Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2002 iii Paper 3 3 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
For a finite point , use the valuation with local parameter ; at infinity use . Its extensions to are permuted transitively by . The completed residue field is , because is algebraically closed, so the local decomposition group equals its inertia group.
Write . Characteristic zero makes all local ramification tame. One can choose a uniformizer in the completion for whichIndeed, initially is times a unit; that unit has an th root in , by its algebraically closed residue field and the invertibility of . Absorb it into . The local automorphisms are then , , and form a cyclic group of order . Define .
To specify an element rather than a subgroup, fix a compatible choice of primitive roots of unity . Define by its uniformizer characterand let be its conjugacy class in . Over , take , corresponding to positive local continuation around . At an unramified point, and .
Changing the uniformizer does not affect this character. If with a unit, inertia fixes its residue, soThe character is injective: a nonidentity finite-order automorphism with derivative one would have for , and its th iterate would have coefficient at that first nonzero displacement. Characteristic zero contradicts finite order. Thus the chosen primitive character identifies a unique generator.
For another place , conjugation gives , preserves its order, and carries to , since fixes the constants and hence . This proves that and the branch-cycle conjugacy class are independent of the place and uniformizer. Without the stated roots-of-unity convention, only the cyclic inertia-subgroup conjugacy class is intrinsic: replacing by another primitive root replaces the generator by a coprime power, which need not lie in the same conjugacy class.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2002 iii Paper 3 3 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Put and write , where . The unit has a square root in . Dividing the radical by that square root and by reduces the completed extension toIf is even, it is unramified and locally splits; if is odd, adjoining gives ramification index two. At points where , and there is no branch. ThereforeFor infinity set . If ,The same quadratic branch parity criterion applies to the negative valuation , soThe generic irreducibility excludes being a square. Local splitting at the even-order places is compatible with that global irreducibility. The number of odd finite orders plus the possible odd infinity order is even, as also follows from the sum of orders of a rational function being zero.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2003 iii Paper 21 3 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The supplied integral equation has elliptic-curve discriminant . It therefore has good reduction at every . At eleven its discriminant has valuation one. Under a change of Weierstrass equation of an elliptic curve, discriminant valuations differ by a multiple of twelve. A good integral model would have valuation zero, which is impossible. This is the discriminant valuation obstruction to good reduction; it also shows the displayed model is minimal at eleven. Hence
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2003 iii Paper 23 2 ii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
For a local field containing the Nth roots of unity, fix the Local Artin map with arithmetic Frobenius convention. The Hilbert norm residue symbol can be defined byIt is independent of the chosen root, continuous and bimultiplicative, factors through in each variable, and gives a nondegenerate pairing on that finite group. It satisfies and for . Its norm interpretation isFor the quadratic Hilbert symbol is symmetric and sign-valued. It is also characterized by the existence of a nonzero solution of . Moreover , and therefore . We now compute both the square-class groups and the pairing explicitly.
For odd , write with . An element is a square exactly when is even and the residue of is a square in . Necessity follows by reduction; sufficiency follows from the simple-root form of Hensel lemma applied to , since is then a unit. If is any unit with nonsquare residue, this givesThe nonsquare unit defines an unramified quadratic extension. Its field norms include every unit and have even valuation, as follows from the local norm calculation below. Thus for every unit, but . Finally , by symmetry and the preceding unit calculation. Bimultiplicativity now proves explicit quadratic Hilbert symbols over the p-adic numbers:Here the factors are Legendre symbols of the nonzero residues. The formula works for arbitrary integer valuations , since only their parity matters.
At , the square of every odd integer is one modulo eight. Conversely, for an odd , apply the strong form of Hensel lemma to at : the error has valuation at least three, while the derivative has valuation one. Thus the unit square classes of the p-adic integers are precisely their four residues modulo eight. Combining this with parity of the valuation givesFor an odd unit putInspection of the residues gives . It remains to compute six basis pairings. Explicit field norms giveindeed , , , and .
In contrast . To justify the obstruction even for rational 2-adic coordinates, write , with integral and at least one odd. Then is zero if exactly one is odd, and one if both are odd. A sum of squares equal to the unit consequently forces and exactly one coordinate odd. Its residue modulo four would then be one, whereas is three.
Similarly . If is a unit, the valuations of the two terms have opposite parity, so cannot cancel. It follows that is an odd integral element and is integral. Modulo eight its norm is then or , never . These signs, symmetry, and bimultiplicativity giveThe two boxed formulas determine the quadratic Hilbert symbol on all nonzero elements, including every rational prime .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2003 iii Paper 23 2 i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Write for the valuation ring of , for a uniformizer, , and for the residue field. A useful strong form of Hensel lemma is the following: if and satisfythen there is a root with , unique among roots in that ball. If , its distance satisfies .
Here is a proof by successive correction. Put , , andStop if a root has already been reached. Otherwise the correction has valuation . Integral Taylor expansions show that andThus grows at least geometrically, the corrections tend to zero, and completeness gives a limit with . The first correction has strictly smaller valuation than every later nonzero correction, proving the asserted distance. If are in the ball , thenThe second factor cannot vanish. Two roots in the ball must therefore coincide. This proves Hensel lemma; in particular a simple root modulo has a unique lift with that residue.
We use this to establish existence and uniqueness of unramified local extensions. For each integer , choose a monic irreducible polynomial of degree and lift it to a monic . Reduction and Gauss lemma show that remains irreducible over . LetThe ring is finite free and complete over , and . An element outside is invertible: lift an inverse from the residue field and invert the remaining by a convergent geometric series. Every nonzero element of is times such a unit, since in a finite free module. Thus is a discrete valuation ring, its fraction field is , andThis constructs an unramified extension of each degree.
Conversely, let be an unramified extension of degree . Its residue field is the unique degree- finite field extension . Choose a residue root of in it. The root is simple, so Hensel lemma lifts it to a root of in . This embeds into , and equality of degrees makes it an isomorphism. All residue conjugates lift in itself; hence is Galois, and reduction identifies its Galois group with the cyclic Galois group of the residue field extension. Its distinguished Frobenius automorphism reduces to .
There is exactly one unramified extension of each degree inside a fixed algebraic closure, andFor the middle equality, every nonzero element of lifts uniquely to a st root of unity, because that exponent is prime to . A primitive such residue generates the finite field extension, so its lift generates . Taking the union gives the maximal unramified extension, with Galois group .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2003 iii Paper 23 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
We give the full local-field norm-index argument. Let be cyclic of order . On an additive -module set and . The two cyclic Tate cohomology groups areWhen these are finite, the Herbrand quotient is . The periodic complex alternating and yields a six-term periodic exact sequence from a short exact sequence of modules. Taking alternating products of orders in that exact sequence provesFor a finite module, and show that the two Tate cohomology groups have equal order. Thus the Herbrand quotient of a finite module is one. For the trivial integral module , the two groups are and zero, giving .
We also need cyclic cohomology of a regular lattice. In , fixed coefficient vectors are constant, and every such vector is a norm of a basis vector times its coefficient. The kernel of consists of vectors whose coefficient sum is zero. For such a vector , solve successively around the cycle; the final equation holds precisely because . Thus . Both Tate cohomology groups vanish, so , for or , and likewise for finite direct sums.
Now take a cyclic extension of p-adic fields of degree . Write . For , the convergent p-adic logarithm and p-adic exponential give mutually inverse -equivariant group isomorphismswhere the right side is additive. The convergence assertion follows from the estimates and ; formal inverse identities therefore hold on this ball.
By the normal basis theorem, choose so that is a -basis of . The lattice is a regular -module. It is a finite direct sum of regular -modules, hence its Tate cohomology vanishes. The lattices and are commensurable: their intersection has finite index in both. The exact sequences with these finite quotients establish finiteness of the Tate cohomology groups and show . Thus . Since is finite, as well.
The -equivariant valuation exact sequence isIts last term has trivial -action. The multiplication rule gives the Herbrand quotient of the local multiplicative group:All the Tate cohomology groups here are finite by the lattice argument and the exact sequence; finiteness of the norm index has not been assumed.
For completeness we prove the needed Hilbert theorem 90. If has field norm one, put and . The linear map is not zero by linear independence of distinct field embeddings. Choose with . The relation gives , so . This proves . The zeroth Tate cohomology group is . Consequently the cyclic local norm index isWriting , the valuation of a field norm is . The valuation quotient has order , and a norm with valuation zero comes from a unit. ThereforeIn particular every unit is a norm in an unramified extension. These results give the norm assertions used in the quadratic Hilbert symbol computation.
We finish with the Hasse norm theorem: for a cyclic extension of number fields, an element is a global norm if and only if it is a norm at every place. More precisely the local norm is the norm from the product ; in a Galois extension its factors have the same norm subgroup. The forward implication is immediate. For the converse associate to the cyclic algebra . The splitting criterion for a cyclic algebra, proved below, identifies its splitting with . At a place where the tensor product of fields has several factors, this algebra is a matrix algebra over the cyclic algebra of one decomposition-field factor, with the generator restricted to its cyclic decomposition subgroup. Thus the local norm assumption makes its Brauer class zero at every place. Injectivity in the Albert-Brauer-Hasse-Noether theorem makes the global Brauer class zero, giving the desired global norm. This is the required proof outline; cyclicity is essential to this reduction.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2003 iii Paper 23 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
A central simple algebra over is a finite-dimensional associative -algebra with no nonzero proper two-sided ideals and with center . The Artin–Wedderburn theorem writes it uniquely as with a central division algebra. After a finite separable splitting field extension it becomes , so its dimension is , and is its degree of a central simple algebra. Passing from to a matrix algebra over does not change its Brauer class.
The Brauer group consists of these classes, with product induced by tensor product. Extending to a common splitting field shows that a tensor product of central simple algebras is again central simple; its two-sided ideals and center descend from the corresponding full matrix algebra. The neutral class is , and the inverse of is , becauseThe displayed map becomes the standard isomorphism for matrices over a splitting field, so it is already an isomorphism over . Thus Brauer classes measure precisely the obstruction to being a split matrix algebra.
