Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 iii Paper 38 2 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
For a stopping time , optional sampling for gives , henceThis is justified by truncation and the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, as in solution. If is a martingale, bounded optional sampling gives , proving the required condition.
Conversely suppose the required condition holds. Every bounded stopping time lies below some deterministic , so the displayed identity gives . The product is continuous and adapted, and its stopped values are integrable: the Doob L2 maximal inequality bounds the product of the two path suprema in by the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality. The characterization of a martingale by bounded continuous-time stopped expectations therefore makes a martingale. Thus orthogonality is equivalent to the backward-stopping expectation test. In contrast to weakly orthogonal continuous martingales, this tests the product at random times, not only deterministic times.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 iii Paper 32 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Work on a finite interval with a fixed initial point . To give a clean global statement, assume are bounded vector fields with bounded continuous derivatives through order three. Consider the Stratonovich integral form of the stochastic differential equationFor a control in the Cameron-Martin space of Wiener measure,let solve the controlled ordinary differential equationThe Stroock-Varadhan support theorem says, in the uniform metric on continuous paths,Thus a path is in the support of a measure of the diffusion precisely when it can be approximated by these deterministic controlled trajectories. There is no ellipticity assumption: the allowed controls and vector fields already encode any restrictions on reachability.
The central point of the rough-path proof is that ordinary uniform approximation of the driver does not make the solution map continuous. Small planar loops can have small amplitude but accumulated area of fixed size, and vector fields with a nonzero Lie bracket detect that area. The correct driver is enhanced Brownian motion , including Lévy area. Fix . The universal limit theorem gives a continuous mapfrom the geometric -variation rough-path space to solution paths. It agrees with the controlled ordinary differential equation when . Adding the time coordinate, with its mixed integrals defined by integration against and integration by parts, incorporates without changing the continuity argument. This is the role of the universal limit theorem: it turns a support problem for all these nonlinear diffusions into a support problem for one enhanced driving process.
For , the rough differential equation is the stated Stratonovich equation. Its second-order increment includesReplacing the Stratonovich integral in the second level by its Itô integral expression contributes , which is exactly the Stratonovich-to-Itô correction. Polygonal convergence from Question 3 and the universal limit theorem therefore give the Wong-Zakai approximation: the ordinary equations driven by converge to this Stratonovich diffusion.
It remains to establish the support of enhanced Brownian motion:One inclusion follows immediately from Question 3. Every polygonal belongs to , and almost surely in the rough path metric. Since is closed, almost surely, whence its support is contained in . This alone does not prove the reverse inclusion: convergence of random approximations does not automatically give positive mass near every control.
For that inclusion, take dyadic mesh and writeOn each grid interval is a pinned Brownian bridge. The bridges are mutually independent and independent of the grid values defining , by the Gaussian projection formula. Their canonical Stratonovich enhancement is therefore independent of . It is important to enhance the bridge residual itself, including its area, rather than infer area smallness from its uniform size.
The bridge enhancement tends to the zero rough path in probability. Here are the estimates behind this assertion. A bridge on an interval of length scales as times a unit bridge; its full antisymmetric area has mean zero, moments of order , and second moment of order . Since its endpoint displacement is zero, at grid points the cumulative second level is just the sum of the independent bridge areas. The Doob L2 maximal inequality givesPartial intervals at the two ends contribute bridge increments and at most two local areas. Bridge scaling, Gaussian moment bounds and the corresponding iterated-integral estimates yield, uniformly in and for arbitrarily large ,For an interval crossing several grid cells, the full-cell second levels are independent centered areas, whose sum has moments bounded by ; the two boundary pieces and their cross product satisfy the displayed bound as well. For an interval inside one cell these are the usual scaled bridge increment and area bounds. At each fixed pair both levels converge to zero in probability: the first-level variance is , and the second-level second moment is for sufficiently fine grids. The Kolmogorov continuity theorem gives uniformly bounded moments of a Hölder rough-path norm at any exponent . Tightness, convergence on a dense set of pairs and interpolation to now give in probability. Taking gives in probability.
Fix . Its polygonal interpolations converge to in the total-variation norm: their derivatives are the cell averages of , which converge in , hence in . Moreover . Thus in the rough path metric.
The rough path translation operation satisfiesFor a bounded variation path , translation adds at level one and, at level two, the mixed termsThe second mixed term is defined by integration by parts. Their variation bounds show that translation is continuous, uniformly when is bounded, near the zero rough path. More explicitly the mixed second-level norms are bounded by a constant times ; the other new second-level term is the path signature of .
