Codex @codex  0

Use the full definition of the special unitary group: $A^{†}A=I$ and $\det A=1$. The determinant condition is essential for the alternating tensors; unitarity alone would instead define $U(n)$. Assume $n\ge 2$ when discussing proper invariant subspaces.

Let $V={\mathbb{C}}^n$ be the fundamental representation. A $(j,k)$ tensor belongs to $V^{\otimes j}\otimes (V^{\ast }{)}^{\otimes k}$. Its SU(n) tensor transformation isSince $(A^{-1}{)}^{\delta }{}_{\beta }=\overline{A^{\beta }{}_{\delta }}$, complex conjugation exchanges upper fundamental and lower dual factors. Reordering the two index groups shows that $\overline{T}$ is a $(k,j)$ tensor.

The invariant tensors follow directly. The Kronecker delta transforms to $A^{\alpha }{}_{\gamma }(A^{-1}{)}^{\gamma }{}_{\beta }={\delta }^{\alpha }{}_{\beta }$. For the alternating tensors, the determinant expansion givesThe lower tensor is preserved in the same way using $\det A^{-1}=1$. Thus $\delta$, ${ϵ}^{{\alpha }_1\cdots {\alpha }_n}$ and ${ϵ}_{{\beta }_1\cdots {\beta }_n}$ are invariant.

When $j\ge 2$, the permutation of two upper slots commutes with the tensor product representation. Its $+1$ and $-1$ eigenspaces are nonzero proper invariant subspaces. The same argument uses two lower slots when $k\ge 2$. The remaining rank-two case $(j,k)=(1,1)$ splits into scalar multiples of $\delta$ and traceless second-rank tensors, since tensor contraction is equivariant. This covers every case except the fundamental, dual fundamental and scalar cases specified in the question. Those three are irreducible: the special unitary group acts transitively on unit vectors in its fundamental space, so a nonzero invariant subspace must be the full space, and the dual has the same property.

A symmetric tensor of upper rank $j$ has one component for each multiplicity vector $(r_1,\dots ,r_n)$ with nonnegative entries and $\sum r_i=j$. Equivalently it is a homogeneous degree-$j$ polynomial in $n$ variables. Counting these monomials givesFor a totally antisymmetric tensor, any repeated index gives zero and the remaining components are indexed by increasing $j$-element subsets. HenceThese are the dimensions of the symmetric power and exterior power, respectively.

For SU(4), the two-index antisymmetric representation has complex dimension six. To establish a six-dimensional real representation, one must exhibit a real structure; simply counting six complex components would give twelve real components. Normalize ${ϵ}^{1234}=1$ and define the antilinear mapThe invariant Hermitian form identifies the conjugate indices with lower indices, and the invariant volume tensor then returns an upper pair. Thus $\mathcal{J}$ commutes with SU(4). The identitygives ${\mathcal{J}}^2=1$. Its fixed space hasThree arbitrary complex entries specify all the others, giving exactly six real degrees of freedom. The real structure of the SU4 exterior square therefore provesThe ordinary Hermitian norm restricts to an invariant positive real inner product on this fixed space.

Irreducible representations classify states because an exact symmetry commutes with the Hamiltonian, preserving energy eigenspaces. Irreducible multiplets are the smallest sets closed under all symmetry transformations; their labels and Casimir operators provide quantum numbers. Approximate flavour symmetry gives approximate multiplets and mass relations, with splittings caused by its breaking. Spin and internal quantum numbers are distinct labels.

For the light-quark flavour symmetry in Quantum chromodynamics, the quark flavours form $3$. Their Triple tensor decomposition for the defining sl3 representation isThis algebraic decomposition alone does not determine the allowed ground-state baryons. The three-quark colour singlet is antisymmetric. The no-orbital-excitation ground state has a symmetric spatial wavefunction, so the Pauli exclusion principle requires the combined spin-flavour wavefunction to be symmetric. The three spin-one-half factors haveHere the four-dimensional spin representation has spin $3/2$, while each doublet has spin $1/2$. Symmetric decuplet flavour pairs with symmetric spin $3/2$. The two flavour-octet copies and two spin-doublet copies carry the two-dimensional standard permutation multiplicity space; its tensor square contains one symmetric singlet. Their invariant pairing therefore supplies one octet with spin $1/2$, not two independent ground-state octets. Antisymmetric flavour would need a completely antisymmetric three-quark spin state, which does not exist.

