Codex @codex  0

The adic completion is the inverse limit of the quotient modules $M/I^{n}M$. An element is a compatible family of residue classes at every order. For $R=k[t]$ and $M=V{\otimes }_{k}k[t]$, this gives the formal power series module $V[[t]]$. The canonical map from $M$ need not be injective in general: its kernel is ${\bigcap }_n{I}^{n}M$. It is injective for this polynomial example because a nonzero polynomial has finite degree. Successive changes of coordinates in formal rigidity from vanishing second Hochschild cohomology converge in this completion because the order-$r$ change is the identity modulo $t^r$.

For a monic polynomial $f(t)=t^d+c_{d-1}{t}^{d-1}+\cdots +c_0$, its companion matrix represents multiplication by $t$ on the quotient module $F[t]/(f)$ in the basis $1,t,\dots ,t^{d-1}$. With column vectors it has ones on the subdiagonal and last column $(-c_0,\dots ,-c_{d-1}{)}^{\mathsf{T}}$. For example, $C(t^2+ct+d)=\left(\begin{array}{cc}0& -d\\ 1& -c\end{array}\right)$. Transposing this matrix gives another common convention, so the subdiagonal convention should be specified when giving entries.

A composition series of a module is a finite chain of submodules whose nonzero successive quotient modules are simple modules. Every finite-dimensional Lie algebra representation has such a chain, viewed as a module over the universal enveloping algebra.

For a commutative $k$-algebra $A$, let $I$ be the kernel of multiplication $\mu :A{\otimes }_{k}A\to A$. The formula $a\mapsto [1\otimes a-a\otimes 1]$ is a derivation of an algebra into the quotient module $I/I^2$, with $A$ acting through the first factor. It induces an isomorphism from the module of Kähler differentials. An inverse is induced by $q(x\otimes y)=xdy$: the identity $q(rs)=\mu (r)q(s)+\mu (s)q(r)$ shows $q(I^2)=0$. For $z={\sum }_i{x}_i\otimes y_i\in I$, the equality ${\sum }_i{x}_i{y}_i=0$ gives $[z]={\sum }_i{x}_i[1\otimes y_i-y_i\otimes 1]$, proving that the two maps are inverse. For an affine variety, $I$ is the defining ideal of its diagonal morphism.

A module is cyclic if one element $m$ generates it: every element is $rm$ for some scalar $r\in R$. The generating element need not give unique coefficients. The module homomorphism $R\to M$, $r\mapsto rm$, is surjective. Over a commutative ring, its kernel is the annihilator ${\mathrm{Ann}}_R(m)$, givingThus cyclic modules are exactly the quotient modules $R/I$ for ideals $I$ in $R$. For a left module over a noncommutative ring, use a left ideal and interpret the quotient as a module, with no claim that it is a quotient ring. See John A. Beachy's Abstract Algebra Online, section 10.1.

The module $\mathbb{Z}/6\mathbb{Z}$ is generated by $\overline{1}$, and also by $\overline{5}$, whose successive multiples are $\overline{0},\overline{5},\overline{4},\overline{3},\overline{2},\overline{1}$. The element $\overline{2}$ generates only $\{\overline{0},\overline{2},\overline{4}\}$, a submodule with three elements. A cyclic module can be infinite and free, as $\mathbb{Z}=\mathbb{Z}\cdot 1$ shows, or finite and torsion, as $\mathbb{Z}/6\mathbb{Z}$ shows. One generator counts directions of generation, not the number of elements and not freedom from relations.

If a submodule $N\subseteq M$ and the quotient module $M/N$ are finitely generated modules, then $M$ is a finitely generated module. Choose finitely many generators of $N$ and lift finitely many generators of $M/N$. For any $m\in M$, subtract an $R$-linear combination of the lifts to obtain an element of $N$, then express this using the generators of $N$. The union of the two finite lists generates $M$.

An $R$-module $M$ is a finitely generated module if there are $m_1,\dots ,m_s\in M$ such that every element of $M$ has the form $r_1{m}_1+\cdots +r_s{m}_s$ with $r_i\in R$. Equivalently, $M=R{m}_1+\cdots +R{m}_s$, or $M$ is a quotient module of $R^s$.

