Past exam of the astrophysical fluid dynamics course of the University of Cambridge / 2019 / Section A

Write the initial mass density as $\rho =mn$. The ideal gas law gives pressure $p=n{k}_{B}T$, and the sphere has $M=4\pi \rho R^3/3$. Here $k_B$ is the Boltzmann constant and $G$ is the gravitational constant. First obtain the gravitational potential energy by adding concentric shells. The mass inside radius $r$ is $M(r)=M{r}^3/R^3$, soIn a small contraction $dR<0$ at fixed total mass, the gravitational energy released is $-dW=3G{M}^2|dR|/(5R^2)$. The positive work required against the gas pressure is $-pdV=4\pi R^{2}p|dR|$. Equating these givesUse $R=(3M/(4\pi mn){)}^{1/3}$ to eliminate the radius. The uniform-sphere pressure-work collapse criterion isThe units are kilograms: $(k_{B}T/(Gm){)}^{3/2}$ has units $\mathrm{k}{\mathrm{g}}^{3/2}{\mathrm{m}}^{-3/2}$, and ${\rho }^{-1/2}$ supplies $\mathrm{k}{\mathrm{g}}^{-1/2}{\mathrm{m}}^{3/2}$. At fixed initial $n$ and $T$, $M>M_{\mathrm{crit}}$ makes gravity stronger than the pressure-work requirement in this model, allowing contraction.

This is a Jeans mass estimate for homologous contraction of an initially uniform sphere. It is not an exact stability limit for a hydrostatic gas sphere: uniform mass density and uniform temperature would give uniform pressure, rather than the gradient required by hydrostatic equilibrium. The numerical coefficient therefore differs from conventions based on a Jeans instability wavelength or a pressure-confined isothermal sphere. Subsequent contraction also depends on heat exchange; isothermal pressure support during gravitational collapse weakens relative to gravity as the radius decreases.

The exponential factor removes the first spatial derivative. Apply the chain rule explicitly:while ${\partial }_t^2\Delta \rho =e^{-z/(2H)}{\Psi }_{tt}$. Substituting into the supplied density equation, the terms proportional to ${\Psi }_z$ cancel, leavingThis is the atmospheric acoustic cutoff transformation. There is a sign error in the target equation in the original PDF, as well as in the transcription: the last term must be $+{\omega }_0^2\Psi$ for real positive ${\omega }_0$. If the displayed minus sign is retained literally, coefficient matching would require ${\omega }_0^2=-c^2/(4H^2)$, so it would not define a real characteristic oscillation period.

For the corrected equation, a plane wave $\Psi \propto e^{i(kz-\omega t)}$ has dispersion relationThus ${\omega }_0$ is the acoustic cutoff frequency: vertically propagating acoustic waves have $|\omega |\ge {\omega }_0$. The scale height and sound speed have units metres and metres per second, respectively, so ${\omega }_0$ has units ${\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$.

For an order-of-magnitude estimate in the lower terrestrial atmosphere, take $H\simeq 8.0\mathrm{km}$ and $c\simeq 340\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$. These are representative atmospheric values, not additional data specified by the paper. They giveThe isothermal atmosphere approximation is local: a real atmospheric temperature profile and the thermodynamic response of the disturbance modify the precise cutoff and period.

For an inverted free surface, gravity promotes a displacement instead of restoring it. The surface tension term still resists curvature. Hence the gravity-capillary wave relation becomes, with $q=|k|$,For $0<q<k_c$, where $k_c=\sqrt{\rho g/\sigma }$, ${\omega }^2<0$. Writing the displacement as $\eta \propto e^{st+ikx}$ gives the Rayleigh-Taylor instability growth rateShorter wavelengths, $q>k_c$, remain oscillatory because surface tension dominates. The marginal scale is determined by the capillary length,A sufficiently small aperture excludes the long unstable modes: this is finite-aperture stabilization of an inverted liquid surface. The estimate requested is therefore a container opening of order one centimetre, with $1.7\mathrm{cm}$ the marginal full wavelength rather than a geometry-independent maximum diameter.

The exact largest opening cannot be fixed from the stated infinite-surface dispersion relation alone. It requires the aperture shape and contact-line boundary conditions. For example, a one-dimensional span of width $L$ whose contact line is pinned at both ends has a half-sine lowest mode with $q_{\min }=\pi /L$. In that simple model,Different geometries change the numerical factor. This is a small-disturbance stability estimate with negligible air inertia and no leakage or contact-line failure; a guarantee that a real inverted container retains its water needs those additional boundary details.