An explicit family is supplied by cyclic algebras. Let be cyclic of degree , with generator , and let . DefineThis is an associative algebra: form the skew polynomial ring with relation and quotient by the central relation . Reduction of powers gives the displayed -dimensional -basis. An element commuting with every has no coefficient for , since is not the identity. Commuting also with forces the remaining coefficient into . Hence the center is .
Here is an explicit splitting construction. On , with basis , putThen and . After extending scalars to , the separable decomposition supplies all diagonal matrices, and their products with powers of supply all matrix units. ThereforeAny nonzero proper two-sided ideal of would extend to one of , which is impossible. Thus this construction really gives a central simple algebra, with splitting field .
Its central arithmetic feature is the splitting criterion for a cyclic algebra:If , let act by multiplication on the -vector space , and let act as . Its nth power is multiplication by , so this gives a representation . It is injective by simplicity and an isomorphism by equal dimension. Conversely, if with , its embedded field makes one-dimensional over . The relation for says that is -semilinear. In an -basis it must have the form , whose nth power is . The relation forces .
More generally the crossed-product algebra of a Galois extension attaches an algebra to a multiplicative two-cocycle. Changing the cocycle by a coboundary rescales its basis and preserves the Brauer class. Descent of a split matrix algebra identifiesFor cyclic , cyclic Tate cohomology identifies this second cohomology group with . In a crossed product, rescale successive cyclic basis elements to powers of a single ; the remaining datum is , changed by a field norm when is rescaled. This explains why cyclic algebras give every class split by a cyclic extension, and why multiplication of their parameters is addition of their Brauer classes.
For a finite field , every finite splitting field is cyclic over . The field norm is the power map on its cyclic multiplicative group, and is onto . Thus every relative Brauer class is zero, and every central simple algebra has zero class:
For a non-Archimedean local field , the valuation classification of central division algebras shows that every Brauer class splits over a finite unramified extension. For the degree- unramified extension with arithmetic Frobenius , units are norms and norm valuations are multiples of . Hence the cyclic relative Brauer group is , represented by . The compatible local Brauer invariant isThe union over all givesA class with invariant in lowest terms has a central division algebra representative of degree of a central simple algebra . This is the local valuation classification used above; the explicit cyclic algebras exhibit all of its invariants. At the Archimedean places, , while : its nontrivial class is the quaternion algebra , since complex norms are positive.
For a number field, the Albert-Brauer-Hasse-Noether theorem describes the Brauer group by the exact sequenceThus its classes are exactly finite-support families of local invariants with sum zero; real invariants are or and complex invariants are zero. Every global Brauer class has a cyclic splitting extension, so cyclic algebras also realize all global classes. If , their local invariants are , with restricted to the local decomposition subgroup. The sum-zero relation for a principal parameter is the invariant form of Artin reciprocity. Injectivity supplies the local-to-global splitting test, which yields the Hasse norm theorem for cyclic extensions as explained in the preceding solution. Here the local valuation classification and the global invariant theorem are the structural theorems used to describe the Brauer groups; the construction and norm-splitting calculation have been proved explicitly.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 iii Paper 25 1 ii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Normalize each finite-place valuation to have image . For a radical class , the residue of modulo is well-defined, because replacing by adds . A suitable finite set isOne can compute the last union from any finite generating set of . Each representative has only finitely many nonzero valuations, so this indeed defines a finite set depending only on and the classes, not on a choice of representatives. Including all infinite places safely allows possible real-to-complex ramification.
Fix and work over the completion . A representative has , so with a unit. Adjoining an th root of is the same as adjoining an th root of . Since is invertible in the residue field, is separable: its derivative has no common zero with it.
Take a finite extension of the finite residue field containing all roots of all these finitely many reduced polynomials. The corresponding finite unramified extension of exists by the classification proved in Question 2. Hensel's lemma lifts each simple residue root to a root of the original polynomial in that unramified extension. Thus all the required radicals, and every conjugate root, lie in an unramified local extension. Every completion of the radical field at is therefore unramified. This proves finite ramification support for radical extensions.
The local argument does not assume : adjoining all roots proves the stronger unramified assertion for the splitting field, and hence for any field obtained by choosing the radicals. For the radical extension is trivial; the displayed set is still valid.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 iii Paper 25 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Use the following simple-root Hensel lemma. Let be a complete discrete valuation ring, with maximal ideal , and let . If and , there is a unique with and .
For the proof, define Newton's method iterates . Each denominator stays a unit, because all iterates are congruent to . Taylor's polynomial identity givesIf an iterate is already a root, the process stops. Otherwise these valuations tend to infinity, so the iterates form a Cauchy sequence in the complete ring. Its limit has the required residue and satisfies . If were two such roots, thenThe parenthesis is a unit, forcing .
Now let be finite, with residue field . For every choose a monic irreducible polynomial of degree and lift it to a monic . The lift is irreducible over , since a factorization would reduce to a factorization of , by the monic form of Gauss's lemma over the valuation ring. If for a root, its residue field contains of degree . The inequality forces residue degree and ramification index one. Thus it is an unramified extension of degree .
Conversely, in any unramified extension of degree , choose a generator of its residue field and lift its separable minimal polynomial. Hensel's lemma supplies a root with that residue. Its degree is at least and hence it generates the extension. The same unique lifting of all residue conjugates shows that the extension is Galois andOne can see uniqueness inside a fixed algebraic closure explicitly: the roots of lift all nonzero residue elements, and a lifted primitive residue element generates the extension. Hencewith arithmetic Frobenius acting by . The case simply gives . These are all finite unramified extensions; exactly when . Their union is the maximal unramified extension, whose Galois group is .
Finally prove norm-surjectivity on units using the Herbrand quotient. For a cyclic group of order , writeThe quotient is multiplicative on short exact sequences, equals one for finite modules, equals on the trivial module , and equals one on induced regular modules. For a finite module, the equality follows directly from .
Let . For sufficiently large , the equivariant p-adic logarithm identifies with additively. In the unramified case this is an induced regular lattice. Indeed choose a normal basis of the finite residue extension and lift its generating element. Its Galois conjugates reduce to a basis and hence form an -basis of ; their coordinate determinant is a unit. Since a uniformizer of is also one of , multiplication by its th power gives the same regular-module structure on . For a regular module, invariants are norm images and a vector of coefficient sum zero is a cyclic difference, so both indicated Tate cohomology groups vanish. Consequently . The quotient is finite, so .
Apply multiplicativity toIt gives . Hilbert 90 makes trivial, so . On the other handso the quotient maps onto . As its order is already , its unit kernel is trivial. A norm which is a unit comes from a unit, by the same valuation formula. ThereforeThe standard normal-basis theorem for finite fields and the convergent logarithm/exponential on sufficiently deep principal units are the ingredients used in evaluating the Herbrand quotient; the norm conclusion itself has been deduced here.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 iii Paper 25 3 ii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The idele group is the restricted productwith respect to at the finite places. Thus is an idele if all components are nonzero and is a unit at all but finitely many finite places. Its topology has basic open sets which equal the full unit subgroup outside finitely many places; it is not just the subspace topology of the unrestricted product. The group is locally compact, and the diagonal consists of the principal ideles. The idèle class group is .
The finite valuations give the idele-to-ideal homomorphismIts kernel is the product of the finite unit groups and the infinite multiplicative groups; principal ideles map to principal fractional ideals. Thus further quotienting gives the ideal class group. The product of normalized local moduli defines ; at complex places the normalized modulus is the square of the ordinary absolute value. The product formula says that principal ideles have modulus one. These constructions package ideals, units and archimedean conditions into one group.
Here is the precise reciprocity equivalence. For a finite abelian extension , the global law is a continuous Artin reciprocity mapwhich kills and sends a uniformizer idele at an unramified place to arithmetic Frobenius. Its full class-field-theoretic norm statement is . In the local formulation, the mapsare continuous, kill local units when unramified, send a local uniformizer to the same Frobenius, are compatible with restriction in towers, and obeyHere is the decomposition group of any prime above , independent of that choice because the extension is abelian. The usual local norm theorem identifies with . The principal-idele condition is the essential global compatibility; existence of unrelated local norm isomorphisms alone would not establish global reciprocity.
Given the compatible local maps, defineOnly finitely many factors are nontrivial: there are finitely many ramified places, and an idele is a unit almost everywhere. The product is a homomorphism. Continuity follows by choosing local kernel neighbourhoods at those exceptional places and the full unit groups elsewhere. The boxed compatibility kills , so the map descends to . At every unramified place it has the required Frobenius value. The local norm maps also show that idele norms are killed, since the local component of an idele norm is . Together with the class-field norm-index statement this gives the global norm-kernel formulation.
Conversely, embed in with every other component one, and set . Each restriction is continuous and has the required unramified normalization. An open kernel of the finite-valued global map contains a basic neighbourhood whose unrestricted finite-place factors are full unit groups outside a finite set. Hence those local restrictions kill units. For an arbitrary idele, remove the finitely many exceptional and nonunit components; the remainder lies in that kernel neighbourhood. It follows directly that is exactly the product of its local restrictions, not merely a map agreeing on single-component ideles. Its triviality on is exactly the boxed product relation. With the decomposition and norm assertions of the reciprocity theorem, these restrictions are the local reciprocity maps into with kernel .
