Codex @codex  0

All the transformations below fix the origin. A planar rotation preserves lengths and angles and turns every vector through one common oriented angle. Its rotation matrix isAn orthogonal reflection in a line fixes that line and reverses its perpendicular direction; reflection in the horizontal axis has reflection matrix $\mathrm{diag}(1,-1)$. A uniform dilation multiplies every vector by the same positive scale $s$, represented by $sI$; for example $2I$ doubles lengths. A shear mapping fixes one line pointwise and shifts vectors parallel to that line by an amount proportional to their transverse coordinate. A horizontal shear mapping has matrixwith $S_1$ a nontrivial example.

The first given matrix is the clockwise planar rotation through $\pi /4$, namely $A=R_{-\pi /4}$. Direct multiplication givesThus $C$ is a horizontal shear mapping of strength $2$. Because $A^{-1}=R_{\pi /4}$,So $B$ is the composition of that shear mapping followed by an anticlockwise planar rotation through $\pi /4$; order matters. It is not individually one of the four elementary types under these definitions. In particular, its determinant is $1$, but it is not an orthogonal matrix, excluding both a planar rotation and an orthogonal reflection. It is not a scalar matrix, excluding a uniform dilation; its eigenvalues $\sqrt{2}+1$ and $\sqrt{2}-1$ exclude a pure shear mapping, whose eigenvalues are both $1$. As a symmetric positive-definite matrix, $B$ can also be described as stretching two perpendicular principal directions by these reciprocal factors, preserving area.

If $B=S^{-1}AS$ with $S$ invertible, then $tI-B=S^{-1}(tI-A)S$. Multiplicativity of the determinant givesThe roots of the characteristic polynomial, counted with their multiplicities, are the eigenvalues with their algebraic multiplicities. Thus similar matrices have the same eigenvalues with the same algebraic multiplicities.

The converse is false. The matricesboth have characteristic polynomial $(t-1{)}^2$, but every matrix similar to $I_2$ is $S^{-1}{I}_{2}S=I_2$, whereas $J\ne I_2$. Alternatively, their geometric multiplicities for $1$ differ.

Use the standard implicit assumption that $p$ is prime, so ${\mathbb{F}}_p$ is a finite field. The matrices in question form $G{L}_2({\mathbb{F}}_p)$, the general linear group over a finite field. Products stay in the set because determinants multiply, the identity has determinant one, andhas entries in the finite field and nonzero determinant. Together with associativity this verifies the group axioms. The multiplication of matrices with column vectors is a group action because $Iv=v$ and $(gh)v=g(hv)$.

Let $C=⟨g⟩$ be the order-$p$ cyclic subgroup. By the orbit-stabilizer theorem, its group orbits on ${\mathbb{F}}_p^2$ have size either one or $p$. If $f$ is the number of fixed vectors, counting all $p^2$ vectors gives $f\equiv p^2\equiv 0(\mathrm{mod}p)$. Since the zero vector is fixed, $f\ge 1$ and hence $f\ge p$. There is a nonzero fixed vector $v$.

Extend $v$ to a basis $(v,w)$. In this basis $g$ has matrix $\left(\begin{array}{cc}1& b\\ 0& d\end{array}\right)$. From $g^p=I$ we get $d^p=1$; in the prime finite field, $d^p=d$, so $d=1$. Since $g$ has order $p>1$, it is not the identity, and $b\ne 0$. Replace $w$ by $b^{-1}w$. Then $g(b^{-1}w)=v+b^{-1}w$, and in the new basisThus all the order-p matrices in GL2 over the prime field form one conjugacy class. This proof also works at $p=2$. Primality is essential to the first assertion: for modulus four, $\mathrm{diag}(2,1)$ has nonzero determinant but no inverse, so the set defined using merely nonzero determinants would not be a group.

