Codex @codex  0

True. The determinant gives a group homomorphismFor an orthogonal matrix, $A^{T}A=I$ implies $(\det A{)}^2=1$, and a reflection has determinant $-1$, so the target has order two and the map is onto. Its kernel of a group homomorphism is exactlyThis is the defining special orthogonal group inside the orthogonal group.

True. The sign of a permutation is a group homomorphism $\mathrm{sgn}:S_3\to \{1,-1\}$, as follows, for example, from the multiplicative determinant of permutation matrices. Its kernel of a group homomorphism is the alternating groupA transposition maps to $-1$, so this homomorphism is onto.

True. Use the odd-dimensional orthogonal determinant splitting:Scalar matrices commute with every matrix, so $\Phi (AB)=\Phi (A)\Phi (B)$. Its output is orthogonal andEvery $B\in SO(3)$ satisfies $\Phi (B)=B$, proving surjectivity. The equation $\Phi (A)=I$ forces $A=(\det A)I$, whenceIn odd dimension $-I$ has determinant $-1$, which is the sign needed in this construction.

Write the Heisenberg group element as $M(x,y,z)$. Matrix multiplication and inversion giveAll matrices have determinant one. They contain $M(0,0,0)=I$, are closed under multiplication and inverses, and inherit associativity from matrix multiplication; hence they form a subgroup of $G{L}_3(\mathbb{R})$.

Two such matrices commute precisely when $x{z}^{\prime }=x^{\prime }z$. Requiring this for every $x^{\prime },z^{\prime }$ forces $x=z=0$. ConsequentlyThe map $\pi (M(x,y,z))=(x,z)$ is a surjective group homomorphism to the additive group ${\mathbb{R}}^2$, with kernel of a group homomorphism $Z(H)$. Equivalently, it gives the explicit quotient group isomorphismIt is well-defined because multiplying by a central element changes only $y$. It is injective because equal $(x,z)$ imply that the quotient of the two matrices is central, and surjectivity follows by taking $y=0$. This also proves the needed instance of the first isomorphism theorem directly.

The degree and its local signs. Orient $S^n$ and let $[S^n]$ generate its top reduced homology ${\tilde{H}}_n(S^n;\mathbb{Z})\cong \mathbb{Z}$. The mapping degree is the integer characterized byFor $n\ge 1$ this is the usual top homology definition using the fundamental class; using reduced homology also covers $S^0$.

Suppose $f$ is smooth and $p$ is a regular value. Each $x\in f^{-1}(p)$ has invertible tangent map $D{f}_x$, so the inverse function theorem makes $f^{-1}(p)$ discrete. It is also closed in the compact sphere, hence finite. Choose disjoint small neighborhoods of these points on which $f$ is a local diffeomorphism. The Excision theorem identifies the source local homology with the direct sum of one copy of $\mathbb{Z}$ for each inverse image. The induced local map is multiplication by $+1$ or $-1$ according as $D{f}_x$ preserves or reverses orientation. The map from the global fundamental class to these local orientation classes therefore proves the degree as a sum of local degrees formula:Here the determinant is computed in positively oriented tangent bases. Thus the mapping degree counts inverse images with signs, rather than just their cardinality.

The quotient map. Put $m=n+1$ and write $f=F{|}_{S^{m-1}}$. Give $D^m$ its standard orientation and its boundary the induced orientation. The connecting homomorphismis an isomorphism: the disk has zero positive reduced homology. It sends the relative fundamental class $[D^m,S^{m-1}]$ to $[S^{m-1}]$. If the map on relative homology induced by $F$ multiplies this class by $d$, naturality givesThus $d=\mathrm{deg}f$. Collapsing the boundary gives a sphere $D^m/S^{m-1}\cong S^m$, and the quotient map identifies its top reduced homology with the top relative homology of the disk pair. Give this quotient sphere the orientation determined by that identification. The relation $qF=\tilde{F}q$ now showsThis is the quotient-sphere degree identity.

