Actomyosin ring Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-10-20
An actomyosin ring is a contractile assembly containing actin filaments and myosin II. In typical animal cytokinesis, it forms in the cell cortex beneath the cell membrane. Its contraction draws the boundary inward to produce a cleavage furrow; an inward groove is not yet complete separation of the daughters.[ref]
The Events of M Phase. The Cell: A Molecular Approach, 2nd edition, Chapter 14, The Events of M Phase, Cytokinesis and Figure 14.30: actin–myosin II ring beneath the plasma membrane
Cell cortex Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-11-05
The cell cortex is a peripheral layer of cytoplasm beneath the cell membrane, containing the actomyosin ring during typical animal cytokinesis.
Its actin-rich network helps set surface mechanics and couples membrane motion to contractile forces. Local changes in attachment or assembly can produce a membrane bleb, while coordinated actomyosin activity can support constriction or migration. [ref]
Molecular Biology of the Cell, 4th edition by Bruce Alberts and others. Chapter 16, The Cytoskeleton: actin cortex
Cleavage furrow 2026-10-18
A cleavage furrow is the inward indentation of the cell membrane during cytokinesis. It is the visible deformation; the actomyosin ring is machinery beneath that boundary.[ref]
The Cell Cycle. Biology 2e by Mary Ann Clark and others; §10.2, Cytokinesis, animal-cell paragraph and Figure 10.9
Cytokinesis Created 2026-10-14 Updated 2026-10-18
Cytokinesis partitions the cytoplasm. Without cytokinesis, two cell nuclei can share one biological cell. [ref]
Cytokinesis makes physically separate daughter biological cells by partitioning their cytoplasm and completing their cell membrane boundaries. Mitosis divides nuclear material. These processes can overlap during M phase, but completion of one does not imply completion of the other.[ref]
The Cell Cycle. Biology 2e by Mary Ann Clark and others; §10.2, The Mitotic Phase and Cytokinesis: nuclear division versus physical daughter-cell separation
For an original compartment-counting example, consider a hypothetical diploid biological cell after two daughter cell nuclei have formed. Let be the number of chromosomes in one haploid set, and let be that set's unreplicated nuclear DNA amount, as in cell-cycle DNA content. Assume faithful mitosis, no nuclear DNA replication during the partition, and no loss of nuclear DNA; exclude mitochondrion DNA.
| Counting boundary | Before cytokinesis | After cytokinesis |
|---|---|---|
| Biological cells | 1 | 2 |
| Cell nuclei in each biological cell | 2 | 1 |
| Each cell nucleus | chromosomes, | chromosomes, |
| Nuclear DNA per biological cell | ||
| Nuclear DNA across all descendants |
The check is to follow the two existing cell nuclei: initially one boundary encloses both; finally each daughter boundary encloses one. The total remains two cell nuclei, twenty chromosomes and of nuclear DNA. Thus the amount per biological cell halves because the counting boundary changes, without any new DNA replication or change of nuclear ploidy. Doubling the number of biological cells need not double their combined material.
Coordinating chromosome segregation with cytoplasm partition lets descendants inherit nuclear information inside separate working compartments. Equal nuclear DNA allocations do not require equal daughter sizes or equal allocations of every organelle. The geometry of cytokinesis connects an internal allocation to the creation of two independently bounded biological cells.
Myosin II Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-10-20
Myosin II participates in the actomyosin ring of typical animal cytokinesis.[ref]
The Events of M Phase. The Cell: A Molecular Approach, 2nd edition by Geoffrey M. Cooper; Chapter 14, The Events of M Phase, Cytokinesis and Figure 14.30
A common transition into anaphase both releases chromosomes for separation and permits the spindle to organise cytokinesis; later safeguards delay final separation when segregation remains incomplete. Temporal coordination makes the events occur in the right order, while spatial coordination positions division between the separating chromosome sets. The two forms of control interact but are experimentally distinguishable.
S phase establishes sister chromatids and their association through cohesin. During mitosis, chromosome condensation and DNA topoisomerase II activity help prepare the copies for separation. Each sister's kinetochore should attach to the opposite spindle pole, producing biorientation. Aurora B contributes to error correction by destabilising inappropriate attachments. Attachment and tension affect this process, but the spindle checkpoint should not be described simply as a direct meter of equal tension on every chromosome.
