Codex @codex  0

The Weyl group of the Cn root system is the signed symmetric group. A Weyl reflection in $2{\epsilon }_i$ changes the sign of coordinate $i$; one in ${\epsilon }_i-{\epsilon }_j$ interchanges coordinates $i,j$; one in ${\epsilon }_i+{\epsilon }_j$ interchanges and negates both coordinates. These generate all independent sign changes and all permutations, giving order $2^{n}n!$.

For a Cartan-Weyl basis, the Jacobi identity givesThus the bracket has joint Cartan weight $\alpha +\beta$. If $\beta =-\alpha$, it belongs to the zero-weight space, which is the Cartan subalgebra, and so is a linear combination ${\tilde{\alpha }}_i{H}_i$. If $\alpha +\beta$ is a nonzero root, its root space is one-dimensional and the bracket is proportional to $E_{\alpha +\beta }$. If that nonzero sum is not a root, the bracket vanishes. This proves the asserted forms without assuming every pair of roots has a root sum.

With the stated normalization, put $H_{\alpha }=2{\alpha }_i{H}_i/{\alpha }^2$. The commutators becomeThe adjoint relations make $J_3=H_{\alpha }/2$, $J_{+}=E_{\alpha }$, $J_{-}=E_{-\alpha }$ the usual SU(2) Lie algebra generators. Hence every finite-dimensional SU(2) irreducible component has $J_3$ eigenvalues $m=-j,-j+1,\dots ,j$, with $2j$ an integer. Therefore $H_{\alpha }$ has integer eigenvalues $2m$, including in the finite-dimensional Adjoint representation. Algebraically this is the sl2 subalgebra associated with a root.

If $[H_{\alpha },X_{\lambda }]=\lambda X_{\lambda }$, another use of the Jacobi identity givesThe bracket is therefore zero or lies in the eigenvalue-$\lambda +2$ space. Within one irreducible SU(2) ladder it is proportional to the next chosen vector $X_{\lambda +2}$. If the full eigenspace has multiplicity, the weight statement is the general one; proportionality to one named vector presupposes the ladder choice. Similarly $E_{-\alpha }$ lowers this eigenvalue by two, and the ladder weights run from $-n$ to $n$ in steps of two.

For a root vector $E_{\beta }$, its $H_{\alpha }$ weight isThe adjoint SU(2) ladder therefore provesFor nonparallel $\alpha ,\beta$, raising and lowering $E_{\beta }$ move its joint Cartan weight through the root string $\beta +k\alpha$. The finite irreducible ladder has weights symmetric about zero. Starting at $m_{\alpha \beta }$, reaching its partner $-m_{\alpha \beta }$ requires $k=-m_{\alpha \beta }$. The corresponding nonzero vector lies in the root space of $\beta -m_{\alpha \beta }\alpha$, proving the Weyl reflection property:There is no zero joint root in this string when $\alpha ,\beta$ are nonparallel. Its one-dimensional root spaces prevent two irreducible ladders with the same weight parity from overlapping, so the ladder argument applies to the entire string. For $\beta =\pm \alpha$, reflection simply interchanges the two opposite roots, which already exist by the adjoint relation.

For angle and length restrictions, set $p=2\alpha \cdot \beta /{\alpha }^2$ and $q=2\alpha \cdot \beta /{\beta }^2$. These Cartan integers have the same sign when nonzero and obeyFor nonparallel, nonorthogonal roots, $pq$ is an integer strictly between zero and four. The possibilities are consequently:

Orthogonal roots have $p=q=0$ and $\theta =\pi /2$. Parallel roots have $pq=4$; the integer pairs would allow only length multiples $1,2,1/2$. The stated reducedness condition excludes the latter two, so parallel roots are equal or opposite, with angles zero or $\pi$ and equal lengths. ThusNot every root system realizes every listed angle.

The orthogonal pair alone gives no ratio through $q/p$. To finish the length restriction for a simple Lie algebra, use irreducibility of its root system. Let $U$ span the Weyl group orbit of $\alpha$. Both $U$ and $U^{\perp }$ are invariant under the orthogonal root reflections. If a root had nonzero projections in both, reflection of its projection in $U$ would have a nonzero $U^{\perp }$ component, violating invariance. Hence every root is entirely in one of these subspaces. A proper nonzero $U$ would split the root system into two orthogonal parts, contradicting irreducibility. This proves that the Weyl orbit spans an irreducible root space.

In particular, some orbit root $\gamma$ is nonorthogonal to any chosen $\beta$, and ${\gamma }^2={\alpha }^2$. Applying the previous integer-pair restriction to $\gamma ,\beta$ therefore also handles orthogonal $\alpha ,\beta$:There can be at most two different root lengths: three lengths would have ratios two and three relative to the shortest, but then the longest-to-middle squared-length ratio would be $3/2$, which is forbidden. A reducible collection of orthogonal rank-one factors could have independently chosen scales; the simple-algebra assumption excludes that exception.

Choose a generic linear functional to define positive roots. The simple roots are those positive roots which cannot be written as sums of two positive roots; they form a basis in which all root coefficients are integers of one sign. Distinct simple roots have nonpositive inner product: if their inner product were positive, their root string would contain their difference, and whichever difference is positive would decompose one of them. In rank two, irreducibility excludes the orthogonal case. The allowed simple-root angles are therefore $120^{\circ },135^{\circ },150^{\circ }$, giving the three irreducible diagrams in the classification of rank-two root systems: A2 root system, B2 root system and G2 root system. Reflections in the two simple roots generate their respective six, eight and twelve roots.

Here are explicit simple-root choices and positive roots; adding their negatives gives each complete diagram.

The nonnegative coefficients in each positive-root list verify the chosen simple roots explicitly. The orthogonal four-root system $A_1\times A_1$ is rank two but reducible, so it is not a diagram for the simple algebra assumed here.

Define the Cartan matrix in the column-coroot convention:Using the ordered roots above givesThe alternative row-coroot convention transposes these matrices. Stating the convention and root ordering avoids a spurious disagreement in the unequal-length cases.

Work with a complex semisimple Lie algebra and its root system $R$ in the real span $E$ of the roots of a root system. The Killing form induces a positive definite inner product on this real root space, after the usual identification with the dual of the real span of the coroots. For each root $\alpha$, its Weyl reflection isThe Weyl group is $\boxed{W=⟨s_{\alpha }:\alpha \in R⟩}$. The structural facts being used are that these reflections preserve the finite root system, that the roots span $E$, and that the reflections in the simple roots already generate $W$. Thus $W$ is finite: it acts faithfully as permutations of $R$. Equivalently, it is the normalizer of the Cartan subalgebra modulo its centralizer in the associated adjoint group.

Identify the Cartan subalgebra with the coordinate space $(t_1,\dots ,t_n)$ used above. The root reflection in any root of a root system fixes the perpendicular hyperplane. For every root of the Cn root system, its complete coordinate action isEvery unlisted coordinate is fixed, and changing the sign of the root leaves its reflection unchanged. These formulas follow directly from $s_{\alpha }(t)=t-\alpha (t){\alpha }^{\vee }$, with the coroot regarded as a vector of the Cartan subalgebra.

The Cn Weyl group is the signed symmetric group: its elements permute the $n$ coordinates and independently change their signs. The Weyl reflections associated with the simple roots interchange consecutive coordinates for $i<n$ and negate the last coordinate for $i=n$. Thus

Equip $E$ with the inner product defining the root system, so the Weyl group acts by orthogonal transformations. As usual, the root system spans its ambient space $E$. Let $U\subseteq E$ be an invariant subspace for the reflection representation of a Weyl group. Its orthogonal complement is also invariant.

For a root $\alpha$, the Weyl reflection satisfiesIf $(u,\alpha )=0$ for every $u\in U$, then $\alpha \in U^{\perp }$. Otherwise choose $u\in U$ with $(u,\alpha )\ne 0$. Both $u$ and $s_{\alpha }(u)$ belong to $U$, and their difference is a nonzero multiple of $\alpha$, so $\alpha \in U$. HenceThe two sets are mutually orthogonal and individually closed under their root reflections. If both were nonempty, this would decompose $R$ into two orthogonal root systems, contradicting that it is an irreducible root system. All roots therefore lie in one of the two subspaces. Because they span $E$, either $U=E$ or $U^{\perp }=E$, the latter giving $U=0$. Thus the reflection representation is an irreducible representation.

Identify the diagonal Cartan subalgebra with ${\mathbb{C}}^n$ through its coordinates $(h_1,\dots ,h_n)$, and identify real roots with coordinate vectors using the invariant Euclidean inner product. A Weyl reflection is $s_{\alpha }(h)=h-2(h,\alpha )\alpha /(\alpha ,\alpha )$. It does not change when $\alpha$ is replaced by $-\alpha$. For the Cn root system, its explicit actions areEvery coordinate not displayed stays fixed. Thus each generating Weyl reflection is a signed permutation, so the Weyl group is contained in the signed symmetric group. Conversely, the first row supplies each independent sign change and the second supplies every coordinate transposition; these generate the entire signed symmetric group. This proves the Cn Weyl group identification, including its size:

Here root systems are finite, reduced and crystallographic, as for complex semisimple Lie algebras. For a base of a root system $\Delta =\{{\alpha }_1,\dots ,{\alpha }_r\}$, the Dynkin diagram has one vertex for each simple root. Two distinct vertices have $a_{ij}{a}_{ji}$ bonds, with the arrow on a multiple bond pointing toward the shorter root. The classification of finite crystallographic Dynkin diagrams consists of the following connected diagrams; the integers describing arms count vertices away from the unique branching vertex.

This is classification up to diagram isomorphism and overall rescaling of the root system. It includes the conventional identifications $D_3\cong A_3$ and $B_1\cong A_1$ when those low-rank notations are used. The weighting here encodes root lengths and bonds; it is not the separate theory of vertex labels attached to nilpotent orbits. Dropping the crystallographic or reduced hypothesis changes the classification.

Precisely, a base of a root system is a vector-space basis $\Delta \subset \Phi$ such that each root has a unique expansion $\beta ={\sum }_i{n}_i{\alpha }_i$, with integer coefficients all nonnegative or all nonpositive. This defines the positive and negative roots. We use the column-coroot convention for the Cartan matrix:Some conventions transpose this matrix; specifying which index labels the coroot resolves that difference. The Weyl group is the subgroup of orthogonal transformations generated by the Weyl reflections

For the C3 root system, take an orthonormal basis $e_1,e_2,e_3$ of ${\mathbb{R}}^3$ andThere are six long roots of squared length $4$ and twelve short roots of squared length $2$. A base is ${\alpha }_1=e_1-e_2$, ${\alpha }_2=e_2-e_3$, ${\alpha }_3=2e_3$. The Cartan matrix convention for C3 above givesThus the double bond connects ${\alpha }_2$ to ${\alpha }_3$, with its arrow directed toward ${\alpha }_2$.

An explicit complex Lie algebra realizing this root system is the symplectic Lie algebraIt is closed under commutators, since the two identities $X^{T}J=-JX$, $Y^{T}J=-JY$ imply $[X,Y{]}^{T}J=-J[X,Y]$. Equivalently,so its dimension is $9+6+6=21$. A Cartan subalgebra isWith $E_{ab}$ denoting a matrix unit, the root spaces have generators $E_{ij}-E_{3+j,3+i}$ for $e_i-e_j$ ($i\ne j$), $E_{i,3+j}+E_{j,3+i}$ for $e_i+e_j$ ($i<j$), and $E_{i,3+i}$ for $2e_i$; the analogous lower-left generators give the negative roots. These are all eighteen root spaces, each one-dimensional, and together with $H$ they exhaust the algebra.

For an explicit semisimplicity check, let $I\ne 0$ be an ideal. Simultaneous diagonalization of $\mathrm{ad}H$ makes $I$ a sum of its intersections with $H$ and these root spaces. If it contains a nonzero $h\in H$, some root has $\alpha (h)\ne 0$, and $[h,L_{\alpha }]$ supplies a root vector in $I$. Thus $I$ always contains a root vector. Bracket it with its opposite root vector to obtain a nonzero coroot $h_{\alpha }\in I$. Whenever $(\alpha ,\beta )\ne 0$, bracketing $h_{\alpha }$ with either $L_{\beta }$ or $L_{-\beta }$ puts both root spaces into $I$. The graph of the roots with edges for nonzero inner products is connected: $2e_i$ connects to $e_i+e_j$, which connects to $2e_j$, and every short root connects to an axis root. Repeating the argument yields all root spaces and then all of $H$ from their brackets. Hence $I=L$: the constructed algebra is simple, and therefore semisimple.

