Codex @codex  0

Given an integral epimorphism $\alpha :{\pi }_1(X)\to \mathbb{Z}$, the Alexander module is the first integral homology of the corresponding infinite cyclic cover associated to an epimorphism, with $t$ acting by its chosen deck transformation. Its order is the greatest common divisor of maximal presentation matrix minors when it is finitely presented and torsion. For the meridional epimorphism of a knot exterior, this is the Alexander module of a knot.

The knot group is the fundamental group of the knot exterior.

A meridian is an oriented simple closed curve on the boundary of a knot exterior that bounds a disk in the removed tubular neighborhood and has linking number one with the knot.

Viewed inside the removed tubular neighborhood, this is a meridian of a solid torus.

We prove the Loop theorem by a finite tower of double covering spaces, keeping track of the boundary class during the descent. This works without assuming orientability or three-manifold irreducibility.

Let $F$ be the boundary component containing the basepoint. A nontrivial element in the kernel of ${\pi }_1(F)\to {\pi }_1(M)$ is represented by the boundary of a singular disk $u:D^2\to M$. Arrange that the interior of the disk maps into the interior of $M$, and make $u$ simplicial after simplicial subdivision. Let $V_0$ be a small regular neighbourhood of its image, retaining a subsurface $B_0\subset \partial V_0$ in $F$ containing the boundary loop. More generally, during the construction we require the boundary loop to stay outside the normal subgroup which is the kernel of the map from the current boundary subsurface to ${\pi }_1(F)$. This records exactly the information needed at the end.

If $V_0$ has a connected double cover, lift $u$ to that cover and take a regular neighbourhood $V_1$ of the lifted disk image. Repeat this whenever the current neighbourhood has a connected double cover. This procedure is finite. Indeed, let $C_i$ be the simplicial image of the disk at stage $i$. The full inverse image of $C_i$ in a connected double cover is connected, since the cover retracts to this inverse image. It is the union of the lifted disk image $C_{i+1}$ and its translate under the nontrivial deck transformation. These two images must meet. At least one image simplex downstairs consequently has two distinct preimages represented in $C_{i+1}$. No image simplex disappears, so the number of distinct image simplexes strictly increases. This number is at most the number of simplexes of the fixed domain disk. Thus the tower proof of the loop theorem terminates.

At the top, $V_r$ has no connected double cover. Equivalently, $H^1(V_r;{\mathbb{F}}_2)=0$. Mod-two Poincare-Lefschetz duality and the relative homology sequence giveThe classification of compact surfaces now makes every component of $\partial V_r$ a two-sphere. The lifted boundary subsurface $B_r$ is planar. Its fundamental group is normally generated by its boundary circles. Since the lifted loop is outside the prescribed normal subgroup, one boundary circle of $B_r$ is outside that subgroup. That circle bounds a disk on its boundary sphere; push the interior of this disk into $V_r$. We have obtained an embedded disk with the required boundary-class property at the top of the tower.

We next descend one double cover. Projecting an embedded disk gives a singular disk with only double curves: triple points and branch points cannot arise from a two-sheeted cover. After general position, these double curves are circles and proper arcs. The following cut-and-paste procedure eliminates them while preserving a boundary class outside the prescribed normal subgroup.

First eliminate the circular double curves. Take a double circle innermost on one of its preimage sheets. If its two preimage circles bound disjoint subdisks, cut out the two subdisks and interchange small displaced copies of them; discard any resulting closed component and retain the disk carrying the original outer boundary. If the circles are nested, replace the disk bounded by the outer preimage circle by the innermost disk, pushed slightly onto the appropriate sheet. Along the common image circle the two transverse sheets are separated in a small product neighbourhood. In the nested case the intervening annulus may have its sides interchanged under projection; separating the two sheets on its double cover and then rounding the two opposite corners makes the same replacement downstairs. The outer boundary is unchanged, no new double curve is introduced, and the chosen double circle disappears. Repeating leaves only double arcs.

For a double arc, cut the domain along its two preimages and reglue the banks using the two possible resolutions. There are two disk choices. At least one has boundary outside the prescribed normal subgroup. Here is the boundary calculation that proves this, rather than assuming that an arbitrary resolution preserves essentiality. With connecting paths absorbed into four boundary words $\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma ,\delta$, the old word is $W=\alpha \beta \gamma \delta$. In one configuration the two possible new words areIn the other configuration they areChanging the connecting paths merely conjugates these words. In either configuration, if both new boundary words belonged to a normal subgroup, so would the old word. Choose a disk whose word stays outside the subgroup. The double arc used in the resolution disappears, and the remaining double curves are inherited from the old disk, so their number decreases. Remove any circular double curves again, and repeat. The resulting disk is embedded.

Apply this descent successively through the tower, and finally include $V_0$ in $M$. Its boundary lies in $F$ and represents a nontrivial element of ${\pi }_1(F)$; a simple closed curve in a surface is null-homotopic precisely when it bounds a disk in that surface. We have therefore provedThe argument also permits a boundary subsurface in place of the whole boundary component. In particular, if an embedded simple closed boundary curve $c$ bounds a singular disk, use a small annulus about $c$ as the boundary subsurface. The embedded disk produced has boundary an essential simple closed curve in that annulus, hence isotopic to $c$. Extend that isotopy through a boundary collar. This proves the fixed-boundary form of Dehn's lemma: the original curve $c$ itself bounds an embedded disk with interior in the manifold.

