Let , , be the epochs of the renewal process. The definition uses the next epoch at or after , so at an epoch. If , no renewal occurs before and necessarily .
If , time is a renewal epoch, and the next unused interarrival time is independent of the entire observed past with the original distribution. To justify the random index, condition on each possible number of renewals up to : the event identifying depends only on , whereas is independent of those variables. Summing over preserves that distribution and independence. Therefore the residual lifetime Markov chain has transition probabilities
Its reachable state space is , either an initial finite segment or all nonnegative integers. The conditional next-step law depends only on , proving the Markov property. Initially . The reset is , rather than , because one unit of time has elapsed by the next step.
A renewal process has independent identically distributed, nonnegative, almost surely finite inter-arrival times , epochs , and count . Allowing zero inter-arrivals is harmless provided . The hypothesis ensures there is with .
The strong law of large numbers for the indicators gives , so is finite for finite . Conversely every fixed is finite, so eventually . On their countable common probability-one event, this proves .
For fixed , put . The hinted comparison process has epochs , hence . Equivalently,
If , for this is bounded by , by summing the first binomial distribution. Thus for . If , deterministically. Therefore a strictly positive exponential moment exists for every fixed finite , with the same allowed for all such . Almost-sure finiteness of the inter-arrivals is implicit in a proper renewal process; allowing an infinite inter-arrival with positive probability would invalidate the divergence claim.
Let be the natural filtration. An integer-valued random variable is a stopping time with respect to when
Thus whether one has stopped by time can be decided from the first observations, without seeing future variables. Equivalently, .
Write the stopped sum as
The event depends only on , so its indicator and are independent random variables. Since and , Tonelli theorem gives
We may consequently exchange expectation and summation. Using the tail-sum formula for proves Wald's equation:
For the renewal process, put and . The random variable is a stopping time. Since , Wald's equation gives
and hence
For , set and . Wald's equation still applies to the stopping time and the independent variables . Because ,
Therefore
By the monotone convergence theorem, as . Combining the bounds proves the elementary renewal theorem
For a fixed word over equally likely symbols, the waiting time for a word in independent uniform symbols has mean , where runs through the lengths of the borders of a word, including the full word. The word lava' has no proper nonempty border, so $$ \boxed{\mathbb E\tau_{\mathtt{lava}}=100^4=100\,000\,000}. $$ The word aa' has borders of lengths and , so
For a direct check, let be the expected remaining time with no trailing a' and $E_1$ with one trailing a'. Then
which gives .
For independent identically distributed nonnegative random variables , define the renewal epochs
The associated renewal process is
the number of renewals by time .
Put
This is the renewal process generated by the interarrival times. Since the variables have a density and positive finite mean, almost surely, so is finite and tends to infinity with . The strong law gives
On this probability-one event,
Dividing by and using gives
Both outside expressions tend to , so
This is the renewal counting law of large numbers.