For pressure-dominated linear cosmological density perturbations, . Writing gives . In the WKB approximation, the oscillation amplitude is . For constant sound speed it is proportional to ; the local frozen-frequency amplitude damping time does not imply a universal global envelope .
For constant positive Hubble parameter and a four-thirds polytropic equation of state, a linear cosmological density perturbation obeys . Put and . The resulting Bessel differential equation has order ; use ordinary Bessel functions for and modified Bessel functions for . Their small- expansions give one constant limiting mode and one mode. The constant limit need not exceed the initial amplitude without an initial-velocity condition.
Einstein-de Sitter density-growth modes Created 2026-10-14 Updated 2026-10-25
For pressureless linear cosmological density perturbations in an Einstein-de Sitter universe, and . The growth equation is an Euler differential equation whose indicial equation is . Hence the independent modes are and . The first is the growing linear growth factor, while the second is a decaying transient.
Expansion-weighted derivative of a passive density perturbation Created 2026-10-14 Updated 2026-10-20
When the self-gravity source in the pressureless linear cosmological density perturbation equation is negligible, . Multiplication by makes it , so . This explains how Hubble friction changes growth for an arbitrary positive scale factor. For , the nonconstant mode is when and when .
Expand the density contrast in spatial Fourier modes using fixed comoving coordinates:The spatial Laplacian multiplies a mode by , while its comoving wavenumber is time-independent. Writing , the linear cosmological density perturbation equation becomesThe proper wavenumber is , since the proper wavelength is . The proper Jeans wavenumber balances the pressure and gravity terms:
In the formal static-background limit, and is constant. The gravity-dominated linear cosmological density perturbation equation reduces toThe Static-universe Jeans modes areThe unstable perturbation grows exponentially rather than as . In the expanding case, the term resists peculiar motion and the falling background density also lengthens the gravitational growth timescale. A globally homogeneous static self-gravitating fluid is not obtained merely by turning off expansion; this calculation is the conventional local Jeans-background idealization, with the uniform background force removed or otherwise supported.
The matter density parameter at general scale factor isThe reference to the definition of in the printed part points to the wrong equation number: the needed definition is the substitution in part (b). Write , so , , andExpanding the matter growth equation as a function of scale factor first givesUsing and dividing by , we obtainwhere these primes denote derivatives with respect to . For the proposed linear cosmological density perturbation ,The left side of the differential equation, divided by , has numeratorover the common denominator . This proves the result directly. Also for every , so it is a decaying mode:It is proportional to the Hubble parameter, an instance of the Hubble parameter as a solution of the dust growth equation.
Let be the normalized galaxy probability density per unit cosmological redshift, , and let be its linear galaxy bias. In a spatially flat background with , . Thus the projected galaxy density contrast isso its radial kernel is . The cosmological Poisson equation in Fourier transform variables givesHere denotes today's matter density parameter, not its time-dependent value. For a growing linear cosmological density perturbation, write , where is the linear growth factor, and define the logarithmic linear growth rate . At fixed comoving coordinate,ConsequentlyIn particular, during matter domination makes the linear potential constant and eliminates this Integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect.
To use the supplied Limber approximation without hiding its scale dependence in a radial kernel, take , , , and . The corresponding three-dimensional cross-power spectrum iswhere is the matter power spectrum. Substitution givesThe Limber approximation relation cancels , yieldingBoth powers of are necessary: one converts the redshift selection to a distance kernel, and the other differentiates the potential in conformal time. The factor two in the Integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect cancels the factor from the cosmological Poisson equation. For positive galaxy bias and , the predicted correlation is positive: an overdense region whose negative potential becomes shallower gives a positive integrated temperature shift. The result assumes linear, scale-independent growth and the Newtonian cosmological Poisson equation; the Limber approximation becomes less accurate at the very lowest angular multipoles.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2001 iii Paper 35 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Write , let be the scale factor, the Hubble parameter, and the asymptotic expansion rate for the positive cosmological constant. The continuity equation for a homogeneous Hubble flow gives . Isotropy and the Poisson equation for Newtonian gravity give a relative acceleration proportional to displacement from any chosen origin:This uses the local relative gravitational acceleration, rather than trying to sum an absolutely convergent potential over an infinite universe. A fluid element with constant comoving coordinate has . The spatially uniform pressure has no gradient, so the Euler equations for an inviscid fluid giveMultiply by and integrate. With , the resulting first integral isFor an expanding branch that reaches arbitrarily large , ; more precisely, and the correction to is integrable. Therefore . Positive alone does not make every initially expanding branch escape: sufficiently large positive can give a turning point or a limiting static radius. Under the stated vacuum-dominance inequalities at , however, and remain small compared with for the future expanding branch, and is the required approximation.
To derive the linear cosmological density perturbation equation, write and , where is the peculiar velocity. At fixed , the linearized continuity equation, Euler equations for an inviscid fluid and perturbation Poisson equation areTaking a divergence of the second equation and differentiating the first eliminates the peculiar velocity. For a Fourier mode of comoving wavenumber , this givesThe adiabatic sound speed for the four-thirds polytropic equation of state is , hence . Both the restoring pressure term and the gravitational term are proportional to . Thus, in the exponential approximation,The sign of is the Jeans instability distinction, but exponential expansion makes the total subsequent amplification finite.
Remove Hubble friction by setting . The standard-form equation isWhere and , the WKB approximation givesWhere , put ; away from a turning point the corresponding WKB approximation isFor , never vanishes. The exponential integral can be evaluated explicitly:Differentiate this expression, using , to verify it. Early on, if coefficients change little over the interval considered, the two local exponents for are : one increases and one decreases. At late times and the displayed integral is . The nominally growing WKB approximation branch of therefore becomes a constant branch of , while the other branch decays like . The WKB approximation is not automatically accurate at all intermediate times; its stated derivative criterion must be checked.
For , the early frozen-coefficient exponents are . There are damped oscillations if , a repeated-root solution at equality, and two real decaying local branches if . In the oscillatory case vanishes at : the ordinary WKB approximation breaks down there, and a turning-point connection is needed. After that transition the solutions again approach a constant or decay. A positive pressure-minus-gravity restoring term does not imply indefinitely continuing oscillation; its physical frequency is redshifted away.
The limiting conclusion does not depend on the accuracy of WKB approximation. With , the equation for isFor its basis is , the Bessel functions of the first kind and Bessel functions of the second kind. For use , the Modified Bessel functions of the first kind and modified Bessel functions of the second kind. Their small- branches are proportional to and . Multiplication by gives the decaying and constant branches respectively. At the exact solution is . Thus Bessel density modes during exponential expansion proveThe same conclusion holds in the full four-thirds perturbation equation on an exponentially escaping background: . Its integrated equation has an absolutely integrable Volterra kernel, bounded by a constant times . The Gronwall inequality first bounds ; then is integrable and is integrable. A finite limiting amplitude follows without setting exactly constant. This argument requires positive and the escaping branch; it is not a claim about or recollapse.
The requested strict increase of that limit needs an initial-velocity qualification. For ,If and , this identity prevents a first loss of positivity and makes the amplitude strictly increase for . Integrating it twice givesThis is monotone Jeans growth with positive cosmological constant. Without the extra initial condition the printed assertion is false: is positive at and tends to zero. An arbitrarily small multiple remains an infinitesimal linear cosmological density perturbation, so linearity does not remove the counterexample.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2001 iii Paper 41 2 iii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
In an Einstein-de Sitter universe, and . The Friedmann equation givesThis is an Euler differential equation. Substitution of gives , namely . The Einstein-de Sitter density-growth modes are thereforeThe linear growth factor for the growing mode is proportional to , rather than an exponential in cosmic time. These expressions apply while the density contrast is small enough for linear cosmological density perturbations.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2002 iii Paper 41 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Integrating the given expansion equation gives , with the integration constant fixed by . Thus the scale factor and Hubble parameter are and . The Newtonian derivation of the flat Friedmann equation gives , soUse the comoving coordinate and the density contrast . Linearized mass conservation, the peculiar-velocity Euler equation for fluid motion and the Poisson equation for the peculiar gravitational potential areDifferentiate the first equation, substitute the second and use the third. A Fourier component of comoving wavenumber obeysSince , the normalization is , as printed in the PDF. The resulting linear cosmological density perturbation equation isTo reduce it to a Bessel equation, put , and . As , multiplying the substituted equation by givesTaking makes the first two coefficients proportional to those in the Bessel equation, and the remaining constant is . HenceFor noninteger , the Bessel density modes of a polytropic expanding universe areThere is an exceptional case within the allowed interval: if is an integer, , so these are not two independent solutions. The full solution then uses , with the Bessel function of the second kind providing the missing branch. For example gives . A basis using is valid for every allowed exponent.
For early times, . The large-argument asymptotic expansion of the Bessel function of the first kind has oscillatory phase and envelope for order ; the Bessel function of the second kind has the same envelope. ThusThis decreases because . At late times , the leading powers are for noninteger order, giving and . The branch gives the same growing power in the integer case. Therefore a generic perturbation grows as ; an initial condition with zero growing-mode coefficient instead has the decaying mode.
To find the growth scale including its dependence on , set . The equation becomesSubstitute . The leading coefficient equation is . The pressure correction to a growing polytropic cosmological mode is consequentlySince and , the correction becomes small when is small compared with . The factor is between two and , giving the stated order-of-magnitude onset conditionFor a well-developed asymptotic growing mode, replace by . This is a Jeans instability interpretation: the physical acoustic frequency must be sufficiently low compared with the gravitational expansion scale, or equivalently the physical wavelength must be sufficiently long for self-gravity to overcome pressure support. It is an approximate condition for the dust-like growing branch, not an exact initial-condition-independent instant at which any perturbation begins increasing. The instantaneous sign change of the coefficient in the original equation instead occurs at .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 iii Paper 62 4 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Write and , the conformal Hubble parameter. The flat Friedmann equation givesOutside the horizon, the stated adiabatic cosmological perturbation relation is . It expresses equality of for dust and radiation in the density convention of the supplied equations. During radiation domination, , so and is negligible. Consequently , and the linear cosmological density perturbation equation becomesThe trial solution gives , hence .
During matter domination, , so . Now the radiation source is negligible and . The equation becomeswhose exponents satisfy , or . Thus the growing solutions in both eras areThe other modes are in the radiation limit and in the matter limit. These are statements in the density and gauge convention of the supplied evolution equation; a density contrast outside the horizon is not a gauge-independent observable by itself.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 iii Paper 62 4 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
After cosmological horizon crossing, the rapidly oscillating radiation source can be averaged away as specified. Well inside radiation domination, the remaining cold dark matter self-gravity is also subleading because . To leading order the linear cosmological density perturbation equation is thereforeTwo integrations giveThe reference time makes the logarithm dimensionless. A growing superhorizon mode reaches entry with a nonzero derivative, so matching generally excites . For example, an abrupt leading-order match from gives , whereas its exact numerical coefficient depends on the transition and the radiation forcing.
This logarithmic growth is the Mészáros effect. It is an asymptotic radiation-era result: after dropping the oscillating radiation perturbation, the original equation still contains . Retaining that term and the changing background leads to the Mészáros equation, which provides the interpolation near matter-radiation equality. It would be incorrect to claim that a pure logarithm solves the complete mixed-background equation exactly.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 iii Paper 62 4 c Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
During matter domination, the radiation source can be neglected irrespective of whether the mode is inside or outside the horizon in the supplied linear cosmological density perturbation equation. The Friedmann equation gives and , just as in part (a). ThereforeSubstituting gives , so for every Fourier modeThus the matter-era growing and decaying density modes have growing behaviour for all . There is no pressure-gradient term introducing a -dependent growth rate for cold dark matter. The coefficients retain their different earlier histories; common growth does not erase the spectral shape. A specially chosen pure decaying solution is of course possible, so the growing-mode statement does not assert that every initial condition grows.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 60 1 ii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
Use the Einstein-de Sitter universe relations and . Write and . Since ,The dimensionless first integral with zero velocity at is . On the expanding branch this givesEvaluating the integral gives the inverse-trigonometric expression in the source. Alternatively, differentiate it: , so differentiation of the first integral gives exactly the required equation of motion. At , the integral equals . Thus fixes . The collapsing branch is , not the same increasing inverse function.
For the early-time density contrast, expand the integral directly:The leading coefficient in the printed small-radius approximation needs correction to . The printed coefficient is inconsistent with both the exact integral and approach to the homogeneous background. Indeed, the nonlinear density contrast satisfiesHence . In the Einstein-de Sitter universe the growing linear cosmological density perturbation is proportional to , so its extrapolation isThe formal collapse occurs at , giving the linear spherical-collapse thresholdThe actual nonlinear density contrast diverges at collapse; the finite number is the extrapolated linear amplitude. Equivalently, the full spherical-collapse model has and , with turnaround at and formal collapse at . Combining the half-radius estimate with the background-density decrease up to gives .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 ii Paper 2 8C Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-06
The flat matter-dominated Friedmann equation gives when . With ,For linear density modes with polytropic pressure, substitution gives the Euler-Cauchy equationA power law has exponent satisfying . Thus, for distinct roots,For , the two modes approach and : gravity produces a growing linear cosmological density perturbation and a decaying mode. For , put ; the real solution isThese are pressure-supported oscillations with a decaying envelope. For the repeated-root cosmological density mode , the complete solution is . The specified separates real exponents from logarithmic oscillations; the growing exponent actually crosses zero at , a slightly smaller value.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 310 2 c Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Relativistic pressure gives the radiation fluid a sound speed . Well inside the sound horizon, , radiation linear cosmological density perturbations undergo rapid pressure-supported oscillations instead of sustained gravitational growth. Their potential decays. For an ideal radiation fluid with negligible scalar anisotropic stress, the regular Newtonian gauge in cosmology solution during radiation domination illustrates this explicitly:For its amplitude is . Thus radiation in cosmology remains essential to the background Friedmann equation, while its rapidly oscillating gravitational forcing can be smoothed out when following the slowly varying cold dark matter density mode. This is the approximation behind the Mészáros equation.
The important limitation is that “subhorizon” alone is not a pointwise theorem that . Radiation can dominate the instantaneous potential during early radiation domination, and the forcing near horizon entry seeds the later logarithmic matter mode. We neglect that transient and rapidly oscillating forcing in the subsequent coarse-grained growth equation, not radiation's contribution to the expansion rate. Close to horizon entry, or for accurate oscillatory evolution, the coupled radiation and matter perturbation equations must be retained. For the slow matter potential, the metric time derivatives in part (a) are also suppressed relative to its spatial Laplacian by . The approximation smooths radiation perturbations while retaining radiation in cosmology in the background cosmic expansion.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 ii Paper 4 9B Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-03
For small ,Put . Inverting the second series givesSubstitution into the first series yieldsUsing the definitions of and simplifies its leading factor toTherefore
The homogeneous sphere containing the same mass has radius . By mass conservation, its nonlinear density contrast isThe leading, linear cosmological density perturbation is consequentlyIn the parametric solution, complete spherical collapse occurs at , when and . Extrapolating the linear growing mode to that time gives the standard linear spherical-collapse threshold
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 iii Paper 346 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Assume nonrelativistic pressureless matter, an initial irrotational vector field of growing-mode linear cosmological density perturbations, a homogeneous expanding background, and no shell crossing. All gradients below refer to initial comoving coordinates. Let , with , and normalize the linear growth factor by . The paper calls a growth rate, but it is the dimensionless growth factor; is its time derivative.