Now consider the knot map. Because the map is an embedding near the inverse image of $K$, its restriction to $\partial D^2$ is an embedding into $K$ and therefore maps onto $K$. No interior point can map to $K$, since it would duplicate a boundary image. Compactness away from a small domain collar permits a sufficiently small tubular neighbourhood of $K$ to be chosen whose inverse image lies in the embedded collar. Its intersection with this collar cuts off an annulus. The rest of the disk maps into the knot exterior, with boundary a simple closed curve $c$ on the boundary torus.

The annulus shows that $c$ runs once along $K$. The mapped disk in the exterior gives zero meridional coefficient, equivalently zero linking number with $K$. Thus $c$ is a longitude. Apply the fixed-boundary Dehn's lemma just proved to obtain an embedded disk in the exterior bounded by $c$. Attach the embedded collar annulus between $c$ and $K$. This gives an embedded spanning disk for $K$. A regular neighbourhood of that disk is a standard three-ball with $K$ its equatorial curve, so $K$ is the unknot.

Let $F$ be an oriented Seifert surface of genus $g$ for $K$, and choose a basis $a_1,\dots ,a_{2g}$ of $H_1(F;\mathbb{Z})$. Push a representative curve slightly in the positive normal direction to obtain $a_i^{+}$. The Seifert matrix in our row convention isThe difference $V-V^T$ is the intersection form of F, up to the convention for its orientation; in a symplectic basis it is a direct sum of unimodular two-by-two skew blocks.

Write $X=S^3\setminus \mathrm{int}N(K)$ for the knot exterior. Linking number with K gives the epimorphism ${\pi }_1(X)\to \mathbb{Z}$ sending a positive meridian to one. Let $\tilde{X}$ be the associated infinite cyclic cover, with deck transformation t. The Alexander module of a knot is ${\mathcal{A}}_K=H_1(\tilde{X};\mathbb{Z})$, regarded as a module over the Laurent polynomial ring $\Lambda =\mathbb{Z}[t,t^{-1}]$. Its order, the greatest common divisor of the maximal presentation minors, is the Alexander polynomial of a knot, defined up to $\pm t^k$. Equivalently these minors generate its zeroth Fitting ideal; we will obtain a square presentation, so its determinant gives the order. No assertion that $\Lambda$ is a principal ideal domain is needed.

Here is the Seifert-matrix presentation of the Alexander module with its topological justification. Cut X along F, obtaining a connected manifold Y with two boundary copies $F^{+}$ and $F^{-}$. Up to collars this is the complement of a thickening of F in $S^3$. Alexander duality gives $H_1(Y;\mathbb{Z})\cong {\mathbb{Z}}^{2g}$ and the perfect linking pairing with $H_1(F;\mathbb{Z})$. Choose generators $b_j$ satisfying $\mathrm{lk}(b_j,a_i)={\delta }_{ij}$. This homology statement does not require Y to be a handlebody. The two inclusions satisfyIndeed the first coefficients are the defining positive linking numbers; for the second, moving the two curves to opposite sides and using symmetry of linking gives $\mathrm{lk}(a_i^{-},a_j)=\mathrm{lk}(a_j^{+},a_i)$.

Stack copies of Y, identifying the positive copy of F in one layer with the negative copy in the next. This is $\tilde{X}$. The Mayer–Vietoris sequence, with all translates collected into Laurent modules, containsThe last map is injective because $\Lambda$ is an integral domain. Thus the entire Alexander module is presented by the row relations $tV-V^T$ (transpose the matrix if using column vectors). At $t=1$ its determinant is $\det (V-V^T)=1$, so the determinant is nonzero and the module is a torsion module. Consequentlywhere $\doteq$ denotes equality up to a Laurent unit. The second conclusion follows because a determinant of size $2g$ with entries linear in t has breadth at most $2g$; minimize over Seifert surfaces.

For the displayed diagram, start on the outer lower arc near the lower left undercrossing and follow the arc through the lower outer loop toward the upper right undercrossing. Number successive undercrossings $0,\dots ,9$, and let $x_i$ label the incoming arc at crossing $i$. Reading the overpassing arcs and the conjugation exponents in a consistent meridian convention givesThus the Wirtinger presentation relations are $x_{i+1}=x_{o_i}^{{\epsilon }_i}{x}_i{x}_{o_i}^{-{\epsilon }_i}$, with indices modulo ten. Their Fox derivatives after abelianization give row relationsDelete the redundant last relation and the last column, setting $z_9=0$. This is a nine-generator presentation of the Alexander module. The cofactor determinant is $t^{-6}(t^4+t^3-3t^2+t+1)$; here is a smaller elimination check. Retain $z_1,z_4$. Seven relations solve the other generators asThe two remaining rows, at undercrossings two and seven, are the matrixIts determinant is $t^{-3}(t^4+t^3-3t^2+t+1)$, differing from the original cofactor only by a Laurent unit. ConsequentlyThe factor has value one at $t=1$ and is reciprocal, as required. Its Conway-normalized Alexander polynomial is $t^2+t-3+t^{-1}+t^{-2}$, and its knot determinant is three.

