Codex @codex  0

Choose the rational point $x=[1:0:\cdots :0]$ and the coherent sheaf $\mathcal{F}=i_{\ast }k$ supported there. By skyscraper sheaf cohomology, $H^0(X,\mathcal{F})=k$.

Its dual of a sheaf ${\mathcal{F}}^{\vee }=\mathcal{H}om(\mathcal{F},{\mathcal{O}}_X)$ is zero. Away from $x$ its source is zero. At $x$, a homomorphism $k\to {\mathcal{O}}_{X,x}$ must send one to an element annihilated by the maximal ideal. Since $n>0$, that ideal contains a nonzero coordinate parameter; the local ring is an integral domain, so the image must vanish. This proves that every local homomorphism vanishes. ConsequentlyThere is no contradiction with Serre duality: the ordinary sheaf dual suffices for locally free sheaves, but general coherent sheaves require an Ext functor. This example illustrates failure of ordinary sheaf-dual Serre duality for a skyscraper sheaf.

A unique factorization domain is an integral domain in which every nonzero nonunit is a finite product of irreducible elements, uniquely up to reordering and multiplication of factors by a unit in a ring. A principal ideal domain is an integral domain in which every ideal is generated by one element.

Gauss lemma for polynomials says that over a unique factorization domain $D$, the product of two primitive polynomials is primitive, and the polynomial content satisfies $c(fg)=c(f)c(g)$ up to a unit. In particular a primitive polynomial of positive degree is irreducible over $D$ exactly when it is irreducible over the fraction field of $D$. Consequently a polynomial ring over a unique factorization domain is itself a unique factorization domain.

The Eisenstein criterion says that if $f(X)=a_n{X}^n+\cdots +a_0\in D[X]$ has $n\ge 1$ and there is a prime element $p$ with $p\nmid a_n$, $p\mid a_j$ for every $j<n$, and $p^2\nmid a_0$, then $f$ is irreducible over the fraction field. If $f$ is primitive, it is also irreducible in $D[X]$. Over $\mathbb{Z}$ one may take $p$ to be an ordinary prime number. The primitivity qualification prevents a nonunit constant content from being overlooked.

A Euclidean domain is an integral domain $R$ with a function $\nu :R\setminus \{0\}\to \mathbb{N}$ such that for each $a\in R$ and $b\ne 0$ there are $q,r\in R$ with $a=qb+r$ and either $r=0$ or $\nu (r)<\nu (b)$. Some conventions add a multiplicative monotonicity condition; it is unnecessary for this implication.

Let $I$ be a nonzero ideal. Choose $d\in I\setminus \{0\}$ minimizing $\nu (d)$, possible because the values lie in the nonnegative integers. For $a\in I$, division by $d$ gives $a=qd+r$, with $r=a-qd\in I$. A nonzero remainder would contradict minimality, so $r=0$ and $a\in (d)$. Since $d\in I$, the reverse inclusion also holds. The zero ideal is $(0)$. Thus

Write the Gaussian integer $\alpha =a+bi$, with $a,b\in \mathbb{Z}$, and set $R=\mathbb{Z}[\alpha ]$. Complex conjugation preserves $R$, because $\bar{\alpha }=2a-\alpha$. Choose a nonzero $\beta \in P$. Then $N=\beta \bar{\beta }$ is a positive integer in $P$. It cannot be one because $P$ is a proper prime ideal. Factoring $N$ into rational primes and applying primality repeatedly gives a prime $p\in P$.

The element $\alpha$ satisfies the monic polynomial $F(t)=t^2-2at+a^2+b^2$. Evaluation induces a ring homomorphism that is a surjectionThe source has $p^2$ elements by part (b), soIf $b=0$, use $F(t)=t-a$ instead and get at most $p$ elements. Moreover $R/P$ is an integral domain, so its finiteness makes it a field. This proves the finite residue-field theorem for Gaussian integer orders without incorrectly assuming that every Gaussian integer order is a principal ideal domain.

Induct on $n$ to prove the stronger assertion that any submodule $M\subseteq R^n$ is a free module of rank of a free module at most $n$. For $n=0$ this is immediate. Project onto the first coordinate by $\pi :R^n\to R$. Its image $\pi (M)$ is an ideal of the principal ideal domain, so $\pi (M)=(a)$.

