Closedness of projection from projective space Created 2026-10-14 Updated 2026-11-05
For every scheme , projection is a closed map, and remains so after every base change. Hence projective space is universally closed over its base. The assertion concerns the underlying scheme points, not just rational points over a non-algebraically closed field.[ref]
The existence part of the valuative criterion explains the role of projective space. Given a valuation ring with fraction field , a -point can be rescaled so that every coordinate belongs to and one coordinate is a unit. Indeed, among the finitely many nonzero coordinates choose whose principal fractional ideal contains all the others; then and . These coordinates define the required morphism of schemes . Since projective space is also separated and of finite type, this proves that projection is a proper morphism.
On a Noetherian scheme, one can instead use finitely many homogeneous equations and the Projective Nullstellensatz to express the image as closed rank-defect conditions on graded multiplication map for a projective fiber. An arbitrary affine base need not give a finitely generated defining ideal, so that finite-equation hypothesis must not be assumed in the general statement.
A field with a surjective discrete valuation, complete for the associated non-Archimedean metric. Its valuation ring is a discrete valuation ring, and its maximal ideal is generated by a uniformizer. Completeness allows successive congruence solutions to converge to actual roots, which underlies the Hensel lemma. Non-Archimedean local fields are examples; completeness alone does not require the residue field to be finite.
Completeness of locally compact nontrivially valued fields Created 2026-10-06 Updated 2026-11-05
In a locally compact nontrivially valued field, the valuation ring is compact. A Cauchy sequence has a tail inside a translate of this compact set, hence a convergent subsequence. The Cauchy property forces the full sequence to converge.
Deep logarithm subgroup of a formal group Created 2026-10-06 Updated 2026-10-14
Let be a formal group law over the valuation ring of a finite extension , with and . If , its formal logarithm is an isomorphism . Indeed, its scaled series is with integral and convergent on ; solving by contraction produces the formal group exponential. The subgroup has index in , where is the residue-field order.
Digit expansion with a nonuniformizer Created 2026-10-07 Updated 2026-11-05
Let a nontrivially valued local field have compact valuation ring , and choose any with . The quotient is finite. A fixed set of representatives containing zero gives every field element a unique convergent digit expansion, with finitely many nonzero negative-index terms. Recursive reduction modulo gives existence; comparing the first differing digit modulo this ideal gives uniqueness. The element need not be a uniformizer.
Discrete valuation Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-11-05
A discrete valuation on a field is a surjective group homomorphism satisfying whenever . Its valuation ring is .
Discrete valuation from nontrivial local compactness Created 2026-10-06 Updated 2026-11-05
For a locally compact field with a nontrivial Non-Archimedean absolute value, scaling a compact neighborhood makes its valuation ring compact. Its open maximal ideal gives a finite discrete residue field, so that ideal is also closed and compact. A nonzero element of maximal absolute value in the ideal generates it. Successive division by this uniformizer makes the value group discrete.
Discrete valuation ring Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-11-05
A discrete valuation ring is a principal ideal domain with exactly one nonzero maximal ideal. Every nonzero element of its fraction field is a unit times a unique integer power of a uniformizer.
An integral Weierstrass equation of an elliptic curve with unit elliptic-curve discriminant defines a smooth proper elliptic curve over the valuation ring. Properness identifies points over the local field with integral sections. The group law, constructed by adding degree-zero divisor classes, is a morphism over the valuation ring, and base change to the residue field preserves it. Hence reducing primitive projective coordinates is a group homomorphism, including exceptional affine addition cases.
Hensel's lemma Created 2026-10-14 Updated 2026-11-05
Integral closure as an intersection of valuation rings Created 2026-10-06 Updated 2026-10-07
For a domain with fraction field , its integral closure is the intersection of all valuation rings of containing . Integral elements belong to every such ring because valuation rings are integrally closed. For a nonintegral , the ideal is proper, since its containing would give a monic equation for . Localize at a maximal ideal containing and apply the valuation domination lemma. The resulting ring contains but not , proving the reverse inclusion.
