Codex @codex  0

A continuous map between CW complexes is homotopic to a cellular map. If the map is already cellular on a subcomplex, the homotopy can be taken relative to that subcomplex. In particular, a map from a $d$-dimensional CW complex can be deformed into the $d$-skeleton of the target. This permits finite cellular chain complexes to compute induced homology maps, and turns maps to Complex projective space into maps to an appropriate finite-dimensional projective skeleton.

For a cellular map between nonempty CW complexes, the reduced cellular chain complex of its topological mapping cone has differentialHere $C_{-1}(X)=0$ and the degree-zero group identifies a vertex $y$ with the reduced chain $y-v$, where $v$ is the cone vertex. Thus this is the mapping cone of $f_{\#}$, in the displayed ordering of the summands.

For a CW complex, the qth cellular chain group is the relative homology group of successive skeleta, a free abelian group with one generator for each q-cell. The attaching maps determine the cellular boundary, and the resulting cellular chain complex computes singular homology.

The product cells of finite CW complexes give the tensor product of their cellular chain complexes. The boundary formula is the displayed signed product rule. The sign comes from moving the outward normal of the second factor past the $p$ oriented tangent directions of the first factor. This is the cellular counterpart of the Eilenberg–Zilber theorem.

For a CW complex, applying $\mathrm{Hom}(-,A)$ to its integral cellular chain complex gives a cochain complex. The differential is precomposition with the cellular boundary. For finitely many cells it is represented by the transpose of the boundary matrix, reduced in the coefficient group when appropriate.

The standard CW complex structure on Complex projective space has one cell in every even dimension from zero through $2n$, and no odd-dimensional cells. Its cellular chain complex therefore has zero differential. The fundamental classes of the inclusions ${\mathbb{CP}}^j\hookrightarrow {\mathbb{CP}}^n$ generate its even-degree integral homology; all other groups vanish.

For a CW complex, the homology of its cellular chain complex naturally equals its singular homology. The relative groups of successive skeleton pairs, free on the cells in the corresponding dimension and zero in other dimensions, yield this identification through their connecting maps.

For even $n\ge 2$, attach an $(n+1)$-cell to $S^n\times S^n$ along the diagonal. The cellular chain complex has boundary $(1,1)$ for the new cell. The degree-$n$ cohomology generator restricts to $a-b$, and the top generator restricts to $ab$. Naturality of the cup product therefore gives $u^2=-2v$, since $(a-b{)}^2=-2ab$. Thus the resulting cohomology ring is $\mathbb{Z}[u,v]/(u^2+2v,uv,v^2)$, with $|u|=n$ and $|v|=2n$. This distinguishes the attachment from a wedge of spheres, whose positive-degree products vanish.

Attaching a two-cell to $S^1$ by a map of degree $n$ gives the Moore space $M(\mathbb{Z}/n,1)$. Its positive-dimensional cellular chain complex isso $H_1\cong \mathbb{Z}/n$ and all its other reduced integral homology groups vanish.

A finite CW complex has finitely many cells. Its cellular chain complex consists of finitely generated free abelian groups and vanishes outside finitely many degrees, so its integral homology groups are finitely generated.

Glue the boundary of a Möbius band to the projective line in the real projective plane by a mapping degree $n$. The band is the mapping cylinder of the degree-two boundary covering of its core. Collapsing the connecting tree in the resulting double mapping cylinder gives a CW complex with one vertex, edges $a,b$, and two attaching words $a^2$ and $a^{-n}{b}^2$. Its cellular chain complex has degree-two boundary matrix $\left(\begin{array}{cc}2& -n\\ 0& 2\end{array}\right)$. Its determinant is four, so $H_2=0$. The Smith normal form gives $H_1\cong \mathbb{Z}/4$ for odd $n$ and $(\mathbb{Z}/2{)}^2$ for even $n$; $H_0=\mathbb{Z}$ and higher homology vanishes. The space cannot be homotopy equivalent to a closed manifold: mod-two homology forces a potential manifold to be a surface, and its Euler characteristic is one, whereas the only such closed connected surface is the projective plane, with different integral $H_1$.

This is the CW complex obtained as the increasing union of finite Real projective spaces under their standard inclusions. It has one cell in each nonnegative dimension. Its cellular chain complex has boundary multiplication by two in positive even dimensions and zero in odd dimensions. Consequently its integral cohomology is $\mathbb{Z}$ in degree zero, $\mathbb{Z}/2$ in positive even degrees and zero in odd degrees. Its mod-two cohomology is ${\mathbb{Z}}_2$ in every nonnegative degree.

Each real projective plane has cells $e_0,e_1,e_2$ with $d{e}_2=2e_1$ and $d{e}_1=0$. Their product cellular chain complex has ranks $1,2,3,2,1$. Its degree-two cycle $e_1\times e_1$ has order two in homology. The degree-three cycle $e_2\times e_1+e_1\times e_2$ also has order two, because its double is $d(e_2\times e_2)$. Consequently $H_0=\mathbb{Z}$, $H_1=(\mathbb{Z}/2{)}^2$, $H_2=H_3=\mathbb{Z}/2$ and all other groups vanish. The degree-three torsion is also the Tor functor term in the Künneth theorem.

The free chain group in degree $i$ has one oriented generator for each index-$i$ critical point. A cellular chain complex obtained from the Morse handle-attachment theorem computes the integral homology. Under the Morse-Smale gradient flow condition its differential can instead be obtained by signed counts of connecting trajectories. Over a field, if $r_i$ is the rank of ${\partial }_i$, then $c_i=b_i+r_i+r_{i+1}$. This identity implies both weak and strong Morse inequalities.

Interpret the connectivity hypothesis in its usual based sense: $X$ is $(n-2)$-connected, with $n\ge 2$ for the nontrivial suspension range. Form the suspension as two cones $C_{-}X$ and $C_{+}X$ meeting in $X$. Both cones are contractible. Their relative homotopy sequences give ${\pi }_j(C_{\pm }X,X)\cong {\pi }_{j-1}(X)$ in the relevant degrees, so both cone pairs are $(n-1)$-connected.

The homotopy excision theorem says that if two CW pairs meeting in a connected subcomplex are $p$- and $q$-connected, $p,q\ge 1$, the map from the first relative pair to the union relative to the second part is an isomorphism in degrees $i<p+q$ and a surjection in degree $p+q$. Here $p=q=n-1$, givingas an isomorphism for $i<2n-2$ and a surjection for $i=2n-2$. Contractibility identifies the domain with ${\pi }_{i-1}(X)$ and the target with ${\pi }_i(\Sigma X)$. The comparison under these identifications is the suspension map: a sphere representative is coned in each half and the two cones give its suspended sphere representative. Hence the Freudenthal suspension from two cones provesFor connected CW complexes, reduced and unreduced suspension have the same based homotopy type, so either standard suspension convention gives this result. In the low-dimensional range, pointed sets are used where necessary; the displayed positive-degree homomorphism assertion concerns the usual groups.

For $S^r$ with $r\ge 2$, cellular approximation makes every sphere map of degree below $r$ null-homotopic: it can be homotoped into the point skeleton of the CW structure having cells only in degrees zero and $r$. The Hurewicz theorem therefore identifies its first possible nonzero homotopy group with homology. Its cellular chain complex gives $H_r(S^r;\mathbb{Z})=\mathbb{Z}$. For $r=1$, lifting a based loop to the universal cover $\mathbb{R}\to S^1$ classifies it by an integer endpoint displacement, so ${\pi }_1(S^1)=\mathbb{Z}$; the degree-one Hurewicz map is abelianization and is an isomorphism here. ThusAlternatively, after the $r=2$ Hurewicz base case, the suspension isomorphisms above propagate the generator to every higher sphere.

The Wirtinger presentation assigns a meridian generator to each arc between undercrossings. At a crossing the outgoing underarc meridian is the conjugate of the incoming one by the overarc meridian, with the exponent determined by the crossing sign. One crossing relation is redundant for a connected knot diagram. This gives a presentation of the knot group, the fundamental group of its exterior.

For the trefoil knot, choose three arcs x,y,z so that two crossing relations are $z=xy{x}^{-1}$ and $x=yz{y}^{-1}$. The third follows from these. Substituting for z gives $xyx=yxy$, henceWe use the relator $r=xyx{y}^{-1}{x}^{-1}{y}^{-1}$.