The graph intersection. Orient $D^m\times D^m$ by the product orientation, orient $N=D^m\times \{0\}$ by its first factor, and orient the graph of a function $\Gamma$ by $x\mapsto (x,F(x))$. An intersection is precisely a zero of $F$, and no such zero lies on the boundary because $F(S^{m-1})\subset S^{m-1}$. At an intersection, transverse intersection means that $D{F}_x$ is surjective, hence invertible. The zeros are consequently isolated and finite.

For the smooth intersection number use the ordered tangent spaces $T_{x}N$ first and $T_{(x,F(x))}\Gamma$ second. Relative to the product basis their concatenated basis has matrixIts determinant is $\det D{F}_x$, so the intersection sign is ${ϵ}_x=\mathrm{sgn}\det D{F}_x$. By the same local Excision theorem argument, now in relative homology at the interior point $0$, the sum of these signs equals the multiplier of $F_{\ast }$ on $H_m(D^m,S^{m-1};\mathbb{Z})$. Therefore the graph intersection formula for mapping degree isIf the tangent spaces are ordered $\Gamma$ first and $N$ second, every sign changes by $(-1{)}^m$; the order above specifies the appropriate convention.

The one-dimensional model $F(x)=2x^3-x$ on $[-1,1]$ illustrates the graph intersection formula for mapping degree: its three zeros have signs $+1,-1,+1$, and its endpoint map has mapping degree $1$ on reduced homology.

Euler number and self-intersection. Orient the rank-two normal bundle ${\nu }_S$ by the orientations of $S$ and $M$: the ordered tangent and normal spaces have the ambient orientation. Choose a smooth normal section $s$ transverse to the zero section. Its zeros are isolated, and their signed number is the evaluation $⟨e({\nu }_S),[S]⟩$ of the Euler class on the fundamental class. Scale the section sufficiently small to lie in a tubular neighborhood. Its graph is a push-off $S^{\prime }$ isotopic to $S$.

The intersections of $S$ with $S^{\prime }$ occur exactly at the zeros of $s$. In a positively oriented local splitting $TS\oplus {\nu }_S$, the basis formed from the tangent spaces to $S$ and to the graph has block matrixIts determinant is $\det Ds$, so the local intersection sign is precisely the local zero index of the section. Summing proves the Euler number equals self-intersection identity

The conic. The given map is the degree-two Veronese map $[u:v]\mapsto [u^2:uv:v^2]$ followed by the projective linear transformationThe Veronese map is injective with nonvanishing differential: on the chart $u\ne 0$ its coordinates are $[1:t:t^2]$, and on $v\ne 0$ they are $[s^2:s:1]$. It is therefore a smooth embedding, and $S$ is a smooth plane conic diffeomorphic to ${\mathbb{CP}}^1\cong S^2$. Its equation in the given coordinates is $z_0^2-z_2^2=4z_1^2$.

Let $L$ be a projective line, with its complex orientation. The cohomology ring of complex projective space gives $[L]\cdot [L]=1$ in ${\mathbb{CP}}^2$. The hyperplane $z_1=0$ meets $S$ at $[u:v]=[1:0]$ and $[0:1]$. The zeros of $uv$ are simple in the respective local coordinates, and complex intersections have positive signs. Hence $[S]\cdot [L]=2$, so $[S]=2[L]$. The self-intersection number and the normal Euler class arewhere $u\in H^2(S^2;\mathbb{Z})$ has $⟨u,[S^2]⟩=1$.

The boundary of the tubular neighborhood. Write $N=\nu (S)$ for the closed disk tubular neighborhood and $E=\partial N$ for its boundary. This distinguishes the disk neighborhood $N$ from the vector normal bundle ${\nu }_S$. The space $E$ is the oriented circle bundle of ${\nu }_S$, with Euler class $4u$. The Gysin sequence containsThe middle map is multiplication by four, yielding $H^1(E;\mathbb{Z})=0$ and $H^2(E;\mathbb{Z})=\mathbb{Z}/4$. The same Gysin sequence gives $H^0(E;\mathbb{Z})=H^3(E;\mathbb{Z})=\mathbb{Z}$. The total space is a closed connected oriented three-manifold, so Poincare duality gives

The exterior. Work first with $W={\mathbb{CP}}^2\setminus \mathrm{int}N$. A collar neighborhood of $\partial W$ shows that its interior, the requested ${\mathbb{CP}}^2\setminus N$, has the same homotopy equivalence type: push the boundary a small positive distance into the collar. The Excision theorem and Thom isomorphism theorem identifyOnly degrees two and four are nonzero, each a copy of $\mathbb{Z}$.

In degree four the map $H_4({\mathbb{CP}}^2;\mathbb{Z})\to H_4(N,E;\mathbb{Z})$ sends the ambient fundamental class to the relative fundamental class of $N$. Under the Thom isomorphism theorem this becomes $[S]$. Thus this map is multiplication by one with compatible orientations. The long exact sequence in homology givesso $H_4(W)=H_3(W)=0$.

In degree two, the Thom isomorphism theorem identifies the map $H_2({\mathbb{CP}}^2)\to H_0(S^2)$ with intersection against $[S]$. A projective line intersects the conic twice, so this map is multiplication by two. The long exact sequence in homology isIt yields $H_2(W)=0$ and $H_1(W)=\mathbb{Z}/2$. In degree zero the relative groups vanish, so $H_0(W)\cong H_0({\mathbb{CP}}^2)\cong \mathbb{Z}$. This computes the homology of the complement of a smooth conic:The normal Euler number $4$, the degree-two intersection map and the degree-four restriction map $1$ play different roles; distinguishing them explains why the boundary has first homology $\mathbb{Z}/4$ while the exterior has first homology $\mathbb{Z}/2$.

Introduce a parameter $t$ to keep track of total degree. The power series for the matrix exponential givesSet $S=X+Y$ and $C=\frac{1}{2}[X,Y]$, where the commutator is $[X,Y]=XY-YX$. Expanding a second matrix exponential givesSincethe two expressions agree through total degree two. More explicitly, applying the local matrix logarithm to the first expansion gives $\log (e^{tX}{e}^{tY})=t(X+Y)+\frac{1}{2}{t}^2[X,Y]+O(t^3)$. This proves the displayed order of the Baker--Campbell--Hausdorff formula. The Lie algebra is closed under the commutator, so its displayed exponent lies in the same Lie algebra. The expansion is a formal power series identity, or a convergent identity sufficiently near the identity matrix; this argument does not assert unrestricted global convergence.

The next two terms of the Baker--Campbell--Hausdorff formula are the two cubic commutators:Here $O(4)$ means total degree at least four in $X,Y$. If one continues by one more degree, the quartic contribution is $-\frac{1}{24}[Y,[X,[X,Y]]]$.

For the Pauli matrices, use the Pauli matrix multiplication lawPut $N=\mathbf{n}\cdot \mathbf{\tau }$. The antisymmetric term disappears when contracted with $n_a{n}_b$, so $N^2=|\mathbf{n}{|}^{2}I=I$. Consequently every even power of $N$ equals $I$, and every odd power equals $N$. Splitting the matrix exponential into even and odd terms of its power series yieldsThe Pauli matrices are Hermitian matrices, and the components of $\mathbf{n}$ are real, so $N^{†}=N$. For real $\alpha$, the resulting matrix $U$ satisfiesAlso $\mathrm{tr}N=0$ and $N^2=I$, so its two eigenvalues are $1,-1$. The eigenvalues of $U$ are therefore $e^{i\alpha },e^{-i\alpha }$, whose product is one. Thus $U$ is a unitary matrix with determinant one: it belongs to the SU(2) group.