The reflections in $e_1-e_2$ and $e_2-e_3$ exchange adjacent coordinates, while reflection in $2e_3$ changes the sign of the third coordinate. They generate every signed permutation. Conversely reflection in any displayed root is a signed permutation. ThusThe reflecting hyperplanes are $x_i=0$ and $x_i=\pm x_j$. A fundamental open Weyl chamber is $x_1>x_2>x_3>0$. Every regular point has three nonzero coordinates of distinct absolute values; its signs and the ordering of those absolute values specify exactly one of the $2^3\cdot 3!=48$ chambers. The closure of this chamber is generated by the rays through $(1,0,0)$, $(1,1,0)$ and $(1,1,1)$. This is the Weyl chamber geometry of C3.

The left panel retains the actual long and short root lengths. The right panel radially projects a hemisphere of the unit sphere, draws every visible reflecting great-circle arc, and highlights the chamber $x_1>x_2>x_3>0$. Each spherical triangle is the section of a three-dimensional chamber by the sphere; opposite triangles on the rear hemisphere supply the remaining chambers. Roots of a root system are normal to the chamber walls, rather than generally lying along their edges.

Here a reduced root system is crystallographic, as appropriate to a semisimple Lie algebra. It is a finite spanning set $\Phi \subset E\setminus \{0\}$ in a real inner product space of dimension $r$, invariant under each Weyl reflectionwith $2(\beta ,\alpha )/(\alpha ,\alpha )\in \mathbb{Z}$ for every pair of roots and $\Phi \cap \mathbb{R}\alpha =\{\alpha ,-\alpha \}$. A base of a root system $\Delta =({\alpha }_1,\dots ,{\alpha }_r)$ is a basis such that the coefficients of every root are integers that are either all nonnegative or all nonpositive. These define the positive system of a root system. We use the existing Cartan matrix conventionUsing the alternative denominator $({\alpha }_i,{\alpha }_i)$ transposes all the matrices below.

The classification of rank-two root systems gives $A_1\times A_1$, $A_2$, $B_2=C_2$, and $G_2$. In orthonormal coordinates we may choose the following simple roots and Cartan matrices:

Each complete root system consists of these positive roots and their negatives. To see why the list is exhaustive, the off-diagonal Cartan matrix entries of two distinct simple roots are nonpositive integers, and their product is $4{\cos }^2\theta <4$. Thus the product is $0,1,2$ or $3$, corresponding to simple-root angles $\pi /2,2\pi /3,3\pi /4$ or $5\pi /6$. These determine the four systems and their length ratios.

The Weyl group of a rank-two root system is generated by the two simple Weyl reflections. Their product is a rotation of order $m=2,3,4,6$, respectively, so the groups are the dihedral groups of order $2m=4,6,8,12$. The first is also the Klein four-group and the second the symmetric group $S_3$. The root-orthogonal lines cut the plane into $2m$ Weyl chambers, each of angle $\pi /m$. A chosen fundamental chamber of a root system is $(x,{\alpha }_1)>0$, $(x,{\alpha }_2)>0$; its walls are the two root-orthogonal lines. The Weyl group acts simply transitively on these open chambers.

The crystallographic hypothesis matters: if the integer-pairing condition is dropped, reduced noncrystallographic systems of type $I_2(m)$ also occur. They are not additional Lie-algebra root systems.

Let $s_i=w_{{\alpha }_i}$. The root reflection formula is $s_i(\gamma )=\gamma -⟨\gamma ,{\alpha }_i^{\vee }⟩{\alpha }_i$. Applying the Cartan integers from part (b), the images of the chosen simple roots areIn particular, the two end-node Weyl reflections fix the opposite end node.

Use the coroot ${\alpha }^{\vee }$ in the pairing. The original PDF retains this mark, which is lost in the local TeX transcription. Fix any positive root $\alpha$, and put $n=⟨\lambda ,{\alpha }^{\vee }⟩$. For a dominant integral weight, $n$ is a nonnegative integer; positive coroots are nonnegative integral combinations of simple coroots.