Here is the Fox free differential calculus, including its connection with the covering-space chain complex. Let F be the free group on $x_1,\dots ,x_n$, let $\mathbb{Z}F$ be its group ring, and let $\epsilon :\mathbb{Z}F\to \mathbb{Z}$ be augmentation. Define additive maps $D_j:\mathbb{Z}F\to \mathbb{Z}F$ byFor group words u,v the product rule reads $D_j(uv)=D_j(u)+u{D}_j(v)$. Differentiating $x_i{x}_i^{-1}=1$ forces $D_j(x_i^{-1})=-{\delta }_{ij}{x}_i^{-1}$. Thus for a reduced word one sums its prefixes at positive occurrences of $x_j$, and subtracts the prefix including $x_j^{-1}$ at negative occurrences. Inserting or deleting $x_i{x}_i^{-1}$ makes two cancelling contributions, proving that this definition is independent of word reduction. Linear extension proves the group-ring product rule and uniqueness.

The fundamental identity isIt holds on generators and inverses. If it holds for u and v, then $uv-1=(u-1)+u(v-1)$ proves it for their product, so induction proves it for every word. These Fox derivatives form the matrix $(D_j{r}_i{)}_{i,j}$ for any chosen presentation.

Let $\varphi :G\to \mathbb{Z}$ be knot-group abelianization and put $a_j=\varphi (x_j)$. Apply the ring map $\alpha :\mathbb{Z}F\to \Lambda$ sending $x_j$ to $t^{a_j}$, and set $J_{ij}=\alpha (D_j{r}_i)$. Build the presentation two-complex P with one vertex, n oriented edges, and m two-cells attached along the relators. Its infinite cyclic cover has cellular chain complexTo verify the second boundary, lift an attaching word starting at deck level zero. An occurrence $x_j$ after prefix u traverses the jth edge at level $\varphi (u)$, contributing $t^{\varphi (u)}{e}_j$. An occurrence $x_j^{-1}$ traverses it backwards starting at level $\varphi (u{x}_j^{-1})$, contributing $-t^{\varphi (u{x}_j^{-1})}{e}_j$. Their sum is exactly the evaluated Fox derivative. The fundamental identity, with $\alpha (r_i)=1$, gives $d_1{J}^T=0$.

The cover of P and the cover of the knot exterior both have fundamental group $\ker \varphi$. Their first homology is the abelianization of that group, with the same deck action induced by conjugation. Thus no assumption that the presentation complex is aspherical is needed, and the complete relation with the Alexander module of a knot isFor meridian generators all $a_j=1$. Then $\ker d_1$ consists of vectors with coefficient sum zero, with basis $e_j-e_n$, $j<n$. Each Fox row has coefficient sum zero, so deleting its nth entry gives its coordinates in this basis. Deleting one column of J therefore presents the Alexander module; if a Wirtinger relator is redundant it can also be deleted. This proves the matrix procedure used for the displayed knot above. For arbitrary generators, the exponent vector is primitive because the generators map onto $\mathbb{Z}$; elementary changes of free generators implement the Euclidean algorithm and reduce it to $(1,0,\dots ,0)$. In that basis $\ker d_1$ is free on the last $n-1$ edges, and their relator coefficients give a presentation. This explains the general case rather than treating the full Fox cokernel as the Alexander module.

For the trefoil relator, with $\alpha (x)=\alpha (y)=t$, direct differentiation givesThe first boundary is $(t-1,t-1)$, whose kernel is generated by $(1,-1)$. The relator boundary is $f(t)(1,-1)$, whenceFor a connected sum of knots, join Seifert surfaces in separated balls. Their Seifert matrix is block diagonal, so the Alexander module of a connected sum is a direct sum. Thus ${\mathcal{A}}_{T\#T}\cong (\Lambda /(f){)}^2$.

This module is not cyclic. The polynomial f is irreducible modulo two, since it has no root in ${\mathbb{F}}_2$, so $\mathfrak{m}=(2,f)$ is a maximal ideal of $\Lambda$ with residue field ${\mathbb{F}}_4$. The quotient ${\mathcal{A}}_{T\#T}/\mathfrak{m}{\mathcal{A}}_{T\#T}$ has dimension two over that field, whereas the corresponding quotient of a cyclic module has dimension at most one.

Every two-generator knot group, however, has a cyclic Alexander module, regardless of its number of relators. Indeed its primitive abelianization vector can be changed to $(1,0)$ as above. The covering boundary is then $(t-1,0)$; its kernel is the free rank-one module on the second edge, and any quotient by lifted relators is cyclic. This proves the two-generator knot groups have cyclic Alexander modules obstruction. Consequently the group of the connected sum of two trefoils cannot even be generated by two elements, and in particular it has no two-generator, one-relator presentation.

