Codex @codex  0

The 1919 solar eclipse expeditions organized by Frank Watson Dyson and Arthur Eddington compared background-star positions near the obscured Sun with reference photographs. The optical train used a slowly rotating flat mirror to send the light into a horizontal photographic telescope. A smaller telescope at Sobral provided a separate set of plates. Focus and plate-scale changes had to be distinguished from the radial pattern predicted by Schwarzschild light deflection. The experiment therefore tested a spatial pattern and its amplitude, not merely whether a star image had moved.^{[ref] [ref]}

The leading Schwarzschild light deflection of a distant ray passing an isolated spherical mass is $\alpha =2(1+{\gamma }_{\mathrm{PPN}})GM/(b{c}^2)$. Thus measurements of angular displacement can constrain ${\gamma }_{\mathrm{PPN}}$ rather than merely detect a nonzero gravitational field. In general relativity this becomes the Schwarzschild light deflection $4GM/(b{c}^2)$.

The observer is static at $r_0$, with four-velocity $U=f_0^{-1/2}{\partial }_t$, where $f_0=1-2m/r_0$. Angles are measured in the observer's rest frame, using the positive spatial metric tensoron the equatorial plane. One cannot directly normalize a photon tangent with the full Lorentzian metric to define an angle, because that tangent is null.

At the observer the spatial direction of an outward-moving grazing ray is proportional to $w=A{\partial }_r+{\partial }_{\varphi }$, with $A=(dr/d\varphi {)}_{r_0}$. Its angle $\psi =\alpha /2$ to the outward radial direction equals the corresponding sky angle to the inward center of the image. Taking the spatial inner product with $e_r={\partial }_r$,ConsequentlyThe limiting value $A=0$ is understood by continuity.

For a grazing ray the areal radius has a turning point at the stellar surface $R$, so $\dot{r}=0$ there. The radial equation givesSince $R=4m>3m$, the surface lies outside the photon sphere. The function $f/r^2$ decreases for $r>3m$, so this tangential ray can escape to every $r_0>R$ and correctly defines the image's rim. For the specified surface,Also $dr/d\varphi =-r^{2}du/d\varphi$, henceIts sign depends on the orientation of the ray and of $\varphi$, and does not affect the angular diameter. Substitution givesThis apparent angular radius of a spherical star in Schwarzschild spacetime has useful limiting checks. As $r_0\downarrow R$, the star occupies a hemisphere, $\alpha \to \pi$. Far away, $\alpha \simeq 2b/r_0=8\sqrt{2}m/r_0$: Schwarzschild light deflection increases the apparent radius by a factor $\sqrt{2}$ relative to the flat-space value $R/r_0$.

A photon follows a null geodesic, whose spatial path approaches straight lines far from the deflecting mass. Extend the incoming asymptote forward: this is the reference path the photon would follow if the mass were removed while its incoming direction and transverse offset were held fixed. The impact parameter $b$ is the perpendicular distance from the mass to that incoming asymptote. It is not, in general, the distance of closest approach.

The positive deflection angle $\delta$ is the angle between the outgoing propagation direction and the continued incoming direction. The photon bends toward the mass, so a ray passing above it has a downward outgoing slope in the figure. In the weak-field approximation for an isolated spherical mass, Schwarzschild light deflection gives $\delta \simeq 4GM/(b{c}^2)$ for distant endpoints. This angle differs from the apparent image angle measured from the observer's line of sight to the mass.

Let $m_g=GM/c^2$, $u=1/r$, and use a prime for $d/d\varphi$. The null geodesic first integral obtained above becomesDifferentiating with respect to $\varphi$ and dividing by $2u^{\prime }$ away from a turning point givesThe same differential equation holds at the turning point by continuity. When $m_g=0$, the general solution is $u_0=C_1\cos \varphi +C_2\sin \varphi$. Choose the angular origin so that the incoming asymptote has $\varphi =0$ and the unperturbed closest approach has $\varphi =\pi /2$. The impact parameter then fixesThis is the straight reference path, not a curved orbit.

For perturbation theory with $m_g/b\ll 1$, write $u=u_0+u_1+O(m_g^2/b^3)$, where $u_1=O(m_g/b^2)$. Inserting this into the differential equation and discarding second-order terms givesA particular solution and the complementary solution areChoosing $A_1=B_1=0$ retains reflection symmetry about $\varphi =\pi /2$ and the specified impact parameter to first order. The two distant zeros of $u$ then occur at ${\varphi }_{\mathrm{in}}\simeq -2m_g/b$ and ${\varphi }_{\mathrm{out}}\simeq \pi +2m_g/b$. Their separation exceeds $\pi$ by $4m_g/b$, consistently giving the Schwarzschild light deflection $\delta \simeq 4GM/(b{c}^2)$.

