Write a Blaschke product as , where , , and the zeros are counted with multiplicity. With normalized angular measure , Jensen's formula for each Blaschke factor gives
Indeed, the mean of is , while has mean zero by the mean value property for harmonic functions. Each factor has modulus at most one. Applying the monotone convergence theorem to the negative logarithms of the finite products yields the radial logarithmic mean of a Blaschke product:
The Blaschke condition implies : only finitely many zeros have modulus below , and for . Every summand tends to zero and is bounded in absolute value by . The dominated convergence theorem for this series, together with , therefore gives
This also covers finite products and constant unimodular products. Zeros on a circle create integrable logarithmic singularities and do not change the conclusion.
Consider a stationary nonnegative work-input process in slotted time, with cumulative work over the last slots and a work-conserving server of capacity per slot. Assume its past average tends almost surely to . The Lindley recursion then defines the finite stationary queue workload
This is work remaining, rather than the number of customers when customer service requirements vary. With unit work per customer the two notions coincide. Stationarity makes the distribution of a past cumulative window equal to that of a forward window of the same length.
For a parameter and a positive window length , the effective bandwidth is
It measures a traffic rate through exponential moments, so it retains information about rare bursts that the mean alone discards. If the limiting scaled cumulant-generating function exists, put
The finite-window effective bandwidth matters when the relevant overflow window is short or when arrivals are correlated; one should not replace it by its long-window limit without justification.
The following proof gives an actual upper bound for the infinite-horizon queue workload. For , if , at least one positive integer has . The union bound followed by the Chernoff bound gives
Assume each finite-window exponential moment is finite and . Choose such that . For all sufficiently large , the summand is at most . Its tail is a convergent geometric series, and its finite prefix is finite. Denote the resulting sum by . The exponential workload bound from cumulative arrival moments therefore proves, for ,
Optimizing over admissible parameters gives
Only parameters with the stated finite-window moments are included. If there are no such positive parameters, the argument yields only the trivial exponent zero. Infinite means that the upper rate is . For a non-strict threshold , first bound it by and then let . This proof permits dependence between slots. It proves the required upper bound; it does not assert a matching lower bound for every arrival process.
This also gives a closed-set large-deviation upper bound for : set for , , and for . If a closed set contains zero, its desired upper bound is the trivial bound zero. If contains positive points but not zero, its positive part has a smallest point , and gives the bound . If it contains no nonnegative points, its probability is zero. This verifies the upper half of a large deviation principle; the actual rate function can be larger when a matching lower bound is unavailable.
For independent and identically distributed slot arrivals , let . Now , so effective bandwidth is independent of window length. For , the geometric-series prefactor is explicitly
Thus the familiar workload Chernoff bound for independent increments is a special case, and the largest admissible parameter is often the positive root of .
For these independent increments there is a sharper argument that works at the root itself when its exponential moment is finite. Along the past read in reverse order, put and . If , then is a nonnegative supermartingale starting at one. For the first crossing time , bounded optional stopping gives
Let . Strict negative drift makes almost surely, so its supremum is attained and the crossing event agrees with . Consequently
This strengthens the prefactor but uses temporal independence, which was unnecessary for the previous proof.
Several examples show what the effective bandwidth constraint means. Deterministic traffic of work units per slot has and effective bandwidth at every parameter; if there is no stationary backlog. For independent on-off slots carrying units with probability and zero otherwise, the Bernoulli effective bandwidth is
For , it rises from the mean to the peak . When , strict convexity of , its negative derivative at zero, and its divergence to infinity give a unique positive root. When , no slot can increase the queue workload. In the specific case , the workload increases by one with probability and decreases by one, reflected at zero, with probability . Its stationary probabilities satisfy
The service-root equation has , and thus . This example realizes the upper exponent exactly.
For independent Poisson slot counts of mean , with unit work per arrival, the Poisson effective bandwidth is
Stability requires . There is a unique positive root of , again by strict convexity, negative initial derivative after subtracting , and growth to infinity. For independent exponentially distributed work with rate , the corresponding expressions are
If , the positive service root lies strictly below . The finite moment-generating function domain cannot be ignored.
To see statistical aggregation explicitly, let the entire arrival processes of sources be independent, though each source may itself have dependence over time. Their cumulative totals satisfy
Thus the shared queue has an exponential overflow bound when , with the finite-window conditions proved above. One must use a common parameter ; adding individual service-root exponents is not the rule. For example, an independent Poisson source of mean and an independent on-off source of size and probability have aggregate cumulant-generating function
For and , their positive service root exists and determines the optimized upper exponent. Several independent Poisson sources similarly have the same formula as one source with intensity .
The connection with large deviation principles also appears in a many-source scaling. For independent copies of a source, aggregate service and buffer , fix a window . Let be each copy's cumulative input in that window. Their total exceeds only if the empirical mean exceeds . Its Chernoff bound has exponent
If exponential moments exist near zero, Cramér's theorem gives the corresponding finite-window large deviation principle. The threshold exceeds the mean because and . A finite union of windows has upper exponential rate at most over those windows. Passing to infinitely many windows requires uniform control of long-window probabilities, not simply an interchange of a limit with an infinite union. A good sample-path large deviation principle in a topology where the queue workload is continuous, as in Question 3, instead permits the contraction principle for large deviations to derive a workload rate function and its closed-set overflow upper bound.
Finally, the mean and peak limits of effective bandwidth quantify the safety margin. With exponential moments near zero, independent slot work of mean and variance has
For bounded work, its large-parameter limit is the essential peak. Stronger tail requirements select larger and hence more capacity; finite-window effective bandwidths also reflect temporal burst correlations. A stable heavy-tailed input can lack every positive exponential moment, in which case this exponential-bound method supplies no positive decay rate. Stability and exponentially small overflow are distinct requirements.

Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project

Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
We have two killer features:
  1. topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculus
    Articles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
    • a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
    • a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
    This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.
    Figure 1.
    Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page
    . View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivative
  2. local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:
    This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
    Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally.
    Video 3.
    Edit locally and publish demo
    . Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension.
  3. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook-media/master/feature/x/hilbert-space-arrow.png
  4. Infinitely deep tables of contents:
    Figure 6.
    Dynamic article tree with infinitely deep table of contents
    .
    Descendant pages can also show up as toplevel e.g.: ourbigbook.com/cirosantilli/chordate-subclade
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact