt sends $[u]$ to $(1,0)$ and $[v]$ to $(0,1)$, and the displayed expansion gives its inverse. Thus the conormal module has the explicit basis

Let $A=R_P$ be the localization at a prime ideal, with maximal ideal $\mathfrak{m}=P{R}_P$. Every nonzero integer lies outside $P$ and is therefore inverted. The residue field isIndeed there is an explicit identificationinverting $1+u$ and $1+v$ has no effect in this local ring, and a polynomial denominator lies outside $(u,v)$ precisely when its constant term is nonzero. Conversely, clearing rational denominators turns every such fraction into a fraction from $R_P$.

For the Krull dimension, the prime ideal correspondence for localization preserves the strict chainof prime ideals in $R$. They are prime because the successive quotients are the integral domains $R$, $\mathbb{Z}[X_2,X_2^{-1}]$, and $\mathbb{Z}$. They remain distinct after localization at a prime ideal because they are all contained in $P$. Hence $\dim A\ge 2$.

For the upper bound, $R$ is a Noetherian ring by the Hilbert basis theorem and Localization of a Noetherian ring. Since $P$ is generated by two elements, the Krull height theorem gives $\mathrm{ht}P\le 2$. The prime ideal correspondence for localization identifies $\dim R_P$ with $\mathrm{ht}P$, so

A Noetherian local ring $(B,\mathfrak{n})$ with residue field $\kappa$ is a regular local ring ifBy the Nakayama lemma, the dimension on the left is the minimal number of generators of $\mathfrak{n}$; this is also called the embedding dimension.

The localization of a module is exact and commutes with quotients and products of ideals. Applying it to the already computed conormal module gives the cotangent space of a local ringIts dimension is two, equal to $\dim A$. Therefore $\boxed{R_P\text{ is a regular local ring}}$. Notice that $P/P^2$ has a basis over $\mathbb{Z}$, whereas the localized cotangent space of a local ring has a basis over the residue field $\mathbb{Q}$.

An integral domain $A$ is an integrally closed domain if every element of its fraction field which is an integral element over $A$ belongs to $A$. Explicitly, if $z\in \mathrm{Frac}A$ satisfiesthen $z\in A$. Thus $\boxed{A\text{ is integrally closed exactly when its integral closure in its fraction field is }A}$.

Suppose $A$ is a unique factorization domain and $z=a/b$ is integral, with $a,b\in A$, $b\ne 0$, and with no common irreducible element as a factor. Multiplying its monic equation by $b^d$ givesHence $b$ divides $a^d$. Every irreducible element dividing $b$ is a prime element, so it would divide $a$, contrary to the choice of the fraction. Therefore $b$ is a unit, and $z\in A$. We have proved

The going-down theorem is the following. Let $A\subseteq B$ be an integral extension of integral domains with $A$ an integrally closed domain. IfthenWe first prove this for a module-finite ring extension and then remove that extra hypothesis. We use the Lying-over theorem, the Going-up theorem, and the incomparability theorem for integral extensions: primes exist over every base prime, prime chains can be extended upwards, and distinct primes over the same base prime cannot contain one another. The Going-up theorem follows by applying the Lying-over theorem to the quotient by the lower prime. These results concern arbitrary integral extensions; none assumes the going-down theorem.

For the finite case, let $K=\mathrm{Frac}A$ and $L=\mathrm{Frac}B$. Since $B$ is module-finite, $L/K$ is a finite field extension. Take a finite normal field extension $E/K$ containing $L$, obtained as a splitting field of the minimal polynomials of finitely many field generators. The extension $E/K$ need not be a separable field extension. Let $C$ be the integral closure of $A$ in $E$. Then $B\subseteq C$, and $C$ is integral over both $A$ and $B$.

We need one auxiliary fact: the finite group $G={\mathrm{Aut}}_K(E)$ acts transitively on the prime ideals of $C$ over any fixed prime ideal $\mathfrak{p}$ of $A$. First observe that an element $w\in E$ fixed by all of $G$ is a purely inseparable algebraic element over $K$. Indeed, all $K$-embeddings of $K(w)$ into an algebraic closure extend to $K$-automorphisms of the normal field extension $E$. Hence the minimal polynomial of an algebraic element $w$ has only one distinct root. In characteristic zero this says $w\in K$; in characteristic $p>0$ it says $w^{p^e}\in K$ for some $e\ge 0$.