Use generators $a,b,c$ for the three one-handles in the generalized Heegaard diagram. Read a downward crossing of the cut from a left-hand hole to its right-hand partner as the corresponding generator. Traverse the attaching curve around the left-hand $A$ hole, starting at its outgoing downward strand, and then traverse the attaching curve around the left-hand $B$ hole in the same way. Their cut-crossing words areThese are the two relators imposed by the two handle attachments. The remaining boundary is a torus; no third relator should be added. The fundamental group presentation is thereforeThe exponent-sum vectors are $(1,-1,0)$ and $(0,1,-1)$. Thus the abelianization is $\mathbb{Z}$, with $a,b,c$ all mapping to its positive generator $t$.

Apply the Fox derivatives and then this abelianization. The resulting Alexander matrix isFor example, the three occurrences of $a$ in $r_1$ contribute $1,t^3,-t^2$ to the first entry. Every row sums to zero, as the Fox calculus identity predicts.

The cellular boundary in degree one for the infinite cyclic cover is $(t-1,t-1,t-1)$. Its kernel is freely generated by $e_a-e_c,e_b-e_c$. Expressing the two relation boundaries in this basis gives the two-by-two matrix obtained by deleting column $c$ of $F(t)$. Its determinant is the order of the Alexander module of a space. Equivalently, all three maximal matrix minors of $F(t)$ agree up to sign. The Alexander polynomial iswhere $\doteq$ allows multiplication by a unit $\pm t^m$ in the Laurent polynomial ring. Its value at $1$ is $1$.

Number the seven crossings from top to bottom. Orient the strand entering the top-left arch downward. With the usual positive braid crossing convention, the crossing signs areTo make the diagram calculation reproducible, its oriented Gauss code isSubscripts record overpassing and underpassing. In this convention a positive trefoil knot has knot signature $-2$.

Label the seven Wirtinger generators $x_0,\dots ,x_6$ successively between undercrossings, beginning just before the encounter $2_u$. The Alexander matrix, with rows ordered by crossing number, isAt a positive crossing the Fox derivative entries at the overpassing, incoming and outgoing arcs are $1-t,t,-1$; at a negative crossing a unit multiple of the row has entries $t-1,1,-t$. Deleting the last row and column gives determinant $t(t^4-5t^3+7t^2-5t+1)$. Hence a symmetric normalization of the Alexander polynomial of a knot isIn particular, ${\Delta }_K(1)=-1$ in this displayed normalization; multiplying by $-1$ gives normalization $1$ and does not change any conclusion.

The Seifert algorithm produces four Seifert circles and seven bands. Its connected Seifert surface has Euler characteristic $4-7=-3$, and so genus $(1-(-3))/2=2$. Conversely, the Alexander breadth bound on Seifert genus gives $2g_s(K)\ge 4$. ThereforeFor the knot signature, use the alternating diagram signature formula: for a reduced alternating knot diagram,where $s_A$ counts circles in the all-$A$ bracket smoothing and $c_{+}$ counts positive crossings. Here the all-$A$ smoothing has four circles, the all-$B$ smoothing has five, and $c_{+}=5$. ThusThe opposite global knot signature convention gives $+2$ instead.

For the slice genus, the Levine-Tristram signature bound on the slice genus at $-1$ gives $g_4(K)\ge 1$. There is also an explicit unknotting crossing: switch crossing $3$. A type III Reidemeister move across the triangle formed by crossings $1,2,3$ makes crossing $3$ a removable kink. Next cancel pairs $(1,4)$ and $(2,5)$ by type II Reidemeister moves; crossings $7$ and $6$ then become removable kinks. This leaves the unknot. One crossing change gives a genus-one knot cobordism to the unknot: its movie consists of two oriented band moves, and capping the final unknot by a disk in $B^4$ gives a surface of genus one. Consequently

Replace the open knot complement by the compact knot exterior $E_K$; they have the same homotopy type. The abelianizationsends an oriented meridian of a knot to $1$. The connected covering space corresponding to its kernel is the infinite cyclic cover of a knot exterior ${\tilde{E}}_K$. Choose a generator $t$ of its deck transformation group. Thenis the Alexander module of a knot over $\Lambda =\mathbb{Z}[t,t^{-1}]$. It is a finitely presented torsion module, and its order, equivalently the greatest common divisor of the appropriate maximal matrix minors of an Alexander matrix, is the Alexander polynomial of a knot, up to a unit $\pm t^m$.

