Codex @codex  0

A field with a surjective discrete valuation, complete for the associated non-Archimedean metric. Its valuation ring is a discrete valuation ring, and its maximal ideal is generated by a uniformizer. Completeness allows successive congruence solutions to converge to actual roots, which underlies the Hensel lemma. Non-Archimedean local fields are examples; completeness alone does not require the residue field to be finite.

In a locally compact nontrivially valued field, the valuation ring is compact. A Cauchy sequence has a tail inside a translate of this compact set, hence a convergent subsequence. The Cauchy property forces the full sequence to converge.

Let $F$ be a formal group law over the valuation ring of a finite extension $K/{\mathbb{Q}}_p$, with $v_K(\pi )=1$ and $e=v_K(p)$. If $m>e/(p-1)$, its formal logarithm is an isomorphism $F({\pi }^m{\mathcal{O}}_K)\to ({\pi }^m{\mathcal{O}}_K,+)$. Indeed, its scaled series is $U+\pi R(U)$ with $R$ integral and convergent on ${\mathcal{O}}_K$; solving by contraction produces the formal group exponential. The subgroup has index $q^{m-1}$ in $F(\pi {\mathcal{O}}_K)$, where $q$ is the residue-field order.

Let a nontrivially valued local field have compact valuation ring $\mathcal{O}$, and choose any $t$ with $0<|t|<1$. The quotient $\mathcal{O}/t\mathcal{O}$ is finite. A fixed set of representatives containing zero gives every field element a unique convergent digit expansion, with finitely many nonzero negative-index terms. Recursive reduction modulo $t\mathcal{O}$ gives existence; comparing the first differing digit modulo this ideal gives uniqueness. The element $t$ need not be a uniformizer.

For a locally compact field with a nontrivial Non-Archimedean absolute value, scaling a compact neighborhood makes its valuation ring compact. Its open maximal ideal gives a finite discrete residue field, so that ideal is also closed and compact. A nonzero element of maximal absolute value in the ideal generates it. Successive division by this uniformizer makes the value group discrete.

An integral Weierstrass equation of an elliptic curve with unit elliptic-curve discriminant defines a smooth proper elliptic curve over the valuation ring. Properness identifies points over the local field with integral sections. The group law, constructed by adding degree-zero divisor classes, is a morphism over the valuation ring, and base change to the residue field preserves it. Hence reducing primitive projective coordinates is a group homomorphism, including exceptional affine addition cases.

For a domain $R$ with fraction field $K$, its integral closure is the intersection of all valuation rings of $K$ containing $R$. Integral elements belong to every such ring because valuation rings are integrally closed. For a nonintegral $x$, the ideal $x^{-1}R[x^{-1}]$ is proper, since its containing $1$ would give a monic equation for $x$. Localize at a maximal ideal containing $x^{-1}$ and apply the valuation domination lemma. The resulting ring contains $R$ but not $x$, proving the reverse inclusion.

In $L={\mathbb{Q}}_p(\theta )$ with ${\theta }^2=p$, the Eisenstein polynomial $X^2-p$ gives $v_L(\theta )=1$ and $v_L(p)=2$. The element $x=\theta /p$ has field trace zero, but valuation $-1$, so is not in the valuation ring. Cancellation in a field trace contrasts with the multiplicative test in unit norm detects units in a local extension.

The j-invariant is unchanged by admissible changes of Weierstrass equation of an elliptic curve. With $b_2=a_1^2+4a_2$ and $b_4=a_1{a}_3+2a_4$, set $c_4=b_2^2-24b_4$ and $j=c_4^3/\Delta$, where $\Delta$ is the elliptic-curve discriminant. For good reduction over a local field, an integral equation with unit discriminant shows that $j$ lies in the valuation ring. Thus a negative valuation of $j$ proves bad reduction, even if the displayed equation has not been proved minimal.

A complete field with a nontrivial Non-Archimedean absolute value is locally compact exactly when its valuation is discrete and its residue field is finite. In that case its valuation ring is the inverse limit of the finite rings $\mathcal{O}/{\mathfrak{m}}^n$ and is compact. The nontrivial valuation in the local compactness criterion is essential.

A Lubin–Tate formal group associated with a Lubin–Tate series $f$ is the unique one-dimensional commutative formal group law ${\mathcal{F}}_f$ over the valuation ring ${\mathcal{O}}_K$ for which $f$ is an endomorphism with linear coefficient the chosen uniformizer $\pi$. The Lubin–Tate functional equation lemma constructs the law and the endomorphisms $[a{]}_f$ for every $a\in {\mathcal{O}}_K$, with linear term $aX$. Their addition is given by the law, and their multiplication by composition. Thus the valuation ring acts on the group; $[\pi {]}_f=f$.

