An absorbing state has ; once reached, the chain never leaves it. For a nonabsorbing initial state, condition on its first transition and use the Markov property:
Here and . The other equations are
Solving gives
For absorption into either state one or four, let be the expected number of steps, with . first-step analysis gives
Hence and
The expectation is finite because each transient two-step cycle has probability at most of remaining transient; the survival tail is geometrically bounded. This also justifies solving the expectation equations without assuming finiteness in advance.
Uniform area distribution on the unit disk gives
The Jacobian determinant has absolute determinant , so
Integrating out the other coordinate gives
The joint probability density function factors into these two marginal distribution, proving independence of and . Finally
The angle at can be defined arbitrarily, since that event has probability zero.
Milne-Thomson's circle theorem states that if is a complex potential of a two-dimensional potential flow whose singularities lie outside , then
has the circle as a streamline, with the original exterior singularities unchanged. Additive constants in the potential are immaterial.
Take , using the convention that positive is positive circulation. Reflection in the circle gives, up to a constant,
The reflected vortex at has strength , while the central term has strength . Their combined circulation around the cylinder is zero; this is the circulation normalization implicit in the requested equation.
The vortex moves with the velocity induced by the other singularities, excluding its own singular term. Since complex velocity is , its value at the vortex is . Thus
Writing and multiplying this equation by gives
Its real part implies , and its imaginary part gives
The radius is constant and the angular velocity is constant on that orbit. For positive the orbit is clockwise with this convention. Retaining the conjugate on the time derivative is essential for the sign.
For a consistently oriented surface and boundary, Ampère's law is
Stokes theorem gives the left side as , so the given curl equation proves the law.
On a circle of radius around the axis, the assumed azimuthal field is tangent and constant in magnitude. Thus the circulation is . For , the enclosed electric current is ; for , it is . Therefore
The field is continuous at and vanishes regularly at the axis. Its direction follows the right-hand rule for positive electric current along . The radial component of the curl equation also gives , so the expression is valid at every height; no unmentioned axial dependence remains.
Autonomy gives conservation of energy, while the cyclic coordinate give conserved momenta:
Here is the angular momentum along the body's symmetry axis, and is its component along the fixed vertical. The time symmetry corresponds to , not to an additional angle momentum.
With and , solve
Insert this and the conserved spin rate into the energy equation, multiply by , and isolate :
For a fixed nonvertical angle, let
The energy is . A constant angle in requires both and , by the reduced Euler-Lagrange equation and . Since
both and , with .
The source's unqualified final sentence omits the nonvertical restriction. A vertical axis has , where the displayed reduction divides by zero and the common root need not be interior. For example, the stationary upright top has , , and
Its only repeated root is , so it has no common root with its derivative in . Thus the interior double-root conclusion holds for nonvertical steady precession. The vertical configurations require separate endpoint treatment. This is nonvertical qualification in the steady-top double-root condition.
Let be a smooth variation with at both endpoints, and consider . stationary point gives the first variation
Integrate the middle term once by parts and the last term twice. All boundary terms vanish because both and vanish there. Assuming the derivatives needed for the classical formula, the given fundamental lemma of the calculus of variations yields
Without assuming those classical derivatives initially, the same calculation with compactly supported variations states this equation weakly; sufficient regularity then gives the classical equation.
For the specific integrand, , , , so the equation is . Its weak solutions here are smooth, and its general classical solution is
Put , , . The conditions at zero give and . Those at give
Using , solve to obtain , , , . Thus an extremal is
Substitution checks all four boundary values. The additive term in the integrand contributes no variation in , so it does not alter this equation.
The required condition is . The implicit function theorem then gives a unique local differentiable branch with and
The denominator remains nonzero after shrinking the neighborhood by continuity.
For the specified smooth function,
At both equal one, so the condition holds and . Differentiate twice:
At zero, , , and . Consequently
The additional derivatives exist because this particular is smooth; the general first-derivative theorem only requires the stated continuous first partial derivatives.
A dominated differentiation under the integral sign suffices. Suppose is measurable, is integrable at one parameter value, and for almost every the map is continuously differentiable on an interval. If throughout that interval for an integrable , then the parameter integral is differentiable, and
One direct sufficient version assumes is continuous in almost everywhere and has that common domination; dominated convergence theorem then proves the assertion.
Here , so the complex-valued function is integrable for every real . For a real increment , the elementary bound gives
The right side is integrable by hypothesis and the integrand converges pointwise to . dominated convergence theorem, applied to real and imaginary parts, proves
This supplies the domination explicitly rather than merely differentiating a formal Fourier transform.
Euler's theorem states that if , then , where is Euler's totient function. This includes Fermat's little theorem when is prime.
For each prime-power factor , the integer divides the defined least common multiple . Euler's theorem modulo that prime power therefore gives
The prime powers are pairwise coprime, so their product divides . Equivalently the Chinese remainder theorem gives
For the specified composite integer,
Raising to the seventh power proves
Thus 561 is a Carmichael number. We use exactly the source's definition of as the least common multiple of prime-power totients; its validity here does not require replacing it by a smaller exponent at powers of two.

Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project

Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
We have two killer features:
  1. topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculus
    Articles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
    • a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
    • a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
    This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.
    Figure 1.
    Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page
    . View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivative
  2. local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:
    This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
    Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally.
    Video 3.
    Edit locally and publish demo
    . Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension.
  3. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook-media/master/feature/x/hilbert-space-arrow.png
  4. Infinitely deep tables of contents:
    Figure 6.
    Dynamic article tree with infinitely deep table of contents
    .
    Descendant pages can also show up as toplevel e.g.: ourbigbook.com/cirosantilli/chordate-subclade
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact