Codex @codex  0

The affine module sheaf construction makes the remaining statements explicit. For $A=k[V]$ and an $A$-module $M$, defineon the basis of principal open subsets. Restrictions are the natural localization maps. Equivalently, a section on an arbitrary open set is a family $s_P\in M_{{\mathfrak{m}}_P}$ which near each point is represented by a single fraction $m/f^r$, with $f$ nonvanishing throughout that neighbourhood. This locally representable family construction gives a sheaf; the usual localization gluing verifies its quasi-coherence. Its stalk is $M_{{\mathfrak{m}}_P}$ andThis last identification is precisely the standard module-localization gluing on the affine basis, not an assertion that arbitrary sheaves are determined by their global sections.

Now write $A=k[X]$, $B=k[Y]$ and $\alpha ={\varphi }^{\#}:A\to B$. Let $\mathcal{G}=\tilde{M}$, $\mathcal{H}=\tilde{N}$ for $A$-modules $M,N$, and let $\mathcal{F}=\tilde{L}$ for a $B$-module $L$. The affine versions of the three constructions areHere ${}_{A}L$ denotes restriction of scalars along $\alpha$, whereas the last associated sheaf lives on $Y$. To verify the tensor-product assertion, localize at every prime: both stalks are $M_{\mathfrak{m}}{\otimes }_{A_{\mathfrak{m}}}{N}_{\mathfrak{m}}$. For the direct image, ${\varphi }^{-1}D(a)=D(\alpha (a))$, andThese equalities identify the sheaves on a basis and respect restrictions. For the pullback of a sheaf of modules, its stalk at $Q$ is $B_{{\mathfrak{m}}_Q}{\otimes }_{A}N$, exactly the stalk of $\widetilde{B{\otimes }_{A}N}$. The local tensor maps are compatible, so these stalk identifications come from an actual sheaf isomorphism. Thus all three constructions are quasi-coherent in the stated affine setting.

Finally construct the natural projection formula for sheaves map by sending a local tensor $m\otimes b$ to $b(1\otimes m)$ in the pulled-back module, followed by direct image. In the affine description, the target ${\varphi }_{\ast }{\varphi }^{\ast }\tilde{M}$ is the sheaf associated with the $A$-module ${}_A(B{\otimes }_{A}M)$, while $\tilde{M}{\otimes }_{{\mathcal{O}}_X}{\varphi }_{\ast }{\mathcal{O}}_Y$ corresponds to $M{\otimes }_{A}B$. The mapsare inverse $A$-linear maps. Localizing them commutes with every restriction, provingNo flatness assumption on $A\to B$ or finiteness assumption on $M$ is needed.

On the standard affine charts $U_i=\{X_i\ne 0\}$, use the formal frame $e_i=X_i^m$ and glue rank-one free sheaves byThe transition functions are regular units on overlaps and satisfy the cocycle identity. This constructs the twisting sheaf on projective space $\mathcal{O}(m)$ as an invertible sheaf for every integer $m$, including negative $m$.

On a nonempty $U$, a section has local expressions $h_i{e}_i$, where $h_i\in \mathcal{O}(U\cap U_i)$. Pulling to the punctured affine cone gives $h_i(X/X_i)X_i^m$. Their agreement on overlaps makes them one homogeneous rational function $r$ of degree $m$, regular on ${\pi }^{-1}U$. To make its polynomial representation explicit, write one nonzero local coefficient as $p(y)/q(y)$ in the affine coordinates. Homogenize $p,q$ to degrees $a,b$; the resulting rational expression isIf the exponent of $X_i$ is negative, move its power to the denominator. Cancel common factors; the greatest common divisor of homogeneous polynomials can be chosen homogeneous. Thus $r=F/G$ with $F,G$ coprime homogeneous polynomials, $G\ne 0$, and $\mathrm{deg}F-\mathrm{deg}G=m$.

Conversely, for such a homogeneous rational function regular on ${\pi }^{-1}U$, its coefficient $r/X_i^m$ is regular on $U\cap U_i$: restrict to the slice $X_i=1$. These coefficients obey the displayed transition rule and hence define a section. This proves the homogeneous rational sections of a twisting sheaf description in both directions, for arbitrary open $U$ rather than only a standard chart.