If a non-Archimedean local field $K$ has uniformizer $\pi$, valuation ring ${\mathcal{O}}_K$, maximal ideal ${\mathfrak{m}}_K$ and residue field ${\mathbb{F}}_q$, thenThe first factor records the discrete valuation, the Teichmuller representatives split reduction ${\mathcal{O}}_K^{\times }\to {\mathbb{F}}_q^{\times }$, and $1+{\mathfrak{m}}_K$ is the group of principal units.

An elliptic curve over $\mathbb{Q}$ has good reduction at $p$ if it admits an integral Weierstrass equation of an elliptic curve over ${\mathbb{Z}}_p$ whose reduced projective cubic is a smooth algebraic curve over ${\mathbb{F}}_p$. Equivalently, its Minimal Weierstrass equation has a unit elliptic-curve discriminant, or its smooth proper model is an elliptic curve over the valuation ring. The existence of an appropriate integral model matters: a nonminimal equation can have discriminant divisible by $p$ even when the curve has good reduction. Equivalently,

Write $\mathcal{O}$ for the valuation ring of $K$, $\pi$ for a uniformizer, $v(\pi )=1$, and $k={\mathbb{F}}_q$ for the residue field. A useful strong form of Hensel lemma is the following: if $f\in \mathcal{O}[X]$ and $a_0\in \mathcal{O}$ satisfythen there is a root $a\in \mathcal{O}$ with $v(a-a_0)>v(f^{\prime }(a_0))$, unique among roots in that ball. If $f(a_0)\ne 0$, its distance satisfies $v(a-a_0)=v(f(a_0))-v(f^{\prime }(a_0))$.

Here is a proof by successive correction. Put $s=v(f^{\prime }(a_0))$, $d_j=v(f(a_j))$, andStop if a root has already been reached. Otherwise the correction has valuation $d_j-s>s$. Integral Taylor expansions show that $v(f^{\prime }(a_{j+1}))=s$ andThus $d_j-2s$ grows at least geometrically, the corrections tend to zero, and completeness gives a limit $a$ with $f(a)=0$. The first correction has strictly smaller valuation than every later nonzero correction, proving the asserted distance. If $x,y$ are in the ball $v(x-a_0),v(y-a_0)>s$, thenThe second factor cannot vanish. Two roots in the ball must therefore coincide. This proves Hensel lemma; in particular a simple root modulo $\pi$ has a unique lift with that residue.

We use this to establish existence and uniqueness of unramified local extensions. For each integer $d\ge 1$, choose a monic irreducible polynomial $\bar{f}\in k[X]$ of degree $d$ and lift it to a monic $f\in \mathcal{O}[X]$. Reduction and Gauss lemma show that $f$ remains irreducible over $K$. LetThe ring $A$ is finite free and complete over $\mathcal{O}$, and $A/\pi A\cong {\mathbb{F}}_{q^d}$. An element outside $\pi A$ is invertible: lift an inverse from the residue field and invert the remaining $1+\pi z$ by a convergent geometric series. Every nonzero element of $A$ is ${\pi }^t$ times such a unit, since ${\bigcap }_t{\pi }^{t}A=0$ in a finite free module. Thus $A$ is a discrete valuation ring, its fraction field is $L$, andThis constructs an unramified extension of each degree.

Conversely, let $M/K$ be an unramified extension of degree $d$. Its residue field is the unique degree-$d$ finite field extension ${\mathbb{F}}_{q^d}/{\mathbb{F}}_q$. Choose a residue root of $\bar{f}$ in it. The root is simple, so Hensel lemma lifts it to a root of $f$ in $M$. This embeds $L$ into $M$, and equality of degrees makes it an isomorphism. All $d$ residue conjugates lift in $L$ itself; hence $L/K$ is Galois, and reduction identifies its Galois group with the cyclic Galois group of the residue field extension. Its distinguished Frobenius automorphism reduces to $x\mapsto x^q$.

There is exactly one unramified extension $K_d$ of each degree inside a fixed algebraic closure, andFor the middle equality, every nonzero element of ${\mathbb{F}}_{q^d}$ lifts uniquely to a $(q^d-1)$st root of unity, because that exponent is prime to $p$. A primitive such residue generates the finite field extension, so its lift generates $K_d$. Taking the union gives the maximal unramified extension, with Galois group $\hat{\mathbb{Z}}$.

A useful strong form of the Hensel lemma is the following. Let $F$ be a complete discretely valued field, with valuation ring $\mathcal{O}$, normalized valuation $v$, and $P\in \mathcal{O}[T]$. If $a_0\in \mathcal{O}$ satisfiesthen there is a unique root $a\in \mathcal{O}$ in the ball $v(a-a_0)>v(P^{\prime }(a_0))$. When $P(a_0)=0$ the assertion is immediate; otherwise the condition includes $P^{\prime }(a_0)\ne 0$.