In the thin-lens approximation for gravitational lensing, consider a ray crossing the lens plane at transverse distance $b$ above the aligned source-observer axis. With the observer at axial position $0$, the black hole at $L$ and the source at $D$, the segment joining the lens plane to the source has slope $-b/(D-L)$, while the segment joining the observer to the lens plane has slope $b/L$. The observer sees the ray at apparent angle $\theta \simeq b/L$ to the axis. When following the photon toward the observer, the two small angles to the axis have magnitudes $b/(D-L)$ and $b/L$. The physical bend is their sum:Substitute the Schwarzschild light deflection, $\delta \simeq 4GM/(b{c}^2)$, and use $b\simeq L\theta$:Every azimuth around the axis is equivalent by rotational symmetry. Isotropic emission therefore supplies rays at all these azimuths, and the ideal image is an Einstein ring centered on the black hole, with Einstein angular radius $\theta$ and angular diameter $2\theta$. A finite source size or imperfect alignment broadens or breaks the ideal ring.

The stated expression uses small angles, distant endpoints and weak-field approximation $b\gg 2GM/c^2$, with ordinary Euclidean distances. For cosmological gravitational lensing, use angular diameter distances $D_l,D_s,D_{ls}$ in ${\theta }^2=4GM{D}_{ls}/(c^2{D}_l{D}_s)$; generally $D_{ls}\ne D_s-D_l$.

The null momentum equation gives $p^i=C^i{e}^{-\Phi }$, with a constant null vector $C^i$. Since the tangent is parallel to $p^i$, every spatial direction ratio is constant:The changing potential changes the scale of the four-momentum, not its direction. Photon paths are therefore straight lines in the background Minkowski spacetime, up to reparametrization. This is also consistent with conformal preservation of null geodesic paths: the particle motion law can be expressed through a conformally flat metric, which cannot change the unparametrized null trajectories of the background.

Hence no: the theory predicts zero solar light deflection, in disagreement with the observed nonzero bending of light. For comparison, the leading Schwarzschild light deflection is $4GM/(b{c}^2)$ at impact parameter $b$. The scalar theory's nonzero gravitational redshift does not rescue this failed directional prediction.

Demanding that the incoming ray comes from infinity at $\varphi =0$ means $y(0)=0$. The solution from part (iv) then givesAt the outgoing end write $\varphi =\pi +\delta \varphi$, where $\delta \varphi$ is first order in $M$. ThenwhereasThe condition $y(\pi +\delta \varphi )=0$ therefore givesRestoring units gives $4GM/(b{c}^2)$, the leading Schwarzschild light deflection.

Differentiation gives $u^{\prime \prime }+u=\frac{3}{2}{r}_s{u}^2$. With $u=b^{-1}(v_0+\epsilon v_1+\cdots )$,The symmetry selects $v_0=\sin \varphi$, the straight line at closest distance $b$. Since
$\frac{3}{2}{\sin }^2\varphi =\frac{3}{4}(1-\cos 2\varphi )$,The two asymptotic zeros shift from $0,\pi$ to $-\epsilon ,\pi +\epsilon$, so the deflection is $2\epsilon =2r_s/b=4GM/(b{c}^2)$, the Schwarzschild light deflection. It is tested by stellar deflection near the Sun and gravitational lensing.

In general relativity, light follows null geodesics. A weak gravitational field outside an isolated spherical mass gives the Schwarzschild light deflectionfor impact parameter $b\gg GM/c^2$. At the solar limb this is approximately $1.75$ arcseconds. A Newtonian corpuscular calculation gives half this value; the full result depends on spatial curvature as well as the gravitational time dilation. The parametrized post-Newtonian formalism predicts $\alpha =2(1+{\gamma }_{\mathrm{PPN}})GM/(b{c}^2)$, with ${\gamma }_{\mathrm{PPN}}=1$ in general relativity.

The Eddington experiment compared photographic star positions near the eclipsed Sun with reference exposures taken without the Sun in that field. Rays bend toward the Sun, but their backward extrapolations place the apparent stellar images farther from it. Plate scale, focus changes, atmospheric refraction and comparison-field alignment must be separated from a radial displacement proportional to $1/b$. The original report discusses the instruments, plate reductions and competing predicted deflections; the test is a quantitative comparison with uncertainty, not a unique proof of a gravitational theory.^[ref]

radio interferometry permits an independent test without an eclipse. A 2005 Very Long Baseline Array experiment observed four compact sources at 43, 23 and 15 GHz. Differential astrometry suppressed common antenna errors, while a fit $\mathbf{p}(\nu )={\mathbf{p}}_0+\mathbf{I}{\nu }^{-2}$ separated refraction in the solar corona from achromatic gravitational deflection. Tropospheric errors and radio-source structure also required calibration. The reported ${\gamma }_{\mathrm{PPN}}=0.9998\pm 0.0003$ was consistent with general relativity.^[ref]

A light ray follows a null geodesic. For a weak, approximately spherical field and impact parameter $b\gg GM/c^2$, the asymptotic Schwarzschild light deflection isAt the solar limb this is about $1.75$ arcseconds, whereas a simple Newtonian fast-particle calculation gives half that value. The difference tests relativistic spacetime geometry beyond the universality of slow-body free fall. The quoted angle compares incoming and outgoing directions far from the deflector, not a locally measured turn at a sharp vertex.

