The Dedekind factorization theorem says that, when a rational prime does not divide the index of an order , a factorization
of the minimal polynomial modulo gives
Let with square-free , and let be odd. The resulting splitting of rational primes in a quadratic field is:
Finally suppose and
has norm , with integers
chosen coprime. Then
If an odd ramified, then . Reduction modulo gives
. Since is not a square modulo such a prime, . Dividing the equation's divisibility shows as well (use that square-free has -adic valuation one), contradicting coprimality. Hence no prime ramifies.
The automorphisms are distinct and hence linearly independent as maps by the linear independence of distinct field embeddings. Therefore the operator
is not the zero map. Choose for which . Reindexing the sum and using gives
This is the Lagrange resolvent eigenvector for a cyclic field automorphism.
Let be the fixed field. Since , the element is a root of
Its orbit under is
and these elements are distinct because and is a primitive root of unity. Hence the minimal polynomial has at least distinct roots. It also divides the displayed degree- polynomial, so
Because , the finite extension is separable. By the primitive element theorem, write . The minimal polynomial of over has a root in the algebraically closed field , so sending to that root defines a -field embedding .
The cyclic group acts faithfully on after replacing by the order of . The Artin fixed-field theorem gives
and says that is a finite Galois extension with cyclic Galois group . The image is an intermediate field. Every subgroup of a cyclic group is normal, so the normal subextension criterion shows that is Galois, and its Galois group is a quotient of , hence cyclic. Transporting this structure through proves that is Galois with cyclic Galois group. This is the finite extensions of the fixed field of a finite-order automorphism of an algebraically closed field theorem.
Algebraic closedness is necessary. Take and , so , and let . The extension has degree three but is not normal, since the two nonreal roots of do not belong to . It is therefore not Galois.
Let
be a primitive polynomial. The Eisenstein criterion states that if a prime number satisfies
then is an irreducible polynomial in , equivalently in by Gauss lemma for polynomials.
To prove it, suppose that with of positive degree. Primitivity and Gauss's lemma let us take such an integral factorisation if a factorisation over exists. Reducing modulo gives
Because does not divide the leading coefficient of , neither factor loses degree on reduction. The polynomial ring is a unique factorization domain, so both reductions are monomials of positive degree. In particular, divides both constant terms and . It follows that divides
a contradiction. This proves the criterion.
For a prime , translate the geometric sum by one:
Its leading coefficient is one, every other coefficient is divisible by , and its constant coefficient is , which is not divisible by . It is therefore Eisenstein at . Translation is an automorphism of , so
This is the geometric-sum irreducibility criterion.
The evaluation homomorphism
has image and contains in its kernel. Since is monic, division by in writes every as with . If , then ; the irreducibility of says that is the minimal polynomial of , so . Thus , and the first isomorphism theorem for rings gives
Now take . Then , and the Eisenstein integers are
Complex conjugation sends to , so the field norm is
Given , choose integers with . For ,
For with , apply this to and put . Then
Hence the norm is a Euclidean function, proving that is a Euclidean domain. This is the Euclidean norm on the Eisenstein integers.
Finally suppose satisfies . Make the free abelian group into a -module by defining
This is well-defined precisely because obeys the same polynomial relation as . The module is finitely generated. It is also torsion-free module: if and , multiplication by the conjugate of gives , and the additive group has no nonzero integer torsion.
A Euclidean domain is a principal ideal domain, and the structure theorem for finitely generated modules over a principal ideal domain says that a finitely generated torsion-free module over one is free. Thus
for some . Since has free module basis over , comparison of abelian ranks gives . There can consequently be no such matrix when is odd.
If , choose a -basis . Then
is a -basis, and . In this basis the matrix of is a direct sum of copies of
Every admissible matrix is therefore conjugate in to . Hence there is exactly one conjugacy class for even , and none for odd . This is the classification of integral matrices satisfying the third cyclotomic polynomial.
A finite extension is normal when every irreducible polynomial in having one root in splits completely over .
Suppose first that is normal. Choose with , and let be the minimal polynomial of over . Every splits in by normality, and is generated by their roots because it is already generated by the particular roots . Thus is the splitting field of .
Conversely, suppose that is the splitting field of . Every -embedding permutes the roots of , so . By the embedding characterization of normality, is normal. This proves the finite normal extension as a splitting field criterion.
Because , we have and
For , the minimal polynomial is
Since , reduction modulo gives . Its two roots are distinct, so
with distinct prime ideals of norm . Thus splits completely, as recorded in splitting of three in Q of square root minus p.
The ideal class group is the group of nonzero fractional ideals of modulo the subgroup of principal fractional ideals. Saying that has order means that is the least positive integer for which is principal.
Suppose for contradiction that is odd and has order . Then for some , and taking norms gives
Write , where have the same parity. Then
If , the right-hand side is at least , contradicting . Hence , so is a rational algebraic integer and therefore an integer. But then , impossible when is odd. This proves the odd-order obstruction for a split prime in an imaginary quadratic field and shows that the order cannot equal .
The Liouville approximation theorem states that if is an irrational algebraic number of degree , then there is a constant such that every reduced rational satisfies
Let be the minimal polynomial of , of degree . Since is irreducible of degree greater than one, . Moreover,
and hence
On the compact interval , put
If , the mean value theorem gives a point between and such that
Thus . If , then . Taking any
proves the stated strict inequality.
Since generates , it cannot lie in a proper subfield, so its minimal polynomial over has degree . Write it as
The identity and characteristic two give
Multiplying by and applying the linear map yields
This is a binary linear recurrence of order at most , so is the output of a linear-feedback shift register of length at most .
An element is separable over when its minimal polynomial has distinct roots in a splitting field.
Because is irreducible, it is separable exactly when
If , then , so irreducibility makes this greatest common divisor equal to one. If , the zero-derivative criterion gives
for some , and is inseparable. Therefore
The Jordan normal form theorem says that every complex square matrix is similar to a direct sum of Jordan blocks, uniquely up to their order. For an eigenvalue , if its blocks have sizes , then its algebraic multiplicity and geometric multiplicity are
and its contribution to the minimal polynomial is . Thus
where is the largest -block size.
For the given matrix,
Moreover,
Hence
The eigenvalue therefore has one Jordan block of size two, so
For a ring homomorphism , the module of Kähler differentials is the -module generated by symbols , subject to
Equivalently, it represents -linear derivations:
For , the Transitivity exact sequence for Kähler differentials is
If is surjective, the Conormal exact sequence for Kähler differentials is
Let be a finite field extension. By the primitive element theorem, its maximal separable field extension is simple, and transitivity reduces the calculation to a simple algebraic extension. If with minimal polynomial , then
Thus a separable simple extension has zero differentials. Conversely, if is not separable, the purely inseparable part has a generator whose minimal polynomial has zero formal derivative in positive characteristic, producing a nonzero differential. Hence
Now let . If , , and , then the minimal polynomial is and has zero derivative, so
If , where , , and , then . Both defining equations have zero derivative, and
  • In (i), and relative to , so
If , this is and its support is the origin . If , it is free of rank one and its support is all of .
  • In (ii), and vanish relatively, whence
Its support is the origin in every characteristic; the module is unless , when it is .
  • In (iii), and give
Its support is the entire component .
For a finite extension of local fields, let be its ramification index and its residue-field degree. An unramified extension has . A totally ramified extension has , equivalently . A tamely ramified extension has separable residue extension and ramification index coprime to the residue characteristic.
Let generate the finite extension , and let be its minimal polynomial. Lift to a monic and choose any lift of . Since finite fields are perfect fields, . The simple-root form of Hensel lemma, applied inside , gives with
Set . Its residue field contains , so
The equation gives the reverse inequality. Thus , its residue-field degree is , and ; hence is unramified. Since , the extension has residue-field degree one and is totally ramified. This constructs the maximal unramified subextension of a local field extension.
The minimal polynomial is the unique monic polynomial of least positive degree with . Uniqueness follows because division of one monic annihilator by another would produce a lower-degree annihilator. Cayley–Hamilton says that the characteristic polynomial annihilates ; division then shows
The map , , is surjective because map to the given basis. Its kernel is generated by the minimal polynomial and the quotient has dimension , so . The relation for gives
Make a -module by . The structure theorem over the Euclidean domain decomposes its torsion module as
where the are monic irreducibles. Each summand is indecomposable: its submodules form a chain, so two nonzero submodules cannot form a direct sum. This is the desired decomposition into invariant indecomposable subspaces.
The characteristic polynomial is
whereas the minimal polynomial is the least common multiple
Suppose first that is a totally ramified extension of degree , and let be a uniformizer of . If the valuation on is normalized by , then . The value group of already contains both and , so its ramification index over is at least . Hence , and therefore .
Let
be the minimal polynomial of . Every conjugate of has positive valuation, so each lies in the maximal ideal of . Moreover
which means . Thus is an Eisenstein polynomial.
Conversely, if is a root of an Eisenstein polynomial of degree , the Eisenstein criterion makes that polynomial irreducible and its Newton polygon gives when is normalized. Consequently ; equality with the field degree forces and residue-field degree one. Thus is totally ramified.
For the general result, choose logarithms of nonzero algebraic numbers and algebraic coefficients , and put
Let
where is the minimal polynomial and its is the naive polynomial height, and let
The general lower bound for a linear form in logarithms states that, if , then
where the effective constant depends only on and the degree of the number field generated by all the data.
For the improved homogeneous result, take and
With the same , after ordering the terms set
The Baker lower bound for a homogeneous linear form in logarithms gives
Both constants are effective. The division by in is the improvement that matters when has variable height.
For coprime integers with ,
This follows either directly from the real and p-adic absolute values, or from the height-Mahler measure formula applied to the primitive minimal polynomial .
Suppose and were linearly dependent over . Then for some , with the zero-polynomial cases included. Since , , and therefore
If this has multiplicity at , then the minimal polynomial of to the power divides in . Hence .
The construction in part (b) gives
When , this exceeds for all sufficiently large depending only on and , contradicting . Thus are linearly independent.
Squaring and eliminating the inner radical gives
Thus are roots of
and are roots of
Both polynomials are irreducible by the Eisenstein criterion at , so these are the four minimal polynomials over .
Over , the relevant radicands are
The norms of and to equal , so neither can be a square in . Also with would force , followed by either or , both impossible. Thus is not a square either.
Similarly, over the radicands and have nonsquare norm , while would force either or . Hence is not a square in . Both extensions therefore satisfy all the hypotheses of part (b).