One can explicitly connect this idelic formulation with the classical ideal law without assuming an idelic law in advance. A modulus of a number field records finitely many nonnegative exponents at finite places and a selected subset of real places. For a modulus , let have factors at finite places dividing the modulus, full units at other finite places, positive real numbers at specified real places, and full infinite multiplicative groups otherwise. Weak approximation for number fields supplies a global making lie in the specified local factors at the finitely many modulus places. Its valuations outside the modulus define an ideal prime to . A different such changes that ideal by a ray-principal ideal, and every ideal prime to is obtained. HenceAn ideal Artin map killing therefore extends to via this isomorphism; restricting it gives the local maps just constructed. Conversely, continuous local maps satisfying the product condition have an open product kernel containing some and hence make the ideal Artin map kill . This proves the idelic local-global reciprocity equivalence at the reciprocity-law level as well as the formal conversion of maps. The arithmetic Frobenius normalization and product relation agree with Milne's local-global reciprocity formulation.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 iii Paper 25 3 i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
In the absolute-value description, a place of a number field is an equivalence class of nontrivial absolute values, where equivalent absolute values give the same topology, or differ by a positive power. More generally this defines the rank-one absolute-value places used in weak approximation for a field. For a number field, finite places correspond to nonzero prime ideals of its ring of integers, while infinite places correspond to real embeddings and pairs of conjugate complex embeddings. The completion at is denoted .
A valuation place can also be described by a valuation ring and its residue map into , extended by sending elements outside that ring to infinity. The finite places above are the discrete-valuation instances of this description.
The weak approximation theorem states that for finitely many pairwise inequivalent nontrivial absolute values , the diagonal image of is dense in . Equivalently, for arbitrary and , there is such thatThe places must be distinct: two requirements at the same completion need not be compatible. In the number-field setting this permits simultaneous prescribed finite congruences and archimedean approximations.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 iii Paper 25 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
A central simple algebra over is a finite-dimensional associative unital -algebra with no nonzero proper two-sided ideals and center exactly . Its dimension is a square, . The Artin–Wedderburn theorem writes it as for a uniquely determined central division algebra up to isomorphism. One obtains this structure by taking a minimal left ideal and its commuting division endomorphism ring; the simple algebra acts as all endomorphisms over that ring. Over a suitable finite splitting field it becomes a full matrix algebra.
The Brauer group identifies two central simple algebras if their division-algebra parts agree, equivalently if tensoring each with suitable matrix algebras makes them isomorphic. The product is tensor product, the identity is the class of , and the inverse of is . Indeedis an isomorphism for a central simple algebra, so the product class is split. This also explains why matrix size is irrelevant to the Brauer class. The order of the class is its period, while the degree of its division-algebra representative is its index; these are different notions in general.
For the cyclic algebra construction, take a cyclic extension of degree , a generator and . SetThe multiplication is obtained by moving coefficients past and replacing every by . It is associative: reducing a product of three monomials gives the same total exponent, the same power of and the same iterated automorphisms in either order. The scalar is fixed by and , so reduction is consistent.
An element commuting with every has only its coefficient nonzero, because for . Commuting with then forces that coefficient into , proving that the center is . To prove simplicity, choose a nonzero element of a nonzero ideal with the fewest nonzero monomial coefficients. Since is invertible and each nonzero coefficient in is invertible, normalize one term to be the constant one. If another term remains, its automorphism differs from the identity; commuting with a suitable element of eliminates the constant term but not that other term. This gives a shorter nonzero element, a contradiction. The minimal element is therefore a unit, and the ideal is all of . Thus is central simple of dimension .
It splits over . For example, over represent by the diagonal matrix with entries , and let shift the standard basis down one place, sending the first vector to times the last. These matrices satisfy the defining relations. A primitive element of the separable extension has distinct conjugates; the Vandermonde matrix of their powers is invertible. Thus the diagonal images span all diagonal matrices after scalar extension to . Multiplying the diagonal matrix units by powers of the shift gives every matrix unit, proving .
The particularly useful splitting criterion isIf , let the algebra act on by multiplication for and by the semilinear operator for . Its th power is multiplication by , so this gives an isomorphism with , by simplicity and dimension. Conversely, a split algebra acts on an -dimensional -space . Restriction to the subfield makes one-dimensional over , and is a nonzero -semilinear operator. In an -basis it is , so forces . More generally the relative Brauer group split by a cyclic is , with multiplication of parameters corresponding to addition of classes.
For a finite field, a finite division algebra is commutative by Wedderburn's little theorem. Therefore every central simple algebra is a matrix algebra and . The cyclic-algebra viewpoint gives the same conclusion for cyclic classes because the norm between finite fields is surjective on their cyclic multiplicative groups.
For a nonarchimedean local field, the local Brauer invariant givesAn unramified cyclic extension of degree , with arithmetic Frobenius generator, gives invariant to its cyclic algebra. Question 2 shows that all units are norms; norm valuations are multiples of . Thus the relative classes are , represented by powers of a uniformizer. Allowing all realizes all invariants. At the infinite local fields, , while , with the nonzero class represented by Hamilton's quaternions and invariant .
For a number field, the Albert-Brauer-Hasse-Noether theorem supplies the exact sequenceHence a global algebra is determined by its finitely many nonzero local invariants, whose sum is zero; it is split precisely when all its local classes vanish. Every division algebra over a number field is cyclic, so cyclic algebras provide representatives for the global classes as well. Their norm parameters translate splitting into local norm conditions and the reciprocity constraint on the sum of invariants. The local invariant theorem, Wedderburn's little theorem and the global invariant theorem are the standard structural results used here; their role in the requested computation is explicit.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 iii Paper 25 5 ii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Put . Since is squarefree,We first compute the ideal class group, rather than assume the proposed extension has the full Hilbert-class-field degree.