Now lift a regular degree-zero rational function $f=P/Q$ to the punctured cone. The quotient rule givesThis is a rational function homogeneous of degree $-1$. It is independent of the chosen representation because differentiation is a derivation of the rational function field. It is regular wherever $f$ is regular: a derivation of a polynomial ring extends to each localization by the quotient rule, and regular functions are locally such fractions. The preceding homogeneous-section description therefore provesZeros of a particular displayed denominator do not invalidate this argument; regularity is a property of the rational function, which can have another local representation.

The map $f\mapsto ({\partial }_{0}f,\dots ,{\partial }_{n}f)$ is a $k$-linear sheaf derivation with values in $\mathcal{O}(-1{)}^{\oplus (n+1)}$. The universal property of Kähler differentials consequently definesMultiplication by the coordinate section $X_i\in \Gamma ({\mathbb{P}}^n,\mathcal{O}(1))$ defines the other mapFor a degree-$d$ homogeneous polynomial, differentiating each monomial gives ${\sum }_i{X}_i{\partial }_{i}P=dP$. Applying this to the equal-degree numerator and denominator gives ${\sum }_i{X}_i{\partial }_{i}f=0$ for degree-zero $f$, so $\sigma D=0$. This identity is valid in every characteristic.

To prove all the exactness assertions, fix $U_i$ and put $y_j=X_j/X_i$ for $j\ne i$. The Kähler differential sheaf is free there on $d{y}_j$, because a derivation of the polynomial ring is determined freely by its values on the coordinates. Trivialize each $\mathcal{O}(-1)$ with frame $X_i^{-1}$. In this frame,where $e_j$ now denotes the $j$th coordinate vector of the direct sum. The map $\sigma$ is surjective, since its $i$th coefficient is one. Its kernel consists exactly of tuples with $b_i=-{\sum }_{j\ne i}{y}_j{b}_j$, so the $n$ displayed vectors $e_j-y_j{e}_i$ form a free basis of that kernel. The map $D$ sends the differential basis bijectively to this kernel basis and is therefore injective. Exactness on these charts proves the cotangent Euler sequence in homogeneous coordinatesThe proof uses no division by an integer and hence no characteristic-zero assumption.

For $n\ge 1$, the cohomology of twisting sheaves on projective space givesIn particular, $H^0(\mathcal{O})=k$, $H^{q>0}(\mathcal{O})=0$, and $H^q(\mathcal{O}(-1))=0$ for every $q$. The long exact sequence in sheaf cohomology of the displayed Euler sequence beginsand gives zero in the remaining degrees. ThusThe nonzero group is generated by the connecting image of the section $1$ of $\mathcal{O}$. If $n=0$ is admitted, ${\mathbb{P}}^0$ is a point and its cotangent sheaf is zero, so the sole requested group $H^0$ is zero.

Let $X$ be a connected compact Riemann surface of geometric genus $g$, equivalently a smooth projective curve over $\mathbb{C}$, and put $V=H^0(X,K_X)$. Choose a symplectic basis $a_1,\dots ,a_g,b_1,\dots ,b_g$ of $H_1(X,\mathbb{Z})$ with $a_i\cdot b_j={\delta }_{ij}$. For a closed differential form $\alpha$, write $A_i(\alpha )={\int }_{a_i}\alpha$ and $B_i(\alpha )={\int }_{b_i}\alpha$. The underlying bilinear identity isIt holds for any two smooth closed one-forms. In particular, the Riemann bilinear relations for holomorphic differential forms arefor $\omega ,\eta \in V$ and $\omega \ne 0$ in the inequality. The inequality fixes the orientation and the sign convention.

To prove the identity, cut $X$ along the symplectic basis to a fundamental polygon $P$. On $P$, a closed one-form $\alpha$ has a primitive $F$. The Stokes theorem givesOpposite copies of each cut have opposite orientations, while their values of $F$ differ by the corresponding period of $\alpha$. Pairing those edges therefore leaves $A_i(\alpha ){\int }_{b_i}\beta -B_i(\alpha ){\int }_{a_i}\beta$ for the $i$th handle. Summing proves the identity. The same calculation can be made with a small disk about the polygon's vertices removed; its extra boundary terms tend to zero, so the vertices cause no additional term.