Writing for the actual position at , the Zeldovich approximation is, to first order,This explicitly gives . The usual notation instead uses the uniform reference Lagrangian coordinate , with . The two labels can be interchanged inside a first-order displacement, but not in the unperturbed position without the initial displacement correction.
To determine , mass conservation between the initial and current positions givesDemanding gives . The irrotational vector field assumption makes a gradient; the initial cosmological Poisson equation is . With the same boundary conditions for these potential equations, and after removing an irrelevant uniform translation,The evolution of follows from the linearized peculiar-motion equation . Since cosmological Poisson equation gives to this order, substitution yields the linear growth equationThus the approximation extrapolates the linear growing displacement along a fixed initial direction, even as its density mapping becomes nonlinear.
The early spin of a dark matter halo comes from an external gravitational torque on its nonspherical initial mass region. A uniform external acceleration moves its centre of mass without spinning it; the spatially varying tidal tensor exerts different forces on different parts. The tidal torque theory requires misalignment of the region's shape and the surrounding tidal field. A local irrotational vector field of velocity does not imply zero integrated angular momentum for a nonspherical region.
Put and use the physical peculiar velocity . The physical lever arm is , while a leading-order mass element is . Substituting the velocity formula into the supplied definition of angular momentum about the centre of mass givesTerms from the perturbed mass measure are higher order. Subtracting the barycentre's velocity also changes nothing because at this order.
Apply the divergence theorem componentwise:The antisymmetry of the Levi-Civita symbol kills the last term. Consequently, for the ordinary oriented comoving surface element ,The original PDF prints a different coefficient, . That coefficient does not follow from its own mass measure and velocity equation and has the wrong dimensions for total angular momentum. The corrected coefficient above also gives the time dependence consistent with the paper's later tensor expression; this is a source typo, not a TeX transcription issue.
For a spherical centered on its barycentre, the outward normal is parallel to , so pointwise. HenceFor an equipotential surface, on , andThereforeThe second conclusion holds for any boundary shape at this order, not just a sphere.
To extract the leading tidal torque, expand the initial peculiar gravitational potential about the barycentre using its Taylor series:The constant has no force; has zero integrated torque because the first mass moment vanishes. With the mass second-moment tensorwe obtainThe second equality swaps the indices and uses the symmetry of both tensors. Define the initial acceleration tidal tensor byThen the formula in the question has exactly the stated sign:If one defines as the positive Hessian matrix of instead, the displayed contraction has a plus sign. Defining the convention is essential. Also, the paper's is a mass second-moment tensor; the mechanical inertia tensor is .
Only the anisotropic parts contribute: a multiple of the identity produces zero contraction with the Levi-Civita symbol. In axes where , for example,Thus a spherical region or tensors sharing principal axes have zero leading torque; unequal principal moments together with off-diagonal tidal components create spin. The Taylor series truncation assumes that higher spatial derivatives of the tidal field are sufficiently small across the region.
In an Einstein-de Sitter universe, , , and . The initial and are time independent, soThis is early-time growth for fixed initial matter, before collapse invalidates the extrapolation. It does not predict indefinite linear spin growth for a virialized halo.
Two reasons for only approximate agreement with simulations are that nonlinear collapse and shell crossing change the trajectories and the tidal field, invalidating the first-order displacement and fixed leading tidal tensor; and that real halos undergo dark-matter halo mergers, anisotropic accretion, and exchange of material and angular momentum, so the halo identified at a later time need not be the same isolated collection of initial particles. These processes can change both the magnitude and the direction of the spin.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2023 iii Paper 312 4 ii Solution 2026-09-28
The linearized cosmological continuity equation, the divergence of the cosmological Euler equation, and the cosmological Poisson equation giveEliminating yields the equation for a linear cosmological density perturbation:In an Einstein-de Sitter universe, and , soSubstitution of the power-law ansatz gives . HenceThe leading one of the matter-era growing and decaying density modes is , as direct substitution confirms, and its velocity divergence is