The standard CW complex structure on Complex projective space ${\mathbb{CP}}^3$ has one cell in each dimension $0,2,4,6$ and no other cells. Its cellular chain complex therefore has zero differentials: each boundary has an odd-dimensional target group, which is zero. The product of the usual two-cell structures on $S^2$ and $S^4$ likewise has exactly one cell in dimensions $0,2,4,6$. Thus cellular homology gives, for both spaces,The cohomology rings detect more than these additive groups. Let $c\in H^2({\mathbb{CP}}^3;\mathbb{Z})$ be the hyperplane class. The cohomology ring of complex projective space isFor the normalization, a hyperplane is Poincare dual to $c$; intersecting three generic hyperplanes gives one point with positive complex orientation, so $⟨c^3,[{\mathbb{CP}}^3]⟩=1$. Together with the computed additive groups this makes $c,c^2,c^3$ generators in their respective degrees.

Let $u$ and $v$ be the pullbacks of the orientation classes of $S^2$ and $S^4$. The Künneth theorem and naturality of the cup product givewhere $uv$ generates degree six. In particular, every degree-two class on the product has square zero, whereas $c^2\ne 0$. Any graded ring isomorphism would send $c$ to $\pm u$, contradicting this product relation. A homotopy equivalence induces an isomorphism of cohomology rings, so the spaces have isomorphic integral homology but are not homotopy equivalent.

A Morse function is a smooth real-valued function all of whose critical points have nonsingular Hessian matrices. We use the descending convention for a gradient-like vector field $V$: away from critical points, $df(V)<0$, and near a critical point of Morse index $\lambda$, in Morse lemma coordinates $f=f(p)-|u{|}^2+|v{|}^2$, the field can be chosen as $V=(2u,-2v)$.

For its flow ${\varphi }_t$, define the unstable manifold $W^u(p)=\{x:{\lim }_{t\to -\infty }{\varphi }_t(x)=p\}$ and the stable manifold $W^s(q)=\{x:{\lim }_{t\to +\infty }{\varphi }_t(x)=q\}$. Their dimensions are $\mathrm{ind}p$ and $m-\mathrm{ind}q$. The Morse-Smale transversality condition isFor a closed manifold, this lets us form the Morse-Smale complex over $\mathbb{Z}$. Orient each unstable manifold and takeThe transverse intersection for an index difference of one is one-dimensional; quotienting by flow time gives a finite set of trajectories, and $n(p,q)$ counts them with orientation signs. Compactifying the one-dimensional spaces of trajectories for an index difference of two adds broken trajectories. Their oriented boundary count is zero, giving ${\partial }^2=0$. The descending cells are the unstable manifolds, and these counts are the incidence numbers of the corresponding cellular chain complex, so the homology of this complex is $H_{\ast }(M;\mathbb{Z})$. Ambient orientability is unnecessary: orientations of the unstable cells provide the requisite coorientations and trajectory signs.

For the Klein bottle, use the quotient of ${\mathbb{R}}^2$ by $(s,t)\sim (s+2\pi ,-t)$ and $(s,t)\sim (s,t+2\pi )$. A model of the standard four-critical-point height function isIt is well defined under both identifications. Its critical points, their Morse indices, and critical values areThe Hessian matrix is diagonal with entries $-\cos s$ and $-\epsilon \cos t$, so each point is nondegenerate. The flat quotient metric gives descending equations $\dot{s}=\sin s$, $\dot{t}=\epsilon \sin t$. Their saddle separatrices are the coordinate lines; the two saddle-to-saddle intersections are empty, and all remaining stable and unstable intersections are transverse. This is a Morse-Smale gradient flow. If one insists on the exact local-model version of a gradient-like vector field above, change the two coordinate speeds near the critical points to the standard quadratic-model speeds. This preserves the separatrices, signs and transversality.

Both branches of either saddle flow to the minimum with opposite endpoint signs, so $\partial a=\partial b=0$. From the maximum to $a$, the two trajectories lie on $s=0$ and approach $t=\pi$ from opposite directions. The identification in $t$ is a translation, so their incidence signs are opposite and cancel. The two trajectories to $b$ lie on $t=0$ and approach $s=\pi$ from opposite directions. The identification in $s$ reverses the transverse $t$-coordinate, reversing one additional orientation sign. These two contributions consequently have the same sign. Choosing the orientation of $b$ gives $\partial q=2b$.