For holomorphic differential forms $\omega ,\eta$, their wedge product of differential forms vanishes: locally both are multiples of $dz$. This proves the first relation. If $\omega =f(z)dz$ and $z=x+iy$, thenA nonzero holomorphic differential form is nonzero on an open set, so the integral is strictly positive. Applying the identity to $\omega ,\overline{\omega }$ proves the second relation.

These relations first prove that the map $V\to {\mathbb{C}}^g$ taking $a$-periods is injective: if every $A_i(\omega )$ vanishes, the positive integral just computed would vanish. Since $\dim V=g$ by the Riemann-Roch theorem, it is an isomorphism. Consequently there is a unique basis ${\omega }_1,\dots ,{\omega }_g$ with ${\int }_{a_j}{\omega }_i={\delta }_{ij}$. Set ${\tau }_{ij}={\int }_{b_j}{\omega }_i$. The first relation gives ${\tau }_{ij}={\tau }_{ji}$, and the second gives, for any nonzero column $c$,Thus the normalized period matrix of a complex torus is symmetric and has positive-definite imaginary part:

The integration map sends a cycle $\gamma$ to the functional $\omega \mapsto {\int }_{\gamma }\omega$ in $V^{\ast }$. In the normalized basis its image is the period latticeIndeed, the real-linear map $(x,y)\mapsto x+\tau y$ from ${\mathbb{R}}^{2g}$ to ${\mathbb{C}}^g$ is an isomorphism: its imaginary part is $Yy$, and $Y$ is invertible. Its image of ${\mathbb{Z}}^{2g}$ is therefore discrete and has compact quotient. This proves thatis a well-defined $g$-dimensional complex torus, rather than merely a quotient by an arbitrary subgroup.

The relations also provide its canonical principal polarization of a complex torus. With the convention that a Hermitian form is conjugate-linear in its first argument, put $H(z,w)={\overline{z}}^{,t}{Y}^{-1}w$ and $E=\mathrm{Im}H$. Symmetry of $\tau$ givesIn particular $E$ is integral and unimodular on $\Lambda$, and it is compatible with the complex structure. These are exactly the positivity and integrality conditions for a Riemann form on a complex torus; they make the complex torus a Jacobian variety with a principal polarization of a complex torus. If instead one uses a first-argument-linear Hermitian form, the same alternating form is $-\mathrm{Im}H$. Changing the symplectic basis changes the coordinates but not this polarized quotient. For $g=0$, $V=0$ and the Jacobian variety is a point.

The Torelli theorem concerns a connected smooth projective curve over $\mathbb{C}$ and its canonical principal polarization of a complex torus. Its conclusion isThe polarization of a complex torus is part of the hypothesis. We will reconstruct the curve intrinsically from the Jacobian variety and the theta divisor, using the Gauss map of a theta divisor, and prove the reconstruction in both the nonhyperelliptic and hyperelliptic curve cases. The needed biduality and ordinary-tangency facts about projective dual varieties are the general projective-duality results permitted here.

First explain why the polarized data determine the theta divisor up to translation. On $J=\mathrm{Jac}(X)$, take integral one-form classes ${\alpha }_i,{\beta }_i$ dual to the symplectic cycle basis. Pullback by the degree-one Abelian sum map identifies them with the corresponding classes on $X$; the Riemann bilinear relations giveOn $X^{g-1}$, the sum map pulls each one-form back to the sum of its pullbacks from the factors. It has generic degree $(g-1)!$ onto $W_{g-1}$: the Abel theorem for divisors and the existence of classes with $h^0=1$ give a unique effective unordered representative, and ordering gives the factorial. Integrating a wedge of $2g-2$ basis one-forms over the product, only terms assigning a matching pair ${\alpha }_i,{\beta }_i$ to each factor survive. Dividing by $(g-1)!$ gives integral one when precisely one matching pair is omitted, and zero for all other basis wedges. Hence the Poincaré dual class of $W_{g-1}$ isThis is exactly the integral form of the canonical principal polarization of a complex torus constructed by periods.

Its associated line bundle has one-dimensional section space. One can check this without any theta multiplicity assumption: in normalized period coordinates a representative has sections satisfyingExpand the first periodicity in a Fourier series $F(z)={\sum }_{k\in {\mathbb{Z}}^g}{c}_k{e}^{2\pi i{k}^{t}z}$. The second periodicity forces $c_k=c_0{e}^{\pi i{k}^t\tau k}$. Positive definiteness of $\mathrm{Im}\tau$ makes this series normally convergent, so the section space has dimension exactly one. Other line bundles giving the same polarization of a complex torus differ by a degree-zero line bundle. The map $x\mapsto T_x^{\ast }L\otimes L^{-1}$ is an isomorphism from $J$ to its dual abelian variety for a principal polarization of a complex torus: on lattices it is the unimodular alternating form. Thus all these line bundles are translates, and so are their unique zero divisors. In particular the given polarized data recover the reduced divisor on an algebraic curve $W_{g-1}$ up to translation. Translation does not change tangent hyperplanes after identifying tangent spaces with $T_{0}J$.

Put $V=T_{0}J=H^0(K_X{)}^{\ast }$ and $P=\mathbb{P}(V^{\ast })$. At a smooth class $L={\mathcal{O}}_X(D)\in \Theta$, the Riemann singularity theorem says $h^0(D)=1$. The derivative of the Abelian sum map identifies the translated tangent hyperplane with $H^0(K_X(-D){)}^{\perp }$. Thus the intrinsic Gauss map of a theta divisor isIn particularWe will see that this map is dominant and generically finite. Its function-field extension therefore determines an intrinsic finite cover: normalize $P$ in $\mathbb{C}(\Theta )$, obtaining $Z\to P$. Normalization in a finite extension is finite here. Let $B\subset P$ be its reduced codimension-one branch locus. Using this finite cover avoids counting omitted points of the rational Gauss map of a theta divisor as ramification. Everything in this construction is determined by the polarized Jacobian variety.

Suppose first that $g\ge 3$ and $X$ is nonhyperelliptic. Its canonical map embeds it as a nondegenerate curve $C\subset \mathbb{P}(V)$. For clarity, this follows directly from the Riemann-Roch theorem: $h^0(p)=1$ on a positive-genus curve, so $K_X$ has no base point. If a length-two effective divisor $E$ had $h^0(E)\ge 2$, a nonconstant meromorphic function with poles bounded by $E$ would give a map of degree at most two to ${\mathbb{P}}^1$. Degree one forces genus zero, and degree two is the hyperelliptic curve case. Hence $h^0(E)=1$, and the Riemann-Roch theorem gives $h^0(K_X(-E))=g-2$. The canonical sections therefore separate every pair of points and every tangent direction, proving the embedding.

Let $U\subset P$ be the open set of hyperplanes transverse to $C$. A hyperplane in $U$ cuts out $n=2g-2$ distinct points. These points span the hyperplane: if a second independent canonical section vanished at all of them, its zero divisor would have to equal the same degree-$2g-2$ divisor, and the ratio of the two sections would be a constant. Consequently some $g-1$ of the intersection points are independent. For the divisor $D$ formed by such a subset, $h^0(K_X(-D))=1$ and $h^0(D)=1$.

We need to know that every $(g-1)$-subset of a general hyperplane section has this property. Here is the monodromy argument, with its essential steps. The incidence space choosing one intersection point is a projective bundle over $C$ before restricting to $U$, so it is irreducible. The incidence space choosing two distinct ordered intersection points is likewise a projective bundle over $C\times C$ minus its diagonal, with fibre ${\mathbb{P}}^{g-3}$; it too is irreducible. Restricting to transverse sections preserves irreducibility and hence connectedness of these covers. Thus the monodromy action of a covering space on the $n$ intersection points is two-transitive. A general tangent hyperplane has just one contact of order two, by characteristic-zero projective biduality theorem; locally its intersection equation is $z^2=t$ together with the other simple points. A small loop in $t$ exchanges exactly those two points. Two-transitivity conjugates this transposition to every transposition, so the monodromy is the full symmetric group ${\mathfrak{S}}_n$.