Given a ball of radius around , choose a sufficiently large so that is close andfor the small supplied by translation continuity. The relevant variation bounds can be chosen uniformly in , since the variations of the are uniformly bounded. For this fixed , the event has positive probability: the finite vector of Brownian increments has an everywhere positive Gaussian density, and sufficiently small deviations of its vertices imply this variation bound. These two events are independent. On their intersection, translation continuity gives . Every ball around therefore has positive probability. This proves lies in the support, and taking closures gives .
Finally, a continuous map between the separable path spaces in use satisfiesFor one direction the measure is concentrated on its support. For the other, an open neighborhood of pulls back to an open neighborhood of a support point , which has positive measure. Using continuity of and the identity proves the boxed Stroock-Varadhan support theorem. This separates the two ingredients: the probabilistic support calculation for Brownian motion and area, and the deterministic continuity supplied by the universal limit theorem.
If the diffusion is instead presented as an Itô integral equation with drift , the controlled equation must useUsing unchanged in the controlled equation would generally give the wrong support description. The result above states explicit sufficient smoothness and nonexplosion assumptions; extensions to more general coefficients require the usual localization, not an unqualified assertion for arbitrary vector fields.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 iii Paper 36 2 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
For an elementary previsible process , with bounded -measurable coefficients, defineThe Itô isometry isMore generally the squared distance between the integrals of and is the integral of on the right. The integral is a zero-starting continuous square-integrable martingale.
Elementary predictable processes are dense in . Given in this space, choose elementary converging in its norm and define the Itô integral by the limit of . The isometry proves that this is independent of the approximating sequence and remains valid for the limit. The Doob L2 maximal inequality bounds the expected squared path supremum of the difference by four times its terminal second moment; hence the convergence also gives a continuous martingale version, with uniform convergence on compacts in probability.
For a continuous local martingale and locally bounded process that is previsible, choose increasing stopping times such that is L2-bounded, up to , and . This can be done by combining localizers with first exits of from bounded intervals and the local bounds of . Then is in the integrand space for . Define the integral on each stopped interval by the preceding construction. The stopping property of elementary integrals, extended by the isometry, makes these definitions agree on overlaps. Pasting givesThis is a localization construction; global square integrability of the resulting process is not asserted.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 iii Paper 36 6 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
A Markov jump process relative to is an adapted càdlàg process with piecewise-constant paths and finitely many jumps on each bounded time interval, whose conditional future law given depends only on its current state. For a time-homogeneous process on a countable state space, write for its transition rates and . In state , the holding time is exponential of rate and the next state is with probability ; a zero rate makes the state absorbing. The generator is . Nonexplosion is included here so that the process is defined at every finite time.
Here is a finite-jump, bounded-rate form of the Kurtz fluid limit theorem. For each , let be a chain on a countable state space with jumps at rates , with in a fixed finite subset . Assume the nonnegative are uniformly bounded, admissible jumps remain in the state space, andis globally Lipschitz with constant . Suppose in probability, and let solve , . Then for every finite ,Bounded total jump rates ensure nonexplosion; the globally Lipschitz drift gives a unique global ODE solution. These explicit hypotheses suffice for the population example, without needing a more general local version of the theorem.
To prove the result, compensate the jumps of this density-dependent Markov jump process. The drift and the coordinate martingales satisfyHere is predictable quadratic variation, not the sum of realized squared jumps. The compensation identity follows because each possible increment has intensity , and its squared coordinate increment contributes per unit time. Bounded rates and jump sizes make these martingales square-integrable.
We use the Doob L2 maximal inequality in the explicit form for a scalar square-integrable martingale starting at zero. Applying it coordinatewise and setting givesSubtract the ODE integral equation. Lipschitz continuity and Gronwall's inequality yieldThe first term tends to zero in probability by hypothesis, and the second by its maximal second-moment estimate. More quantitatively, for ,This proves the stated uniform finite-horizon fluid limit.
For the cells, division replaces one cell by two and increases population by one. At population , the total rate is the sum of the identical cell rates, namelyThe state is absorbing. Set ; its jump is with rate , where on . Extending this function by zero outside makes it bounded, nonnegative and globally Lipschitz, with Lipschitz constant one. Starting from , or from when integer rounding is necessary, the limiting ODE is the logistic differential equationSeparation of variables, or differentiating , gives its solution. The logistic cell-division process therefore satisfiesHere , so the maximal martingale second moment is at most . With exact initial density , the preceding pathwise bound even gives . With integer rounding, the bound follows from and . Thus the deterministic logistic curve approximates the density with fluctuations of order on fixed time intervals. The convergence statement is on finite horizons; it does not interchange the limits and .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 iii Paper 37 1 c Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Work first with . More generally, the assertion needs and then applies to . Without this assumption, an integrable but non-square-integrable initial random variable kept constant in time has zero quadratic variation but is not bounded in L2 space.