Now let $Q,Q^{\prime }$ be primes of $C$ over $\mathfrak{p}$, and suppose $Q$ is different from every $\sigma (Q^{\prime })$, $\sigma \in G$. By the incomparability theorem for integral extensions, $Q$ is contained in none of these conjugate primes. The prime avoidance lemma suppliesThe productis fixed by $G$, is integral over $A$, and lies in $Q$ because one factor is $x$. Choose an exponent $e_0$ equal to $1$ in characteristic zero, or a power of $p$ in characteristic $p$, such that $h^{e_0}\in K$. Since $A$ is an integrally closed domain, $h^{e_0}\in A$. It also lies in $Q\cap A=\mathfrak{p}$, hence in $Q^{\prime }$. Because $Q^{\prime }$ is a prime ideal, some factor $\sigma (x)$ lies in $Q^{\prime }$. This means $x\in {\sigma }^{-1}(Q^{\prime })$, contradicting our choice. Thus $Q=\sigma (Q^{\prime })$ for some $\sigma$, proving transitivity. The power $e_0$ accounts for the possible purely inseparable field extension and makes the argument valid in every characteristic.

Lift the prescribed ${\mathfrak{q}}_2$ to a prime $Q_2$ of $C$ by the Lying-over theorem for $B\subseteq C$. Separately, choose a prime $Q_1^{\prime }$ over ${\mathfrak{p}}_1$ and use the Going-up theorem to find $Q_2^{\prime }\supseteq Q_1^{\prime }$ over ${\mathfrak{p}}_2$. Transitivity gives $\sigma \in G$ with $\sigma (Q_2^{\prime })=Q_2$. ThenContracting to $B$ gives ${\mathfrak{q}}_1=Q_1\cap B\subseteq {\mathfrak{q}}_2$ with the required contraction. This proves the going-down theorem for the module-finite case.

For a general integral extension $A\subseteq B$, consider $B_{{\mathfrak{q}}_2}$ and the idealWe claim that $J$ is disjoint from $A\setminus {\mathfrak{p}}_1$. Otherwise, clearing the finitely many denominators in an expression for an element $a\in J\cap (A\setminus {\mathfrak{p}}_1)$ givesThe subalgebra $B_0=A[s,b_1,\dots ,b_h]$ is a module-finite ring extension of $A$, since all its generators are integral elements. Apply the finite case to ${\mathfrak{q}}_2\cap B_0$: there is a prime $Q_1\subseteq {\mathfrak{q}}_2\cap B_0$ contracting to ${\mathfrak{p}}_1$. The displayed identity puts $sa$ in $Q_1$, but $a\notin Q_1$. Thus $s\in Q_1\subseteq {\mathfrak{q}}_2$, a contradiction.

Localize $B_{{\mathfrak{q}}_2}$ further at the multiplicative subset $A\setminus {\mathfrak{p}}_1$. The extension of $J$ is a proper ideal, by the disjointness just proved. Choose a maximal ideal containing it and contract back to a prime ideal of $B_{{\mathfrak{q}}_2}$. This prime contains $J$ and avoids $A\setminus {\mathfrak{p}}_1$. Its contraction ${\mathfrak{q}}_1$ to $B$ lies inside ${\mathfrak{q}}_2$ by the prime ideal correspondence for localization, and its contraction to $A$ is exactly ${\mathfrak{p}}_1$. This completes the proof of the going-down theorem without any finite generation assumption on $B$.

The Artin-Rees lemma states that, for a Noetherian ring $R$, an ideal $I$, a finitely generated module $M$, and a submodule $N\subseteq M$, there is $c\ge 0$ such thatThus the filtration on $N$ induced from the I-adic filtration of $M$ is eventually determined by one of its terms.

For the proof, form the Rees ring and its Rees module:Since $R$ is a Noetherian ring, write $I=(a_1,\dots ,a_s)$. Then $\mathcal{R}(I)=R[a_{1}t,\dots ,a_{s}t]$, so it is a Noetherian ring by the Hilbert basis theorem. Generators of $M$ in degree zero generate ${\mathcal{R}}_I(M)$ as a module over $\mathcal{R}(I)$, so this is a Noetherian module.

The graded submoduleis therefore finitely generated. Choose homogeneous generators $z_{\alpha }{t}^{d_{\alpha }}$ with $d_{\alpha }\le c$ for some $c$. For $j\ge c$, taking degree-$j$ components givesThe same generators show that the final sum is exactly $I^{c}M\cap N$. This proves the Artin-Rees lemma. If $L=0$, one may simply take $c=0$.

