The inner cylinder is . With and , this becomes , so away from the touching point
At this boundary the outward radial vector from the cylinder center is , so the counterclockwise unit tangent is . Since and , the no-slip boundary condition gives
For a streamfunction in polar coordinates, no penetration through a stationary material curve makes constant along that curve. Both cylinders touch at the origin, so continuity forces their constants to agree. Since adding a constant does not alter velocity, choose their common value as .
Differentiate along and commute the two covariant derivatives:
where the sign is the covector form of the Ricci identity. Apply the product rule to the first term:
The first term vanishes by the geodesic equation, and the second is
Finally the pair symmetries and antisymmetries of the Riemann curvature tensor give
Consequently
This is the Riccati equation for a timelike geodesic congruence; taking its spatial trace is the starting point for the timelike Raychaudhuri equation.
The fields and arise by pushing forward the two coordinate vectors on the two-parameter family of geodesics, so . Part (i), or equivalently the torsion-free property, gives
In components,
Therefore
This says that the deformation tensor of a timelike geodesic congruence gives the relative velocity of neighboring geodesics represented by the geodesic deviation vector.
First differentiate the unit normalization . Metric compatibility gives
The timelike geodesic vector field equation gives the other contraction,
For the spatial projector of a timelike congruence,
and symmetry also gives . Thus
Splitting the deformation tensor of a timelike geodesic congruence into symmetric and antisymmetric parts and substituting the definitions gives
Moreover, the orthogonality of implies
while in four dimensions
It follows that
Hence
which is the kinematic decomposition of a timelike geodesic congruence.
The coordinate vector fields on the parameter surface commute, so their pushforwards satisfy
Because the Levi-Civita connection is torsion free, part (i) then gives
Every -curve is an affinely parametrized geodesic, hence . Applying the definition of the Riemann curvature tensor,
Therefore the connecting vector is a Jacobi field and obeys the geodesic deviation equation
The coordinate expression for the Lie bracket of vector fields is
For the Levi-Civita connection,
The final term vanishes because the Christoffel symbols are symmetric in while the vector product in parentheses is antisymmetric. Hence
Because is constant, . The coordinate speed along the circle is consequently
so
For the convention in the question, take , so and .
On the circular solution, the free part of the relativistic charged-particle action is
In the gauge , the interaction is the closed line integral
The orbit is clockwise for , so . Thus
Combining the two terms and using gives the charged-particle action over one relativistic cyclotron orbit
Although the intermediate magnetic line integral depends on the chosen magnetic vector potential, the closed-orbit result is gauge invariant.
For , the only independent nonzero component of the electromagnetic field tensor is
The temporal and components of the Lorentz force show that and are constant. Taking , the transverse equations are
where dots now denote proper time derivatives. With
a solution is
Direct differentiation verifies both equations. Hence the trajectory is a relativistic cyclotron orbit with proper angular frequency ; the sign fixes its orientation.
The momentum conjugate to is
while
The Euler-Lagrange equation therefore gives
Since and , division by gives the Lorentz-force equation from the worldline action
Raising the free index yields exactly
Use Minkowski spacetime signature and write . The reparametrization-invariant relativistic charged-particle action is
The first term is because
An electromagnetic gauge transformation is
It leaves the electromagnetic field tensor unchanged because antisymmetrized second derivatives commute. The action changes only by
This endpoint term has zero variation for fixed endpoints, which is the gauge invariance of the charged-particle worldline action.
Using the rules for the matrix transpose together with and ,
Thus the commutator is a symmetric matrix.
After adding , the equilibrium equation is
The constant term breaks the reflection symmetry . Consequently each symmetry-forced pitchfork becomes an imperfect pitchfork bifurcation, while each crossing that produced a transcritical bifurcation is disconnected. The remaining generic turning points are saddle-node bifurcations. The lower row shows this unfolding for a representative small positive ; the upper row gives the unperturbed diagrams.
Figure 1.
Bifurcation diagrams for the equilibrium branches
. Details.
For , both pitchforks and both transcritical crossings are destroyed. For , the simultaneous fifth-order meeting splits into separated folds. For , both pitchforks become imperfect. Hence, under the allowed constant perturbation,
This is the structural stability of a bifurcation distinction between the nongeneric pitchfork and transcritical diagrams and the generic saddle-node diagrams left by their unfoldings.
Suppose . Near the pitchfork at , put . Keeping the lowest terms that distinguish the branches gives
Since , this is the pitchfork bifurcation normal form: the zero branch changes from stable to unstable and the stable branches appear for .
Near , put . Then
Here , so for the zero branch is stable and the two nearby nonzero branches are unstable. This confirms the parameter-reversed subcritical pitchfork bifurcation.
Finally fix either and put
The two vanishing factors have the leading expansions
With the parameter-dependent coordinate ,
This is the transcritical bifurcation normal form: the branches and cross and exchange stability.
Put
The equilibrium points of a dynamical system form the three branch families
For a simple equilibrium, fixed point stability for an autonomous differential equation is determined by the sign of . On the three families,
Thus solid branches in the figure are stable and dashed branches are unstable.
If , the pair emerges stably from at in a pitchfork bifurcation. At , the pair meets with unstable nonzero branches; after reversing the parameter orientation this is a subcritical pitchfork bifurcation. At , the two positive branches cross and exchange stability, as do the two negative branches, giving two simultaneous transcritical bifurcations at .
If , every branch meets at . For only the stable trivial branch exists. For , is stable, the inner branches are unstable, and the outer branches are stable. This is a degenerate fifth-order bifurcation rather than a generic pitchfork.
If , a supercritical pitchfork bifurcation occurs at : the trivial branch loses stability and the stable branches emerge. At , the unstable branches meet the trivial branch, which regains stability; this is the parameter-reversed form of a subcritical pitchfork bifurcation.
For a fixed sample , its Empirical Rademacher complexity is
Its sample expected value is .
Because every takes values in , replacing one sample point changes by at most . Put
The lower-tail form of the Bounded differences inequality gives
outside an event of probability at most .
For the excess-loss supremum from part (b), replacing one observation changes by at most . A second application of the same inequality gives
outside another event of probability at most . On the intersection of these two events, symmetrization and the union bound yield
This event has probability at least , and . Thus
For define the misclassification loss
and take the loss class
Write and , so the misclassification risk and empirical misclassification risk are and .
Because is an empirical risk minimizer, . Hence its excess risk obeys
Introduce an independent ghost sample and perform Rademacher symmetrization. The contribution involving the fixed function has zero expectation over the Rademacher signs, so each of the two independent sample terms has supremum expectation . Therefore
Every difference takes values in . Replacing one observation can consequently change by at most . Applying the Bounded differences inequality with gives, except on an event of probability at most ,
Combining these inequalities proves, with probability at least ,

There are unlisted articles, also show them or only show them.