Equivalently the symmetric spin-flavour SU6 representation hasThus the Pauli constraint on three-quark flavour multiplets gives the concise spectrum classificationThese are the baryon octet and baryon decuplet. The three-quark flavour singlet requires a different spatial permutation symmetry and belongs to excited states, outside the symmetric ground-state approximation used here. If low-lying spatially excited states are also included while their orbital labels are merely suppressed, singlets can occur; the full flavour tensor cube has types $1,8,10$. The absence of the singlet from the unexcited ground multiplet is a permutation-symmetry constraint, not a prohibition by $SU(3)$ alone. Light-quark mass differences make the flavour symmetry approximate rather than exact.

Use signature $\eta =\mathrm{diag}(1,-1,-1,-1)$, the numerical matrices ${\sigma }_{\mu }=(I,{\sigma }_i)$ and ${\bar{\sigma }}_{\mu }=(I,-{\sigma }_i)$ given in the question, and raise genuine tensor indices with $\eta$. A real Minkowski spacetime vector corresponds to the Hermitian matrixFor SL(2,C) matrices, $X^{\prime }=AX{A}^{†}$ is Hermitian and has the same determinant. It therefore induces a real linear Lorentz transformation; composition of the congruence actions agrees with matrix multiplication. The kernel consists of $\pm I$: preservation of $X=I$ makes a kernel element unitary, and preservation of every Hermitian $X$ makes it scalar.

Polar decomposition of an invertible complex matrix connects every determinant-one complex matrix to its unitary factor, so the group is connected. The action gives the Lorentz spinor double cover of the Proper orthochronous Lorentz group. It covers rotations via $A_R=e^{-i\vartheta \mathbf{n}\cdot \mathbf{\sigma }/2}$ and boosts via the positive Hermitian matrices below. Every proper orthochronous transformation is a boost followed by a rotation, since one can first match its image of the future unit time vector and then use its rotation stabilizer. The congruence construction does not cover spatial parity or time reversal. In particular parity has determinant $-1$ as a four-vector transformation; all transformations continuously produced from SL(2,C) have determinant $+1$.

Set $c_{\theta }=\cosh (\theta /2)$, $s_{\theta }=\sinh (\theta /2)$ and $N=\mathbf{n}\cdot \mathbf{\sigma }$. The Pauli matrix multiplication law gives $N^2=I$. The proposed boost matrix is $A_B=c_{\theta }I+s_{\theta }N$, with eigenvalues $e^{\pm \theta /2}$, determinant one and $A_B^{†}=A_B$. Split $\mathbf{x}=x_{\parallel }\mathbf{n}+{\mathbf{x}}_{\perp }$. The perpendicular Pauli part anticommutes with $N$, so multiplication givesThis is an active Lorentz boost. The image of a rest worldline has velocity $\mathbf{v}=\tanh \theta \mathbf{n}$, fixing the velocity sign convention.

For two nonzero boosts, write $A^{\prime }=c^{\prime }I+s^{\prime }{\mathbf{n}}^{\prime }\cdot \mathbf{\sigma }$ and $A=cI+s\mathbf{n}\cdot \mathbf{\sigma }$. Their product isThe last term is anti-Hermitian. Thus $A^{\prime }A$ is not Hermitian unless the axes are collinear; a pure boost has Hermitian lifts $\pm A_B$, so it cannot give the same Lorentz transformation. The noncollinear boost obstruction from Pauli products is thereforeThat rotation is a Wigner rotation. A zero-rapidity factor is the trivial exception, regardless of the arbitrary axis assigned to it.

Define $J_i=\frac{1}{2}{ϵ}_{ijk}{M}_{jk}$ and $K_i=M_{0i}$. The printed Lorentz algebra brackets giveSet $L_i=(J_i+i{K}_i)/2$, $R_i=(J_i-i{K}_i)/2$. ThenThis is the chiral decomposition of the complex Lorentz algebra. The two copies are the complexifications of the SU(2) algebras conventionally labelled left and right. They are not two independent compact real subalgebras of the real Lorentz algebra: $L,R$ are complex linear combinations of the real generators. The distinction is needed for noncompact boosts.

To verify the infinitesimal two-component action, putIts trace vanishes by antisymmetry, so $\det A=1+O({\omega }^2)$. The Pauli matrix multiplication law impliesSince $a^{†}=\frac{1}{4}{\omega }^{\mu \nu }{\bar{\sigma }}_{\nu }{\sigma }_{\mu }$, antisymmetrizing this identity yieldsConsequently $AX{A}^{†}=X+{\sigma }_{\mu }{\omega }^{\mu }{}_{\nu }{x}^{\nu }+O({\omega }^2)$, exactly the claimed infinitesimal coordinate transformation with ${\omega }^{\mu }{}_{\nu }={\omega }^{\mu \rho }{\eta }_{\rho \nu }$.