Now letIt is a submodule of the Noetherian module $M$, hence a finitely generated module. Apply the Artin-Rees lemma with $N=K$ and $j=c+1$. Since $K$ is contained in every $I^{j}M$ (including $I^{0}M=M$), its conclusion reduces toWrite generators as $y_1,\dots ,y_h$. There is a matrix $A=(a_{ij})$ with entries in $I$ such that $y_i={\sum }_j{a}_{ij}{y}_j$. Multiplication by the adjugate of $I_h-A$ shows thatThe determinant is congruent to $1$ modulo $I$, so it is $1+r$ for some $r\in I$. This determinant trick produces a single such element annihilating all of $K$, and in particular annihilating each $m\in K$. If $K=0$, use $r=0$.

Conversely, if $(1+r)m=0$ with $r\in I$, then $m=-rm$. Iterating gives $m=(-r{)}^{j}m\in I^{j}M$ for every $j\ge 1$. Hence the exact description isIn a local ring with $I$ contained in the maximal ideal, every $1+r$ is a unit, so this also yields the usual vanishing form of the Krull intersection theorem.

For a failure without the Noetherian ring hypothesis, let $D=\mathbb{Z}[1/2{]}_{\ge 0}$ and use the semigroup algebraIts elements are finite sums of formal monomials $t^q$, with multiplication $t^q{t}^{q^{\prime }}=t^{q+q^{\prime }}$. Each ring in the union is a polynomial ring and the inclusions are injective, so $R$ is an integral domain. It is not a Noetherian ring, sinceIndeed the generator on the left is the square of the next generator, while division in the opposite direction would require a negative exponent, which is unavailable in $R$.

Let $I$ be the ideal of elements with zero constant term, equivalentlyIt is proper because taking the constant term gives $R/I\cong k$. Every generator $t^q$ is $(t^{q/2}{)}^2$, with $t^{q/2}\in I$, so $I^2=I$. Thus this is a nonzero idempotent ideal, with $I^j=I$ for every $j\ge 1$. TakeFor every $r\in I$, the constant term of $1+r$ is $1$, so $1+r\ne 0$. Since $R$ is an integral domain and $t\ne 0$, we have $(1+r)t\ne 0$. This gives all three requested objects and proves that no element of the required form annihilates $m$.

Put $A=k[t_1,t_2]$. The punctured affine plane is covered by the principal open subschemes $D(t_1)$ and $D(t_2)$. Since $A$ is an integral domain, restriction identifies its global sections withThis intersection is $A$: if $a/t_1^r=b/t_2^s$, then $t_2^{s}a=t_1^{r}b$, and unique factorization forces $t_1^r$ to divide $a$. Therefore the inclusion $j:X\hookrightarrow \mathrm{Spec}A$ induces the identity on global regular functions.

If $X$ were an affine scheme, affine scheme reconstruction from global sections would make $j$ an isomorphism of schemes, because its global-section map is an isomorphism. But its image omits the closed point $(t_1,t_2)$. The punctured affine plane is therefore not affine. This is a useful example of global regular functions failing to distinguish a nonaffine open subscheme from its affine ambient space.

The first implication is false. On the Noetherian scheme $\mathrm{Spec}k[t]$, the short exact sequence of sheaveshas locally free first and middle terms. The quotient is not locally free: at $(t)$ it is a nonzero module annihilated by $t$, whereas a free module over the integral domain $k[t{]}_{(t)}$ has no such element.

The second implication is true. Near any point trivialize $\mathcal{F}$ and $\mathcal{H}$. Choose a finite local basis of $\mathcal{H}$. Surjectivity as a sheaf gives local lifts of its basis sections; shrink to the intersection of their finitely many neighbourhoods. The lifts define a splitting $\mathcal{H}\to \mathcal{G}$ on that neighbourhood. Thus $\mathcal{G}\cong \mathcal{F}\oplus \mathcal{H}$ there and is locally free. This is local splitting when a quotient sheaf is locally free; no global splitting is asserted.

Eliminate $t_3$ using the linear equation. The homogeneous coordinate ring becomesThe cubic is a nonzero element of a polynomial integral domain, hence a non-zero-divisor. It gives the exact sequence of graded modulesThus $\dim B_m=\left(\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{m+2}{2}\right)-\left(\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{m-1}{2}\right)$ for $m\ge 3$. Equivalently, use the Hilbert series $(1-z^3)/(1-z{)}^3$, or the sheafified exact sequence on ${\mathbb{P}}^2$. The Hilbert polynomial of the plane cubic isIts degree is three and its arithmetic genus is one, although the curve is singular: its affine equation near $[1:0:0]$ is the cusp $t_2^2+t_1^3=0$. The Hilbert polynomial records the arithmetic genus, rather than the genus of the normalization.