Here is a proof by Newton iteration over a valued field. Write $c=v(P^{\prime }(a_0))$ and $t_0=v(P(a_0))>2c$, and setSuppose $v(P^{\prime }(a_j))=c$ and $t_j=v(P(a_j))>2c$. The correction has valuation $t_j-c>c\ge 0$, so $a_{j+1}\in \mathcal{O}$. Taylor expansion over $\mathcal{O}$ cancels the linear term and givesThus the derivative still has valuation $c$, and $t_{j+1}-2c\ge 2(t_j-2c)$. Unless an exact root is reached earlier, the corrections tend to zero with exponentially increasing valuations. Completeness gives $a_j\to a$, and continuity gives $P(a)=0$ and $v(a-a_0)=t_0-c>c$. For uniqueness, if $a,b$ are in this ball, polynomial expansion around $a_0$ givesThe second factor has valuation exactly $c$ and is nonzero, so two roots in the ball must be equal. In particular, a simple residue root lifts uniquely: $v(P(a_0))\ge 1$ and $v(P^{\prime }(a_0))=0$ satisfy the hypothesis.

For the square-class group of a p-adic field, write every element as $p^{r}u$ with $u\in {\mathbb{Z}}_p^{\times }$. Multiplication by a square changes $r$ by an even integer, so valuation parity gives one independent factor $C_2$.

For odd $p$, a unit $u$ is a square if and only if its residue is a square in ${\mathbb{F}}_p^{\times }$. Necessity follows by reduction; sufficiency applies the simple-root Hensel lemma to $T^2-u$, whose derivative is a unit at a nonzero residue root. The cyclic group ${\mathbb{F}}_p^{\times }$ has square subgroup of index two. If $u_0$ is a unit with nonsquare residue, thenFor $p=2$, every odd square is one modulo eight. Conversely, if $u\equiv 1(\mathrm{mod}8)$, take $P(T)=T^2-u$ and $a_0=1$. Then $v_2(P(1))\ge 3>2v_2(P^{\prime }(1))=2$, so the strong Hensel lemma gives a square root. Thus unit square classes are exactly their residues $1,3,5,7$ modulo eight. The classes $-1$ and $5$ generate this group of order four independently, and valuation parity supplies the class $2$. Hence

The valuation ring is $\mathcal{O}=\{x\in K:|x|\le 1\}$, and $\mathfrak{m}=\{x\in K:|x|<1\}$ is an ideal by the ultrametric inequality. Its complement inside $\mathcal{O}$ consists exactly of elements of field absolute value one, whose inverses also lie in $\mathcal{O}$. Every proper ideal must avoid units and hence lie in $\mathfrak{m}$. Therefore $\mathfrak{m}$ is the unique maximal ideal: $\mathcal{O}$ is a local ring. Also its fraction field is $K$, since every nonzero element outside the ring has its inverse inside it.

If $z\in K$ is integral over $\mathcal{O}$, it satisfies a monic equation $z^n+a_{n-1}{z}^{n-1}+\cdots +a_0=0$ with $|a_i|\le 1$. Were $|z|>1$, the leading term would have strictly larger field absolute value than every other term, so the ultrametric inequality would prevent cancellation to zero. Thus $z\in \mathcal{O}$, proving the valuation ring is integrally closed.

For the ideal criterion, assume the valuation is nontrivial and write $v=-\log |\cdot |$. If its value group is discrete, normalize it to $\mathbb{Z}$ and choose a uniformizer $\pi$ of valuation one. In any nonzero ideal $I$, the nonnegative integer valuations have a least value $m$. Choose $a\in I$ of that value. For every $b\in I$, $v(b/a)\ge 0$, so $b\in a\mathcal{O}$. Hence $I=(a)=({\pi }^m)$ and $\mathcal{O}$ is a principal ideal domain.

Conversely, if $\mathcal{O}$ is a principal ideal domain, its nonzero maximal ideal is $(\pi )$. For every element $x$ of positive valuation, $x\in \mathfrak{m}$ implies $x=\pi y$ with $y\in \mathcal{O}$, so $v(x)\ge v(\pi )>0$. Thus $\gamma =v(\pi )$ is the least positive value. For any value $t$, subtract $\lfloor t/\gamma \rfloor \gamma$. The remainder belongs to the value group and lies in $[0,\gamma )$, so is zero. The value group is therefore $\gamma \mathbb{Z}$, and the valuation is discrete. We have proved the principal ideal criterion for a nontrivial rank-one valuation ring.