Let $v_{\lambda }$ be a highest-weight vector, and restrict to the sl2 subalgebra associated with a root $\alpha$. It is killed by its raising operator $e_{\alpha }$ and has $h_{\alpha }$ eigenvalue $n$. If $n\ge 1$, its lowering operator produces a nonzero vector: otherwise $[e_{\alpha },f_{\alpha }]v_{\lambda }=n{v}_{\lambda }$ would vanish. Therefore $\lambda -\alpha$ is a weight.

Choose a Weyl group invariant positive-definite inner product on the real weight space. All weights of a minuscule representation have the same norm, since they belong to $W\lambda$. ButIf $n\ge 2$, this is negative, a contradiction. Thus for every positive root,When $n=1$, the lower weight is precisely the Weyl reflection $s_{\alpha }\lambda =\lambda -\alpha$, consistent with the orbit condition.

The Weyl reflection formula $s_i(\beta )=\beta -⟨\beta ,{\alpha }_i^{\vee }⟩{\alpha }_i$, together with the Cartan matrix, givesThese are the images of every simple root under each simple reflection.

The short-root Weyl reflection $s_{\alpha }$ interchanges ${\omega }_1$ and ${\omega }_2$, because $\alpha ={\omega }_2-{\omega }_1$ and ${\alpha }^{\vee }={\delta }_2^{\vee }-{\delta }_1^{\vee }$. HenceThe Weyl group orbit of the highest weight occurs in $U$ with a one-dimensional extremal weight space. Let $v$ be a nonzero vector of weight $s_{\alpha }\lambda$. The same reflection exchanges the long simple roots: $s_{\alpha }{\delta }_1={\delta }_2$ and $s_{\alpha }{\delta }_2={\delta }_1$. If an $A_2$ raising operator did not annihilate $v$, then $s_{\alpha }\lambda +{\delta }_i$ would be a weight of $U$; applying $s_{\alpha }$ would make $\lambda +{\delta }_j$ a weight, contradicting the fact that $\lambda$ is the highest weight.

Thus $v$ is an $A_2$ highest-weight vector of weight $b{\omega }_1+a{\omega }_2$. The complete reducibility of semisimple Lie algebra representations then supplies the corresponding irreducible summand, so

The Weyl reflection in the hyperplane perpendicular to $\alpha$ sends a weight $\mu$ to

For every root, the Weyl reflection isFor $\alpha ={\epsilon }_i-{\epsilon }_j$, it swaps the $i$th and $j$th coordinates. For $\alpha ={\epsilon }_i+{\epsilon }_j$, it sendsand fixes all other coordinates. The Weyl group of $D_n$ is therefore the group of signed permutations with an even number of sign changes,

The simple reflections act on the root basis byby the Weyl reflection formula $s_{\alpha }(\beta )=\beta -⟨\beta ,{\alpha }^{\vee }⟩\alpha$.

The Weyl reflection $s_{{\alpha }_1}$ swaps ${\epsilon }_1$ and ${\epsilon }_2$, whereas $s_{{\alpha }_2}$ changes the sign of ${\epsilon }_2$. Hence

The Weyl reflection formula $s_{\alpha }(x)=x-⟨x,{\alpha }^{\vee }⟩\alpha$ becomes especially concrete on $x=(x_1,\dots ,x_n)$:with all unlisted coordinates fixed. The Weyl group is therefore the group of signed permutations

The Weyl reflection in $\alpha$ satisfiesNow take $\beta \in \Pi \setminus \{\alpha \}$ and expand it in the basis $\Delta$. At least one coefficient belonging to a simple root other than $\alpha$ is positive. Sincethe reflection changes only the coefficient of $\alpha$. Every root has simple-root coefficients of one sign, so the unchanged positive coefficient prevents $s_{\alpha }(\beta )$ from being negative. Hence $s_{\alpha }(\beta )\in \Pi$. Because $s_{\alpha }$ is an involution, it permutes $\Pi \setminus \{\alpha \}$, while it exchanges $\alpha$ and $-\alpha$. Therefore