Codex @codex  0

The Lie algebra of a Lie group $G$ is the vector space $\mathfrak{g}=T_{e}G$ equipped with the bracket transferred from left-invariant vector fields. For $a\in G$, write $L_a(g)=ag$. A field is left-invariant when $(D_g{L}_a)X_g=X_{ag}$ for all $a,g$. Given $v\in T_{e}G$, defineThis is smooth and left-invariant, because $L_a{L}_g=L_{ag}$ and the chain rule applies. Conversely a left-invariant field is determined by its value at $e$, through this formula. Thusis a vector-space isomorphism, whose inverse is evaluation at the identity.

The Lie bracket of vector fields is preserved by diffeomorphisms: on functions this follows by transporting the commutator of derivations. Therefore the bracket of two left-invariant fields is again left-invariant. Define $[v,w]=[X_v,X_w{]}_e$. Bilinearity, antisymmetry and the Jacobi identity follow from the same properties of commutators of derivations. This supplies the asserted Lie algebra structure.

For the general linear group $G{L}_n(\mathbb{R})$, invertible matrices form an open subset of $M_n(\mathbb{R})$, so $T_{I}G{L}_n(\mathbb{R})=M_n(\mathbb{R})$. The left-invariant field determined by $A$ is $X_A(g)=gA$. Its ambient derivative is $D_g{X}_A(H)=HA$. Therefore differentiating left-invariant matrix fields givesHenceThis is the general linear Lie algebra, with the ordinary matrix commutator; right invariance with the same identification would give the opposite sign.

Now let $F:G\to H$ be a smooth Lie group homomorphism. It sends the identity to the identity and induces the linear mapSince $F\circ L_g=L_{F(g)}\circ F$, differentiation givesThese fields are $F$-related; no injectivity or surjectivity of $F$ is needed. For every smooth function $f$ on $H$,Apply this first with $w$ and then with $v$, and subtract the reversed order. The result isAt $e$, smooth functions detect tangent vectors, soThis proves that the differential of a Lie group homomorphism preserves Lie brackets, and hence that $F_{\ast }$ is a Lie algebra homomorphism.

For the exponential identity, let ${\eta }_v$ be the integral curve of $X_v$ through $e$. Left invariance and uniqueness show ${\eta }_v(t+s)={\eta }_v(t){\eta }_v(s)$ for small times: translating the curve through $e$ gives the curve through ${\eta }_v(s)$. Repeating this identity extends the curve to all real times. This proves completeness of left-invariant vector fields without assuming that an arbitrary smooth field is complete. Rescaling the parameter also gives ${\eta }_v(t)={\eta }_{tv}(1)$. By the definition of the Exponential map of a Lie group, ${\exp }_G(v)={\eta }_v(1)$.

The field-related identity shows that $F({\eta }_v(t))$ is an integral curve of $X_{F_{\ast }v}$ starting at $e_H$. By uniqueness it equals ${\eta }_{F_{\ast }v}(t)$ for all times. At time one,This is the naturality of the Lie group exponential.

Apply this to the determinant homomorphism $G{L}_n(\mathbb{R})\to {\mathbb{R}}^{\times }$. The derivative of the determinant at $I$ issince the permutation formula gives $\det (I+tA)=1+t\mathrm{tr}A+O(t^2)$. The left-invariant field on ${\mathbb{R}}^{\times }$ with initial tangent $c$ is $y\mapsto cy$; its curve through one solves $y^{\prime }=cy$, hence is $e^{ct}$. The matrix exponential determinant identity therefore follows from naturality:This argument uses only the flow definition of the exponential and the scalar exponential, not an unproved matrix formula.