The two Weyl spinor representations transform asBoth maps preserve group multiplication. For $\Lambda =e^{\omega }$, choose its spin lift and write the finite matrices asFor rotations these coincide as the SU(2) doublet; for boosts their generator signs are opposite. Any complex-linear intertwiner would commute with all rotations and hence be scalar by the Schur lemma, but a nonzero scalar cannot intertwine the opposite boost matrices. They are therefore inequivalent. Infinitesimally their $K_i$ matrices are $-i{\sigma }_i/2$ and $+i{\sigma }_i/2$, while their $J_i$ matrices are both ${\sigma }_i/2$. Thus they have chiral labels $(1/2,0)$ and $(0,1/2)$. The finite matrices are representations of the spin cover; choosing $A$ or $-A$ matters for spinors even though their four-vector transformations coincide.

Using the supplied block gamma matrices, the generator of the Dirac spinor isThe antisymmetry of $\omega$ removes the symmetric Clifford part. Hence

There is a conjugation-order error in the last displayed gamma identity in the PDF. The Clifford algebra gives, with ${\gamma }^{\rho }={\eta }^{\rho \sigma }{\gamma }_{\sigma }$,Exponentiating this linear commutator action proves the inverse Lorentz action on gamma matricesThe second identity is the order required for the requested bilinears when $\psi \mapsto S\psi$. An explicit countercheck to the printed order is a positive boost along the third axis: ${\omega }^{03}=-\theta$ giveswhereas the printed right side has a plus sign. This cannot be repaired by dropping index raising; the same raising convention is needed in the preceding coordinate transformation.

The adjoint relation supplied in the question gives ${\Omega }^{†}{\gamma }^0=-{\gamma }^0\Omega$, hence the Dirac spinor pseudo-unitarity identity $S^{†}{\gamma }^{0}S={\gamma }^0$. The Dirac adjoint therefore transforms as $\bar{\psi }\mapsto \bar{\psi }{S}^{-1}$. It now follows that the Dirac scalar bilinear isthe vector isand the antisymmetric second-rank tensor isThese are respectively a Lorentz scalar, Lorentz four-vector and Lorentz tensor. The source's inconsistent gamma identity is replaced by its correct inverse/order pair; all three transformation laws then follow with the stated spinor transformation.

The Equivalence principle permits Riemann normal coordinates at any event, in which the first derivatives of the metric tensor, and hence the Christoffel symbols, vanish. A putative universal local gravitational stress-energy tensor constructed from the metric and its first derivatives would vanish in that freely falling description. If it were a genuine tensor, it would then vanish in every description, even where other coordinates assign nonzero gravitational energy density. The gravitational field therefore does not have a local stress-energy tensor analogous to that of matter, with coordinate-independent energy density and the usual energy-balance interpretation.

Gravitational energy is not represented by a universal local covariant stress-energy tensor. This does not assert that all local curvature tensors vanish or are forbidden: the Riemann curvature tensor measures tidal gravity, and higher-curvature tensors can be constructed. They do not provide the sought ordinary local gravitational energy density. Boundary charges, quantities associated with a background, and suitable averaged wave energies have different definitions and evade that local requirement. This is the absence of a local gravitational stress-energy tensor.

Fix the curvature conventionTo prove tensoriality, use $[hX,Y]=h[X,Y]-Y(h)X$ and the connection rules. The two $Y(h){\nabla }_{X}Z$ terms cancel, giving $R(hX,Y)Z=hR(X,Y)Z$. Antisymmetry in $X,Y$ gives linearity over smooth functions in the second input. Expanding the third input givesIt is therefore a smooth tensor of type $(1,3)$. Lowering the output with $g$ gives the type $(0,4)$ Riemann curvature tensor $R_4(X,Y,Z,W)=g(R(X,Y)Z,W)$.

For an independent pair $X,Y$, define sectional curvature byMetric compatibility gives $g(R(X,Y)Z,W)=-g(R(X,Y)W,Z)$ by applying $XY-YX-[X,Y]$ to $g(Z,W)$. Together with antisymmetry in $X,Y$, this shows that replacing the pair by $(aX+bY,cX+dY)$ multiplies both numerator and denominator by $(ad-bc{)}^2$. Thus the value depends only on the plane. Define Ricci curvature by $\mathrm{Ric}(Y,Z)={\sum }_{i}g(R(e_i,Y)Z,e_i)$ for any orthonormal basis; a trace is independent of the orthonormal basis.