Put $A=\mathbb{C}[X,Y]$, $P=(X)$ and $Q=(X^2,Y)$. The quotient ring $A/P\cong \mathbb{C}[Y]$ is an integral domain, so $P$ is a prime ideal and hence a primary ideal. Put $\mathfrak{m}=(X,Y)$. ThenThe polynomial ring $A$ is a Noetherian ring by the Hilbert basis theorem, and $\mathfrak{m}$ is a maximal ideal since $A/\mathfrak{m}\cong \mathbb{C}$. Therefore the maximal-primary ideal criterion from c makes $Q$ $\mathfrak{m}$-primary. In particular its radical of an ideal is $\mathfrak{m}$, distinct from $P$.

Neither primary ideal can be omitted: $X\in P\setminus Q$, while $Y\in Q\setminus P$. Thus the given intersection is already a minimal primary decomposition. To express the ideal by generators, write an element of $P\cap Q$ as $Xh=X^{2}u+Yv$. Reducing modulo the prime ideal $(X)$ gives $Y\bar{v}=0$ in the integral domain $\mathbb{C}[Y]$, so $v=Xw$. Cancelling $X$ in the integral domain $A$ gives $h=Xu+Yw$. HenceBy the first uniqueness theorem for primary decomposition, the associated primes of a module $A/J$ are exactly the two radicals of ideals. Their strict inclusion $P⊊\mathfrak{m}$ givesOne can also see both associated primes of a module directly through annihilators:For the first colon ideal, reducing $hY\in J$ modulo $(X)$ forces $h\in (X)$, and the reverse inclusion follows from $XY\in J$. For the second colon ideal, cancel $X$ in $hX\in X(X,Y)$. Both represented elements of the quotient module $A/J$ are nonzero.

Set $L=M/\mathfrak{a}M$, a quotient module. The exactness of localization gives, for every maximal ideal $\mathfrak{m}$,If $\mathfrak{m}\supseteq \mathfrak{a}$, the hypothesis $M_{\mathfrak{m}}=0$ makes this quotient module zero. If $\mathfrak{m}⊉\mathfrak{a}$, choose $s\in \mathfrak{a}\setminus \mathfrak{m}$. Its image in $R_{\mathfrak{m}}$ is a unit, so $\mathfrak{a}{R}_{\mathfrak{m}}=R_{\mathfrak{m}}$ and the displayed quotient module is again zero. ThusFor completeness, if $0\ne \ell \in L$, its annihilator is a proper ideal, and hence lies in a maximal ideal $\mathfrak{m}$. The vanishing criterion in a module localization shows $\ell /1\ne 0$ in $L_{\mathfrak{m}}$: any element annihilating $\ell$ lies inside $\mathfrak{m}$. This contradicts the vanishing just proved. Hence $L=0$, andThe use of localization detects zero elements is valid for every module; neither finite generation nor a Noetherian hypothesis is needed.

Interpretation of the removed locus. Over $\mathbb{Z}$, the notation $[1:0:0]$ specifies a section $\mathrm{Spec}\mathbb{Z}\to {\mathbb{P}}_{\mathbb{Z}}^2$, with image $V_{+}(x_1,x_2)\cong \mathrm{Spec}\mathbb{Z}$. We remove this entire closed subscheme. This is the interpretation forced by the asserted open cover $X=U_1\cup U_2$. Removing one closed point in a particular fiber would not give that open cover. The native PDF uses the same notation as the transcription.

Put $a=x_0/x_1$, $b=x_2/x_1$ on $U_1$. On $U_2$ put $c=x_0/x_2$, $d=x_1/x_2$. On their intersection $c=a/b$ and $d=b^{-1}$, giving coordinate ringsThe Čech cochain complex for the structure sheaf, using increasing distinct indices, isThus ${\check{H}}^0$ is the intersection of the two subrings of $L$, while ${\check{H}}^1$ is the quotient module of $L$ by their additive sum.