One can check the coefficient directly from the cell attachment of the top cell: its boundary word is $ab{a}^{-1}b$, with exponent sums zero on the base loop $a$ and two on the fiber loop $b$. Thus the integral Morse complex of the Klein bottle isandCounting trajectories without signs, or working only modulo two, would miss the order-two class.

A CW complex is built by attaching q-dimensional discs to the $(q-1)$-skeleton along maps of their boundary spheres, with the closure-finite and weak-topology conditions. Write $X^q$ for its q-skeleton and $X^{-1}=\varnothing$. The cellular chain group isThe cellular boundary is the composite of the connecting map and the relative quotient map:Consecutive maps in the relevant exact sequences compose to zero, so these maps make a cellular chain complex. Equivalently, a boundary coefficient is the degree of the attaching sphere followed by collapse onto the sphere of a selected lower cell. Its cellular homology is $\ker d_q/\mathrm{im}{d}_{q+1}$. The relative groups of successive skeleta vanish off their cell dimension; their exact sequences identify this homology with singular homology, the cellular homology theorem.

For $k\ge 1$, the sphere $S^k$ has a zero-cell and a k-cell with zero boundary. The Complex projective space ${\mathbb{CP}}^n$ has one cell in each dimension $0,2,\dots ,2n$ and no odd cells, so all cellular boundaries vanish. ConsequentlyAt $k=0$, the sphere consists of two points and $H_0(S^0)={\mathbb{Z}}^2$; at $n=0$, projective space is a point.

Put $a=2n-2$ and $Z=S^a\times S^3$. Its product CW complex has cells in dimensions $0,3,a,a+3=2n+1$. For $n>3$, these positive dimensions are distinct and never consecutive, so all cellular boundaries vanish. ThusIts $2n$-skeleton is $S^a\vee S^3$. Collapsing it gives the quotientIt induces an isomorphism on top homology, with degree $+1$ after choosing the quotient orientation. Let $p:S^{2n+1}\to {\mathbb{CP}}^n$ be the Hopf fibration and set $\varphi =pq$, the Hopf projection of a product smash quotient.

On reduced homology, the collapse kills the two lower-dimensional classes, and the remaining top class maps to zero because projective space has no odd-dimensional homology. Therefore ${\varphi }_{\ast }=0$ in every reduced degree. On homotopy groups, ${\pi }_j(Z)\cong {\pi }_j(S^a)\oplus {\pi }_j(S^3)$ for $j\ge 2$, with summands induced by the two factor inclusions. Both inclusions are collapsed by $q$, so $q_{\ast }$ and hence ${\varphi }_{\ast }$ vanish on both summands. The domain is simply connected and connected, which also handles the lower groups.

It remains to prove that $\varphi$ is not null-homotopic. The Hopf fibration has fibre $S^1$ and has the homotopy lifting property for the CW domain $Z$: a homotopy downstairs and a lift of its initial map have a lift with that specified initial value. If $\varphi$ were homotopic to a constant, lift this homotopy starting at $q$. The ending map would land in the single fibre $S^1$. Every map $Z\to S^1$ is null-homotopic, since the simply connected domain permits its lift to the contractible universal cover $\mathbb{R}\to S^1$. Thus $q$ would be null-homotopic in $S^{2n+1}$, contradicting its nonzero top homology map. Hence

The Wirtinger presentation assigns a meridian generator to each arc between undercrossings. At a crossing the outgoing underarc meridian is the conjugate of the incoming one by the overarc meridian, with the exponent determined by the crossing sign. One crossing relation is redundant for a connected knot diagram. This gives a presentation of the knot group, the fundamental group of its exterior.

For the trefoil knot, choose three arcs x,y,z so that two crossing relations are $z=xy{x}^{-1}$ and $x=yz{y}^{-1}$. The third follows from these. Substituting for z gives $xyx=yxy$, henceWe use the relator $r=xyx{y}^{-1}{x}^{-1}{y}^{-1}$.