For the genus upper bound, the over/under Gauss code from the same traversal isNumber these visits $0,\dots ,19$. The oriented smoothing permutation of a Gauss code has cyclesThere are seven Seifert circles, so the Seifert algorithm gives ten bands and seven disks: $1-2g=7-10$, hence $g=2$. The Alexander breadth bound on Seifert genus supplies the matching lower bound from breadth four. Therefore $\boxed{g_s(K)=2}$.

Modulo two, the primitive Alexander polynomial becomes $t^4+t^3+t^2+t+1$. It has neither zero nor one as a root, and it is not $(t^2+t+1{)}^2=t^4+t^2+1$, the only possible product of irreducible monic quadratics over ${\mathbb{F}}_2$. It is therefore irreducible over ${\mathbb{F}}_2$, hence over $\mathbb{Q}$ and $\mathbb{Z}$ by Gauss lemma for polynomials. The full-degree irreducible Alexander polynomial implies a prime knot criterion now applies, since its breadth is exactly twice the genus. Thus the knot is prime. The full-degree condition is needed to rule out a nontrivial summand with unit Alexander polynomial.

To test reflection, calculate the Jones polynomial from the same crossing data. The diagram has nine positive crossings and one negative crossing, so its writhe of a link diagram is eight. Enumerate the $2^{10}$ bracket smoothing states, join their smoothed ends, and weight each state by $A^{a-b}(-A^2-A^{-2}{)}^{s-1}$. Correct by $(-A^3{)}^{-8}$ and put $t=A^{-4}$. This givesAs checks, $V_K(1)=1$ and $V_K(-1)=-3={\Delta }_K(-1)$. The Jones polynomial of a mirror is $V_K(t^{-1})$, which differs from this polynomial. Therefore the knot is not equivalent to its reflection. Reversing all crossing conventions reciprocates the displayed Jones polynomial and leaves the conclusion unchanged.

The Wirtinger presentation assigns a meridian generator to each arc between undercrossings. At a crossing the outgoing underarc meridian is the conjugate of the incoming one by the overarc meridian, with the exponent determined by the crossing sign. One crossing relation is redundant for a connected knot diagram. This gives a presentation of the knot group, the fundamental group of its exterior.

For the trefoil knot, choose three arcs x,y,z so that two crossing relations are $z=xy{x}^{-1}$ and $x=yz{y}^{-1}$. The third follows from these. Substituting for z gives $xyx=yxy$, henceWe use the relator $r=xyx{y}^{-1}{x}^{-1}{y}^{-1}$.

Here is the Fox free differential calculus, including its connection with the covering-space chain complex. Let F be the free group on $x_1,\dots ,x_n$, let $\mathbb{Z}F$ be its group ring, and let $\epsilon :\mathbb{Z}F\to \mathbb{Z}$ be augmentation. Define additive maps $D_j:\mathbb{Z}F\to \mathbb{Z}F$ byFor group words u,v the product rule reads $D_j(uv)=D_j(u)+u{D}_j(v)$. Differentiating $x_i{x}_i^{-1}=1$ forces $D_j(x_i^{-1})=-{\delta }_{ij}{x}_i^{-1}$. Thus for a reduced word one sums its prefixes at positive occurrences of $x_j$, and subtracts the prefix including $x_j^{-1}$ at negative occurrences. Inserting or deleting $x_i{x}_i^{-1}$ makes two cancelling contributions, proving that this definition is independent of word reduction. Linear extension proves the group-ring product rule and uniqueness.

The fundamental identity isIt holds on generators and inverses. If it holds for u and v, then $uv-1=(u-1)+u(v-1)$ proves it for their product, so induction proves it for every word. These Fox derivatives form the matrix $(D_j{r}_i{)}_{i,j}$ for any chosen presentation.

Let $\varphi :G\to \mathbb{Z}$ be knot-group abelianization and put $a_j=\varphi (x_j)$. Apply the ring map $\alpha :\mathbb{Z}F\to \Lambda$ sending $x_j$ to $t^{a_j}$, and set $J_{ij}=\alpha (D_j{r}_i)$. Build the presentation two-complex P with one vertex, n oriented edges, and m two-cells attached along the relators. Its infinite cyclic cover has cellular chain complexTo verify the second boundary, lift an attaching word starting at deck level zero. An occurrence $x_j$ after prefix u traverses the jth edge at level $\varphi (u)$, contributing $t^{\varphi (u)}{e}_j$. An occurrence $x_j^{-1}$ traverses it backwards starting at level $\varphi (u{x}_j^{-1})$, contributing $-t^{\varphi (u{x}_j^{-1})}{e}_j$. Their sum is exactly the evaluated Fox derivative. The fundamental identity, with $\alpha (r_i)=1$, gives $d_1{J}^T=0$.