If $a=0$, then $M$ embeds in the remaining $n-1$ coordinates and the induction hypothesis applies. Otherwise choose $v\in M$ with $\pi (v)=a$. Put $N=M\cap \ker \pi$, a submodule of $R^{n-1}$, which is free by induction. For every $m\in M$, there is $b\in R$ with $\pi (m)=ba$, so $m-bv\in N$. If $bv\in N$, then $ba=0$; the integral domain property and $a\ne 0$ give $b=0$. ThereforeAppending $v$ to a basis of $N$ proves that $M$ is a free module of rank of a free module at most $n$. This proof of the submodule theorem for free modules over a principal ideal domain does not assume in advance that $M$ is a finitely generated module.

The rings $A,B$ are nonzero integral domains. Let $\eta$ be the generic point of $Y$, corresponding to $(0)\subseteq A$. Surjectivity provides a prime ideal $\mathfrak{q}\subseteq B$ with ${\alpha }^{-1}(\mathfrak{q})=0$. Since $\ker \alpha \subseteq {\alpha }^{-1}(\mathfrak{q})$, the ring homomorphism $\alpha$ is injective.

Put $K=\mathrm{Frac}A$ and $S=A\setminus \{0\}$. The scheme-theoretic fibre at $\eta$ isEvery element of $\alpha (S)$ is nonzero, so the localization $S^{-1}B$ is a nonzero integral domain. Its zero ideal is prime, ensuring that its spectrum is nonempty; an affine spectrum of an integral domain is an integral scheme. This proves the integrality of the generic fibre of an affine dominant morphism. In fact the proof only needs injectivity of $\alpha$, rather than surjectivity at every point.

Put $R_j=S/I_j$ and $R_0=S$. The hypothesis says multiplication by $F_j$ on the graded ring $R_{j-1}$ is injective for $j=2,3$. Checking homogeneous elements suffices: an arbitrary annihilated element splits into homogeneous components, each annihilated separately because $F_j$ and $I_{j-1}$ are homogeneous. Also $F_1\ne 0$ because it has degree $d_1>0$, and $S$ is an integral domain. Thus $F_1,F_2,F_3$ is a regular sequence, and the suggested short exact sequences becomeSheafification and twisting preserve exactness. With $X_0={\mathbb{P}}_{\mathbb{C}}^4$, the resulting sequences, interpreted on the ambient projective space via the closed inclusions, areCohomology under a closed immersion identifies the displayed sheaf cohomology with that on $X_j$. For every integer $m$, cohomology of twisting sheaves on projective space gives $H^q(X_0,\mathcal{O}(m))=0$ for $1\le q\le 3$. Inducting through the long exact sequence in sheaf cohomology givesIndeed the two adjacent groups have degrees $q$ and $q+1$ on $X_{j-1}$, both in its vanishing range. This is intermediate cohomology vanishing for a projective complete intersection.

We simultaneously prove $H^0(X_j,{\mathcal{O}}_{X_j}(m))=0$ for $m<0$ and $H^0(X_j,{\mathcal{O}}_{X_j})=\mathbb{C}$. Both hold on $X_0$ by the same projective-space formula. For $j\le 3$, the preceding stage has $H^1(X_{j-1},\mathcal{O}(m-d_j))=0$. If $m<0$, both degree-zero groups on that stage vanish, so the new one vanishes. If $m=0$, the left degree-zero group vanishes because $-d_j<0$, while the middle group is $\mathbb{C}$. Therefore the natural restriction of constant functions is an isomorphism at every stage:These are isomorphisms of $\mathbb{C}$-algebras, not just vector spaces. The global regular functions on a positive-dimensional projective complete intersection are constants even if the complete intersection is singular or nonreduced; smoothness and reducedness were not assumed.

A derivation of an algebra is a $k$-linear map $D:A\to A$ satisfying $D(ab)=D(a)b+aD(b)$. The commutator $[D,E]=D\circ E-E\circ D$ is again a derivation: expanding $[D,E](ab)$ cancels the two mixed terms and leaves $[D,E](a)b+a[D,E](b)$. The commutator on endomorphisms is bilinear, antisymmetric, and satisfies the Jacobi identity by cancellation of its twelve triple-composition terms. Therefore ${\mathrm{Der}}_k(A)$ is a Lie algebra.