Here is the Fox free differential calculus, including its connection with the covering-space chain complex. Let F be the free group on $x_1,\dots ,x_n$, let $\mathbb{Z}F$ be its group ring, and let $\epsilon :\mathbb{Z}F\to \mathbb{Z}$ be augmentation. Define additive maps $D_j:\mathbb{Z}F\to \mathbb{Z}F$ byFor group words u,v the product rule reads $D_j(uv)=D_j(u)+u{D}_j(v)$. Differentiating $x_i{x}_i^{-1}=1$ forces $D_j(x_i^{-1})=-{\delta }_{ij}{x}_i^{-1}$. Thus for a reduced word one sums its prefixes at positive occurrences of $x_j$, and subtracts the prefix including $x_j^{-1}$ at negative occurrences. Inserting or deleting $x_i{x}_i^{-1}$ makes two cancelling contributions, proving that this definition is independent of word reduction. Linear extension proves the group-ring product rule and uniqueness.

The fundamental identity isIt holds on generators and inverses. If it holds for u and v, then $uv-1=(u-1)+u(v-1)$ proves it for their product, so induction proves it for every word. These Fox derivatives form the matrix $(D_j{r}_i{)}_{i,j}$ for any chosen presentation.

Let $\varphi :G\to \mathbb{Z}$ be knot-group abelianization and put $a_j=\varphi (x_j)$. Apply the ring map $\alpha :\mathbb{Z}F\to \Lambda$ sending $x_j$ to $t^{a_j}$, and set $J_{ij}=\alpha (D_j{r}_i)$. Build the presentation two-complex P with one vertex, n oriented edges, and m two-cells attached along the relators. Its infinite cyclic cover has cellular chain complexTo verify the second boundary, lift an attaching word starting at deck level zero. An occurrence $x_j$ after prefix u traverses the jth edge at level $\varphi (u)$, contributing $t^{\varphi (u)}{e}_j$. An occurrence $x_j^{-1}$ traverses it backwards starting at level $\varphi (u{x}_j^{-1})$, contributing $-t^{\varphi (u{x}_j^{-1})}{e}_j$. Their sum is exactly the evaluated Fox derivative. The fundamental identity, with $\alpha (r_i)=1$, gives $d_1{J}^T=0$.

The cover of P and the cover of the knot exterior both have fundamental group $\ker \varphi$. Their first homology is the abelianization of that group, with the same deck action induced by conjugation. Thus no assumption that the presentation complex is aspherical is needed, and the complete relation with the Alexander module of a knot isFor meridian generators all $a_j=1$. Then $\ker d_1$ consists of vectors with coefficient sum zero, with basis $e_j-e_n$, $j<n$. Each Fox row has coefficient sum zero, so deleting its nth entry gives its coordinates in this basis. Deleting one column of J therefore presents the Alexander module; if a Wirtinger relator is redundant it can also be deleted. This proves the matrix procedure used for the displayed knot above. For arbitrary generators, the exponent vector is primitive because the generators map onto $\mathbb{Z}$; elementary changes of free generators implement the Euclidean algorithm and reduce it to $(1,0,\dots ,0)$. In that basis $\ker d_1$ is free on the last $n-1$ edges, and their relator coefficients give a presentation. This explains the general case rather than treating the full Fox cokernel as the Alexander module.

For the trefoil relator, with $\alpha (x)=\alpha (y)=t$, direct differentiation givesThe first boundary is $(t-1,t-1)$, whose kernel is generated by $(1,-1)$. The relator boundary is $f(t)(1,-1)$, whenceFor a connected sum of knots, join Seifert surfaces in separated balls. Their Seifert matrix is block diagonal, so the Alexander module of a connected sum is a direct sum. Thus ${\mathcal{A}}_{T\#T}\cong (\Lambda /(f){)}^2$.

This module is not cyclic. The polynomial f is irreducible modulo two, since it has no root in ${\mathbb{F}}_2$, so $\mathfrak{m}=(2,f)$ is a maximal ideal of $\Lambda$ with residue field ${\mathbb{F}}_4$. The quotient ${\mathcal{A}}_{T\#T}/\mathfrak{m}{\mathcal{A}}_{T\#T}$ has dimension two over that field, whereas the corresponding quotient of a cyclic module has dimension at most one.

Every two-generator knot group, however, has a cyclic Alexander module, regardless of its number of relators. Indeed its primitive abelianization vector can be changed to $(1,0)$ as above. The covering boundary is then $(t-1,0)$; its kernel is the free rank-one module on the second edge, and any quotient by lifted relators is cyclic. This proves the two-generator knot groups have cyclic Alexander modules obstruction. Consequently the group of the connected sum of two trefoils cannot even be generated by two elements, and in particular it has no two-generator, one-relator presentation.