Multiplying the two exact Pauli matrix exponentials, and using ${\tau }_1{\tau }_2=i{\tau }_3$, givesIn particular, the ${\tau }_3$ term has a minus sign. Its quadratic Taylor expansion isTaking $X=i\alpha {\tau }_1$, $Y=i\beta {\tau }_2$, the Pauli matrix commutator identity gives $[X,Y]=-2i\alpha \beta {\tau }_3$. The quadratic exponent in the Baker--Campbell--Hausdorff formula is therefore $Z=i\alpha {\tau }_1+i\beta {\tau }_2-i\alpha \beta {\tau }_3$. In $e^Z=I+Z+\frac{1}{2}{Z}^2+O(3)$, only the linear part of $Z$ contributes to $Z^2$ through degree two. The anticommutator ${\tau }_1{\tau }_2+{\tau }_2{\tau }_1=0$ gives $Z^2=-({\alpha }^2+{\beta }^2)I+O(3)$, reproducing the exact product's quadratic expansion.

For a differentiable curve $R(t)$ in the SO(3) group with $R(0)=I$, differentiating $R(t{)}^{T}R(t)=I$ gives $X^T+X=0$, where $X=R^{\prime }(0)$. Conversely, if $X$ is a real skew-symmetric matrix, $e^{tX}$ is an orthogonal matrix and has determinant $e^{t\mathrm{tr}X}=1$. HenceThe displayed generators of the SO(3) Lie algebra areThey are linearly independent and span the three independent entries of a real skew-symmetric matrix. Equivalently, $T_a\mathbf{v}={\mathbf{e}}_a\times \mathbf{v}$. The vector triple-product identity then givesThus the structure constants of a Lie algebra in this basis are

Use a real, antisymmetric convention throughout the SO(3) vector Higgs model. With gauge coupling $g$, the gauge covariant derivative and gauge field strength areThere is no factor of $i$ in these formulas because $T_a$ are real antisymmetric generators. For a local non-Abelian gauge transformation ${\Phi }^{\prime }=R\Phi$, with $R(x)$ in the SO(3) group, the compatible transformation of the gauge potential isIt gives $D_{\mu }^{\prime }{\Phi }^{\prime }=R{D}_{\mu }\Phi$ and $F_{\mu \nu }^{\prime }=R{F}_{\mu \nu }{R}^{-1}$. These covariance laws fix the relative signs in the gauge covariant derivative and gauge field strength.

An SO(3) invariant quartic scalar potential isSince $(R\Phi {)}^T(R\Phi )={\Phi }^T\Phi$, this scalar potential is gauge-invariant. Its minimum is the sphere ${\Phi }^T\Phi =v^2$, rather than a preferred direction in the internal vector space.

Writing ${\mathbf{A}}_{\mu }=(A_{\mu 1},A_{\mu 2},A_{\mu 3})$, the cross product form of the gauge covariant derivative is $D_{\mu }\Phi ={\partial }_{\mu }\Phi +g{\mathbf{A}}_{\mu }\times \Phi$. In components this isCorrespondingly, the gauge field strength has components

A covariantly constant vector Higgs field has constant norm, becauseThe last equality uses antisymmetry of the gauge potential. On a connected region write this norm as $\varphi \ge 0$. If $\varphi =0$, the vector Higgs field is identically zero. If $\varphi >0$, the SO(3) group acts transitively on unit vectors, so choose a smooth local non-Abelian gauge transformation rotating $\Phi /\varphi$ to ${\mathbf{e}}_3$. In this unitary gauge, $\Phi =(0,0,\varphi {)}^T$ with $\varphi$ constant. This is a local construction, and is global on a trivial contractible region; a nontrivial bundle can require more than one gauge patch.

For nonzero $\varphi$, substituting the constant aligned vector Higgs field into $D_{\mu }\Phi =0$ gives $g\varphi (A_{\mu 2},-A_{\mu 1},0{)}^T=0$. For nonzero gauge coupling, the most general compatible gauge potential and gauge field strength arewhere $a_{\mu }$ is an arbitrary real one-form. Thus the surviving gauge group is the $SO(2)$ stabilizer subgroup of ${\mathbf{e}}_3$. A covariantly constant vector Higgs field does not force the gauge field strength to vanish: it only requires the curvature to annihilate that field.

For the Higgs mechanism, choose a vacuum of the SO(3) invariant quartic scalar potential, so the constant norm is $v$. The canonically normalized kinetic term then containsThe two broken-direction gauge bosons have mass $gv$ (or $|g|v$ if the sign of $g$ is unrestricted), while the $T_3$ gauge boson remains massless. The two angular Goldstone bosons supply the massive vectors' longitudinal gauge-boson polarizations. The radial fluctuation remains a physical scalar field, with $m_h^2=2\lambda v^2$ for this normalization. The condition $D_{\mu }\Phi =0$ selects backgrounds without broken-direction gauge potentials; fluctuations about such a vacuum exhibit the two massive modes. Constancy of the norm alone does not require it to minimize the scalar potential.

The special orthogonal group in five dimensions isIts Lie algebra consists of real skew-symmetric matrices. There are $5\cdot 4/2=10$ independent entries above the diagonal, so $\dim SO(5)=10$. Equivalently, the orthogonality equations impose fifteen independent constraints on twenty-five matrix entries; the determinant condition chooses a component without changing the dimension.

Fix the fifth coordinate. The matrices $\mathrm{diag}(S,1)$, $S\in SO(4)$, form an explicit subgroup. Under this subgroup the defining vector space splits as ${\mathbb{R}}^4\oplus \mathbb{R}{\mathbf{e}}_5$, so its branching rule is $5\downarrow SO(4)=4\oplus 1$. An element of the so5 Lie algebra can be written uniquely asConjugation by $\mathrm{diag}(S,1)$ sends $B$ to $SB{S}^{-1}$ and $w$ to $Sw$. The first summand is the six-dimensional Adjoint representation of a Lie algebra of $\mathfrak{so}(4)$, and the second is its four-dimensional vector representation. Hence the SO5 to SO4 branching gives

For the left SU(2) subgroup of SO(4), identify ${\mathbb{R}}^4$ with the quaternions. Left multiplication by a unit quaternion is a real orthogonal transformation and gives an embedded SU(2) group. More generally, $q\mapsto aq{b}^{-1}$ gives the double cover $SU(2{)}_L\times SU(2{)}_R\to SO(4)$ with kernel $\{(1,1),(-1,-1)\}$. After complexifying, the vector representation is $(2,2)$ and the Adjoint representation is $(3,1)\oplus (1,3)$. Restricting to the left factor turns the right factor into a multiplicity space. ThereforeThese are decompositions into complex irreducible representations; the real $4$ is the underlying real representation of a quaternionic doublet. Combining the branching rules gives

Write a weight as $\lambda =(x,y)$. The integrality conditions for the B2 root system give $2x\in \mathbb{Z}$ and $y-x\in \mathbb{Z}$. Hence $x=m/2$, $y=m/2+n$, with $m,n\in \mathbb{Z}$. ThusThis is the B2 weight lattice, with an integer square lattice and a second square lattice shifted by $(1/2,1/2)$. The eight roots of a root system areThe short roots lie on the coordinate axes and the long roots on the diagonals. The positive roots for the given simple-root choice are $\alpha$, $\beta$, $\alpha +\beta$, $2\alpha +\beta$.

The integrality conditions determine the weight lattice of the Lie algebra, equivalently of the simply connected Spin group $\mathrm{Spin}(5)$. For the global special orthogonal group $SO(5)$, a $2\pi$ rotation in either coordinate plane is the identity, so a genuine group representation requires integer $x,y$. Thus the half-integer coset contains spin representations that do not descend to $SO(5)$. Both representations requested here have integer weights, so their diagrams are unaffected by this distinction.

The root system of the displayed $SO(4)$ subgroup is $\{\pm (1,1),\pm (1,-1)\}$. The two orthogonal pairs give its two commuting $\mathfrak{su}(2)$ factors. Choose the left factor to have root $\delta =(1,1)$; exchanging the two diagonal pairs exchanges left and right. Its coroot pairs with a weight asThis demonstrates the diagonal-root SU(2) embedding in SO(5) directly. The short-axis root $\alpha$ would instead give $2x$, and therefore a different subgroup: on the vector representation it would produce a triplet and two singlets rather than two doublets and a singlet.

For the vector representation, simultaneously rotate the first and second coordinate planes. Over $\mathbb{C}$, the two planes give opposite pairs of weights, while the fifth coordinate is fixed. Hence its weight diagram iswith every weight multiplicity equal to one. Evaluating $x+y$ gives $+1$ twice, $-1$ twice and $0$ once, exactly two SU(2) representations of dimension two and one singlet.

For the Adjoint representation, the root-space decomposition has one one-dimensional space for each of the eight roots and a two-dimensional zero-weight Cartan subalgebra. ThusThe coroot values $x+y$ have multiplicities $1,2,4,2,1$ at $-2,-1,0,1,2$. One zero-weight state joins the $\pm 2$ states to make a triplet; the $\pm 1$ states form two doublets, leaving three zero-weight singlets. This verifies the earlier branching rule and accounts for all ten dimensions.

Use the minimal four-dimensional Super-Poincaré algebra, with $\{Q_{\alpha },Q_{\beta }\}=0$, $\{Q_{\alpha },{\bar{Q}}_{\dot{\beta }}\}=2{\sigma }_{\alpha \dot{\beta }}^{\nu }{P}_{\nu }$ and commuting translations. Lorentz covariance and closure on the existing supercharges permit onlyThe graded Jacobi identity for $P^{\mu },Q_{\alpha },Q_{\beta }$ therefore givesFor example, with ${\sigma }^0=I$, $\mu =0$ and $\alpha =\beta =1$, the coefficient is a nonzero multiple of $A(P_1-i{P}_2)$. Independence of the translation generators forces $A=0$. Its adjoint gives the barred result. Thus every supercharge commutes with four-momentum:Consequently $[Q_{\alpha },P^2]=0$. If $|u⟩$ has a particular mass-shell condition, the nonzero state $Q_{\alpha }|u⟩$ has the same one. This gives supersymmetric mass degeneracy within an unbroken physical supermultiplet. The qualification matters: after spontaneous supersymmetry breaking, the chosen vacuum is not annihilated by the supercharges, and its one-particle excitations need not constitute degenerate supermultiplets.

For the O'Raifeartaigh model, write $X={\varphi }_1$, $Y={\varphi }_2$, $Z={\varphi }_3$. Field phases allow $g,M,m$ to be positive. The canonical Kähler potential and elimination of the auxiliary fields give the F-term scalar potentialA supersymmetric vacuum would require $W_Y=MZ=0$, hence $Z=0$, while $W_X=g(Z^2-m^2)=-g{m}^2$ could not vanish. Thus F-flatness is impossible. More precisely, with $Z=u+iv$,The stated strict inequality makes every nonconstant term nonnegative. The entire classical vacuum family isHere $F_X=-\overline{W_X}=g{m}^2$, while $F_Y=F_Z=0$. The Weyl spinor ${\psi }_X$ is the massless goldstino, and the complex scalar field $X$ is a pseudomodulus with two zero tree-level squared masses. The hierarchy $M\gg m$ separates the massive fields from the breaking scale, but it does not itself select $x=0$ along this flat direction.

At the representative vacuum $x=0$, the chiral-superfield fermion mass matrix isIts physical masses are its singular values: $0,M,M$. The two massive Weyl spinors can be combined into one massive Dirac spinor. For $Y=(y_R+i{y}_I)/\sqrt{2}$, $Z=(z_R+i{z}_I)/\sqrt{2}$, the real scalar squared masses areIn particular, there is no tachyon under the stated inequality. The splitting of the $Z$ masses displays supersymmetry breaking directly.

For completeness, the mass spectrum can be given throughout the classical vacuum family, rather than silently fixing the pseudomodulus. A phase rotation makes $x$ real and nonnegative without changing physical masses. The massive fermion squared masses areThe real and imaginary scalar sectors have two-by-two scalar squared-mass matriceswhose eigenvalues areBoth determinants are $M^2(M^2+2ϵg^2{m}^2)>0$ and their traces are positive, so stability holds at every finite $x$. Quantum corrections can lift a pseudomodulus; these formulas describe the classical, tree-level spectrum requested here.