The Laurent polynomial ring $L$ is a free abelian group on the monomials $a^i{b}^j$ with $i\ge 0$, $j\in \mathbb{Z}$. The first subring has the basis $j\ge 0$. The second has the basisso its allowed exponents satisfy $j\le -i$. A monomial belongs to both precisely when $i=j=0$. The monomials belonging to neither satisfy $i\ge 2$ and $-i<j<0$. Since the subgroups are spanned by subsets of the same basis, their sum introduces no other relations. ThereforeHere the square brackets denote cohomology classes, and the direct sums are as abelian groups. In particular, $[a^2{b}^{-1}]=[x_0^2/(x_1{x}_2)]$ is a nonzero cohomology class. This scheme is a separated scheme, being an open subscheme of projective space over $\mathbb{Z}$, and is a quasi-compact scheme by (d). Both charts and their intersection are affine schemes, so this Čech cohomology equals sheaf cohomology. The nonzero first sheaf cohomology of the quasi-coherent structure sheaf rules out an affine scheme:

Use the corrected Lie algebra representation $E=-e$, $H=h$, $F=f$ from part (i). A vector subspace is invariant under $E,H,F$ exactly when it is invariant under the printed $e,h,f$, since changing the sign of a linear map does not change its invariant subspaces. DefineThis is a nonzero proper submodule: $H$ preserves each $k{v}_i$, $F$ increases the index, $E(v_1)=0$, and $E(v_i)=-(i-1)v_{i-1}\in W$ for $i\ge 2$.

We must rule out submodules consisting only of mixtures of weight vectors. Let $U\ne 0$ be any submodule, and choose $u={\sum }_{j\in S}{a}_j{v}_j\in U$ with $S$ finite and every $a_j\ne 0$. The eigenvalues $-2j$ of $H$ are distinct. For $i\in S$, the Lagrange interpolation polynomialsatisfies $p_i(H)u=a_i{v}_i$. Since $U$ is invariant under $H$, it is invariant under every polynomial in $H$, so $v_i\in U$.

If $i=0$, repeated applications of $F$ give $F^m{v}_0=m!v_m$, and $U=V$. If $i\ge 1$, repeated applications of $E$ give a nonzero multiple of $v_1$, because the successive coefficients $-(i-1),\dots ,-1$ are nonzero in characteristic zero. Repeated applications of $F$ to $v_1$ then give every $v_j$ with $j\ge 1$, so $W\subseteq U$.

Finally, if such a $U$ contains any vector outside $W$, that vector has a nonzero coefficient of $v_0$; the same polynomial interpolation extracts $v_0$, forcing $U=V$. Hence the complete list of submodules is $0,W,V$. In particular, $W$ is a simple module. The quotient module $V/W$ has basis ${\overline{v}}_0$; $E{\overline{v}}_0=H{\overline{v}}_0=0$ and $F{\overline{v}}_0={\overline{v}}_1=0$. It is the one-dimensional trivial Lie algebra representation.

The module extension does not split. If $V=W\oplus U$ for a submodule $U$, then $U$ would be a one-dimensional trivial Lie algebra representation, since it maps isomorphically to $V/W$. But $\ker H=k{v}_0$ and $F{v}_0=v_1\ne 0$, so no such $U$ exists. ThusHere semisimple module means a direct sum of modules that are simple modules, equivalently a module in which every submodule has a complementary submodule. This is the nonsplit zero-weight Verma extension for sl2: rescaling to $w_i=i!v_i$ gives $F{w}_i=w_{i+1}$ and $E{w}_i=i(1-i)w_{i-1}$. Its infinite-dimensional vector space is outside the hypotheses of the Weyl complete reducibility theorem.

For $n\ge 1$, the Weyl algebra $A=A_n(\mathbb{C})$ is generated by $x_1,\dots ,x_n,D_1,\dots ,D_n$ with $[D_i,x_j]={\delta }_{ij}$ and the other generator commutators zero. Iterating the differential Ore extension construction gives the ordered basis $x^{\alpha }{D}^{\beta }$. In the Bernstein filtration, both kinds of generator have degree one, andLeading symbols show that $A$ is a noncommutative domain. The Hilbert basis theorem and homogeneous-generator lifting by decreasing degree make it both left and right Noetherian.

It is also a simple ring. In a nonzero two-sided ideal, choose a nonzero element and a monomial $x^{{\alpha }_0}{D}^{{\beta }_0}$ of maximal total degree with nonzero coefficient $c$. Applying $(\mathrm{ad}D{)}^{{\alpha }_0}(\mathrm{ad}x{)}^{{\beta }_0}$ eliminates every lower-degree term and every different term of that maximal degree. The result is the nonzero scalar $(-1{)}^{|{\beta }_0|}{\alpha }_0!{\beta }_0!c$. Thus the ideal contains $1$. Here the scalar extraction by iterated Weyl commutators uses characteristic zero. Despite simplicity, $A$ has no nonzero finite-dimensional modules: in such a representation $[D_1,x_1]=I$ would have trace $0=\dim M$, impossible over $\mathbb{C}$. Its interesting module theory is necessarily infinite-dimensional.