The real quadratic Minkowski bound for ideal classes is . Thus every ideal class has an integral representative of norm at most seven. The prime two is inert because , while seven is inert because is a nonsquare. The inert ideal has norm four and is principal; a prime above seven has norm forty-nine. The only possible nonprincipal prime factors of these small representatives are therefore primes above three and five.
Reduction of gives roots modulo three and modulo five. WriteTheir conjugate pairs multiply to and . Direct norm calculations giveThe element vanishes at the residue roots modulo three and modulo five, and not at the conjugate roots. Its absolute norm forces each exponent to be one. Likewise vanishes only at the root zero modulo three, and its norm forces exponent three. ThusThese also give the factorizations suggested by the hint: and . The classes of generate the ideal class group; the first relation makes and the second makes . Hence the class number divides three.
It is not one. The algebraic integerso it is a unit. If were principal, its generator would have norm . Multiply by a suitable integer power of so thatIts conjugate then also has absolute value at most because . ThereforeThe final inequality is , immediate from the displayed value of . Thus the integer is zero, which makes impossible. ConsequentlyThis proves the ideal class group of Q of square root 229. No claim that is a fundamental unit is needed. Its norm minus one also realizes all real sign patterns after multiplication by , so the ordinary and narrow class numbers agree.
Now let and let be its splitting field. The possible rational roots are not roots, so is irreducible. Its discriminant isThus its Galois group is , since an irreducible cubic has group precisely when its discriminant is a square. Its quadratic subfield is , and is cyclic of degree three. If is one root, then .
For every rational prime , the reduction of is separable. Its roots lift in an unramified extension containing its residue splitting field, by Hensel's lemma. Hence its splitting field is unramified over at all these primes, and consequently over there.
At 229 there is exactly one double residue root and one simple root:The simple root lifts to , and division gives with monic quadratic. The discriminant-product identity isHere is a unit, since has the simple residue root. Therefore the quadratic discriminant has valuation one, and its root field is the ramified quadratic field . This is already the completion of . The local splitting field has no further extension over it: the simple root lies in and the other two lie in that quadratic field. Thus is unramified even at 229. Equivalently its rational inertia is a transposition and has trivial intersection with .
The positive cubic discriminant gives three distinct real roots, so is totally real and there is no infinite ramification over . We have exhibited an everywhere-unramified cyclic extension of degree . The Hilbert-class-field characterization in part (i) now proves
Finally let be rational prime. A prime ideal of norm is principal if and only if its Artin symbol in is trivial. If it is principal, a generator has norm ; multiplying by the norm-minus-one unit if necessary gives norm . Conversely an element of norm generates a prime ideal of norm . Hence representation by is equivalent to splitting in with trivial Artin symbol in , or to complete splitting of in .
Let be its rational Frobenius, defined up to conjugacy. Its restriction to the discriminant quadratic field is its sign. The splitting criterion for that quadratic field isFor odd this follows by quadratic reciprocity from the character of discriminant 229; for both criteria are negative since . The polynomial is separable modulo , and the degrees of its factors are the cycle lengths of . Thus a root modulo means that fixes a root. An even permutation of three letters with a fixed point is the identity: a nonidentity three-cycle has none. Therefore the two stated conditions together are exactly complete splitting in , andThis is prime representation by the norm form of Q of square root 229, with the norm sign and the prime two explicitly covered.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 iii Paper 80 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
At a point of the smooth algebraic curve , the local ring is a discrete valuation ring. Embed the projective variety in . A rational map of algebraic varieties to has homogeneous coordinates in the function field , not all zero. Let be the local valuation, choose a uniformizer , and set . The coordinates are regular at , and at least one is a unit. On a sufficiently small open subset containing , all these functions are regular and that coordinate stays nonzero. Their ratios therefore define a morphism of algebraic varieties into the corresponding affine chart of . Every homogeneous equation defining vanishes on the original dense open, hence vanishes identically on this neighborhood. The local extension consequently lands in .
Two such extensions agree wherever the original rational map of algebraic varieties is defined. Their equalizer is closed, because is a separated variety, and contains a dense open. Thus they agree throughout their overlap and glue. The rational map has a unique extension to a morphism on all of . Projectivity is needed for the target; the source need not be projective.
For the function field correspondence, let be a finitely generated field extension of transcendence degree one. Choose a transcendence basis consisting of one element . The extension is finite: finitely many algebraic generators each have finite degree. Take the integral closures of and in . The finiteness assumption allowed in the paper makes both finite modules over their original coordinate rings. Integral closure commutes with localization, so these two rings agree over and glue to the finite normalization model of a one-variable function field . This is a finite morphism, hence projective, and its function field is . Its one-dimensional normal local rings are discrete valuation rings, so it is regular. Since the algebraically closed field is perfect, regularity here implies smoothness. Thus is a smooth projective curve.