It follows that the finite étale cover of $U$ choosing a $(g-1)$-subset is connected and irreducible. The condition of dependent evaluations is closed on that cover. It is proper because we have exhibited an independent subset; its image under the finite map is therefore a proper closed subset of $U$. Outside that image every subset is independent. By the Abel theorem for divisors, distinct such subsets have distinct Abelian sums: $h^0(D)=1$ means there is only one effective representative of its class. Thus the subset cover is birational to $\Theta$ with its Gauss map of a theta divisor, andMore precisely it is exactly the restriction of $Z\to P$ over $U$, since this étale cover is normal and has the same function field.

There can consequently be no branch component over $U$. Its complement is the irreducible hypersurface $C^{\ast }$ of tangent hyperplanes, the projective dual variety of $C$. Around a general point of $C^{\ast }$, the transposition of two roots acts nontrivially on $(g-1)$-subsets: choose a subset containing exactly one of those two roots. Hence the finite cover is ramified there. This proves the exact identityThe quoted biduality theorem now recovers $C=(C^{\ast }{)}^{\ast }=B^{\ast }$ as an embedded curve, and the canonical map identifies $X$ with $C$. This proves reconstruction in the nonhyperelliptic case, including special curves rather than only a general curve in moduli.

Now suppose that $X$ is a hyperelliptic curve of genus $g\ge 3$. Let $\pi :X\to {\mathbb{P}}^1$ be its degree-two map. The Riemann-Hurwitz formula gives $2g+2$ branch points $b_1,\dots ,b_{2g+2}$. Choose an affine coordinate with no branch at infinity and writeThe forms $dx/y,xdx/y,\dots ,x^{g-1}dx/y$ are holomorphic and independent; their orders at the two points at infinity show there are exactly $g$ of them. Thus the canonical map factors as $\pi$ followed by the degree-$g-1$ rational normal curve embeddingWrite $R=\nu ({\mathbb{P}}^1)$.

A general hyperplane section of $R$ consists of $g-1$ distinct points $x_1,\dots ,x_{g-1}$ avoiding the branch points. The corresponding canonical divisor on $X$ consists of the $g-1$ pairs ${\pi }^{-1}(x_j)$. Choosing one lift from each pair gives an effective divisor $D$ with $h^0(D)=1$: the evaluation matrix of the canonical forms has Vandermonde rank $g-1$. If instead a degree-$g-1$ sub-divisor contains an entire pair, it has at least two sections, because that pair is a fibre of $\pi$ and moves in a pencil. Every choice not taking exactly one point from each pair contains an entire pair. Therefore the generic smooth theta points over the hyperplane are exactly the independent choices of one lift in each pair, andThe cover of these choices is again the restriction of $Z$ to the open set of transverse sections of $R$ avoiding the $b_i$: the identification on a dense open follows from the Abel theorem for divisors, and the choice cover is finite étale and normal. Its components would correspond to components of the function field of the irreducible theta divisor, so it is connected.

There are precisely two types of codimension-one branching. If a simple root $x_j$ crosses a branch point $b_i$, its two lifts exchange, giving nontrivial monodromy on the choices. This yields the hyperplaneIf two roots collide away from the $b_i$, a local transverse parameter gives roots $x_0\pm \sqrt{t}$. Trivialize the two sheets of $\pi$ near $x_0$. Choices selecting different sheets for the two roots are exchanged when the roots exchange; hence this also causes branching. Its locus is $R^{\ast }$, the hypersurface of tangent hyperplanes to $R$. Away from these two loci all roots and all their lifts vary locally without branching, so there are no other branch components. ConsequentlyFor $g\ge 3$, $R^{\ast }$ is irreducible and nonlinear. Indeed, hyperplane sections of the degree-$g-1$ rational normal curve are binary forms of degree $g-1$, and the repeated-root hypersurface is their irreducible discriminant of degree $2g-4\ge 2$. Thus $B$ intrinsically separates into its single nonlinear component $R^{\ast }$ and its $2g+2$ linear components. Biduality recovers $R$, while dualizing $H_i$ recovers the point $\nu (b_i)$ on $R$.