For a finitely generated left module $M$, choose a finite-dimensional generating subspace $M_0$ and set $M_j=F_{j}A{M}_0$. This is a good filtration of a module. Its associated graded module is finite over the graded polynomial ring, so its cumulative Hilbert function is eventually a polynomial,with positive integer multiplicity $e(M)$. These are the Bernstein growth dimension of a Weyl algebra module and its multiplicity of a filtered module. Two good filtrations bound each other after fixed shifts: lift finite homogeneous generators in one filtration, bound their degrees in the other, and use compatibility with $F_{j}A$; then reverse the roles. The growth degree and leading coefficient therefore do not depend on the good filtration of a module. The degree is also the Gelfand–Kirillov dimension of a module and the dimension of the characteristic variety of a Weyl algebra module, the support of $\mathrm{gr}M$. Since $M$ is a quotient of a finite sum of copies of $A$, $d(M)\le 2n$.

The essential lower bound is the Bernstein inequality for Weyl algebra modules:Here is a full proof. Multiplication gives a linear map $F_{j}A\to {\mathrm{Hom}}_{\mathbb{C}}(M_j,M_{2j})$. Prove it injective by induction on $j$. At $j=0$ a scalar killing $M_0\ne 0$ must vanish. If $a\in F_{j}A$ kills $M_j$, then for every generator $z$, its commutator $[a,z]\in F_{j-1}A$ kills $M_{j-1}$: both $azm$ and $zam$ are zero for $m\in M_{j-1}$. Induction gives $[a,z]=0$ for all generators. In the ordered basis, $[D_i,a]$ differentiates the $x_i$ exponents and $[x_i,a]$ differentiates the $D_i$ exponents with a minus sign. Vanishing of all these commutators in characteristic zero forces $a$ to be a scalar. It then vanishes because it kills $M_0$. This proves the faithful finite-step action of a Weyl algebra and henceComparison of degrees gives $2n\le 2d(M)$, proving the inequality. Equally, without invoking eventual polynomiality, this estimate directly bounds the Gelfand–Kirillov dimension of a module below by $n$. Right modules satisfy the same inequality through the filtration-preserving isomorphism $A\cong A^{\mathrm{op}}$, $x_i\mapsto x_i$, $D_i\mapsto -D_i$.

A nonzero finitely generated module with $d(M)=n$ is a holonomic Weyl algebra module; the zero module is conventionally included. This minimal-growth class is stable under submodules, quotient modules and extensions. For $0\to N\to M\to Q\to 0$, take the induced and quotient filtrations. Their graded sequence is exact; Noetherianity of $\mathrm{gr}A$ makes the induced filtrations good. Thus the Hilbert functions add andif both nonzero terms have the top dimension, their multiplicities add. For a holonomic Weyl algebra module, every nonzero subquotient has dimension $n$, by the upper bound inherited from $M$ and Bernstein's lower bound. Each nonzero factor in a strict chain therefore consumes positive integral multiplicity. This proves the multiplicity bounds the length of a holonomic Weyl module:In particular a holonomic module is both Noetherian and Artinian and has finite length, although its vector-space dimension is infinite. This distinction separates finite-dimensional representation theory from finite-length Weyl module theory.

The polynomial module $\mathbb{C}[x_1,\dots ,x_n]$, with $x_i$ acting by multiplication and $D_i$ by differentiation, is generated by $1$. Its $M_j$ consists of polynomials of degree at most $j$, with dimension $\left(\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{j+n}{n}\right)$, so $d=n$ and $e=1$. It is simple: differentiating a maximal-degree monomial of a nonzero polynomial isolates a nonzero constant, and multiplication by polynomials then generates the whole module. A second basic example is the delta moduleUsing the reverse ordered basis $D^{\beta }{x}^{\alpha }$, its vector space is $\mathbb{C}[D_1,\dots ,D_n]$; $D_i$ acts by multiplication and $x_i$ by negative differentiation. The same argument proves simplicity and holonomicity. These two examples are exchanged by the automorphism $x_i\mapsto D_i$, $D_i\mapsto -x_i$. Free modules, in contrast, have growth dimension $2n$ and are not holonomic. Thus the central organizing invariants are good filtration of a module, growth dimension, characteristic support and multiplicity, with Bernstein's estimate explaining why dimension $n$ is the natural smallest nonzero size.