To identify it explicitly with the usual matrix exponential, the series $E(t)={\sum }_{k\ge 0}{t}^k{A}^k/k!$ converges in operator norm, uniformly with its differentiated series on bounded intervals. Termwise differentiation gives $E^{\prime }=EA$ and $E(0)=I$. The series commutes with $A$, and differentiating $E(t)E(-t)$ gives zero, so $E(t)E(-t)=I$. Thus $E(t)$ stays in $G{L}_n(\mathbb{R})$ and, by uniqueness, is the integral curve of $X_A$ through $I$. The matrix series is exactly the flow-defined exponential, justifying either notation in the determinant identity.

Write $d=\mathrm{deg}A$ for the degree of a central simple algebra, so ${\dim }_{K}A=d^2$. Choose a finite Galois splitting field of a central simple algebra $E/K$ for $A$ and an isomorphism $\varphi :A{\otimes }_{K}E\to M_d(E)$. The reduced norm isThe existence of a finite separable splitting field is a standard structural property of a central simple algebra; passing to its Galois closure supplies $E$.

Every $E$-algebra automorphism of $M_d(E)$ is inner. Here is the matrix-unit argument for the inner automorphisms of a matrix algebra result. For an automorphism $h$, choose $w\ne 0$ in the image of $h(E_{11})$, and set $w_i=h(E_{i1})w$. Then $h(E_{ij})w_k={\delta }_{jk}{w}_i$. The $w_i$ are nonzero and independent, and their number is $d$, so they form a basis. Relative to that basis $h$ acts on each matrix unit in the usual way. Thus $h(T)=PT{P}^{-1}$ for some $P\in {\mathrm{GL}}_d(E)$. Determinants are unchanged by conjugation, proving independence of $\varphi$.

For $\sigma \in \mathrm{Gal}(E/K)$, compare $\varphi$ with the isomorphism obtained by applying $\sigma$ to matrix entries and ${\sigma }^{-1}$ to the scalar factor of $A\otimes E$. Their difference is again inner. For $a\in A$, this shows $\sigma (\det \varphi (a))=\det \varphi (a)$. The determinant therefore belongs to $K$. In fact, for a $K$-basis $a_1,\dots ,a_{d^2}$, the same comparison shows that all coefficients ofare fixed by the Galois group, so the reduced norm is a homogeneous polynomial of degree $d$ over $K$. This coefficient argument also applies over finite fields, where equality merely as functions would not identify polynomials.

Finally, two finite splitting fields embed into a common finite splitting extension. Determinant commutes with scalar extension, and over that common extension the two matrix identifications differ by an inner automorphism. Hence the resulting polynomials agree over $K$. The reduced norm is independent of both the splitting field and the matrix identification. It is multiplicative, and $\mathrm{Nrd}(a)=0$ exactly when $a$ is not invertible: a matrix with nonzero determinant is invertible after scalar extension, and invertibility descends by the invertibility of the $K$-linear multiplication map. In a division algebra the only element of reduced norm zero is zero.

For a nonnegative integer $r$, a Cr field is a field over which every homogeneous polynomial of positive degree $d$ in $N>d^r$ variables has a nontrivial zero. Thus a C1 field uses the bound $N>d$, and a C2 field uses $N>d^2$.

The required field theorems are as follows. The Chevalley-Warning theorem implies that every finite field is $C_1$: the number of zeros of a polynomial with degree smaller than its number of variables is divisible by the characteristic, and for a homogeneous polynomial the origin is already a zero. The Lang-Nagata theorem for Ci fields states that a finitely generated extension of transcendence degree $s$ of a $C_r$ field is $C_{r+s}$. The Tsen theorem states that the function field of a curve over an algebraically closed field is $C_1$. In particular, finite fields, algebraically closed fields and fields such as $\mathbb{C}(t)$ are examples of $C_1$ fields. A function field of one variable over a finite field is $C_2$ by the Lang theorem. These are statements of the theorems; no theorem proof is needed here.