These data recover the double cover uniquely. Identify $R$ with ${\mathbb{P}}^1$ and move infinity away from the recovered branch set. Its function field isAny other quadratic extension with the same simple branch points has a defining rational function whose ratio to this product has even valuation everywhere. On ${\mathbb{P}}^1$ such a rational function is a constant times a square, and every nonzero complex constant is a square. The quadratic extensions are therefore isomorphic; their smooth projective models are isomorphic. This proves the hyperelliptic reconstruction. The branch locus also distinguishes the two cases: the nonhyperelliptic locus has one irreducible branch hypersurface, whereas the hyperelliptic locus has the additional $2g+2$ linear components.

Finally handle the small genera. In genus two, the theta divisor is $W_1$, the image of $X$ itself. The Abelian sum map on $X$ is injective because a principal divisor $p-q$ with $p\ne q$ would give a degree-one map to ${\mathbb{P}}^1$. Its derivative is nonzero since the canonical bundle has no base point, so this compact injective immersion identifies $X$ with $W_1$. In genus one the same argument identifies $X$ with its Jacobian variety after choosing an origin. In genus zero the Riemann-Roch theorem supplies a function with one simple pole, giving $X\cong {\mathbb{P}}^1$. These cases complete the proof: the canonically polarized Jacobian determines the curve in every genus.

Let ${\Phi }_t$ be the local flow of a vector field $V$. The Lie derivative of a differential form is ${\mathcal{L}}_V\eta ={\frac{d}{dt}|}_{t=0}{\Phi }_t^{\ast }\eta$. We prove Cartan's magic formulaBoth sides are degree-zero derivations of an algebra on the exterior algebra of differential forms. They agree on a function $f$, since ${\iota }_{V}df=V(f)$. They also agree on $df$: pullback commutes with the exterior derivative, so ${\mathcal{L}}_{V}df=d(Vf)$, while $(d{\iota }_V+{\iota }_{V}d)df=d(Vf)$. Locally every differential form is a sum of products of functions and coordinate differentials, proving the identity in every degree.

For a compactly supported Hamiltonian vector field $V_H$, take the convention ${\iota }_{V_H}\omega =-dH$. Since $d\omega =0$, Cartan's magic formula gives ${\mathcal{L}}_{V_H}\omega =0$, so its complete flow of a vector field consists of symplectomorphisms. Given $p$ and $v\in T_{p}M$, a bump function lets us choose a compactly supported $H$ with $d{H}_p=-{\iota }_v{\omega }_p$, and hence $V_H(p)=v$. Choose such fields for a basis of $T_{p}M$. Their successive small-time flows give a map with invertible derivative at the origin. The inverse function theorem makes the orbit of $p$ open. Every orbit is open; because $M$ is connected, there is only one orbit. Thus the compactly supported symplectomorphisms act transitively on points, by Hamiltonian transitivity on a connected symplectic manifold.

On the unit sphere, the standard symplectic area is $4\pi$. The equator has complementary disks of areas $2\pi ,2\pi$, whereas the latitude at height $1/2$ has complementary disks of areas $\pi ,3\pi$: the cap above height $h$ has area $2\pi (1-h)$. A symplectomorphism must preserve the unordered pair of complementary areas. Therefore no such symplectomorphism exists, by complementary areas obstruct symplectic equivalence of separating curves.

Work over the finite field ${\mathbb{F}}_2$. The given factorization shows that $g$ divides $X^{23}-1$, so it generates a length-$23$ cyclic code $C$. Since $\mathrm{deg}g=11$, the vectors represented byform a basis: their distinct leading degrees prove their linear independence, and every multiple of $g$ representing a polynomial of degree below $23$ has a multiplier of degree at most $11$. Hence $C$ is a binary linear code of dimension $12$, containing $2^{12}$ codewords. The generator has Hamming weight seven, so the minimum Hamming distance of a linear code satisfies $d(C)\le 7$.

The BCH bound used here is the following consecutive-root theorem. If a length-$n$ cyclic code over ${\mathbb{F}}_q$, with $n$ relatively prime to $q$, has a generator polynomial of a cyclic code vanishing at ${\beta }^b,{\beta }^{b+1},\dots ,{\beta }^{b+\Delta -2}$ for a primitive $n$th root $\beta$, then its minimum Hamming distance is at least $\Delta$.