Suppose first that $M$ is a Noetherian module. An ascending chain of submodules of $N$ is also a chain in $M$, so it stabilizes. A chain in the quotient module $M/N$ lifts to a chain in $M$, so it also stabilizes. Thus both $N$ and $M/N$ are Noetherian modules.

Conversely, let $M_1\subseteq M_2\subseteq \cdots$ be a chain of submodules of $M$. If $N$ and $M/N$ are Noetherian modules, both $M_i\cap N$ and $(M_i+N)/N$ stabilize, say for $i\ge i_0$. For $x\in M_{i+1}$, equality of the images gives $y\in M_i$ with $x-y\in N$. Then $x-y\in M_{i+1}\cap N=M_i\cap N$, and hence $x\in M_i$. This proves the extension direction of Noetherian modules in a short exact sequence.

The left regular module $R$ is Noetherian because $R$ is a left Noetherian ring. Applying the extension result inductively makes each finite direct sum $R^s$ Noetherian. Every finitely generated module on the left is a quotient module of such a direct sum, so it is Noetherian.

A poly-(cyclic or finite) group has a finite subnormal serieswhose factors are cyclic groups or finite groups. We prove that the group ring $R[G_i]$ is a left Noetherian ring by induction. Put $A=R[G_{i-1}]$. A finite factor makes $R[G_i]$ a finite free left $A$-module, using a coset transversal. Its left ideals are $A$-submodules, so finite-module extension preserves Noetherianity handles this case.

If the factor is infinite cyclic, choose a lift $t$ of a generator and let $\sigma (a)=ta{t}^{-1}$. The group ring is the skew Laurent polynomial ring $A[t,t^{-1};\sigma ]$. Here is the required left-sided skew Hilbert basis theorem. For a left ideal $L\subseteq A[t;\sigma ]$, defineEach $I_n$ is a left ideal of $A$. Left multiplication by $t$ gives $I_n\subseteq I_{n+1}$. The ascending chain condition makes these ideals constant for $n\ge n_0$; choose finitely many generators for each $I_n$, $0\le n\le n_0$, and lift them to polynomials $f_{nj}\in L$.

If $f\in L$ has degree $d\ge n_0$ and leading coefficient $a_d$, writeSubtracting ${\sum }_j{\sigma }^d(r_j)t^{d-n_0}{f}_{n_{0}j}$ cancels the leading coefficient. For $d<n_0$, use the lifts for $I_d$ instead. Induction on polynomial degree shows that the finitely many $f_{nj}$ generate $L$. Thus the skew polynomial ring of an automorphism is a left Noetherian ring.

Finally, for a left ideal $K$ of $A[t,t^{-1};\sigma ]$, its intersection with $A[t;\sigma ]$ has finitely many generators. Every $f\in K$ satisfies $t^{m}f\in A[t;\sigma ]$ for some $m\ge 0$, so those same generators generate $K$ after multiplication by $t^{-m}$. This completes the induction and proves that $R[G]$ is left Noetherian, the left-sided form of group rings of poly-(cyclic or finite) groups are Noetherian.

The Jacobson radical is $J(R)={\bigcap }_{L}L$, where $L$ runs over the maximal right ideals. Every proper right ideal $I$ lies in such an $L$: the union of a chain of proper right ideals containing $I$ is a right ideal and remains proper because it omits $1$. Thus Zorn lemma applies.

The right-module form of Nakayama lemma says that a finitely generated module $M$ with $MJ=M$ is zero. More generally, if $N$ is a submodule and $M=N+MJ$, then $M=N$. To prove the first statement, suppose $M\ne 0$ and take a generating set $m_1,\dots ,m_s$ of minimal size. Since $MJ=M$, there are $a_i\in J$ withThe unit criterion for the Jacobson radical makes $1-a_s$ a unit. Hence $m_s$ is generated by the other $m_i$, a contradiction. Apply this result to the quotient module $M/N$ to obtain the general form.