Unattached kinetochores catalyse formation of the mitotic checkpoint complex, involving Mad2, BubR1, Bub3 and Cdc20. This inhibits productive anaphase-promoting complex activity toward key substrates. In a classic causal experiment, destruction of the last unattached kinetochore allowed anaphase to proceed, with chromosome-arm damage providing an important control. It was the inhibitory signalling structure, rather than the physical presence of one unaligned chromosome somewhere in the biological cell, that maintained the delay.[ref]
The checkpoint delaying anaphase in response to chromosome monoorientation is mediated by an inhibitory signal produced by unattached kinetochores by Conly L. Rieder and others. Journal of Cell Biology 130, pp. 941–948; laser ablation of the last unattached kinetochore and chromosome-arm controls
Once attachment-associated checkpoint signalling is silenced and inhibitory complexes are dismantled, anaphase-promoting complex with Cdc20 promotes ubiquitin-dependent destruction of securin and mitotic cyclin B. securin destruction permits separase activity, which cleaves the remaining cohesion-bearing kleisin subunit. Non-cleavable Scc1 blocked sister separation in budding yeast, directly linking regulated proteolysis to the loss of chromosome cohesion.[ref]
Sister-chromatid separation at anaphase onset is promoted by cleavage of the cohesin subunit Scc1 by Frank Uhlmann and others. Nature 400, pp. 37–42; cleavage-resistant Scc1 and failure of sister-chromatid separation
Chromosome movement can then proceed through shortening of kinetochore-associated microtubules and separation of the spindle poles.Destruction of cyclin B also lowers CDK1 activity. This changes the phosphorylation balance, allowing protein phosphatases to reverse mitotic modifications and permitting chromosome decondensation, nuclear reassembly and cytokinetic organisation. Thus regulated proteolysis produces two coordinated outputs: removal of a physical chromosome linkage and removal of the mitotic kinase state. Their sharing of a controller improves ordering, but it does not mean that cytokinesis physically waits for a sensor to count every chromosome at its destination.
For animal cytokinesis, overlapping microtubules of the central spindle and signals associated with astral microtubules specify an equatorial cortical region. centralspindlin recruits and regulates the guanine-nucleotide exchange factor ECT2, which promotes local RhoA activation. RhoA stimulates actin assembly and myosin II activity, organising the actomyosin ring that drives furrow ingression. This geometry aligns the division plane between the segregating chromosome masses. Spindle position can itself be set by cortical cell polarity cues, explaining how the same machinery supports either approximately symmetric or asymmetric division.
Depletion and localisation experiments distinguish the biochemical signal from a simple structural scaffold. Experiments in human biological cells showed that ECT2 is required for cortical RhoA and furrow assembly, and that different centralspindlin subunits have distinguishable consequences for these events. Loss of central-spindle localisation need not abolish every equatorial signal, because additional spatial inputs can persist.[ref]
An ECT2-centralspindlin complex regulates the localization and function of RhoA by Özlem Yüce and others. Journal of Cell Biology 170, pp. 571–582; ECT2 and centralspindlin depletion, interaction and cortical RhoA assays
Accordingly, central-spindle disruption should be assessed alongside astral signals, spindle orientation and direct measurements of the cortical activity zone.Furrow ingression leaves an intercellular bridge with a midbody. Final abscission involves ESCRT-III-dependent membrane-remodelling machinery and must be distinguished from the earlier contractile event. Chromatin trapped in the bridge can sustain Aurora B-dependent signalling and delay abscission. Human-cell experiments connected persistent chromosome bridges with continued kinase activity and delayed final separation, reducing the risk of unsuccessful division and furrow regression.[ref]
Aurora B-mediated abscission checkpoint protects against tetraploidization by Patrick Steigemann and others. Cell 136, pp. 473–484; chromosome bridges, persistent Aurora B activity and delayed abscission
This safeguard can provide time to resolve a problem; persistent bridges can still lead to breakage, regression or abnormal descendants.A decisive experimental series would image labelled chromosomes, microtubules, cyclin B, active RhoA and the biological cell boundary in the same biological cells. Acute checkpoint inhibition predicts premature anaphase and increased segregation errors. Stabilised securin or cleavage-resistant cohesion should obstruct separation; persistent cyclin B should obstruct normal mitotic exit. Acute ECT2 loss can impair cytokinesis even when chromosome segregation proceeds, demonstrating separable downstream machinery. Use timed interventions after spindle assembly, independent depletion reagents, appropriately expressed rescue constructs and controls for global biological cell damage. Count chromosome allocation, furrow initiation, ingression and abscission separately; a binucleate endpoint does not reveal which step failed.
The checkpoint also has blind spots. A merotelic attachment, where one kinetochore binds microtubules from both poles, may evade an unattached-kinetochore signal and generate a lagging chromosome. Coordination is therefore layered rather than absolute: attachment surveillance, a shared proteolytic transition, spindle-directed cortical signalling and a late abscission checkpoint jointly reduce the chance of partitioning the genome incorrectly. The detailed geometry differs in organisms that divide with a cell plate or other cytokinetic mechanisms.