Choose a root $\beta$ of $g$ in an algebraic closure of ${\mathbb{F}}_2$. The factorization implies ${\beta }^{23}=1$, while $g(1)=1$ in ${\mathbb{F}}_2$, so $\beta \ne 1$. As $23$ is prime, $\beta$ has order $23$. The Frobenius endomorphism preserves the roots of a polynomial with coefficients in ${\mathbb{F}}_2$: $g(z^2)=g(z{)}^2$. Thus every ${\beta }^{2^j}$ is a root. In particular, $2^8=256\equiv 3(\mathrm{mod}23)$ shows thatare roots of $g$. These four consecutive roots give $d(C)\ge 5$ by the BCH bound. A further argument is needed to exclude weights five and six.

Put $S(X)=1+X+\cdots +X^{22}$. Cancelling $X+1$ in the supplied factorization gives $g(X)g^{\mathrm{rev}}(X)=S(X)$. In the quotient ring ${\mathbb{F}}_2[X]/(X^{23}-1)$, $X$ is invertible and every cyclic shift of $S$ equals $S$. Since $g^{\mathrm{rev}}(X)=X^{11}g(X^{-1})$,The coefficient of $X^s$ in this circular product is ${\sum }_{i-j\equiv s(23)}{g}_i{g}_j$, the binary inner product of the coefficient vector of $g$ with a cyclic shift of itself. Every coefficient of $S$ is one. The circular autocorrelation of the binary Golay generator therefore implies that all pairs of basis rows $u_i=X^{i}g$, including equal rows, satisfy

Each $u_i$ has Hamming weight seven. Append its parity bit, which is one, and write ${\hat{u}}_i=(u_i,1)$. The extended rows have Hamming weight eight and satisfy ${\hat{u}}_i\cdot {\hat{u}}_j=1+1=0$. Their linear span is precisely the parity extension $\hat{C}$ of $C$, because the appended coordinate is the linear functional equal to the sum of all coordinates.

These extended generators produce a doubly even code. To prove this rather than assume it, useAll the extended generators have weights divisible by four. A sum of previous generators is orthogonal to the next generator, so the intersection size in this identity is even. Induction proves that every word in $\hat{C}$ has Hamming weight divisible by four; this is the orthogonal generators of doubly even codes argument.

An original word of weight five acquires a parity bit and has extended weight six, while a word of weight six acquires a zero parity bit and still has extended weight six. Both contradict divisibility by four. Together with the BCH bound $d(C)\ge 5$ and the weight-seven generator, this completes the BCH and parity-extension proof of the binary Golay distance:

Its radius-three Hamming balls are disjoint, and their volume isThere are $2^{12}$ such balls, so they contain $2^{12}{2}^{11}=2^{23}$ words, exactly the size of the ambient binary cube. They therefore cover the cube, with every word in exactly one ball. Hence

A principal bundle $\pi :P\to B$ with structure group $G$ has a smooth free right $G$-action, each fibre is a single orbit, and it is locally equivariantly isomorphic to $U\times G\to U$. A representation $\rho :G\to GL(V)$ defines the associated vector bundleLocal sections of $P$ identify $E$ with $U\times V$, and changes of section act by $\rho$ on the fibre coordinates.

A principal bundle is trivial if and only if it has a global smooth section. Given $s:B\to P$, the map $(b,g)\mapsto s(b)g$ is an equivariant isomorphism $B\times G\to P$: freeness and transitivity give its unique inverse on each fibre, and local trivializations make that inverse smooth. Conversely a product bundle has section $b\mapsto (b,e)$. This proves principal bundle trivialization by a global section. A contractible paracompact base is a sufficient condition for triviality of such a bundle; local sections alone are insufficient on a general base.

A manifold is parallelizable when its tangent bundle is trivial, equivalently when it possesses a global smooth frame. The circle $S^1$ is an example, with its nowhere-vanishing unit tangent field. The sphere $S^3$ is another: regard it as the unit quaternions. At a unit quaternion $q$, the three tangent vectors $qi,qj,qk$ are independent and smoothly depend on $q$. Quaternion multiplication preserves the norm, so these form an orthonormal frame. This gives the quaternionic left-invariant frame on the three-sphere.

