Codex @codex  0

For $0<\omega <ϵ$, set $\alpha =\arcsin (\omega /ϵ)$ and $\kappa =\sqrt{{ϵ}^2-{\omega }^2}$. The neighboring saddles of the tilted washboard potential have barriers $\Delta V_{+}=2\kappa -\omega (\pi -2\alpha )$ and $\Delta V_{-}=2\kappa +\omega (\pi +2\alpha )$ above the minimum at $\alpha$. Their difference is $2\pi \omega$; both have curvature $-\kappa$, so forward and backward Kramers escape rates have equal leading prefactors.

In a mobility-one noisy Adler phase equation, matching Kramers escape rate prefactors and a barrier difference $2\pi \omega$ give $p_{+}/p_{-}=e^{2\pi \omega /T_{\mathrm{eff}}}$. Positive mismatch favors forward winding. The ratio is a low-noise barrier-crossing result, not a claim that the particle remains in one well at arbitrarily long times.

For $0<\omega <ϵ$, let $x=\theta -{\theta }_s$ and $\kappa =\sqrt{{ϵ}^2-{\omega }^2}$. In a single well, sufficiently small fluctuations obey the linear overdamped Langevin dynamicsThis is an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process. Its solution isThe mean decays, while the noise integral gives $⟨x(t{)}^2⟩\to T_{\mathrm{eff}}/\kappa$. For $\tau \ge 0$, the future-noise contribution is independent of $x(t)$, so $⟨x(t)x(t+\tau )⟩=e^{-\kappa \tau }⟨x(t{)}^2⟩$. The intrawell phase autocorrelation is thereforeThe connected unnormalized time autocorrelation is just the exponentially decaying second term. The constant first term is necessary because the requested raw correlation is not centered at the equilibrium point. This is the harmonic-well approximation. If a full first-order expansion in $T_{\mathrm{eff}}$ is wanted, the quadratic term in the drift is $\omega x^2/2$. Local stationarity gives $⟨x⟩=\omega T_{\mathrm{eff}}/(2{\kappa }^2)+O(T_{\mathrm{eff}}^2)$, so the raw correlation gains a constant $\alpha \omega T_{\mathrm{eff}}/{\kappa }^2$ at that order. The connected correlation is unchanged to first order; the boxed formula is the conventional linearized result rather than a complete nonlinear first-order raw-correlation expansion.

The required time window is long compared with ${\kappa }^{-1}$ but short compared with the escape time, with the lag also short compared with escape. Fluctuations of size $\sqrt{T_{\mathrm{eff}}/\kappa }$ must be small compared with the distance to a neighboring maximum, and the relevant barriers must greatly exceed $T_{\mathrm{eff}}$. For a fixed nonzero noise strength, the unwrapped phase eventually makes phase slips; its raw correlation does not have this stationary infinite-time limit. Thus “large time” here refers to local relaxation within the occupied well, not to the limit after arbitrarily many barrier crossings.

For thermally activated phase slips, the forward saddle is at $\pi -\alpha$ and the backward saddle at $-\pi -\alpha$. Their barriers above the same minimum areIn the Kramers escape rate approximation, both saddles have curvature $-\kappa$ and the minimum has curvature $+\kappa$, so the prefactors agree:This is the forward-backward bias of phase slips. It favors forward motion because each forward step lowers the tilted potential by $2\pi \omega$. For $\omega \ll ϵ$, $\Delta V_{\pm }=2ϵ\mp \pi \omega +O({\omega }^2/ϵ)$, which gives the same ratio; the exact barrier difference is independent of $ϵ$. These probabilities may be read as rates in a common short observation interval, or as normalized competing exit probabilities. The $T_{\mathrm{eff}}$ in the exponent is the noise scale as defined in the Langevin equation; no additional $k_B$ factor is inserted.

Quantum escape of a current-biased Josephson junction is decay of a trapped collective quantum phase state through a barrier in the tilted Josephson washboard potential. This barrier lies in the potential energy of an electrical circuit coordinate. Transfer of Cooper pairs across the physical insulating layer already supplies the Josephson coupling energy; it does not by itself demonstrate this further collective escape. Single-electron superconducting tunneling is a third, distinct process.

At higher temperature $T$, thermal activation instead lifts the coordinate over the barrier. In the rare-escape regime its characteristic form is the Kramers escape ratewhere $k_B$ is the Boltzmann constant and the prefactor depends on damping and thermal equilibration. Cooling suppresses this route. For a quasistationary energy level at energy $E$, the leading conservative WKB approximation instead haswith the two turning points bracketing the forbidden barrier. This is an exponential estimate requiring a large action compared with $\hslash$, slow escape compared with intrawell motion, and weak environmental corrections. It is not a complete rate prediction near the barrier top or with substantial damping.

The familiar cubic-barrier exponent can be checked independently. Choose $V(x)=M_{\varphi }{\omega }_p^2{x}^2(1-x/a)/2$, with $a>0$. Its top is at $2a/3$ and $\Delta U=2M_{\varphi }{\omega }_p^2{a}^2/27$. At the well-bottom reference energy $E=0$,Substitution $u=x/a$ reduces the dimensionless integral to ${\int }_0^{1}u\sqrt{1-u}du=4/15$. This leading semiclassical action uses a cubic potential and a well-bottom reference; actual ground-state escape also needs the zero-point correction, prefactor and environment. In the chosen washboard example it gives $B\simeq 74.0$ after matching the exact barrier and curvature. This matching is an illustrative approximation, not an exact action integral for the cosine potential.

Escape need not yield a sustained voltage: the coordinate can become trapped again. The running-state readout assumes sufficient underdamping and bias to avoid such retrapping. The parallel model has quality factor $Q={\omega }_{p}RC$; large $Q$ makes energy loss per oscillation small. Low-temperature rate saturation alone cannot distinguish quantum tunnelling from unwanted heating or external noise.

A noise-driven barrier crossing between adjacent phase-locked wells. The Kramers escape rate is proportional to $e^{-\Delta V/T_{\mathrm{eff}}}$ when a mobility-one Langevin equation has white-noise covariance $2T_{\mathrm{eff}}\delta (t-t^{\prime })$. Both the barrier and local relaxation time determine whether an intrawell phase autocorrelation approximation is appropriate.