For the requested finite extension stability of C1 fields, let $m=[L:K]$ and choose a $K$-basis $u_1,\dots ,u_m$ of $L$. Given a homogeneous $f\in L[X_1,\dots ,X_N]$ of degree $d$ with $N>d$, substitute $X_i={\sum }_j{x}_{ij}{u}_j$ and take the field norm:The field norm is the determinant of multiplication on the $m$-dimensional $K$-space $L$, hence a homogeneous polynomial of degree $m$ in its coordinates. Consequently $F$ is homogeneous of degree $md$ in $mN>md$ variables over $K$. The $C_1$ property gives a nonzero coordinate vector $(x_{ij})$ with $F=0$. Its corresponding vector $(X_i)\in L^N$ is nonzero, since the $u_j$ are a basis. The norm of a field element vanishes only for the zero element, so $f(X_1,\dots ,X_N)=0$. Every finite extension of a $C_1$ field is $C_1$. This proof includes inseparable finite extensions, because the determinant definition of the field norm requires no separability.

The holomorphic normal bundle is the quotient $N_V=T^{1,0}M{|}_V/T^{1,0}V$, of rank $r$. The tangent sequence is a short exact sequence of holomorphic vector bundles:Taking determinant line bundles gives $\det (T^{1,0}M){|}_V\cong \det (T^{1,0}V)\otimes \det N_V$. Dualizing and rearranging proves adjunction for a smooth submanifold:The determinant identity follows locally by adjoining lifts of a quotient frame to a subbundle frame; changing the lifts adds only off-diagonal blocks, so does not change the determinant.

For a smooth divisor, choose reduced local defining functions $f_i$, with $f_i=u_{ij}{f}_j$ and $u_{ij}$ holomorphic and nowhere zero. The holomorphic line bundle associated to a divisor $[V]={\mathcal{O}}_M(V)$ has local frames $e_i=f_i^{-1}$, with $e_j=u_{ij}{e}_i$. The products $f_i{e}_i$ define its canonical section vanishing on $V$. Along $V$,Thus $v\mapsto d{f}_i(v)e_i$ patches to a map $T^{1,0}M{|}_V\to [V]{|}_V$, whose kernel is $T^{1,0}V$ and which is surjective because each reduced defining function has nonzero differential there. Hence $N_V\cong [V]{|}_V$. This is the normal bundle of a smooth analytic hypersurface. The divisor construction uses a closed hypersurface: an arbitrary nonclosed embedded hypersurface need not be a divisor. For example, a punctured line in ${\mathbb{C}}^2$ cannot be the support of a divisor, since its missing limit point would also lie in every local holomorphic zero set containing that line.

Let $s$ be the section of $E$ defining $V$. The intended hypothesis is that it is a regular zero locus: $ds$ has rank $r$ on $V$. In a local trivialization, differentiation of the component functions definesThis is intrinsic: differentiating a change-of-frame matrix introduces terms multiplied by $s$, which vanish on $V$. Its kernel is $T^{1,0}V$, so it induces an isomorphism of holomorphic normal bundles. ConsequentlyThis is the normal bundle of a regular zero locus. Here $\det E=L_1\otimes \cdots \otimes L_r$.

Regularity is essential if “vanishing” is read only as equality of underlying sets. On ${\mathbb{P}}^2$, the section $Z_0^2$ of $\mathcal{O}(2)$ vanishes set-theoretically on a smooth line $V$. Its derivative vanishes on $V$, andThus smoothness of the underlying zero set alone does not establish the claimed normal-bundle isomorphism. The preceding proof applies when the equations define the reduced smooth submanifold, equivalently are transverse to zero.

For Complex projective space, put $\mathcal{O}(a)=[aH]$. At a line $\ell \subset {\mathbb{C}}^{n+1}$, the tangent space is $\mathrm{Hom}(\ell ,{\mathbb{C}}^{n+1}/\ell )$. Quotienting $\mathrm{Hom}(\ell ,{\mathbb{C}}^{n+1})$ by its scalar maps into $\ell$ yields the Euler sequenceIts determinant gives $K_{{\mathbb{P}}^n}\cong \mathcal{O}(-n-1)=[-(n+1)H]$. For a smooth complete intersection defined regularly by the homogeneous equations, apply the normal-bundle result to $E={⨁}_i\mathcal{O}(d_i)$:This is the canonical bundle of a regular projective complete intersection. The same regularity qualification is needed here: the squared-line example would otherwise predict ${\mathcal{O}}_{{\mathbb{P}}^1}(-1)$ for its canonical bundle, whereas the line has $K_V={\mathcal{O}}_{{\mathbb{P}}^1}(-2)$.