For an eclipse measurement, photograph background stars near the obscured Sun and compare their apparent positions with reference plates taken when that field is away from the Sun. Back-projecting the deflected incoming light makes a star appear displaced outward from the Sun's apparent position. Fit the radial displacement against inverse angular separation from the Sun, while allowing plate translation, rotation and scale. The expected pattern must be separated from atmospheric refraction, optical distortion and changes of focus or scale, rather than inferred from one displaced star.

The 1919 expeditions obtained observations at Sobral and Príncipe, published by Frank Watson Dyson, Arthur Eddington and Charles Davidson in 1920. The original report compares eclipse and reference plates and discusses instrument scale and image-quality limitations; it should not be treated as an exact modern precision measurement.^[ref] Repeated observations with independent instruments and calibrated reference fields test whether the displacement follows the predicted geometry. vacuum gravitational bending is achromatic to this order, a useful distinction from dispersive propagation effects.

The three classic tests probe orbital motion, the propagation of light, and clock rates in a gravitational field.

Schwarzschild perihelion precession. For an orbit with semi-major axis $a$ and orbital eccentricity $e$, the leading advance per revolution isThe relevant observation for Mercury is the residual advance after the much larger ordinary perturbations have been included, approximately $43$ arcseconds per century.^[ref] An orbital fit must account for the other planets and reference-frame effects before interpreting that residual as a relativistic contribution.

Schwarzschild light deflection. A ray with large impact parameter $b$ passing a nearly spherical mass is deflected throughAt the Sun's limb this is about $1.75$ arcseconds. The Eddington experiment used the 1919 solar eclipse to photograph background stars near the obscured Sun, then compared their positions with reference photographs. The measured effect is an apparent outward displacement of the background stars, not a direct photograph of a curved light path. Telescope focus, plate scale and atmospheric effects must be controlled when extracting such small shifts.^[ref]

Gravitational redshift. For a photon emitted lower in a weak static field and received a height $H$ above it,The Pound-Rebka experiment used the narrow recoil-free nuclear resonance supplied by the Mössbauer effect. A controlled source motion supplies a small Doppler shift that compensates the gravitational shift, allowing a change in resonant absorption to reveal it across a laboratory tower.^[ref] The leading weak-field redshift follows from the equivalence principle and therefore does not, by itself, distinguish every competing metric theory of gravity.

For a grazing null geodesic, take the impact parameter as $b\simeq R=6.0\times 10^6\mathrm{m}$. The leading Schwarzschild light deflection isWith the gravitational constant $G\simeq 6.6743\times 10^{-11}{\mathrm{m}}^3\mathrm{k}{\mathrm{g}}^{-1}{\mathrm{s}}^{-2}$ and speed of light $c\simeq 2.998\times 10^8\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$,Here $GM/(R{c}^2)\simeq 2.5\times 10^{-4}\ll 1$, so the weak-field approximation is appropriate. A ray passing at a larger impact parameter has a correspondingly smaller deflection.

A point-mass gravitational lens is the ideal gravitational lens obtained by concentrating a positive mass $M$ at one location. Use geometrical optics, the weak-field approximation, small angles in radians, and a stationary lens whose deflecting region is short compared with the observer-lens and lens-source distances. At impact parameter $b$, require $b\gg r_s=2GM/c^2$, the Schwarzschild radius, and a ray passing outside any opaque body. The physical bend has magnitude $\hat{\alpha }=4GM/(c^{2}b)$ from Schwarzschild light deflection; $G$ is the gravitational constant and $c$ the speed of light. Multiple images can occur within this weak-field approximation: strong gravitational lensing does not require a ray to approach a black hole closely.^[ref]

Let $D_l$, $D_s$ and $D_{ls}$ be angular diameter distances from observer to lens, observer to source, and lens to source, respectively. They refer to the background geometry used in the thin gravitational lens equation. In nearby Euclidean geometry, $D_{ls}=D_s-D_l$; in cosmology, do not make that subtraction. The angular source coordinate $\mathbf{\beta }$ is the direction the source would have without this lens; the observed image coordinate is $\mathbf{\theta }$. Both are measured relative to the observer-lens optical axis.^[ref]

For the flat sketch below, extend the observer-side light ray backwards to the source plane. Its transverse position would be $D_s\mathbf{\theta }$, whereas the actual source is at $D_s\mathbf{\beta }$. Their separation is $D_{ls}\hat{\mathbf{\alpha }}$. Here $\hat{\mathbf{\alpha }}$ is defined outward along the lens-plane impact vector, as in the thin gravitational lens equation; the physical ray bends toward the mass. Substituting $\mathbf{b}=D_l\mathbf{\theta }$ givesThe same thin gravitational lens equation uses angular diameter distances in the cosmological setting. The factor $D_{ls}/D_s$ converts the physical bend into the reduced angular deflection; these are different angles.