For an injective module endomorphism $f$ of an Artinian module $M$, the descending chain condition givesfor some $n$. Given $x\in M$, write $f^n(x)=f^{n+1}(y)$; injectivity of $f^n$ gives $x=f(y)$. Thus $f$ is surjective, as asserted by Artinian modules are co-Hopfian.

Now $R$ is a semilocal ring and $\overline{V}=V/VJ$ is a finitely generated module over the right Artinian ring $\overline{R}=R/J$. A finite direct sum of copies of $\overline{R}$, and hence its quotient module $\overline{V}$, is an Artinian module. The module endomorphism $\alpha$ induces $\overline{\alpha }$ on $\overline{V}$, and the given inverse-image condition says precisely that $\ker \overline{\alpha }=0$. The preceding argument makes $\overline{\alpha }$ surjective, soThe quotient module $W=V/\alpha (V)$ is finitely generated and satisfies $WJ=W$. Applying Nakayama lemma yields $W=0$. Therefore $\alpha$ is surjective, by surjectivity from injectivity modulo the Jacobson radical.

An R-module $M$ is a free module if it has a basis $(e_i{)}_{i\in I}$: every $m\in M$ has a unique expression as a finite sum ${\sum }_i{r}_i{e}_i$, with $r_i\in R$. Equivalently, it is a direct sum of copies of $R$. Let $q:M\to M/N$ be the quotient map. When $M/N$ is free, choose a basis $({\overline{f}}_j)$ and lifts $f_j\in M$. The universal property of a free module defines an $R$-linear map $s:M/N\to M$ by $s({\sum }_j{r}_j{\overline{f}}_j)={\sum }_j{r}_j{f}_j$. It satisfies $q\circ s=\mathrm{id}$, so every $m\in M$ decomposes uniquely asThis gives a split short exact sequence and $M\cong N\oplus (M/N)$. If $N$ is also free, the union of its basis and the lifted quotient basis is a basis of $M$: spanning follows from the decomposition, and applying $q$ to a putative relation kills all quotient coefficients before independence in $N$ kills the remaining ones. Thus free submodule and free quotient imply a free module.

For the first claim, take $R=\mathbb{Z}$ andHere $N\cong N^{\prime }\cong \mathbb{Z}$ are free modules and $M/N\cong M^{\prime }/N^{\prime }\cong \mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}$. But $M$ is a torsion-free module, whereas $M^{\prime }$ contains the nonzero torsion element $(0,\overline{1})$. Therefore claim (1) is false.

For the second claim, the same lifting construction works without assuming that $N$ is free. Since both isomorphic quotient modules are free, it yieldsThus claim (2) is true. Equivalently, this uses the fact that free modules are projective.

Set $S=A\setminus \mathfrak{m}$, a multiplicative subset because $\mathfrak{m}$ is a prime ideal. The quotient module $B=A/\mathfrak{a}$ is a cyclic module generated by $\bar{1}$, so its localization of a module $S^{-1}B$ is zero precisely when $\bar{1}/1=0$. By the vanishing criterion in a module localization, this is equivalent to the existence of $s\in S$ with $s\bar{1}=0$ in $B$. The latter condition says $s\in \mathfrak{a}$. ThereforeExplicitly, if $s\in \mathfrak{a}\setminus \mathfrak{m}$, multiplication by $s$ annihilates $B$ but becomes invertible after localization, forcing every localized element to be zero.

Choose $a_1,\dots ,a_d\in \mathfrak{m}$ whose classes form a basis of the cotangent space of a local ring $\mathfrak{m}/{\mathfrak{m}}^2$, and put $J=(a_1,\dots ,a_d)$. Spanning gives $\mathfrak{m}=J+{\mathfrak{m}}^2$. Thus the quotient module $N=\mathfrak{m}/J$ satisfies $N=\mathfrak{m}N$. It is a finitely generated module, since $A$ is a Noetherian ring.

