Past exam of the advanced Quantum Condensed Matter Physics course of the University of Cambridge / 2012 / Paper 1 (Advanced Quantum Condensed Matter Physics, Paper 110)

For a finite-range isotropic Heisenberg model, the Mermin-Wagner theorem excludes spontaneous magnetic order in one dimension at every nonzero temperature. Long-wavelength rotations cost very little energy: a smooth orientational fluctuation has $\delta F=({\rho }_s/2)\int dx({\partial }_x\theta {)}^2$, so its thermal variance contains $(k_{\mathrm{B}}T/{\rho }_s)\int dq/q^2$, which diverges in the infrared. In a Heisenberg ferromagnet, the same obstruction appears as a divergent thermal occupation of quadratic long-wave spin waves. This explains why a finite magnetization cannot be supported, although correlations can be strong over a long finite distance. The rigorous statement requires short-range interactions and the stated continuous symmetry; interchain coupling and anisotropy change the problem. Symmetry forcing the mean to zero in a finite chain alone would not prove absence of thermodynamic order. ^[ref]

For the Ising model, use dimensionless $s_i=2S_i^z=\pm 1$, $h=g{\mu }_{\mathrm{B}}B$, $K=\beta J/2$ and $b=\beta h/2$. Its pair Boltzmann factor isMultiplying N such factors around the periodic ring counts each bond once and each field term twice with weight one half. Summing the closed spin-index sequence therefore gives the transfer matrix for the one-dimensional Ising modelThe two eigenvalues areAt finite temperature every entry of P is positive, so the Perron–Frobenius theorem gives ${\lambda }_{+}>|{\lambda }_{-}|$. ConsequentlyThe exact finite-N correction to the extensive expression is $-k_{\mathrm{B}}T\ln [1+({\lambda }_{-}/{\lambda }_{+}{)}^N]$. No assumption that ${\lambda }_{-}$ is positive is needed.

Differentiate at fixed temperature. For $D=\sqrt{{\sinh }^{2}b+e^{-2\beta J}}$, ${\partial }_b\ln (\cosh b+D)=\sinh b/D$. The Ising-chain magnetization with spin-half normalization gives total magnetic momentThis is the thermodynamic-limit result; the moment per site is M/N. For every finite $T>0$, ${\lim }_{B\to 0}M/N=0$, even with the thermodynamic limit taken first. The zero-field magnetic susceptibility per site is $(g{\mu }_{\mathrm{B}}{)}^2{e}^{\beta J}/(4k_{\mathrm{B}}T)$, large but finite.

The Ising-chain domain-wall energy convention explains the result for $J>0$: changing a parallel bond into an antiparallel bond costs J in this spin-half normalization. Domain walls, occurring in pairs on a ring, acquire a nonzero density at any nonzero temperature. Indeed the zero-field correlation length is $\xi =-a/\ln [\tanh (\beta J/2)]\sim (a/2)e^{\beta J}$ at low temperature. The Ising symmetry is discrete, so this is a separate one-dimensional domain-wall mechanism rather than an application of the continuous-symmetry theorem. At zero temperature a ferromagnetic chain can select a fully polarized state; the $B\to 0$ and $T\to 0$ limits do not commute.

The joint density of states counts vertical valence-to-conduction transitions at photon energy $\hslash \omega$. Optical absorption weights it by dipole or momentum matrix elements, occupation factors and optical-frequency prefactors. A Van Hove singularity occurs at a stationary transition energy ${\nabla }_{\mathbf{k}}(E_c-E_v)=0$. It can create a strong peak, edge or cusp in an absorption spectrum and thereby reveal electronic band structure. The relevant stationary quantity is the band difference, not necessarily either band separately. Forbidden optical transitions can suppress the feature; excitons, finite lifetimes and disorder can shift or broaden it. A two-dimensional saddle gives a logarithm, whereas a parabolic two-dimensional minimum gives a step. ^[ref]

Put $\delta =\hslash \omega -E_g$, $A={\hslash }^2/(2m^{\ast })>0$ and $\eta =\delta /A$. For $\delta >0$, the saddle-point optical transition contour is the two-branch hyperbolaFor $\delta <0$ it opens along y instead; at zero the limiting contour is $k_x=\pm k_y$. On either positive-energy branch,Using the opening spin factor2, one branch therefore contributesThe displayed integral in the question is this one-branch expression with ${\Lambda }_y=\pi /a$. With both hyperbola branches and the opening spin factor2, the full joint density of states is $J_{\mathrm{full}}=2J_{\mathrm{branch}}$. Equivalently, the printed coefficient describes the full two-branch contour if the spin degeneracy is1. The PDF itself has this factor-of-two mismatch; it cannot be removed by reparametrizing the complete contour.

There is also a cutoff qualification. For the strict square first Brillouin zone, $|k_x|,|k_y|\le \Lambda =\pi /a$, both coordinates must remain inside, giving ${\Lambda }_y=\sqrt{{\Lambda }^2-\eta }$ for $0<\eta <{\Lambda }^2$. Taking ${\Lambda }_y=\Lambda$ is a convenient local-saddle cutoff with the same leading singularity, not the exact intersection with that square. The quadratic dispersion is only a local band model, so the nonsingular constant depends on how the saddle region joins the actual bands.

For the source's cutoff, the logarithmic two-dimensional saddle joint density of states follows directly:Thus, in the one-branch normalization of the requested integral,The strict square cutoff has the same leading logarithm. This establishes the requested $C-\ln (\hslash \omega -E_g)$ shape, with a dimensionless logarithm after choosing the cutoff energy. Here $E_g$ is the saddle transition energy; it need not be the global minimum optical gap. The definition in the question has units of states per area per energy, despite being written as a function of frequency.

For a representative unstrained zinc blende structure III-V semiconductor such as gallium arsenide, take the valence-band maximum at the Gamma point as zero. The near-centre ordering is an s-like ${\Gamma }_{6c}$ conduction band doublet above a p-like ${\Gamma }_{8v}$ valence quartet. Spin-orbit interaction puts the p-like ${\Gamma }_{7v}$ doublet below the quartet by ${\Delta }_{\mathrm{so}}$. These are the zone-centre bands of a zinc-blende III-V semiconductor.

The $j=3/2$ quartet produces the heavy-hole and light-hole bands. Along a chosen symmetry direction, their components have $|m_j|=3/2$ and $1/2$ respectively; their different curvatures define different positive hole effective masses. They are degenerate at zero wavevector in the unstrained cubic crystal, but separate away from it. The $j=1/2$ doublet is the split-off valence band. To leading isotropic order,Valence-band curvature is negative for electrons; the corresponding hole masses are positive. Real valence bands warp with direction, so these are illustrative effective-mass parabolas rather than an exact spherical band structure.

The k·p perturbation theory couples the s-like and p-like states through momentum matrix elements. It controls the conduction-band mass, nonparabolicity and mixing of hole characters. Strain or quantum confinement can split the heavy/light degeneracy even at zero in-plane wavevector. The lack of inversion symmetry in zinc blende also permits spin splitting away from the zone centre; time-reversal symmetry still protects the zone-centre doublets.

The s–p electric-dipole transitions near $\Gamma$ are optically important and produce structures at $E_g$ and $E_g+{\Delta }_{\mathrm{so}}$ with polarization-dependent weights. For direct band gap compounds the conduction minimum is also at $\Gamma$, allowing near-edge absorption and emission without a momentum-supplying phonon. Not every III-V compound is direct-gap, and wurtzite materials have an additional crystal-field splitting; the cubic scheme should not be imposed on every III-V semiconductor. ^[ref]

Indirect exchange couples magnetic moments through intervening degrees of freedom. Its mechanism and sign depend on whether the mediators are virtual charge excitations or mobile carriers.

In superexchange, electrons hop virtually through intermediate ligand orbitals in an insulating solid and return to the original charge sector. For two half-filled orbitals, virtual double occupation lowers the antiparallel-spin state more strongly. In a one-band reduction,This positive sign denotes antiferromagnetism in this convention, unlike the $-2J$ convention in Question1. A metal–ligand–metal path has $t_{\mathrm{eff}}\sim t_{pd}^2/\Delta$ and hence the scale $J_{\mathrm{AF}}\sim t_{pd}^4/({\Delta }^{2}U)$. Orbital geometry, occupation and Hund's coupling can instead favour ferromagnetic channels; superexchange is not universally antiferromagnetic.

In the RKKY interaction, a localized moment polarizes conduction-electron spins through a local exchange, and another moment samples that polarization. Second-order response gives an effective coupling governed by the static spin susceptibility. For an ideal three-dimensional spherical Fermi surface, its long-distance form oscillates approximately asThe overall sign convention and precise prefactor must be specified; the alternating sign and power-law range are the main features. This mechanism is useful for localized moments in metals, for example rare-earth systems. The Fermi surface and dimensionality change the range and oscillation pattern. ^[ref]

In double exchange, carriers move between sites of different valence while strongly aligned by Hund's coupling to local core spins. In the strong-coupling classical-spin limit, the magnitude of their hopping isParallel moments maximize the carrier bandwidth and lower its kinetic energy, favouring ferromagnetism. Doped mixed-valence manganites are the standard setting. The process involves real carrier motion and is distinct from a virtual insulating superexchange or weak-coupling conduction-electron response. ^[ref]

In a real material several mechanisms compete. Ligand geometry, charge-transfer and repulsion energies, carrier concentration and the band susceptibility are therefore needed before predicting the net ordering.

The clearest examples are the cuprate superconductors. Their unusual properties should be compared with the clean, weak-coupling, fully gapped s-wave electron–phonon limit of BCS theory; that limit is not a definition of all possible BCS-like paired states.

Cuprates are layered copper oxides with strongly anisotropic transport. Their undoped parents are antiferromagnetic Mott insulators or, more specifically for many compounds, charge-transfer insulators, despite partially filled bands in a simple band picture. Doping produces a superconducting dome rather than simply improving an ordinary weakly interacting metal. This points to strong electronic correlations. Near optimal doping, an extended temperature range often shows approximately linear electrical resistivity, termed strange-metal behaviour, instead of the low-temperature $T^2$ law of a conventional Fermi liquid. Neither law applies at every temperature and doping.

The dominant Cooper pair symmetry is spin-singlet $d_{x^2-y^2}$, with a representative gapIt changes sign under a quarter turn and has nodes on the zone diagonals. Phase-sensitive experiments detect that sign change; it is not established by a large transition temperature alone. ^[ref] Clean nodal quasiparticles give power-law low-temperature responses, for example electronic heat capacity $C\propto T^2$ and penetration-depth change $\lambda (T)-\lambda (0)\propto T$, in contrast with activated responses of a fully gapped s-wave state. Disorder, dimensional crossover and competing phases can alter these powers.

The cuprate pseudogap is a partial, momentum-dependent loss of low-energy electronic spectral weight extending above the superconducting transition in underdoped materials. It need not be identical to the superconducting gap, and observing it alone does not identify its microscopic origin or prove preformed pairs. ^[ref]

Short coherence lengths, anisotropy and low phase stiffness in underdoped systems make thermal phase and vortex fluctuations important. Many cuprates are strong type-II superconductors, with large London penetration depths relative to their superconducting coherence lengths. Gap-to-transition-temperature ratios and isotope effects vary with doping and need not obey the simplest weak-coupling benchmarks $2\Delta (0)/(k_{\mathrm{B}}{T}_c)=3.53$ and $T_c\propto M_{\mathrm{ion}}^{-1/2}$. A weak or variable isotope effect by itself does not identify the pairing mechanism.

These features motivate strongly correlated pairing descriptions, often involving spin fluctuations, but do not uniquely establish a microscopic pairing glue. Other high-temperature families need not share every cuprate property: iron-based superconductors are multiband and may be nodeless. The robust distinction is the observed combination of correlated normal states, unusual gap symmetry and important collective fluctuations, rather than high $T_c$ alone.