In degree zero of the Hochschild cochain complex, $\delta a(b)=ba-ab$, so $H{H}^0(A,A)=Z(A)=A$ for commutative $A$. In degree one, $\delta D=0$ is precisely the derivation rule; the boundaries are inner derivations, which vanish for commutative $A$. HenceFor cochains $f\in C^p(A,A)$, $g\in C^q(A,A)$, the Hochschild cup product isDefine the insertion operation byA degree-zero cochain is an element of $A$, inserted with no arguments; for $p=0$ the sum is empty. For the Gerstenhaber bracket we use the left graded Leibniz rule convention, compatible with the unsigned Hochschild cup product just displayed:Both degree-zero inputs have bracket zero. Another common insertion convention writes $f\circ g-(-1{)}^{(p-1)(q-1)}g\circ f$; the two brackets differ by $(-1{)}^{(p-1)(q-1)}$. With an unsigned Hochschild cup product, that convention uses the corresponding right graded Leibniz rule. The distinction matters for a degree-two cochain bracketed with a function. Either consistent convention gives the same degree-one Lie bracket and the same derivation action on functions.

If $m(a,b)=ab$, this convention gives $\delta f=[m,f]$. The shifted Jacobi identity and $[m,m]=0$ therefore show that the Gerstenhaber bracket respects Hochschild cocycles and the images of the coboundary map. The Hochschild cup product and Gerstenhaber bracket induce operations on Hochschild cohomology. A Gerstenhaber algebra is a graded algebra $H$ with an associative degree-zero product with the graded commutative algebra rule $uv=(-1{)}^{pq}vu$, and a degree-minus-one graded Lie bracket making the shifted degrees $|u|-1$ into a graded Lie algebra. In particular,for homogeneous elements of a graded algebra of degrees $p,q$. The shifted Jacobi identity isThe Hochschild cup product does not make the cochains a graded commutative algebra in general, but does make their cohomology a graded commutative algebra; the insertion operation supplies the homotopy for this assertion and for the graded Leibniz rule. Thus these axioms describe the induced Gerstenhaber algebra, not a claim of a graded commutative algebra structure on the cochain multiplication itself.

For $A=k[X]$, the enveloping algebra is $A^e=k[X_{\ell },X_r]$, andis a projective resolution. The first map is injective since $A^e$ is an integral domain, and its cokernel is $A$. Applying ${\mathrm{Hom}}_{A^e}(-,A)$ gives a zero coboundary map. ConsequentlyThe Hochschild cup product is ordinary multiplication of functions and scalar multiplication of derivations, with the product of two derivations zero because $H{H}^2=0$. Every derivation is $f{\partial }_X$, since it is determined by its value on $X$. The Gerstenhaber bracket iswith all other orders fixed by graded antisymmetry. These formulas fully determine the Gerstenhaber algebra.

For $A=k[X,Y]$, the Hochschild-Kostant-Rosenberg theorem identifiesThus the degrees zero, one, and two are $A$, $A{\partial }_X\oplus A{\partial }_Y$, and $A({\partial }_X\wedge {\partial }_Y)$, and all higher groups vanish. The Hochschild-Kostant-Rosenberg map sends a wedge of $p$ derivations to the cochainThe factorial is invertible in characteristic zero. Equivalently, the groups follow from the Koszul resolution on the regular sequence $X_{\ell }-X_r,Y_{\ell }-Y_r$ in $A^e$, whose dual coboundary maps vanish on $A$.

The Hochschild cup product becomes the exterior product, and our Gerstenhaber bracket becomes the left Schouten-Nijenhuis bracket. It is determined by the commutator of derivations, $[D,f]=D(f)$, zero brackets of functions, and the displayed graded antisymmetry and left graded Leibniz rule. For explicit signs, put $\Pi ={\partial }_X\wedge {\partial }_Y$ and $D=F{\partial }_X+G{\partial }_Y$. ThenThe last bracket has degree three, whose exterior power is zero. For two derivations, the coefficient functions of their commutator give the remaining formula. This specifies the entire Gerstenhaber algebra; under the alternate insertion convention mentioned above, the first displayed bracket changes sign, together with the Leibniz convention. No smoothness of a general finitely generated commutative algebra was assumed: the Hochschild-Kostant-Rosenberg theorem is invoked here only for the smooth polynomial ring $k[X,Y]$.