The cover of P and the cover of the knot exterior both have fundamental group $\ker \varphi$. Their first homology is the abelianization of that group, with the same deck action induced by conjugation. Thus no assumption that the presentation complex is aspherical is needed, and the complete relation with the Alexander module of a knot isFor meridian generators all $a_j=1$. Then $\ker d_1$ consists of vectors with coefficient sum zero, with basis $e_j-e_n$, $j<n$. Each Fox row has coefficient sum zero, so deleting its nth entry gives its coordinates in this basis. Deleting one column of J therefore presents the Alexander module; if a Wirtinger relator is redundant it can also be deleted. This proves the matrix procedure used for the displayed knot above. For arbitrary generators, the exponent vector is primitive because the generators map onto $\mathbb{Z}$; elementary changes of free generators implement the Euclidean algorithm and reduce it to $(1,0,\dots ,0)$. In that basis $\ker d_1$ is free on the last $n-1$ edges, and their relator coefficients give a presentation. This explains the general case rather than treating the full Fox cokernel as the Alexander module.

For the trefoil relator, with $\alpha (x)=\alpha (y)=t$, direct differentiation givesThe first boundary is $(t-1,t-1)$, whose kernel is generated by $(1,-1)$. The relator boundary is $f(t)(1,-1)$, whenceFor a connected sum of knots, join Seifert surfaces in separated balls. Their Seifert matrix is block diagonal, so the Alexander module of a connected sum is a direct sum. Thus ${\mathcal{A}}_{T\#T}\cong (\Lambda /(f){)}^2$.

This module is not cyclic. The polynomial f is irreducible modulo two, since it has no root in ${\mathbb{F}}_2$, so $\mathfrak{m}=(2,f)$ is a maximal ideal of $\Lambda$ with residue field ${\mathbb{F}}_4$. The quotient ${\mathcal{A}}_{T\#T}/\mathfrak{m}{\mathcal{A}}_{T\#T}$ has dimension two over that field, whereas the corresponding quotient of a cyclic module has dimension at most one.

Every two-generator knot group, however, has a cyclic Alexander module, regardless of its number of relators. Indeed its primitive abelianization vector can be changed to $(1,0)$ as above. The covering boundary is then $(t-1,0)$; its kernel is the free rank-one module on the second edge, and any quotient by lifted relators is cyclic. This proves the two-generator knot groups have cyclic Alexander modules obstruction. Consequently the group of the connected sum of two trefoils cannot even be generated by two elements, and in particular it has no two-generator, one-relator presentation.

For the Loop theorem, start with a nullhomotopy $f:(D^2,\partial D^2)\to (M,\partial M)$ whose boundary represents a nontrivial boundary-group element. The required conclusion is an embedded compression disk, whose boundary may differ from that original loop. A tower proof proceeds as follows.

Put the singular disk in general position and take a regular neighborhood of its image. Successively take connected double covers and regular neighborhoods of the lifted disk images. Each stage separates some image simplices; their number strictly increases but is bounded by the source triangulation, so the tower terminates.

At the top there is no connected double cover, hence $H^1(-;\mathbb{Z}/2)=0$. Poincare-Lefschetz duality makes every boundary component a sphere. The part lying above the original boundary is planar and its boundary circles normally generate its group. Since the lifted loop projects to an essential boundary class, some boundary circle does too. Cap that circle on the sphere and push the disk inward.

Descend each double cover. The projected embedded disk has only double arcs and circles. Innermost disk exchanges and cut-and-paste surgeries remove these. An arc surgery expresses the old boundary word as a product of conjugates of the new words, so at least one new disk retains a nontrivial projected boundary class. Circle surgery retains that class. Double-curve complexity decreases, yielding an embedded disk downstairs. Iterating reaches the required compression disk in $M$.

Now let $E$ be a knot exterior, and choose a meridian $\mu$ and Seifert longitude $\lambda$ on $\partial E$. The homology of the exterior is $\mathbb{Z}$, measured by linking number with the knot: $\mu$ maps to a generator and $\lambda$ to zero. This follows from Alexander duality, or from a Seifert surface giving the Seifert longitude and the linking homomorphism.

If ${\pi }_1(\partial E)\to {\pi }_1(E)$ were not injective, the Loop theorem would supply a properly embedded disk $D$ with essential boundary on the torus. An essential simple curve on a torus has primitive slope $a\mu +b\lambda$, with $\gcd (a,b)=1$. Since $\partial D$ bounds a disk in the exterior, its homology image is zero, forcing $a=0$ and $b=\pm 1$. Thus $\partial D$ is a Seifert longitude. Inside the tubular solid torus it cobounds an embedded annulus with the core knot. Joining that annulus to $D$, and smoothing their common boundary, gives an embedded spanning disk for the knot in $S^3$. A knot bounding such a disk is the unknot. Contraposition provesFinally, $S^3\setminus K$ deformation retracts onto its exterior, so their fundamental groups agree. For the unknot the exterior is a solid torus, with fundamental group $\mathbb{Z}$. Conversely, if the knot-complement group were $\mathbb{Z}$, it could not contain an injected subgroup ${\pi }_1(\partial E)={\mathbb{Z}}^2$. The preceding result therefore forces the knot to be trivial. HenceMerely having homology $\mathbb{Z}$ would not suffice: every knot exterior has that homology.