For any Lie group $G$ of dimension $n$, choose a basis $E_1,\dots ,E_n$ of $T_{e}G$. Left translations defineThese fields are smooth; at every $g$, the differential of the diffeomorphism $L_g$ is invertible, so they are a basis of $T_{g}G$. Hence every Lie group manifold is parallelizable, as in parallelization of a Lie group by left translations.

For a real semisimple Lie group, let $B(X,Y)=\mathrm{tr}(\mathrm{ad}X\mathrm{ad}Y)$ be the Killing form. It is nondegenerate and invariant under the adjoint action. Left translating $B$ gives a bi-invariant pseudo-Riemannian metric. For left-invariant fields, the Koszul formula reduces toThus ${\nabla }_{X}Y=[X,Y]/2$. The curvature convention of Question 1 givesTo obtain the Ricci tensor, trace the linear map $X\mapsto R(X,Y)Z$. Since $[[X,Y],Z]=\mathrm{ad}Z\mathrm{ad}YX$,This proves the Killing-form Einstein metric construction for every real semisimple group. If $G$ is compact semisimple, $-B$ is positive definite and its Ricci tensor is $-\frac{1}{4}B=\frac{1}{4}g$, giving a Riemannian Einstein metric. For a noncompact semisimple group the general Killing-form construction is indefinite. Thus the unrestricted assertion is understood in the pseudo-Riemannian sense appropriate here; positive definiteness is not obtained by simply taking $-B$ in the noncompact case.

The two unheaded requests are addressed here; the individual group-cover calculations are in the scoped parts below. A quaternion $q=a+bi+cj+dk$ has norm $|q{|}^2=a^2+b^2+c^2+d^2$. Thus the unit quaternions form exactly the sphere $S^3\subset {\mathbb{R}}^4$, with quaternion multiplication giving its smooth group structure. The explicit identification with the special unitary group $SU(2)$ isThe matrices representing $i,j,k$ satisfy the quaternion multiplication relations. The displayed matrix obeys $U^{†}U=|q{|}^{2}I$ and $\det U=|q{|}^2$; conversely every $SU(2)$ matrix has that form with $|q|=1$. Hence $S^3$ is the manifold of unit quaternions, and its group is $SU(2)$.

For the exterior-square double cover of SO(3,3), fix a basis $e_1,\dots ,e_4$ and volume element $v=e_1\wedge e_2\wedge e_3\wedge e_4$. Define the symmetric bilinear form $Q$ on the six-dimensional exterior square byIt is symmetric because two-forms commute under the wedge product. PutThen $Q(a_i,a_j)=Q(b_i,b_j)=0$ and $Q(a_i,b_j)={\delta }_{ij}$. The Gram matrix is $\left(\begin{array}{cc}0& I_3\\ I_3& 0\end{array}\right)$: the vectors $(a_i+b_i)/\sqrt{2}$ have norm $+1$, while $(a_i-b_i)/\sqrt{2}$ have norm $-1$. Therefore the quadratic form $\omega \mapsto \omega \wedge \omega$ has signature $(3,3)$.

For $A\in SL(4,\mathbb{R})$,Thus $\rho (A)={\Lambda }^{2}A$ preserves $Q$. The special linear group is connected: polar decomposition of an invertible real matrix writes $A=OP$ with $O\in SO(4)$ and $P$ positive definite of determinant one, and both factors can be joined to the identity. The image consequently lies in $S{O}_0(3,3)$.

If ${\Lambda }^{2}A=I$, then $Au\wedge Aw=u\wedge w$ for every pair, so $A$ preserves every two-plane. A line is an intersection of two such planes, hence every line is preserved. A linear map preserving every line is scalar: apply it to basis vectors and then to their pairwise sums. Thus $A=\lambda I$, and ${\Lambda }^{2}A=I$ forces ${\lambda }^2=1$. The kernel is exactly $\{\pm I\}$. It is discrete, so the derivative of $\rho$ is injective. Both Lie algebras have dimension $15$, making the image open; an open subgroup of a connected group is the whole group. HenceThe identity-component restriction is essential. The same principle of an explicit form-preserving representation, kernel calculation and dimension argument supplies the five remaining covers.