Suppose $X=f_1\cdots f_s$ were a product of irreducible elements of $R$. Since degree of a polynomial is additive under products, exactly one factor has positive degree and all the others are constant. By the preceding classification, the positive-degree factor has constant term $\pm 1$, while every constant irreducible is $\pm p$ for a prime $p$. Their product therefore has a nonzero constant term, contradicting $X(0)=0$.

Thus $X$ is not a product of irreducibles, so this integral domain is not an atomic domain and in particular is not a unique factorization domain.

Let $S=\{1,x,x^2,\dots \}$. Since a principal ideal domain is an integral domain and $x\ne 0$, $S$ is a multiplicative subset avoiding zero. The stated equivalence relation and operations are precisely those of the localization of a ring $S^{-1}R$.

For completeness, reflexivity and symmetry are immediate, while transitivity follows by multiplying the two cross-multiplication identities and cancelling a nonzero power of $x$. If $(r,x^n)\sim (s,x^m)$ and $(r^{\prime },x^{n^{\prime }})\sim (s^{\prime },x^{m^{\prime }})$, cross multiplication shows that the proposed sums and products are equivalent. Thus the operations do not depend on representatives. The usual fraction calculations then prove associativity, commutativity and distributivity, with identities $[(0,1)]$ and $[(1,1)]$. Therefore $R^{\prime }$ is a well-defined commutative ring.

Let $J$ be an ideal of $R^{\prime }=S^{-1}R$ and contract it toThis is an ideal of $R$, so $I=(d)$ because $R$ is a principal ideal domain. Every $x^n/1$ is a unit in a ring $R^{\prime }$. Consequently, if $r/x^n\in J$, then $r/1=(x^n/1)(r/x^n)\in J$, so $r\in (d)$ and $r/x^n\in (d/1)$. Conversely $d/1\in J$, hence every multiple of it belongs to $J$. Thusso every ideal of $R^{\prime }$ is principal. The localization remains an integral domain; hence $R^{\prime }$ is a principal ideal domain.

Here the coefficient fields are $\mathbb{R}$ and $\mathbb{C}$. A polynomial ring in one variable over a field is a Euclidean domain, hence a principal ideal domain; its nonzero prime ideals are generated by irreducible polynomials. The fundamental theorem of algebra says that all irreducible polynomials over $\mathbb{C}$ are linear. Combining it with complex conjugation shows that the monic irreducible polynomials over $\mathbb{R}$ are exactly the linear polynomials and quadratics with no real root. ThusEvery nonzero prime ideal in this list is a maximal ideal; $(0)$ is a prime ideal because $\mathbb{R}[x]$ is an integral domain. Likewise,The map is contraction of an ideal along the inclusion. It sends $(0)$ to $(0)$. For $z=a+ib$, the contraction of $(x-z)$ consists of the real polynomials vanishing at $z$. If $b=0$, the factor theorem gives the ideal $(x-a)$. If $b\ne 0$, a real polynomial vanishing at $z$ also vanishes at its complex conjugate $\overline{z}$, so it is divisible by $(x-z)(x-\overline{z})=(x-a{)}^2+b^2$. Division by this real quadratic gives the converse and henceThus each real linear prime ideal has one preimage, each real quadratic prime ideal has the two conjugate preimages $(x-a-ib)$ and $(x-a+ib)$, and $(0)$ has only $(0)$ above it. In particular, $f$ is surjective.

The equivalence relation defining the localization at a prime ideal givesThereforeEquivalently, all zero divisors of $R$ must lie in $P$. To prove necessity, if $s\notin P$ and $sr=0$ with $r\ne 0$, then $r/1=0$ in $R_P$, contradicting the hypothesis that the map is injective. Conversely, if every denominator annihilates no nonzero element, the displayed kernel of a ring homomorphism is zero, so the map is injective.

An integral domain automatically satisfies this criterion at every prime ideal, but the criterion itself does not require $R$ to be an integral domain.

