Past exam of the viscous flow course of the University of Oxford / 2023 / 1

Let $V(t)$ have a boundary moving with velocity ${\mathbf{v}}_b$, and let $\mathbf{n}$ be its outward unit normal vector. For a smooth scalar field $q$, the Reynolds transport theorem isIn the last expression, extend ${\mathbf{v}}_b$ smoothly into $V(t)$ and use the divergence theorem. For a material volume, its boundary moves with the fluid velocity $\mathbf{u}$, so ${\mathbf{v}}_b=\mathbf{u}$. Equivalently, the Reynolds transport theorem for a material volume readswhere $D/Dt$ is the material derivative.

For an arbitrary moving region, mass conservation includes the relative mass flow rate across its boundary:Substitution of the Reynolds transport theorem and the divergence theorem givesSince the region is arbitrary, a continuous integrand must vanish: if it had a positive or negative value at a point, a sufficiently small surrounding region would have an integral of the same sign. This gives the continuity equation. With constant positive mass density $\rho$, it reduces toThus the flow is incompressible. For a material volume, the same argument starts directly from conservation of its total mass, with zero relative boundary flux.

At an oriented internal surface with unit normal vector $\mathbf{n}$, the traction $\mathbf{t}(\mathbf{x},t;\mathbf{n})$ is the limiting contact force per unit surface area exerted by the material on the positive-$\mathbf{n}$ side on the material on the negative-$\mathbf{n}$ side:For a boundary of a chosen material volume, this convention gives the external traction when $\mathbf{n}$ is outward. The Cauchy stress tensor has componentsso the second index specifies the surface orientation and the first specifies the force component. The vectors ${\mathbf{e}}_i$ form the standard Cartesian coordinate system basis of unit vectors.

Cauchy's stress theorem states that the dependence of traction on the normal vector is linear:Repeated indices are summed according to Einstein notation. In particular, reversing the normal vector reverses the traction, and knowing the tractions on three mutually perpendicular coordinate planes determines the traction on every plane. Symmetry of the Cauchy stress tensor, for an ordinary fluid without body couples, follows separately from angular momentum conservation.

For an arbitrary material volume $V(t)$, Newton's second law equates the rate of change of linear momentum to the resultant contact force, since there is no body force:Use the Reynolds transport theorem on the left. Expanding the product and using the continuity equation leavesOn the right, the divergence theorem applied to each row of the Cauchy stress tensor givesConsequently the volume integral of $\rho D{u}_i/Dt-{\partial }_j{\sigma }_{ij}$ vanishes on every material volume. Localizing as in part (i) gives the Cauchy momentum equation:The left side is mass density times material acceleration; the right side is the divergence of the Cauchy stress tensor.

For an isotropic Newtonian fluid in incompressible flow, the constitutive equation isHere $p$ is pressure, ${\delta }_{ij}$ is the Kronecker delta, $\mu$ is the constant dynamic viscosity, and $E$ is the strain-rate tensor. The more general compressible constitutive equation can include a term proportional to $(\nabla \cdot \mathbf{u}){\delta }_{ij}$; that term vanishes here.

Differentiate the Cauchy stress tensor, retaining the constant dynamic viscosity outside the derivatives:The last equality uses incompressibility. Substitution into the Cauchy momentum equation gives the Navier-Stokes equationThe pressure gradient and the Laplacian of the velocity field therefore give the two contact force densities in this model.

For the unidirectional flow $\mathbf{u}=(0,0,w)$, incompressibility gives ${\partial }_{z}w=0$. Hence $w=w(x,y,t)$, and the convective acceleration $w{\partial }_{z}w$ vanishes. The transverse components of the Navier-Stokes equation give $p_x=p_y=0$, while the axial component givesA steady-flow assumption is implicit in the question. Neither unidirectional flow nor a time-independent pressure gradient alone eliminates ${\partial }_{t}w$: a decaying transient can be superposed on the final pipe profile. The native PDF does not explicitly say steady flow in this part. For the intended steady flow, $w_t=0$, and thereforeTaking the pipe walls to be stationary, the no-slip boundary condition isThe no-penetration boundary condition is already satisfied by the assumed velocity field. This is the Poisson equation defining rectangular duct flow.

For a profile depending only on $y$, the Poisson equation becomes $w_1^{\prime \prime }=-G/\mu$. Integrating twice givesThe no-slip boundary conditions $w_1(b)=w_1(-b)=0$ imply $C_1=0$ and $C_2=G{b}^2/(2\mu )$. ThusThis is plane Poiseuille flow between the two horizontal walls. It is positive in the interior for $G>0$, so the velocity points down the pressure gradient. It does not satisfy the side-wall no-slip boundary conditions, which is precisely what the correction in part (iii) repairs.

Subtract the particular plane Poiseuille flow profile from the full rectangular duct flow. The remainder is a harmonic function:The data are even in $x$ and $y$. The boundary value problem is unique: if two solutions differed by $v$, Green's first identity and the zero Dirichlet boundary condition would giveThus $v$ is constant, and its zero boundary values force $v=0$. Reflection of a solution in either coordinate axis therefore gives the same solution. We may seek even separated eigenfunctions.

Use separation of variables withEach summand solves the Laplace equation, vanishes at $y=\pm b$, and has the required evenness. The hyperbolic cosine ratio equals one at either side wall. The functions $\cos (k_{n}y)$ have orthogonality relationThey are the even Dirichlet eigenfunctions on $[-b,b]$, so their Fourier series represents the even boundary data. Projecting that data onto the $n$th eigenfunction yields the Fourier coefficientFor completeness, two integrations by parts give the quadratic arch expansion in half-integer cosine modes: the displayed integral is $4(-1{)}^n/k_n^3$, agreeing with the identity supplied in the paper.

Adding the particular solution givesThe coefficients are absolutely summable and the hyperbolic cosine ratio is at most one throughout the closed rectangle, giving uniform convergence and the prescribed boundary values. On compact subsets of the interior, the hyperbolic cosine ratio supplies exponential decay in $n$, justifying differentiation of the series and the Laplace equation. The side-wall correction slows the plane Poiseuille flow enough to satisfy all four no-slip boundary conditions.

The volumetric flow rate is the integral of axial velocity over the cross-section:The plane Poiseuille flow contribution isFor each correction eigenfunction,Uniform convergence permits termwise integration. Multiplying these two integrals by $A_n$ givesConsequentlyEvery summand in the subtracted quantity is positive. Thus the side walls reduce the flux below the infinite-width plane Poiseuille flow prediction. Its dimensions are volume per unit time, as required for a volumetric flow rate.