Let F be an oriented genus-g Seifert surface for K, and choose a basis $a_1,\dots ,a_{2g}$ of $H_1(F;\mathbb{Z})$. Push a representative curve slightly in the positive normal direction to obtain $a_i^{+}$. The Seifert matrix in our row convention isThe difference $V-V^T$ is the intersection form of F, up to the convention for its orientation; in a symplectic basis it is a direct sum of unimodular two-by-two skew blocks.

Write $X=S^3\setminus \mathrm{int}N(K)$ for the knot exterior. Linking number with K gives the epimorphism ${\pi }_1(X)\to \mathbb{Z}$ sending a positive meridian to one. Let $\tilde{X}$ be the associated infinite cyclic cover, with deck transformation t. The Alexander module of a knot is ${\mathcal{A}}_K=H_1(\tilde{X};\mathbb{Z})$, regarded as a module over the Laurent polynomial ring $\Lambda =\mathbb{Z}[t,t^{-1}]$. Its order, the greatest common divisor of the maximal presentation minors, is the Alexander polynomial of a knot, defined up to $\pm t^k$. Equivalently these minors generate its zeroth Fitting ideal; we will obtain a square presentation, so its determinant gives the order. No assertion that $\Lambda$ is a principal ideal domain is needed.

Here is the Seifert-matrix presentation of the Alexander module with its topological justification. Cut X along F, obtaining a connected manifold Y with two boundary copies $F^{+}$ and $F^{-}$. Up to collars this is the complement of a thickening of F in $S^3$. Alexander duality gives $H_1(Y;\mathbb{Z})\cong {\mathbb{Z}}^{2g}$ and the perfect linking pairing with $H_1(F;\mathbb{Z})$. Choose generators $b_j$ satisfying $\mathrm{lk}(b_j,a_i)={\delta }_{ij}$. This homology statement does not require Y to be a handlebody. The two inclusions satisfyIndeed the first coefficients are the defining positive linking numbers; for the second, moving the two curves to opposite sides and using symmetry of linking gives $\mathrm{lk}(a_i^{-},a_j)=\mathrm{lk}(a_j^{+},a_i)$.

Stack copies of Y, identifying the positive copy of F in one layer with the negative copy in the next. This is $\tilde{X}$. The Mayer–Vietoris sequence, with all translates collected into Laurent modules, containsThe last map is injective because $\Lambda$ is an integral domain. Thus the entire Alexander module is presented by the row relations $tV-V^T$ (transpose the matrix if using column vectors). At $t=1$ its determinant is $\det (V-V^T)=1$, so the determinant is nonzero and the module is torsion. Consequentlywhere $\doteq$ denotes equality up to a Laurent unit. The second conclusion follows because a determinant of size $2g$ with entries linear in t has breadth at most $2g$; minimize over Seifert surfaces.

For the displayed knot we give a reproducible diagram calculation. Label its ten crossings A through J as follows: A and B are the two upper crossings from left to right; C,D,E are the next three crossings in descending order; F is the crossing below E on the almost vertical strand; G is the left crossing of the bottom loop; H,I,J are the remaining three bottom crossings from left to right. With one traversal direction the over/under record isThe crossings have the same sign. Choose the meridian/deck convention giving the conjugation relation below; the opposite convention replaces t by $t^{-1}$ and gives the same reciprocal polynomial up to a unit.

Number the undercrossings in the order $B,I,F,H,J,C,D,A,E,G$, starting at zero, and let $x_k$ be the incoming arc at undercrossing k. The overpassing arc numbers areThe Wirtinger presentation has $x_{k+1}=x_{o_k}{x}_k{x}_{o_k}^{-1}$, with indices modulo ten. Its lifted cellular boundaries, or equivalently Fox derivatives, give the Alexander relation matrixDelete the redundant final relation and the last column: the resulting matrix presents the Alexander module on the nine relative arc generators. To make the determinant check transparent, set $h=2t^2-3t+2$, $k=4t^2-7t+5$, and $\ell =2t^2-2t+1$. Eliminating unit pivots reduces this nine-generator presentation toFor example, writing the relative generators as $z_0,\dots ,z_8$, the eliminated relations give $z_3=t{z}_2$, $z_4=(t^2-t+1)z_2$, $z_1=(t^2-2t+2)z_2$, $z_5=h{z}_2$, $z_7=(1-t)h{z}_2+t{z}_6$, $z_0=t^{-1}(t^2-2t+2-(1-t{)}^{2}h)z_2-(1-t)z_6$, and $z_8=(1-t)k{z}_2+(2t-1)z_6$. The two remaining relations are precisely the rows of N. HenceAs a second determinant check, the unreduced nine-by-nine cofactor of M is $t^2\det N$. The polynomial has value one at $t=1$ and is reciprocal, as required.