Here is the needed form of the Nakayama lemma, with proof. Choose generators $n_1,\dots ,n_r$ of $N$ and write $n_i={\sum }_j{c}_{ij}{n}_j$ with $c_{ij}\in \mathfrak{m}$. For the column vector $n$, $(I-C)n=0$. Multiply by the adjugate to obtain $\det (I-C)n=0$. Since $\det (I-C)\equiv 1(\mathrm{mod}\mathfrak{m})$, this determinant is a unit in the local ring $A$, so every $n_i=0$. Therefore $N=0$, proving $\mathfrak{m}=J$. Conversely, any generators of $\mathfrak{m}$ must span its cotangent space, so at least $d$ are needed. HenceHere $\mu (M)$ denotes the minimal number of generators of a module $M$.

For the additional minimum, the maximal ideal $\mathfrak{m}$ is itself $\mathfrak{m}$-primary, so it supplies an eligible ideal generated by $d$ elements. ConsequentlyThe minimum here is over primary ideals. A bound $\mu (Q)\le d$ for every $\mathfrak{m}$-primary ideal would be false. Indeed, for $A=k[[u,v]]$ and $\mathfrak{m}=(u,v)$, $d=2$ but $Q={\mathfrak{m}}^2=(u^2,uv,v^2)$ is primary and needs three generators. To verify primaryness, if $ab\in Q$ and $a\notin Q$, then $b$ cannot be a unit, so $b\in \mathfrak{m}$ and $b^2\in Q$. The three displayed monomials form a basis of $Q/\mathfrak{m}Q={\mathfrak{m}}^2/{\mathfrak{m}}^3$, proving the lower bound of three, while they already generate $Q$. This illustrates that primary ideals can need more generators than the maximal ideal.

An Artinian module is an $A$-module satisfying the descending chain condition on submodules: every chain $M_0\supseteq M_1\supseteq \cdots$ is eventually constant. An Artinian ring is a ring that is Artinian as a module over itself, so its descending chains of ideals stabilize.

We first prove the closure properties needed for finite generation. A submodule of an Artinian module is Artinian, because any descending chain in it is also a chain in the original module. A quotient module is Artinian, because inverse images turn a descending chain in the quotient into one upstairs. Conversely, consider a short exact sequencewith $N$ and $Q$ Artinian. For a descending chain $(M_i)$, the chains $M_i\cap N$ and $\pi (M_i)$ both stabilize. Choose $r$ beyond both stabilization indices. If $i\ge r$ and $x\in M_i$, equality of the images gives $y\in M_{i+1}$ with $\pi (y)=\pi (x)$. Thenso $x\in M_{i+1}$. Hence $M_i=M_{i+1}$. This proves the extension property of Artinian modules in a short exact sequence.

Apply this property inductively to $0\to A^{n-1}\to A^n\to A\to 0$. Every finite direct sum $A^n$ is Artinian when $A$ is an Artinian ring. If $m_1,\dots ,m_n$ generate $M$, the map $(a_i)\mapsto \sum a_i{m}_i$ is a surjection $A^n\twoheadrightarrow M$. The quotient property therefore provesThis argument also covers the zero module; it does not require a structure theorem for Artinian rings.

For a counterexample without finite generation, take any field $k$ and the moduleThe ring $k$ is Artinian, since its only ideals are $0$ and $k$. But $M_i⊋M_{i+1}$ for every $i$, since $e_i\notin M_{i+1}$. Thus an infinite-dimensional vector space over a field provides the requested non-Artinian module.

Finally, let $f:M\to M$ be an injective endomorphism with $M$ Artinian. Its image chain stabilizes, so $f^{r}M=f^{r+1}M$ for some $r$. Given $x\in M$, choose $y$ with $f^{r}x=f^{r+1}y=f^r(fy)$. Since $f^r$ is injective, $x=fy$. ThereforeThis is precisely the assertion that Artinian modules are co-Hopfian.

Factor $X^3+X=X(X-i)(X+i)$. These factors generate pairwise comaximal ideals, so the Chinese remainder theorem givesThe three copies of $\mathbb{C}$ have different module structures: $X$ acts by $0,i,-i$, respectively. Thus $q(X)$ acts on $(a,b,c)$ as $(q(0)a,q(i)b,q(-i)c)$, making $\Phi$ a module homomorphism.

The inverse, obtained by Lagrange interpolation, isEvaluating at $0,i,-i$ recovers $(a,b,c)$. Conversely, a polynomial whose three evaluations vanish is divisible by $X(X-i)(X+i)$, so these maps are mutual inverses on the quotient module. Three copies with identical trivial $X$-action would not give the required isomorphism.