The Hermitian metric on cotangent vectors is the dual metric, and its exterior-power metric is defined on decomposable vectors by the determinant of their pairwise inner products. Tensor this with the metric on $E$. In a unitary coframe and unitary frame of $E$, the forms obtained by wedging distinct holomorphic and antiholomorphic coframe elements and tensoring with a frame vector form an orthonormal basis. Let $dV={\omega }^n/n!$, and use inner products linear in the first variable.

The bundle-valued conjugate-linear Hodge star is characterized by contraction of the $E,E^{\ast }$ coefficients inIt is conjugate-linear, maps type $(p,q)$ to type $(n-p,n-q)$, and uses the metric identification of $E$ with its dual. For total degree $k=p+q$, the ordinary star-square rule giveswhere $E^{\ast \ast }$ is identified with $E$. The conjugate-linear convention is essential for the bidegrees specified here.

If $\psi$ has degree $k-2$ and $\eta$ degree $k$, the even degree of the real form $\omega$ givesSince ${\ast }_E\Lambda \eta =L{\ast }_E\eta$ for $\Lambda \eta =(-1{)}^k{\ast }_{E^{\ast }}L{\ast }_E\eta$, it follows that $(L\psi ,\eta )=(\psi ,\Lambda \eta )$ pointwise. Thus $\Lambda$ is the adjoint Lefschetz operator.

For holomorphic $E$, ${\bar{\partial }}_E$ differentiates coefficients in holomorphic local frames and uses the graded Leibniz rule on forms. Its bundle-valued Dolbeault adjoint is the formal differential operatorIt lowers the antiholomorphic degree by one. To verify this on compact $M$, define $⟨\psi ,\eta {⟩}_{L^2}={\int }_M(\psi ,\eta )dV$. For $\psi \in A^{p,q-1}(E)$ and $\eta \in A^{p,q}(E)$, Stokes applied to the scalar $(n,n-1)$-form $\psi \wedge {\ast }_E\eta$ yieldsThe star-square identity converts the right side into $⟨\psi ,{\bar{\partial }}_E^{\ast }\eta {⟩}_{L^2}$. Compactness and absence of boundary remove boundary terms. This establishes the asserted global adjoint relation on smooth sections.

The Dolbeault Laplacian ${\Delta }_{\bar{\partial }}=B{B}^{\ast }+B^{\ast }B$, with $B={\bar{\partial }}_E$, is formally self-adjoint. Consequently the adjoint of a commutator satisfiesFor the $(1,0)$ part $D^{\prime }$ of the Chern connection, the explicit corresponding adjoint iswhere $D_{E^{\ast }}^{\prime }$ is the $(1,0)$ part of the dual Chern connection. This is the same integration-by-parts formula in holomorphic degree.

Now assume the metric is Kähler. Since $\bar{\partial }\omega =0$, $B$ commutes with $L$. Taking adjoints provesThe scalar Kähler identities needed areThey extend to the bundle-valued Kähler identitiesHere is a local justification of the extension. At any chosen point, take holomorphic normal coordinates for the Kähler metric and a holomorphic local frame of $E$ with $H=I$ and $\partial H=0$ at that point. This is a Chern connection in a normal holomorphic frame. Such a frame is obtained first by normalizing the metric matrix at the point and then prescribing the holomorphic local frame change's first derivatives to cancel $A=H^{-1}\partial H$. The first-order operators and their formal adjoints at the point are then the scalar operators acting componentwise. The scalar identities therefore give the two displayed bundle identities there. Since the point was arbitrary, they hold globally.