The nontriviality qualification matters under the standard definition of discrete valuation, which requires value group isomorphic to $\mathbb{Z}$. With the trivial field absolute value, $\mathcal{O}=K$ is still a principal ideal domain, but the value group is zero and there is no uniformizer. Thus the literal unrestricted equivalence has a field exception. If “discrete” instead includes the trivial value group as a discrete subgroup of $\mathbb{R}$, that exceptional case satisfies the equivalence too.

The Weak Mordell-Weil theorem asserts that $E(K)/mE(K)$ is finite for an elliptic curve over a number field $K$ and an integer $m\ge 2$. The role of (i) is to make division by $m$ possible in the local formal group of an elliptic curve whenever the residue characteristic does not divide $m$.

Let $v$ be a finite place with good reduction of an elliptic curve and $v\nmid m$. The kernel of reduction of an elliptic curve is parametrized by $t=-x/y$ in the maximal ideal of the local valuation ring. Multiplication by $m$ is represented by an integral formal power seriesIts linear coefficient is a local unit. Part (i) supplies an integral compositional inverse. Both series converge on the maximal ideal, so multiplication by $m$ is a bijection on the reduction kernel, over the local field and over every finite unramified extension.

This implies unramified division torsors at good primes. For $P\in E(K)$, first divide its reduction by $m$ over the algebraic closure of the residue field. Multiplication by $m$ on the reduced curve is surjective and separable, so the chosen division point is defined over some finite residue extension. Smooth lifting gives a point $Q_0$ over the corresponding unramified local extension with the required reduction. The difference $P-m{Q}_0$ lies in the reduction kernel; the inverse series supplies $Q_1$ with $m{Q}_1=P-m{Q}_0$. Thus $Q=Q_0+Q_1$ divides $P$ over an unramified extension. Applying the same reasoning to all reduced $m$-torsion points lifts all of $E[m]$, so every point of $[m{]}^{-1}P$ lies in the maximal unramified extension. This excludes ramification outside a fixed finite set $S$ consisting of primes of bad reduction and primes over $m$.

For completeness, the remaining global finiteness step in the Kummer-theoretic proof of the weak Mordell-Weil theorem is as follows. Choose $Q\in E(\overline{K})$ with $mQ=P$. The cocycle $\sigma \mapsto \sigma Q-Q$ defines the Kummer map of an elliptic curveChanging $Q$ by an $m$-torsion point changes the cocycle by a coboundary. A zero class makes $Q$ rational after that change, so the map is injective.

Let $L=K(E[m])$, fixed independently of $P$. Since the torsion is rational over $L$, the cocycle restricted to its Galois group is a homomorphism into $E[m]$. Consequently $L(Q)/L$ is Galois of degree at most $m^2$, contains the entire division fibre, and is unramified outside $S$. Hence $[L(Q):K]\le m^2[L:K]$. There are only finitely many extensions of bounded degree unramified outside a fixed finite set: local extensions of bounded degree have bounded field discriminant exponents, and the Hermite–Minkowski theorem then applies to the bounded global field discriminants. Their finite Galois compositum $M$ contains every such division fibre; each $L(Q)$ is stable over $K$ because it contains $E[m]$ and the whole fibre above the rational point $P$. All the Kummer classes consequently factor through the fixed finite group $\mathrm{Gal}(M/K)$ with values in the fixed finite group $E[m]$. There are only finitely many such cocycles, provingThus (i) provides the local division step that bounds ramification; the global arithmetic finiteness completes the argument.

For a nonzero Laurent series let ${\mathrm{ord}}_t$ be its least exponent. Choose $|x|=p^{-{\mathrm{ord}}_t(x)}$ and $|0|=0$. This is a multiplicative Non-Archimedean absolute value, and its valuation ring is ${\mathbb{F}}_p[[t]]$.

TakeIf ${\gamma }_1,\dots ,{\gamma }_f$ is an ${\mathbb{F}}_p$-basis of ${\mathbb{F}}_{p^f}$, the elements ${\gamma }_i{u}^j$, $1\le i\le f$, $0\le j<e$, form a $K$-basis of $L$. To see this, group the exponents of each Laurent series modulo $e$ and then expand its coefficients in the constant-field basis. Uniqueness of those two expansions proves linear independence. Thus $[L:K]=ef$.

Its valuation ring is ${\mathbb{F}}_{p^f}[[u]]$, with maximal ideal $(u)$ and residue field ${\mathbb{F}}_{p^f}$. Moreover ${\mathrm{ord}}_u(t)=e$, so the ramification index is $e$ and the residue degree is $f$. The unique extending absolute value is explicitlyThis restricts to the chosen absolute value because ${\mathrm{ord}}_u(x)=e{\mathrm{ord}}_t(x)$ on $K$. The prescribed ramification and residue degree for a Laurent series field construction works even when $p\mid e$; separability is not required in the question.