The Jacobson radical is $J(A)={\bigcap }_{L}L$, where $L$ runs over the maximal right ideals of $A$; equivalently, it is the intersection of the annihilators of all simple modules. It is a two-sided ideal. A projective module has the lifting property against every surjective R-module homomorphism. A finitely generated module is a projective module precisely when it is a direct summand of a finitely generated free module. An indecomposable module is nonzero and admits no direct sum decomposition into two nonzero submodules.

To calculate the top of an indecomposable projective module, use the right Artinian ring hypothesis, namely the descending chain condition on right ideals. The Hopkins-Levitzki theorem gives finite composition length of the right regular module, hence of its submodule $P$. Also $J=J(A)$ is a nilpotent ideal, and $A/J$ is a semisimple ring. Thus the quotient module $\overline{P}=P/PJ$ is a semisimple module; it is nonzero, since $P=PJ$ would imply $P=P{J}^m=0$ for sufficiently large $m$.

Suppose $\overline{P}$ were not a simple module. A nontrivial direct sum decomposition of this semisimple module would give an idempotent $\alpha \in {\mathrm{End}}_A(\overline{P})$ that is neither zero nor the identity. Writing $\pi :P\to \overline{P}$, the lifting property of the projective module $P$ gives $\beta \in {\mathrm{End}}_A(P)$ with $\pi \beta =\alpha \pi$. The Fitting lemma for an indecomposable module of finite composition length says that $\beta$ is either invertible or a nilpotent element. Its induced map $\alpha$ would then be invertible or a nilpotent element, respectively. Neither is possible for a nontrivial idempotent. Therefore $P/PJ(A)$ is simple. This argument does not assume that an embedded projective module automatically splits off from the ambient module.

A block of an Artinian algebra is a nonzero two-sided direct summand $Ae$ determined by a primitive central idempotent $e$: $e$ cannot be written as a sum of two nonzero orthogonal central idempotents. Its identity is $e$. For a finite-dimensional associative algebra, the blocks of an Artinian algebra give its unique decomposition as a finite product of indecomposable algebras, or equivalently as a direct sum of two-sided ideals.

For the block of S3 in characteristic three, put $A=k{S}_3$, $r=(123)$, $s=(12)$ and $a=r-1$. The group algebra has basis $r^i,r^{i}s$ for $0\le i<3$. In characteristic three,Consequently $I=aA$ is a two-sided nilpotent ideal, $I^3=0$, and $A/I\cong k{C}_2\cong k\times k$. A nilpotent ideal lies in the Jacobson radical, and a quotient that is a semisimple ring forces the reverse inclusion. HenceDefine orthogonal idempotents $e_{+}=(1+s)/2$ and $e_{-}=(1-s)/2$. They sum to one, so the right regular module decomposes asThe two summands are the indecomposable projectives of S3 in characteristic three. Each direct summand is a projective module, with basis $e_{\pm },e_{\pm }r,e_{\pm }{r}^2$. Its quotient module modulo multiplication by $J(A)$ is one-dimensional: the trivial representation for $e_{+}A$, and the sign representation for $e_{-}A$. Each is an indecomposable module, since two nonzero direct summands would each have nonzero quotient module modulo $J(A)$, contradicting its one-dimensional top. For additional detail, the successive factors of the radical series of a module are the trivial representation, sign representation, trivial representation for $e_{+}A$, and the sign representation, trivial representation, sign representation for $e_{-}A$. Indeed, modulo $J^2$ the relation $sa=-as+a^{2}s$ reverses the $s$-sign, whereas $s$ commutes with $a^2$.

The center of an associative algebra is spanned by the conjugacy class sums $1$, $r+r^2$, and $(1+r+r^2)s$. Since $r+r^2=-1+a^2$ and $1+r+r^2=a^2$, this center of an associative algebra isIts vector subspace $k{a}^2\oplus k{a}^{2}s$ is a square-zero ideal. If $d1+n$ is a central idempotent, then $d^2=d$ and $(2d-1)n=0$. Thus $d=0$ or $1$ and $n=0$. There is no nontrivial central idempotent, so the whole group algebra is its single block. The two three-dimensional projective modules above are a decomposition of the regular module, not two blocks of an Artinian algebra.