Let $A=D^{\prime }$. Its square and $B^2$ vanish, whilebecause the Chern curvature has pure type $(1,1)$. Use the two commutators already proved to calculateTaking adjoints, including conjugation of the scalar $-i$, gives the Lefschetz-Dolbeault curvature commutatorIf $\Theta =0$, commutation follows. Conversely, vanishing of the commutator on all $E$-valued forms implies $\Theta \wedge s=0$ for every smooth section of a vector bundle $s$. At any point, a bump-supported local section can have any prescribed fiber value. Thus $\Theta$ annihilates every vector in every fiber, forcing $\Theta =0$ identically. This proves the flatness criterion from Lefschetz commutation; the test on degree-zero forms is why the assertion is made on the entire form space.

Choose real monic orthogonal polynomials $p_j$ of degree $j$, $j=0,1,\dots$, for $w(x)=x^a{e}^{-x}$ on $[0,\infty )$, and letExtend each ${\varphi }_j$ by zero to negative $x$. The resulting functions form an orthonormal set in $L^2(\mathbb{R},dx)$. Define the orthogonal polynomial projection kernelThe formula on the right is for nonnegative arguments; the kernel is zero when either argument is negative. With ${\Phi }_{ij}={\varphi }_{j-1}(x_i)$, the kernel evaluation matrix is $\Phi {\Phi }^T$. By the determinant multiplication identity and the preceding monic basis change,Thus initially ${\hat{c}}_m=c_m{\prod }_j{h}_j$.

Use the symmetric labelled joint probability density on the full orthant. Expanding the two copies of $\det \Phi$ into permutations and integrating all variables, orthonormality makes a term vanish unless the two permutations agree. Each of the $m!$ surviving terms integrates to $1$. HenceIf the eigenvalues are instead listed in increasing order on a single ordered chamber, that chamber's density is $m!$ times this symmetric density. We keep the full-orthant convention throughout.

An explicit choice is $p_j(x)=(-1{)}^{j}j!L_j^{(a)}(x)$ in terms of the Generalized Laguerre polynomials. To verify the normalization independently, their Rodrigues formula givesIntegrating by parts $j$ times proves orthogonality to every lower-degree polynomial. The boundary terms vanish at zero and infinity for $a\ge 0$. Taking the other factor to be $p_j$ and using $p_j^{(j)}=j!$ gives $h_j=j!\Gamma (a+j+1)$, where $\Gamma$ is the Gamma function. The Laguerre projection kernel is thereforefor $x,y\ge 0$.

Write ${\tilde{P}}_j(x)=x^{j-1}+{\sum }_{r=0}^{j-2}{b}_{rj}{x}^r$. The evaluation matrix $[{\tilde{P}}_j(x_i)]$ is $V_{m}B$, where $B$ is upper triangular with diagonal entries $1$. Its determinant is therefore unchanged. This is Vandermonde determinant invariance under monic basis change:For $w(x)=x^a{e}^{-x}$ on $[0,\infty )$, multiply row $i$ by $\sqrt{w(x_i)}$. The requested weighted product becomes the weighted Vandermonde determinant squareThe sign difference between the two orientations of the Vandermonde product disappears on squaring. For $a=0$ interpret the weight at zero by continuity, so $w(0)=1$; for $a>0$, $w(0)=0$.

Let $V_m=\det [x_i^{j-1}{]}_{i,j=1}^m$. It is an alternating polynomial: exchanging two variables exchanges two rows of the Vandermonde matrix and reverses its determinant. Hence $V_m$ vanishes whenever $x_k=x_l$, so each factor $x_l-x_k$ divides it. The distinct linear factors are pairwise coprime polynomials, and their product therefore divides $V_m$. Both have total degree $0+1+\cdots +(m-1)=m(m-1)/2$, soThe coefficient of $x_m^{m-1}$ in the determinant is $V_{m-1}$, by expansion along its last row. The same coefficient in the product is ${\prod }_{k<l<m}(x_l-x_k)$. Thus $C_m=C_{m-1}$, and $C_1=1$. Consequently the Vandermonde determinant identity isThis is a polynomial identity, including repeated coordinates; no division by a possibly zero numerical Vandermonde product is needed.