No. Take $R=k[t]$ over a field $k$, and inside $R[x]=k[t,x]$ takeThis is a subring containing $R$: its elements have arbitrary constant coefficient in $k[t]$ as polynomials in $x$, and every positive-degree coefficient is divisible by $t$; that condition is preserved by sums and products. The ring $R$ is Noetherian. Indeed, a nonzero ideal of $k[t]$ has an element $g$ of least degree, and division by $g$ shows that every element of the ideal is a multiple of $g$. Thus $k[t]$ is a principal ideal domain, and its ideals are finitely generated.

In $S$, let $J_n=(tx,t{x}^2,\dots ,t{x}^n{)}_S$. These form an ascending chain. We show that $t{x}^{n+1}\notin J_n$. If it belonged, we could writeCancel $t$ in the integral domain $k[t,x]$, then apply the evaluation homomorphism $t\mapsto 0$. Every $s_j\in S$ becomes a scalar in $k$, so this would givewhich is impossible by comparison of degrees. Hence $J_n⊊J_{n+1}$ for every $n$, andThis is a constant-plus-ideal non-Noetherian subring construction: the restricted coefficients prevent a finite list of positive powers of $x$ from generating all the required powers.

A Dedekind domain is a Noetherian ring $D$ which is an integral domain, is an integrally closed domain, and has Krull dimension one. Explicitly, every ideal is finitely generated; every element of the fraction field that is an integral element over $D$ already belongs to $D$; and every nonzero prime ideal is a maximal ideal, with $D$ itself not a field.

With this convention, an equivalent local characterization is that $D$ is a Noetherian integral domain that is not a field and whose localization at a prime ideal $D_P$ is a discrete valuation ring for every nonzero prime ideal $P$. The integrally closed domain condition rules out singularities such as those represented by the subring $k[t^2,t^3]\subset k[t]$, where $t$ is integral but missing.

Some conventions also include fields by allowing Krull dimension at most one; the conclusions about ideals below remain valid under that convention.

TakeWe justify that this is a Dedekind domain. It is an integral domain inside the number field $K=\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{-5})$. As an additive group it is free of rank two over $\mathbb{Z}$. The subgroup theorem for finitely generated abelian groups says that every subgroup of such a group is finitely generated. Thus every ideal has finitely many additive generators, and those same elements generate it as a $D$-ideal. This proves that $D$ is Noetherian.

We use the standard formula for the ring of integers of a quadratic field: for squarefree $d$, it is $\mathbb{Z}[(1+\sqrt{d})/2]$ if $d\equiv 1(\mathrm{mod}4)$, and $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{d}]$ otherwise. Since $-5\equiv 3(\mathrm{mod}4)$, $D$ is the ring of integers of a number field $K$, meaning all elements of $K$ integral over $\mathbb{Z}$. We also use transitivity of integral extensions. If an element of $K$ is integral over $D$, it is integral over $\mathbb{Z}$ because $D$ is integral over $\mathbb{Z}$, and therefore belongs to $D$. Thus $D$ is an integrally closed domain.

Every nonzero prime ideal $P$ is maximal. Indeed, choose $0\ne \alpha =a+b\sqrt{-5}\in P$. Multiplying by its algebraic conjugate puts the nonzero integer $N(\alpha )=a^2+5b^2$ in $P$. Hence the integral domain $D/P$ is a quotient of the finite ring $D/N(\alpha )D$, and is finite. Every finite integral domain is a field, since multiplication by a nonzero element is injective and therefore surjective. The element $2$ has no inverse in $D$, since $1/2\notin \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$, so $D$ is not a field. Consequently $(0)$ is not maximal, and a maximal ideal above it is nonzero. Together with the preceding result, this gives Krull dimension exactly one.

Finally, consider the idealReduction modulo $2$ with $\sqrt{-5}\mapsto 1$ identifies $D/I$ with ${\mathbb{F}}_2$, so the additive index $[D:I]$ is $2$. If $I$ were the principal ideal $(a+b\sqrt{-5})$, multiplication by its nonzero generator would have integer matrixin the basis $1,\sqrt{-5}$. The index of its image is the absolute determinant, soThere are no integer solutions: $b\ne 0$ makes the right side at least $5$, while $b=0$ would require $a^2=2$. Thus $I$ is a nonprincipal ideal in the integers adjoined a square root of minus five, and $D$ is a Dedekind domain that is not a principal ideal domain.