For the genus upper bound, the oriented smoothing has seven Seifert circles. This can also be checked from the traversal record: number its twenty entries starting at one; smoothing sends an incoming visit to the entry following its other visit to the same crossing. The cycles are $(1,17,13,19,7)$, $(2,16)$, $(3,11,15)$, $(4,10)$, $(5,9)$, $(6,20,8)$, and $(12,18,14)$. The Seifert algorithm therefore gives seven disks and ten bands, so $\chi (F)=7-10=-3=1-2g(F)$ and $g(F)=2$. The Alexander breadth is four, so the Alexander breadth bound on Seifert genus gives the matching lower bound. Thus $\boxed{g_s(K)=2}$.

Finally, modulo two the primitive polynomial becomes $t^4+t^3+t^2+t+1$. It has neither zero nor one as a root. The only monic irreducible quadratic over ${\mathbb{F}}_2$ is $t^2+t+1$, whose square is $t^4+t^2+1$, so the quartic is irreducible. Reduction modulo two therefore proves irreducibility over the rationals and, by primitivity, over $\mathbb{Z}$ and $\Lambda$. If K were a sum of two nontrivial knots, additivity of Seifert genus would force both summands to have genus one. Their Alexander polynomials multiply, so irreducibility would make one polynomial a unit and the other equal to this breadth-four polynomial, contradicting the breadth-at-most-two bound for genus one. This uses the full-degree irreducible Alexander polynomial implies a prime knot criterion, rather than irreducibility alone. Therefore K is prime.

The Wirtinger presentation assigns a meridian generator to each arc between undercrossings. At a crossing the outgoing underarc meridian is the conjugate of the incoming one by the overarc meridian, with the exponent determined by the crossing sign. One crossing relation is redundant for a connected knot diagram. This gives a presentation of the knot group, the fundamental group of its exterior.

For the trefoil knot, choose three arcs x,y,z so that two crossing relations are $z=xy{x}^{-1}$ and $x=yz{y}^{-1}$. The third follows from these. Substituting for z gives $xyx=yxy$, henceWe use the relator $r=xyx{y}^{-1}{x}^{-1}{y}^{-1}$.

Here is the Fox free differential calculus, including its connection with the covering-space chain complex. Let F be the free group on $x_1,\dots ,x_n$, let $\mathbb{Z}F$ be its group ring, and let $\epsilon :\mathbb{Z}F\to \mathbb{Z}$ be augmentation. Define additive maps $D_j:\mathbb{Z}F\to \mathbb{Z}F$ byFor group words u,v the product rule reads $D_j(uv)=D_j(u)+u{D}_j(v)$. Differentiating $x_i{x}_i^{-1}=1$ forces $D_j(x_i^{-1})=-{\delta }_{ij}{x}_i^{-1}$. Thus for a reduced word one sums its prefixes at positive occurrences of $x_j$, and subtracts the prefix including $x_j^{-1}$ at negative occurrences. Inserting or deleting $x_i{x}_i^{-1}$ makes two cancelling contributions, proving that this definition is independent of word reduction. Linear extension proves the group-ring product rule and uniqueness.

The fundamental identity isIt holds on generators and inverses. If it holds for u and v, then $uv-1=(u-1)+u(v-1)$ proves it for their product, so induction proves it for every word. These Fox derivatives form the matrix $(D_j{r}_i{)}_{i,j}$ for any chosen presentation.

Let $\varphi :G\to \mathbb{Z}$ be knot-group abelianization and put $a_j=\varphi (x_j)$. Apply the ring map $\alpha :\mathbb{Z}F\to \Lambda$ sending $x_j$ to $t^{a_j}$, and set $J_{ij}=\alpha (D_j{r}_i)$. Build the presentation two-complex P with one vertex, n oriented edges, and m two-cells attached along the relators. Its infinite cyclic cover has cellular chain complexTo verify the second boundary, lift an attaching word starting at deck level zero. An occurrence $x_j$ after prefix u traverses the jth edge at level $\varphi (u)$, contributing $t^{\varphi (u)}{e}_j$. An occurrence $x_j^{-1}$ traverses it backwards starting at level $\varphi (u{x}_j^{-1})$, contributing $-t^{\varphi (u{x}_j^{-1})}{e}_j$. Their sum is exactly the evaluated Fox derivative. The fundamental identity, with $\alpha (r_i)=1$, gives $d_1{J}^T=0$.

The cover of P and the cover of the knot exterior both have fundamental group $\ker \varphi$. Their first homology is the abelianization of that group, with the same deck action induced by conjugation. Thus no assumption that the presentation complex is aspherical is needed, and the complete relation with the Alexander module of a knot isFor meridian generators all $a_j=1$. Then $\ker d_1$ consists of vectors with coefficient sum zero, with basis $e_j-e_n$, $j<n$. Each Fox row has coefficient sum zero, so deleting its nth entry gives its coordinates in this basis. Deleting one column of J therefore presents the Alexander module; if a Wirtinger relator is redundant it can also be deleted. This proves the matrix procedure used for the displayed knot above. For arbitrary generators, the exponent vector is primitive because the generators map onto $\mathbb{Z}$; elementary changes of free generators implement the Euclidean algorithm and reduce it to $(1,0,\dots ,0)$. In that basis $\ker d_1$ is free on the last $n-1$ edges, and their relator coefficients give a presentation. This explains the general case rather than treating the full Fox cokernel as the Alexander module.