Define the physical mass supertrace byEach real scalar contributes once and each Weyl spinor twice with a minus sign. At $x=0$ this gives $4M^2-2(2M^2)=0$. At general $x$, ${\sum }_{ϵ,\pm }{b}_{ϵ,\pm }=4M^2+8g^2|x{|}^2=2(f_{+}+f_{-})$. Hence the tree-level mass supertrace vanishes despite broken supersymmetry:This is the tree-level supertrace mass sum rule, not a claim that the individual masses are equal.

For direct breaking in the Minimal supersymmetric Standard Model, the difficulty is both field content and the tree-level spectrum. A linear gauge-invariant superpotential term needs a gauge-singlet chiral superfield, which the minimal model does not contain. Moreover, with canonical kinetic terms and purely neutral F-term breaking, without D-term mass shifts, the MSSM tree-level sfermion mass constraint applies separately to conserved charge sectors. For one electron pair it gives $m_{{\tilde{e}}_1}^2+m_{{\tilde{e}}_2}^2=2m_e^2$: both scalar partners cannot be heavy. This is an illustrative charge-sector consequence under those assumptions, not an unrestricted inference from the total supertrace alone. A separate hidden supersymmetry-breaking sector communicating effective soft supersymmetry breaking through loops or suppressed operators avoids the direct canonical tree-level obstruction.

Since $v=t+r_{\star }$, $dt=dv-f^{-1}dr$. Substitution into the radial metric cancels the $d{r}^2/f$ terms. The Ingoing Eddington-Finkelstein coordinates giveThe radial block has determinant $-1$, even when $f=0$. Its coefficients are analytic for every $r>0$, so this form extends through $r=r_{+}$ and also through $r=r_{-}$ to $0<r<r_{+}$. Ordinary angular coordinate singularities are removed by angular charts on the three-sphere. The genuine endpoint $r=0$ is not included in this extension.

The field $n=-{\partial }_r$ is an ingoing null tangent. It is future-directed in the original exterior, since its inner product with the future stationary Killing vector field is $-1$, and it remains future-directed by continuation. This fixes the time orientation used in the next part.

For one small transverse displacement, the elastic energy of the elastic filament iswhere $A$ is the filament bending modulus. Its first variation isThe clamped boundary conditions remove the left boundary terms. A force-free and torque-free tip permits independent $\delta h(L)$ and $\delta h^{\prime }(L)$, so the natural boundary conditions for a free endpoint are $h^{\prime \prime }(L)=h^{\prime \prime \prime }(L)=0$: zero bending moment and transverse shear.

There is an important distinction between an energy minimum and a normal mode. The unloaded higher-order Euler-Lagrange equation is $h^{\prime \prime \prime \prime }=0$, whose only solution with these four boundary conditions is $h=0$. A general fluctuating shape is a sum of modes, not one of the stated sinusoidal/hyperbolic functions. To obtain the clamped--free bending modes, extremize the bending Rayleigh quotient, or equivalently $U[W]-\frac{1}{2}A{k}^4\int W^{2}dx$ with a fixed norm. Its Euler-Lagrange equation isThis is the constrained variational characterization of bending modes. Its four characteristic roots are $\pm k,\pm ik$. Clamping gives $F=-D$ and $E=-B$, henceThe free-tip conditions reduce toIts determinant is $-2(1+\cos q\cosh q)$, so nontrivial modes requireNo zero mode exists, since a cubic satisfying the homogeneous clamp/free conditions is zero. The clamped-free bending spectrum starts with $q_1\in (\pi /2,2)$; bisection or Newton iteration gives $q_1\simeq 1.875104$, so $k_1\simeq 1.875104/L$. Choosing $D=N(\sin q_n+\sinh q_n)$ and $B=-N(\cos q_n+\cosh q_n)$ givesThe second boundary condition follows from the root equation, and $N$ is arbitrary until a normalization is chosen.