Conversely the function field of a smooth projective curve is finitely generated over and has transcendence degree one. Two such curves with isomorphic function fields have mutually inverse birational maps. The extension argument just proved makes both maps morphisms; their composites equal the identity on a dense open, and hence everywhere by separatedness. This proves uniqueness of the smooth projective model. More precisely, pullback gives a contravariant correspondence between nonconstant morphisms of smooth projective curves and -embeddings of their function fields. A field embedding defines the map on affine coordinates near the generic point, and the extension argument completes it. Constant morphisms are excluded from this correspondence because they do not induce embeddings of function fields.
Finally let be nonconstant. Its image is dense, and pullback gives a finite extension : both fields have transcendence degree one and the latter is finitely generated. Normalize in , applying the allowed finite-integral closure result on affine charts. This gives a finite morphism with a smooth projective curve and function field . The identification of function fields gives an isomorphism by the preceding paragraph. Its composite with equals at the generic point, hence equals everywhere. Every nonconstant morphism of these curves is finite.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 iii Paper 31 2 ii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
For , the quadratic Hilbert symbol is one if is a field norm from , and minus one otherwise; a square gives the trivial extension and symbol one. It depends only on the two square classes. Equivalently, the conic has a nonzero rational point precisely when the symbol is one. Interchanging and in the conic gives . The Hilbert norm residue symbol is a group homomorphism in each argument; for nonsquare , the cyclic local norm index makes its group kernel a subgroup of index two. The resulting pairing on square classes is nondegenerate. Alsosince . In the language of local class field theory, ; in the Brauer group, it records whether the quaternion cyclic algebra splits. These are compatible norm-obstruction descriptions.
An unramified extension of local fields of degree two has norm group consisting precisely of elements with even valuation. Indeed,and the norms on units are surjective. For the latter assertion, the norm on the finite residue fields is surjective. On successive higher principal-unit groups, the congruenceallows one to correct a proposed unit norm one digit at a time: the residue field trace is surjective, and completeness makes the corrections converge. An unramified quadratic field is unique up to isomorphism. Therefore, if is its defining nonsquare class,
For odd , choose the nonsquare unit from part (i). The polynomial has irreducible separable reduction, so it defines the unramified quadratic extension. ThusThe trivial class is included in , since a degree-one extension is unramified. The two units pair trivially, while . Any class outside has odd valuation and consequently pairs nontrivially with . This proves directly
For , the unit square classes from part (i) give . The element satisfies ; its reduction is irreducible and separable over . This shows that is unramified of degree two, givingFor a fully explicit pairing check, use the generators . We have and , since and from . But : a norm equal to would be a sum of two squares. If either summand had negative valuation, the sum would have negative valuation (equal negative valuations give valuation ); if both were integral, their squares could not sum to . Finally, the unramified norm criterion gives . The identity and determine the remaining entries. Writing , the exponent matrix isFor , annihilating both generators of requires , so . Annihilating alone requires , so is a unit class. HenceThese are the Hilbert-symbol annihilators of units and unramified square classes. Annihilators here are taken with respect to this pairing, or equivalently in the character group of a finite abelian group after identifying square classes with their Hilbert-symbol characters.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 iii Paper 31 2 i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
A useful strong form of the Hensel lemma is the following. Let be a complete discretely valued field, with valuation ring , normalized valuation , and . If satisfiesthen there is a unique root in the ball . When the assertion is immediate; otherwise the condition includes .
Here is a proof by Newton iteration over a valued field. Write and , and setSuppose and . The correction has valuation , so . Taylor expansion over cancels the linear term and givesThus the derivative still has valuation , and . Unless an exact root is reached earlier, the corrections tend to zero with exponentially increasing valuations. Completeness gives , and continuity gives and . For uniqueness, if are in this ball, polynomial expansion around givesThe second factor has valuation exactly and is nonzero, so two roots in the ball must be equal. In particular, a simple residue root lifts uniquely: and satisfy the hypothesis.
For the square-class group of a p-adic field, write every element as with . Multiplication by a square changes by an even integer, so valuation parity gives one independent factor .
For odd , a unit is a square if and only if its residue is a square in . Necessity follows by reduction; sufficiency applies the simple-root Hensel lemma to , whose derivative is a unit at a nonzero residue root. The cyclic group has square subgroup of index two. If is a unit with nonsquare residue, thenFor , every odd square is one modulo eight. Conversely, if , take and . Then , so the strong Hensel lemma gives a square root. Thus unit square classes are exactly their residues modulo eight. The classes and generate this group of order four independently, and valuation parity supplies the class . Hence
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 iii Paper 31 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
We give the detailed norm-index argument for a cyclic extension of p-adic fields; thus is a finite extension of . Write , . For an additive -module , put and . The two periodic Tate cohomology of a cyclic group groups and the Herbrand quotient arewhen these groups are finite. For multiplicative modules, is the product of conjugates and .
The periodic complex alternating and gives a six-term exact sequence for every short exact sequence of modules. Taking the alternating product of the finite group orders in that exact sequence provesFor a finite module, the counting fibers gives and , so the two Tate groups have equal order. This proves the Herbrand quotient of a finite module is one. It follows that replacing a module by a finite-index submodule does not change its quotient, whenever the cohomology groups are finite.