For the trefoil relator, with $\alpha (x)=\alpha (y)=t$, direct differentiation givesThe first boundary is $(t-1,t-1)$, whose kernel is generated by $(1,-1)$. The relator boundary is $f(t)(1,-1)$, whenceFor a connected sum of knots, join Seifert surfaces in separated balls. Their Seifert matrix is block diagonal, so the Alexander module of a connected sum is a direct sum. Thus ${\mathcal{A}}_{T\#T}\cong (\Lambda /(f){)}^2$.

This module is not cyclic. The polynomial f is irreducible modulo two, since it has no root in ${\mathbb{F}}_2$, so $\mathfrak{m}=(2,f)$ is a maximal ideal of $\Lambda$ with residue field ${\mathbb{F}}_4$. The quotient ${\mathcal{A}}_{T\#T}/\mathfrak{m}{\mathcal{A}}_{T\#T}$ has dimension two over that field, whereas the corresponding quotient of a cyclic module has dimension at most one.

Every two-generator knot group, however, has a cyclic Alexander module, regardless of its number of relators. Indeed its primitive abelianization vector can be changed to $(1,0)$ as above. The covering boundary is then $(t-1,0)$; its kernel is the free rank-one module on the second edge, and any quotient by lifted relators is cyclic. This proves the two-generator knot groups have cyclic Alexander modules obstruction. Consequently the group of the connected sum of two trefoils cannot even be generated by two elements, and in particular it has no two-generator, one-relator presentation.

Replace the open knot complement by the compact knot exterior $E_K$; they have the same homotopy type. The abelianizationsends an oriented meridian of a knot to $1$. The connected covering space corresponding to its kernel is the infinite cyclic cover of a knot exterior ${\tilde{E}}_K$. Choose a generator $t$ of its deck transformation group. Thenis the Alexander module of a knot over $\Lambda =\mathbb{Z}[t,t^{-1}]$. It is a finitely presented torsion module, and its order, equivalently the greatest common divisor of the appropriate maximal matrix minors of an Alexander matrix, is the Alexander polynomial of a knot, up to a unit $\pm t^m$.

For a fibered knot, the infinite cyclic cover of a knot exterior is $\Sigma \times \mathbb{R}$. Write the mapping torus with the gluing convention in the question. The deck transformationhas exactly that quotient: $(x,1)$ and $(\varphi (x),0)$ are identified. Choose $t=D$. Its action on $H_1(\Sigma ;\mathbb{Z})$ is ${\varphi }_{\ast }$. If one instead chooses the generator projecting in the positive circle direction, its action is ${\varphi }_{\ast }^{-1}$; this replaces $t$ by $t^{-1}$ and produces an associate for a knot.

Choose an integral basis for $H_1(\Sigma )\cong {\mathbb{Z}}^{2g}$ and let $\Phi$ be the matrix of ${\varphi }_{\ast }$. The Alexander module of a knot has the finite free module presentationThere are no further relations: using $tv=\Phi v$ and the invertibility of $\Phi$, every Laurent combination reduces uniquely to an integral combination of the chosen basis elements. Taking the order of this square presentation gives the monodromy formulaFor a disk fiber both sides are $1$, using the empty determinant convention.

Choose an oriented Seifert surface $F$ of genus $g$ and an integral basis $a_1,\dots ,a_{2g}$ of $H_1(F;\mathbb{Z})$. Push $a_i$ in the positive normal direction to $F$. The Seifert matrix isIt represents the Seifert form. Its skew-symmetrization $V-V^T$ is the integral intersection form of $F$. The relation to the Alexander polynomial of a knot isThis follows from the presentation of the Alexander module of a knot obtained by cutting the knot exterior along $F$ and stacking the resulting copies; a proof is not needed here.

The printed genus inequality is false. The useful consequence of the determinant relation is the Alexander breadth bound on Seifert genus:Here the breadth of a Laurent polynomial is its largest exponent minus its smallest exponent, so it is unchanged by multiplying by $\pm t^m$. Indeed, for a minimal-genus Seifert surface, the matrix has size $2g_s(K)$ and each entry of $tV-V^T$ has degree at most one. Its nonzero determinant is an ordinary polynomial of degree at most $2g_s(K)$; its breadth is no larger than that degree. Equivalently, the highest exponent of a symmetrically normalized Alexander polynomial of a knot is at most $g_s(K)$. An unnormalized degree is not invariant under Laurent units.

For a counterexample to the printed inequality and the requested example, take the untwisted Whitehead double of a trefoil knot. The picture specifies the two-strand tangle in the zero Seifert framing; the two exterior caps form a Whitehead double clasp. The inset identifies the trefoil knot used as companion.