For the curvature of the round unit sphere, the outward unit normal is the position vector $p$. The tangential projection of ambient differentiation is torsion-free and has metric compatibility, so uniqueness identifies it with $\nabla$. Ambient differentiation $D$ satisfies $D_{X}p=X$ andsince differentiating $g(Y,p)=0$ gives its normal component. The ambient curvature is zero. Take tangential components of $D_X{D}_{Y}Z-D_Y{D}_{X}Z-D_{[X,Y]}Z=0$ to obtainHenceEvery two-plane has sectional curvature one. Tracing the first formula gives $\mathrm{Ric}(Y,Z)=ng(Y,Z)-g(Y,Z)$, and consequentlyThus the sphere is an Einstein manifold. When $n=1$ there are no tangent two-planes, the curvature tensor is zero and the same Ricci formula gives zero. The declared slot convention fixes all signs.

DefineThey sum to $t_{ij}$, with $s_{ji}=s_{ij}$ and $a_{ji}=-a_{ij}$. Interchanging two slots of a tensor still produces a tensor, so these are a symmetric second-rank tensor and an antisymmetric second-rank tensor, not merely symmetric and antisymmetric arrays in a selected frame.

For uniqueness, if $t=s+a=s^{\prime }+a^{\prime }$, then $s-s^{\prime }=a^{\prime }-a$. The common difference is both symmetric and antisymmetric, so each of its components equals its own negative and vanishes over $\mathbb{R}$. Thus the decomposition is unique. These are the symmetric and antisymmetric parts of a matrix, with their tensor transformation law preserved.

Let $R$ be rotation through $2\pi /3$ about $z$, and let $S$ be rotation through $\pi$ about $x$. These generate the order-six dihedral group with relationsnamely $\{I,R,R^2,S,RS,R^{2}S\}$. We specify its order explicitly because dihedral notation has two conventions. It is a proper finite subgroup of the full axial rotation group.

To see that it is sufficient, write a general matrix in blocks $T=\left(\begin{array}{cc}B& u\\ v^T& c\end{array}\right)$. Commutation with $R$ forces $u=v=0$, since a nontrivial planar $120$-degree rotation fixes no nonzero planar vector. Its planar part is $\cos (2\pi /3)I+\sin (2\pi /3)J$, with nonzero sine, so $B$ must commute with $J$ and has the form $aI+bJ$. Commutation with $S$ again kills $b$. Hence this six-element subgroup has precisely the required invariant tensors.

It is also smallest by order. Groups of orders $2,3,5$ are cyclic: a nonidentity element has order dividing the prime group order by Lagrange theorem. For a cyclic rotation subgroup, the nonzero antisymmetric tensor representing cross product with its rotation-axis direction is invariant, so it cannot force the symmetric form above. The trivial subgroup plainly imposes no constraint. A group of order four is either cyclic or has three nonidentity elements of order two; in the latter case they commute, since $(AB{)}^{-1}=AB$ and also equals $BA$. Commuting distinct half-turns in three dimensions have perpendicular axes: conjugation by one half-turn must preserve the other's axis, and a distinct preserved axis lies in its perpendicular plane. In the specified axial group, their three axes are consequently $z$ and two perpendicular horizontal directions. In coordinates along them every diagonal matrix is invariant, including one with unequal horizontal entries. Such a group again does not force the required form.

Thus the smallest subgroup has six elements, generated by the axial $120$-degree rotation and one horizontal half-turn. It is the smallest axial rotation group forcing second-rank transverse isotropy; conjugating the horizontal axis gives equally valid choices.

The antisymmetric part need not be a tensor. Its contraction with every symmetric test is zero, so the premise imposes no transformation law on it. This is the blindness of symmetric contraction tests to antisymmetric arrays, now with a third free index.

For a concrete example, prescribe the same numerical array in every orthonormal frame, with onlynonzero, and take $d^s=0$. Every contraction $d_{ijk}^a{s}_{ij}$ vanishes, and the zero result is a genuine vector in every frame. But under $R=\mathrm{diag}(-1,-1,1)$ the rank-three tensor transformation law would send the $121$ component to $-1$, whereas our framewise prescription leaves it equal to $1$. Thus the array is not a tensor despite satisfying every stipulated contraction test. An antisymmetric part could be a tensor if an additional transformation law were supplied; it is simply not forced to be one.