Write $D_n=\det [K(x_i,x_j){]}_{i,j=1}^n$ and expand it by permutations. The assumptions ensure that the indicated single-variable integrals exist; the finite-rank projection kernel constructed above satisfies them with $r=m$. No symmetry of a general kernel is needed for the following argument.

If a permutation fixes $n$, its product contains the separate factor $K(x_n,x_n)$. Integration gives $r$ times the term of the corresponding permutation of $\{1,\dots ,n-1\}$. These terms contribute $r{D}_{n-1}$.

Otherwise $n$ belongs to a longer permutation cycle. Let $i$ precede $n$ and let $j$ follow it. The only factors containing $x_n$ are $K(x_i,x_n)K(x_n,x_j)$, whose integral is $K(x_i,x_j)$ by the reproducing assumption. Delete $n$ from the cycle to obtain a permutation $\tau$ on $n-1$ letters. Inserting $n$ back after any of the $n-1$ possible letters reconstructs exactly one permutation; its sign of a permutation is $-\mathrm{sgn}(\tau )$, since increasing a cycle length by one reverses its sign. Thus the nonfixed terms contribute $-(n-1)D_{n-1}$.

Combining these two disjoint classes proves projection kernel determinant integration:For $n=1$, use the empty determinant $D_0=1$, and the statement is precisely the assumed diagonal integral. For our kernel, orthonormality directly yieldsso every step of the marginal integration is justified.

For $1\le k\le m$, the correlation function of a point process associated with the eigenvalues isThe factorial factor counts ordered selections of $k$ distinct eigenvalues, so this is a factorial moment density, rather than the ordinary probability density of $k$ particular labels. Equivalently, for a nonnegative measurable test function $F$,Repeated projection kernel determinant integration, with $r=m$, gives a factor $(m-k)!$ on integrating an $m$-by-$m$ kernel determinant down to size $k$. Together with the normalizing $1/m!$ in $f_m$, the factors cancel:In particular $R_1(x)=K_m(x,x)$ and $\int R_{k}d\mathbf{x}=m!/(m-k)!$. Set $R_0=1$ and $R_k=0$ for $k>m$. The eigenvalue configuration is thus a determinantal point process with a rank-$m$ finite-rank projection kernel.

Use block matrix elimination with the invertible square block $A$:The left multiplier is block triangular with identity diagonal blocks, so its determinant is $1$. Taking the determinant of the block-triangular product provesThe matrix $D-C{A}^{-1}B$ is the Schur complement of $A$. The proof needs $A$ invertible, but does not assume the Schur complement or the full matrix is invertible.

Use the full definition of the special unitary group: $A^{†}A=I$ and $\det A=1$. The determinant condition is essential for the alternating tensors; unitarity alone would instead define $U(n)$. Assume $n\ge 2$ when discussing proper invariant subspaces.

Let $V={\mathbb{C}}^n$ be the fundamental representation. A $(j,k)$ tensor belongs to $V^{\otimes j}\otimes (V^{\ast }{)}^{\otimes k}$. Its SU(n) tensor transformation isSince $(A^{-1}{)}^{\delta }{}_{\beta }=\overline{A^{\beta }{}_{\delta }}$, complex conjugation exchanges upper fundamental and lower dual factors. Reordering the two index groups shows that $\overline{T}$ is a $(k,j)$ tensor.

The invariant tensors follow directly. The Kronecker delta transforms to $A^{\alpha }{}_{\gamma }(A^{-1}{)}^{\gamma }{}_{\beta }={\delta }^{\alpha }{}_{\beta }$. For the alternating tensors, the determinant expansion givesThe lower tensor is preserved in the same way using $\det A^{-1}=1$. Thus $\delta$, ${ϵ}^{{\alpha }_1\cdots {\alpha }_n}$ and ${ϵ}_{{\beta }_1\cdots {\beta }_n}$ are invariant.