Two basic calculations drive the norm computation. For the trivial module , and is multiplication by , so . For a regular lattice , with , invariants are constant coefficient vectors and every such vector is a norm: put its constant coefficient in just one coordinate before applying . The group kernel of consists of the coefficient vectors of sum zero. Successively taking partial sums solves the cyclic difference equation for every such vector . Thus both Tate groups vanish and . This is cyclic cohomology of a regular lattice.
Let and . For sufficiently large , the p-adic logarithm and p-adic exponential are inverse -equivariant isomorphismsTo make the range explicit, suffices: the higher terms in the logarithm and exponential have greater valuation than their leading terms, their series converge there, and the identities and remain valid. Thus a deep multiplicative unit group becomes an additive -lattice in .
By the normal basis theorem, as a -module. As a -module it is therefore . Transport the regular lattice into . Both and are full -stable -lattices, so their intersection has finite index in each. The exact sequences with finite quotients show that the Tate groups of are finite and thatSince is finite, the exact-sequence formula for the Herbrand quotient gives . Finally, the valuation sequencehas trivial -action on . Hence the Herbrand quotient of the local multiplicative group is
For completeness, the denominator vanishes by Hilbert theorem 90. If , put and . Independence of distinct field automorphisms lets us choose with . Since , shifting the sum gives . Thus , a multiplicative coboundary. Therefore . The invariant subgroup of is , soThis proves the cyclic local norm index without assuming local reciprocity. If the extension has ramification index and residue degree , the valuation formula shows that the valuation contribution to the index is . A norm is a unit only when is a unit, so the remaining contribution isIn particular, unit norms are surjective in an unramified cyclic extension. The norm subgroup is open: on deep units its logarithm is , a nonzero full lattice in , and therefore contains a sufficiently deep principal-unit group. This connects the index calculation to the open finite-index norm subgroups classified by local class field theory.
To finish, the Hasse norm theorem for a cyclic extension of number fields states that a nonzero element is a global norm if and only if it is a norm at every finite and infinite completion. Here is its Brauer-theoretic proof outline. Associate to the cyclic algebra , with relations and . The splitting criterion for a cyclic algebra says that it splits exactly when : if , multiplication by and the operator realize it as ; conversely, in a split matrix representation, the underlying -dimensional space is one-dimensional over , so must act as and .
Apply this criterion at every completion, using the restricted cyclic character and any one completion of above that place. If is a local norm everywhere, every localized Brauer class is zero. Injectivity in the Albert-Brauer-Hasse-Noether theorem forces in ; the global splitting criterion gives . Conversely, a global norm is a local norm after completion, since the norm on is the product of the component norms, whose images coincide in the Galois case. The cyclic hypothesis is essential; the stated local-global principle does not hold for arbitrary extensions.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 iii Paper 32 1 i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
For the Weierstrass equation of an elliptic curve in this part, , , . HenceThe elliptic-curve discriminant is thereforeEvery prime other than has unit discriminant, so this integral equation gives good reduction. At the valuation is one. An Admissible change of Weierstrass coordinates changes discriminant valuations by a multiple of twelve; consequently no integral model can lower this value to zero. Thus the equation is minimal there and the reduction is genuinely bad, rather than an artifact of a nonminimal model. Explicitly is singular on the reduced affine cubic: both partial derivatives vanish there. The set of bad reduction primes is
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 iii Paper 32 1 v Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The good-reduction map respects elliptic addition. Since the finite groups at two and three have orders five and seven, respectively, reduces to at two and reduces to at three. These multiples are not , since has infinite order. The formal kernel of a minimal Weierstrass equation gives, for every nonidentity point in the reduction kernel at ,Thus both coordinates of have negative two-adic valuation, and both coordinates of have negative three-adic valuation. In particularThere is also an elementary way to see that both coordinates must fail integrality here. An integral affine pair cannot reduce to the point at infinity. If one coordinate had negative valuation and the other nonnegative valuation, the equation would give different valuations on its two sides. When both are negative the lowest-valuation terms give , so both are indeed negative.
For a direct numerical confirmation, continuing the chord-and-tangent group law calculation givesThe original printed part repeats its request about at the end; the two distinct requested multiples are and .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 iii Paper 32 3 ii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Near , put and , or projectively , . The integral Weierstrass equation of an elliptic curve becomesThe linear coefficient of at the origin is a unit, so successive coefficient comparison gives a unique series beginning . Expressing the addition morphism in the local parameters of its two inputs givesIts identity, inverse, commutativity and associativity identities follow from the corresponding elliptic group identities. This one-dimensional commutative formal group law is the formal group of an elliptic curve attached to the model.
A point reducing to lies in the chart with a unit and has . The implicit equation determines uniquely from . Conversely every gives the convergent solution and the point ; gives . Hence the parameter is a bijection from the reduction kernel to . The series converges there and describes its addition. ThereforeFor nonzero with , times a unit, so and . These are the formal kernel of a minimal Weierstrass equation valuations used earlier.