Let be complete for a discrete valuation and let be finite. The valuation ring is exactly the integral closure of in . One direction follows from a monic integral equation; for the other, the coefficients of the minimal polynomial are elementary symmetric polynomials in conjugates of absolute value at most one.
In with , the Eisenstein polynomial gives and . The element has field trace zero, but valuation , so is not in the valuation ring. Cancellation in a field trace contrasts with the multiplicative test in unit norm detects units in a local extension.
Iwasawa module structure theorem Created 2026-10-07 Updated 2026-11-05
A finitely generated module over is pseudo-isomorphic to
where the are irreducible distinguished polynomials. Height-one localizations are discrete valuation rings, which give the elementary divisors; the remaining errors are supported only at the maximal ideal and are finite. This is a finite-error classification, not necessarily an actual direct-sum decomposition.
j-invariant of an elliptic curve Created 2026-10-05 Updated 2026-10-06
The j-invariant is unchanged by admissible changes of Weierstrass equation of an elliptic curve. With and , set and , where is the elliptic-curve discriminant. For good reduction over a local field, an integral equation with unit discriminant shows that lies in the valuation ring. Thus a negative valuation of proves bad reduction, even if the displayed equation has not been proved minimal.
Local compactness criterion for a complete non-Archimedean field Created 2026-09-28 Updated 2026-11-05
A complete field with a nontrivial Non-Archimedean absolute value is locally compact exactly when its valuation is discrete and its residue field is finite. In that case its valuation ring is the inverse limit of the finite rings and is compact. The nontrivial valuation in the local compactness criterion is essential.
Local unit of a local field Created 2026-10-14 Updated 2026-11-05
A local unit has valuation zero in the local field, or equivalently is an invertible element of its valuation ring. A principal unit additionally reduces to one in the residue field. The distinction between local units and principal units retains the prime-to-p residue roots of unity in a cyclotomic p-adic field.
Lubin–Tate formal group Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-05
A Lubin–Tate formal group associated with a Lubin–Tate series is the unique one-dimensional commutative formal group law over the valuation ring for which is an endomorphism with linear coefficient the chosen uniformizer . The Lubin–Tate functional equation lemma constructs the law and the endomorphisms for every , with linear term . Their addition is given by the law, and their multiplication by composition. Thus the valuation ring acts on the group; .
Multiplicative group of a non-Archimedean local field Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-11-05
If a non-Archimedean local field has uniformizer , valuation ring , maximal ideal and residue field , then
The first factor records the discrete valuation, the Teichmuller representatives split reduction , and is the group of principal units.
The constant and linear Taylor terms cancel in the Newton step, leaving
Thus residuals strictly decrease whenever the current residual is nonzero, and the steps tend to zero doubly exponentially. By the ultrametric inequality, the distance between any two sufficiently late iterates is bounded by the largest intervening step. The sequence is Cauchy and converges in the complete valuation ring to . Continuity gives , and
The literal infinite chain of strict inequalities needs the root-hit exception: if , or a later iterate is already a root, it cannot keep strictly decreasing below zero. The construction is eventually constant in that case; all existence and distance conclusions remain valid.
For the equality case, suppose with . The first Newton step has norm . Write the Taylor coefficient of as . Its norm is strictly below one by hypothesis; all higher coefficients have norm at most one. Hence
The derivative changes by , of norm strictly below , so it still has norm . The strict Hensel argument applies from this first iterate onward, and the root remains within distance of . If characteristic two is admitted, interpret the displayed half-second-derivative as the second Taylor coefficient ; this is the division-free form of the required hypothesis.
For the final local equation put . Its values modulo nine are , so the sum of two such values is confined to . Conversely choose initial pairs for these five classes as
respectively. Fix the second coordinate and apply the equality-case Hensel result to at the first coordinate . Its residual is divisible by nine, has 3-adic norm , and has norm below one for every . The strict or equality case therefore supplies a root in . Thus
is the necessary and sufficient condition.