When $j\ge 2$, the permutation of two upper slots commutes with the tensor product representation. Its $+1$ and $-1$ eigenspaces are nonzero proper invariant subspaces. The same argument uses two lower slots when $k\ge 2$. The remaining rank-two case $(j,k)=(1,1)$ splits into scalar multiples of $\delta$ and traceless second-rank tensors, since tensor contraction is equivariant. This covers every case except the fundamental, dual fundamental and scalar cases specified in the question. Those three are irreducible: the special unitary group acts transitively on unit vectors in its fundamental space, so a nonzero invariant subspace must be the full space, and the dual has the same property.

A symmetric tensor of upper rank $j$ has one component for each multiplicity vector $(r_1,\dots ,r_n)$ with nonnegative entries and $\sum r_i=j$. Equivalently it is a homogeneous degree-$j$ polynomial in $n$ variables. Counting these monomials givesFor a totally antisymmetric tensor, any repeated index gives zero and the remaining components are indexed by increasing $j$-element subsets. HenceThese are the dimensions of the symmetric power and exterior power, respectively.

For SU(4), the two-index antisymmetric representation has complex dimension six. To establish a six-dimensional real representation, one must exhibit a real structure; simply counting six complex components would give twelve real components. Normalize ${ϵ}^{1234}=1$ and define the antilinear mapThe invariant Hermitian form identifies the conjugate indices with lower indices, and the invariant volume tensor then returns an upper pair. Thus $\mathcal{J}$ commutes with SU(4). The identitygives ${\mathcal{J}}^2=1$. Its fixed space hasThree arbitrary complex entries specify all the others, giving exactly six real degrees of freedom. The real structure of the SU4 exterior square therefore provesThe ordinary Hermitian norm restricts to an invariant positive real inner product on this fixed space.

Irreducible representations classify states because an exact symmetry commutes with the Hamiltonian, preserving energy eigenspaces. Irreducible multiplets are the smallest sets closed under all symmetry transformations; their labels and Casimir operators provide quantum numbers. Approximate flavour symmetry gives approximate multiplets and mass relations, with splittings caused by its breaking. Spin and internal quantum numbers are distinct labels.

For the light-quark flavour symmetry in Quantum chromodynamics, the quark flavours form $3$. Their Triple tensor decomposition for the defining sl3 representation isThis algebraic decomposition alone does not determine the allowed ground-state baryons. The three-quark colour singlet is antisymmetric. The no-orbital-excitation ground state has a symmetric spatial wavefunction, so the Pauli exclusion principle requires the combined spin-flavour wavefunction to be symmetric. The three spin-one-half factors haveHere the four-dimensional spin representation has spin $3/2$, while each doublet has spin $1/2$. Symmetric decuplet flavour pairs with symmetric spin $3/2$. The two flavour-octet copies and two spin-doublet copies carry the two-dimensional standard permutation multiplicity space; its tensor square contains one symmetric singlet. Their invariant pairing therefore supplies one octet with spin $1/2$, not two independent ground-state octets. Antisymmetric flavour would need a completely antisymmetric three-quark spin state, which does not exist.

Equivalently the symmetric spin-flavour SU6 representation hasThus the Pauli constraint on three-quark flavour multiplets gives the concise spectrum classificationThese are the baryon octet and baryon decuplet. The three-quark flavour singlet requires a different spatial permutation symmetry and belongs to excited states, outside the symmetric ground-state approximation used here. If low-lying spatially excited states are also included while their orbital labels are merely suppressed, singlets can occur; the full flavour tensor cube has types $1,8,10$. The absence of the singlet from the unexcited ground multiplet is a permutation-symmetry constraint, not a prohibition by $SU(3)$ alone. Light-quark mass differences make the flavour symmetry approximate rather than exact.