For , the derivative is positive everywhere, so the mean value theorem makes strictly increasing. Since a polynomial is a continuous function, the intermediate value theorem and the values , locate its unique real root in . By the rational root theorem, a rational root of a monic integer polynomial must be an integer. There is no integer in , so the unique real root is an irrational number. The denominator part of that theorem also follows directly: if in lowest terms were a root, would force , hence .
Choose a positive common denominator so that and with nonzero integers . Put . Every element of the generated subgroup has the form , so it lies in . Conversely, Bezout identity gives integers with , so belongs to the generated subgroup. Consequently
This map is a bijective additive group homomorphism. It is the two-generator instance of a finitely generated subgroup of the rational additive group being an infinite cyclic group.
For the real example, take and . The group homomorphism from onto the generated subgroup is injective because is an irrational number. Thus this subgroup is isomorphic to . More directly, if a single real number generated it, then and for integers , giving , a contradiction. The choice generates a noncyclic additive subgroup.
Let . Solving the given Möbius transformation for the complete quotient and rationalizing gives
Therefore
The denominator is , so both are integers. The algebraic norm denominator is nonzero because is an irrational number.
For , and . Iterating this Gauss continued-fraction map on an irrational number never reaches zero, and its continued fraction is
The branches have inverse , for . The change of variables formula for a probability density function gives, almost everywhere,
The endpoints of these branches are a countable set of probability zero. Thus and have the same distribution; this Gauss measure is an invariant measure for the Gauss continued-fraction map.
For a partition of an interval , put
The upper Darboux sum and lower Darboux sum are
The upper and lower integrals are
The bounded function is Riemann integrable when these values agree, and their common value is its Riemann integral.
For the indicator of the rational numbers, every nondegenerate interval contains both a rational number and an irrational number. Hence every upper sum is one and every lower sum is zero. The function is not Riemann integrable.
Let be the complete quotient after . Part (a) writes the irrational number as
so lies between the adjacent continued fraction convergents and . Their separation is
Because all are positive integers, the recurrence implies . Hence this separation tends to zero, and the squeeze theorem gives
Let
The tail satisfies
For every fixed positive integer , this is smaller than for all sufficiently large .
The binary expansion has digits at factorial positions and arbitrarily long blocks of zeros, but it is neither eventually zero nor eventually periodic. Since a rational number has an eventually periodic binary expansion, is irrational. If it were an algebraic number of degree , part (b), or equivalently the Liouville approximation theorem, would give a fixed positive multiple of as a lower bound for all rational approximations. The fractions violate that bound. Thus is a transcendental number.
False, with “disjoint union” understood as a topological disjoint union. Take the rational numbers with the usual subspace topology from the real line.
Every connected subset of has at most one point. Indeed, if it contained , choose an irrational number . The two relatively open sets
partition and separate any subset containing both and . Hence the connected components of are singletons.
If a topological disjoint union of nonempty connected spaces were homeomorphic to , the image of each summand would be connected, hence a singleton. Every summand would therefore be a one-point topological space. Their topological disjoint union is a discrete space, since each summand is open. But is not a discrete space: for each , the distinct rational numbers approach , so is not an isolated point. This is a contradiction. The set decomposition into connected components always exists; giving those pieces the topological disjoint union topology need not recover the original topology.
True. Choose the irrational number , and partition the rational numbers into
No endpoint is rational, so these disjoint sets cover . Each is nonempty by the density of the rational numbers, and each is clopen in the subspace topology on .
Let two rational numbers be equivalent exactly when they belong to the same . The bijection
is well-defined. For every subset , the preimage of under the canonical projection of a quotient set is , which is open in . Thus every subset of is open: its quotient topology is the discrete topology. The usual subspace topology on the integers is also the discrete topology, because . Consequently is a homeomorphism.
For a proof by contradiction, suppose for positive integers in lowest terms, so . Squaring gives , and part (a) implies . Write ; then , hence , and part (a) again implies . This contradicts the coprimality of . Therefore is an irrational number.
Assuming and integrating a suitably normalized polynomial times produces a positive integer that tends to zero as the polynomial degree grows. This contradiction proves that is an irrational number.
On , use reduced representations of rational numbers with positive denominator. This reverses the nonzero values of the Thomae function, while leaving its values at irrational numbers zero. Every interval of positive length contains rational numbers of arbitrarily large reduced denominator: there are only finitely many fractions in with denominator at most a fixed , whereas any open interval contains infinitely many rational numbers. Thus this function taking finite real number values is unbounded on every nondegenerate subinterval.
Fix a real angle fraction , and repeatedly multiply by in the circle group. The generated cyclic subgroup is . Equivalently, the angle fractions are the fractional parts of , with one full turn identified with zero.
If is a rational number in lowest terms, with and coprime, then and no smaller positive power is . Hence is a finite cyclic group of order , consisting of equally spaced points. For , the successive angle fractions, starting at , are
The subgroup is finite, so it is a closed subgroup of the circle group; it is also a discrete subgroup. It is not an open subgroup, since every ambient neighbourhood of any of its points contains an arc, rather than only these seven points.
If is an irrational number, no nonzero integer satisfies , so the powers never repeat. The stronger statement is that is a dense set in the circle group: every nonempty open arc contains a power . Thus its closure is all of , while itself is a countable proper subgroup and is not a closed subgroup or a discrete subgroup. See irrational rotation and everywhere interval frequency under an irrational rotation for the corresponding motion and its long-term frequencies.
For , direct computation of the fractional parts of gives, to six decimal places,
For example, and . These calculations specify exactly which points the diagram displays.
Figure 1.
Seven repeating rational-rotation points and the first eight and sixty-four irrational-rotation points
. Labels give the power index ; the points are . The first panel uses , and the other two use . Each finite sample is only an illustration: a finite plot cannot establish that the infinite subgroup is a dense set. Reproduce the diagram with rational-versus-irrational-rotations.py. Details.
This example shows why algebraic generation and closure must be distinguished: one irrational rotation generates a countable cyclic subgroup, yet its closure is the whole uncountable compact group.