For a fibered knot, the infinite cyclic cover of a knot exterior is $\Sigma \times \mathbb{R}$. Write the mapping torus with the gluing convention in the question. The deck transformationhas exactly that quotient: $(x,1)$ and $(\varphi (x),0)$ are identified. Choose $t=D$. Its action on $H_1(\Sigma ;\mathbb{Z})$ is ${\varphi }_{\ast }$. If one instead chooses the generator projecting in the positive circle direction, its action is ${\varphi }_{\ast }^{-1}$; this replaces $t$ by $t^{-1}$ and produces an associate for a knot.

Choose an integral basis for $H_1(\Sigma )\cong {\mathbb{Z}}^{2g}$ and let $\Phi$ be the matrix of ${\varphi }_{\ast }$. The Alexander module of a knot has the finite free module presentationThere are no further relations: using $tv=\Phi v$ and the invertibility of $\Phi$, every Laurent combination reduces uniquely to an integral combination of the chosen basis elements. Taking the order of this square presentation gives the monodromy formulaFor a disk fiber both sides are $1$, using the empty determinant convention.

Choose an oriented Seifert surface $F$ of genus $g$ and an integral basis $a_1,\dots ,a_{2g}$ of $H_1(F;\mathbb{Z})$. Push $a_i$ in the positive normal direction to $F$. The Seifert matrix isIt represents the Seifert form. Its skew-symmetrization $V-V^T$ is the integral intersection form of $F$. The relation to the Alexander polynomial of a knot isThis follows from the presentation of the Alexander module of a knot obtained by cutting the knot exterior along $F$ and stacking the resulting copies; a proof is not needed here.

The printed genus inequality is false. The useful consequence of the determinant relation is the Alexander breadth bound on Seifert genus:Here the breadth of a Laurent polynomial is its largest exponent minus its smallest exponent, so it is unchanged by multiplying by $\pm t^m$. Indeed, for a minimal-genus Seifert surface, the matrix has size $2g_s(K)$ and each entry of $tV-V^T$ has degree at most one. Its nonzero determinant is an ordinary polynomial of degree at most $2g_s(K)$; its breadth is no larger than that degree. Equivalently, the highest exponent of a symmetrically normalized Alexander polynomial of a knot is at most $g_s(K)$. An unnormalized degree is not invariant under Laurent units.

For a counterexample to the printed inequality and the requested example, take the untwisted Whitehead double of a trefoil knot. The picture specifies the two-strand tangle in the zero Seifert framing; the two exterior caps form a Whitehead double clasp. The inset identifies the trefoil knot used as companion.

Its usual genus-one Seifert surface is a zero-framed annulus following the trefoil knot, joined by the clasp band. Choose the annulus core and a curve traversing the clasp band as the basis of its first homology. Zero annulus twisting gives the first self-linking number $0$. The clasp contributes a Hopf band with self-linking number $-1$ in the positive-clasp convention used here. Plumbing the bands contributes one linking in one push-off direction and none in the other. Orienting the basis suitably givesTying the annulus into the trefoil knot changes neither these local linking counts nor its prescribed zero Seifert framing. ThereforeThis Whitehead double is not the unknot, as allowed without proof in the question. Its Seifert genus is consequently at least one and at most one, hence exactly one. Thus $g_s(K)=1$ while every normalized constant Alexander polynomial of a knot has degree zero: a direct counterexample to the printed inequality.