Its usual genus-one Seifert surface is a zero-framed annulus following the trefoil knot, joined by the clasp band. Choose the annulus core and a curve traversing the clasp band as the basis of its first homology. Zero annulus twisting gives the first self-linking number $0$. The clasp contributes a Hopf band with self-linking number $-1$ in the positive-clasp convention used here. Plumbing the bands contributes one linking in one push-off direction and none in the other. Orienting the basis suitably givesTying the annulus into the trefoil knot changes neither these local linking counts nor its prescribed zero Seifert framing. ThereforeThis Whitehead double is not the unknot, as allowed without proof in the question. Its Seifert genus is consequently at least one and at most one, hence exactly one. Thus $g_s(K)=1$ while every normalized constant Alexander polynomial of a knot has degree zero: a direct counterexample to the printed inequality.

For a properly embedded oriented topological surface $F=\coprod F_j$, putThis defines the Thurston norm on integral relative homology classes in $H_2(Y,\partial Y;\mathbb{Z})$. Homogeneity extends it to rational classes, and continuity extends it to real classes. It is a seminorm: nonzero classes carried by spheres, disks, annuli or tori can have zero value.

Not every integral class has a connected embedded representative. In $Y=S^1\times S^2$, the class $2[\{\ast \}\times S^2]$ is a counterexample. A connected embedded oriented surface either separates, in which case it is null-homologous, or has connected complement. In the latter case join its two local sides through its complement to obtain a loop intersecting it exactly once. Its homology class is consequently a primitive lattice element. The proposed double has all intersection numbers even, so cannot have such a representative. Two disjoint parallel spheres do represent it.

For the knot exterior in an integral homology sphere, $H_2(Y,\partial Y;\mathbb{Z})=\mathbb{Z}$ is generated by a Seifert surface. Its Thurston norm iswhere $g(K)$ is the Seifert genus in the ambient integral homology sphere. To justify using a one-boundary-component Seifert surface, simplify a minimizing representative's boundary to parallel essential longitudes. The algebraic sum of these longitudes is one. Join oppositely oriented pairs by boundary annuli and push inward; this preserves Euler characteristic and does not increase ${\chi }_{-}$. Discard closed components, which represent zero because the ambient integral homology sphere has $H_2=0$. The component retaining the single boundary is a Seifert surface. This proves the formula, including the disk case.

When $\Vert y{\Vert }_T>0$, $g(K)\ge 1$. In zero Dehn surgery the longitude bounds a meridional disk in the filling solid torus. Cap a minimizing Seifert surface with that disk. The resulting closed surface $\hat{F}$ has the same genus and represents a generator of $H_2(Z;\mathbb{Z})$: its intersection with the filling core is one. ThereforeThe case $g(K)=1$ gives a zero-cost torus, rather than a negative value.

Here is a rigorous family of strict examples with $Z=S^1\times S^2$. Use the excellent knot representative theorem to choose a knot $J$ representing the generator of ${\pi }_1(Z)$ with an excellent three-manifold as exterior $E_0$. Inside $V=\nu J$, choose a winding number of a satellite pattern one pattern $P$ whose two-boundary-component exterior $E_1=V\setminus \mathrm{int}\nu P$ is also an excellent three-manifold. Both choices are available because neither ambient manifold has a spherical boundary component. Put $\Gamma =P(J)$ and $E=Z\setminus \mathrm{int}\nu \Gamma =E_0{\cup }_{\partial V}{E}_1$.

The interface is an incompressible surface. On a Thurston norm minimizing surface in $E$ with boundary the meridian ${\mu }_{\Gamma }$, arrange all interface intersections to be essential. The winding number of a satellite pattern one condition forces the oriented boundary on that interface to have net class ${\mu }_J$. The piece in $E_0$ has odd meridional boundary sum and costs at least one: a zero-cost representative would require an essential disk or annulus, forbidden by excellence. The piece in $E_1$ has opposite net meridians on its two boundary tori. It costs at least two: zero-cost components are boundary-parallel annuli or tori and carry no such boundary class, and its total meridional boundary count is even, so its nonzero negative Euler characteristic has even magnitude. Cutting along the interface adds the costs, since the essential pieces have no disk or sphere components. ThusHere the notation denotes the relative class whose boundary is ${\mu }_{\Gamma }$, not the meridian curve itself. This is the usual Thurston norm gluing along an incompressible torus argument.

Because $\Gamma$ represents the generator of $H_1(Z)$, $H_1(E)=\mathbb{Z}$, its meridian is null-homologous in $E$, and a longitudinal curve ${\lambda }_{\Gamma }$ generates $H_1(E)$. Fill $E$ along ${\lambda }_{\Gamma }$ to obtain $X$. The Mayer–Vietoris sequence gives $H_1(X)=0$, so $X$ is an integral homology sphere. Let $K$ be the filling core. Its preferred longitude is ${\mu }_{\Gamma }$; zero Dehn surgery on $K$ consequently recovers $Z$. For this example $\Vert y{\Vert }_T\ge 3$, whereas the product sphere generates $H_2(Z)$ with zero cost. HenceThe construction needs a nontrivial winding-one pattern; merely tying a local knot into the product core would not provide this lower bound.