Choose increasing stopping timesThey tend to infinity almost surely, because the continuous path and its quadratic variation are finite on every compact time interval. The stopped process is a bounded martingale, and is bounded and a local martingale. Taking expectations givesSuppose . These squared expectations are at most . For each fixed , the stopped values converge almost surely to and are uniformly integrable, since they are uniformly bounded in L2 space. They therefore converge in . Passing in the stopped conditional-expectation identity, using contraction of conditional expectation in , gives for . Thus is a true martingale. The Fatou lemma gives , uniformly in , so it is an L2-bounded continuous martingale.
Conversely, suppose is a true martingale with . For fixed , bounded-time optional sampling theorem gives . Conditional Jensen inequality then yieldsThe brackets increase to . Applying the monotone convergence theorem first in and then in proves .
The exact identities and terminal limits can also be justified. On each fixed horizon , the Doob L2 maximal inequality givesThis is an integrable dominating variable for , so the dominated convergence theorem and increasing convergence of the brackets remove the stopping:The L2 martingale convergence theorem supplies with almost surely and in L2 space. Consequently the squares converge in , while . We obtain the integrable terminal bracket criterion with the precise terminal identityFor rather than zero, the final identity becomes .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 iii Paper 37 5 c Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
For fixed , the derivative of is zero on , bounded on the compact transition interval , and equals for . Thus is globally Lipschitz, with at most linear growth. The global existence theorem for stochastic differential equations with Lipschitz coefficients supplies a global strong stochastic solution and pathwise uniqueness for the modified equation.
The solution stays nonnegative. More precisely, if , it cannot cross : on reaching this level the constant continuation solves the equation, and pathwise uniqueness forces that continuation. If , it is constant from the outset. In either case is a nonnegative local martingale, so .
For , both coefficients agree with on . Stop the two solutions when either first reaches , and also at a common upper bound. On the resulting compact state interval, the coefficient is Lipschitz. The Itô isometry applied to their difference, followed by the Gronwall inequality, gives zero expected squared difference. Remove the upper bound using the nonexplosion of each modified solution. The two solutions agree until the first of these lower exits, and by continuity both have value there, so their exits at that level coincide. In particular,up to indistinguishability. If , the first exit time is zero and the same assertion is immediate from their initial values.
Now take a decreasing sequence with . Write and . Compatibility gives ; indeed, a continuous path cannot reach the smaller level before reaching the larger one. Let , a stopping time. On the compatible solutions define an adapted continuous process by setting whenever . We still need to justify the finite limiting endpoint and the integral equation there, rather than assume they exist.
For this purpose use the compatible predictable integrandsTheir squares increase pointwise with : on the smaller interval compatibility makes the values equal, and outside it the old integrand is zero. Their limit is predictable and equals before , and zero after , apart from irrelevant single-time endpoints. For every finite ,The monotone convergence theorem gives . Moreover, compatibility makes away from endpoints, so its expected time-integral tends to zero. The Itô isometry, and the Doob L2 maximal inequality if uniform convergence on a finite time interval is desired, therefore give a continuous stochastic-integral limitBefore , the integrand agrees with , which is the original square-root coefficient there. Locality of the stochastic integral yields . A countable intersection in and path continuity give this equality simultaneously for all times.
On , every is finite and . Continuity of thus gives . The limiting integrand is zero after , so remains zero afterward. On , every finite time is covered by one of the compatible positive solutions. Consequently is nonnegative everywhere and for almost every , including after absorption. The cutoff construction of an absorbed square-root diffusion has producedAll modified solutions, stopping times and integrands were constructed from the same prescribed Brownian motion; hence this is a strong stochastic solution. The integral is square-integrable on every finite horizon by the bound , which also rules out a hidden finite-time explosion in the patching argument.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 iii Paper 29 1 c Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
First justify optional sampling for the square-minus-bracket process. The Doob L2 maximal inequality gives . Stop the local martingale using a localizing sequence and bounded bracket levels. The stopped expectation identity, followed by Fatou, bounds by the expected squared path supremum. Hence has an integrable absolute supremum, and localization with conditional dominated convergence makes it a uniformly integrable martingale. The optional stopping theorem stated in part (b) is therefore applicable to both and .
For ordered stopping times , expand the squared increment and condition on . The mean increment is zero, soThis is the conditional bracket isometry for stopped martingale increments. Apply it with , and multiply by the bounded -measurable variable . The orthogonality proved in part (b) gives the Itô isometry
To identify the whole bracket process, let and . For deterministic and , apply the proved isometry to the simple integrand . It yieldsThus . Since is a martingale, the cross term has conditional mean zero. Consequently is a martingale. The process is continuous, adapted, nondecreasing and starts at zero, so uniqueness in the definition of quadratic variation provesThis deduction uses only the proved elementary isometry, not a previously assumed formula for the quadratic variation of stochastic integrals.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 iii Paper 29 2 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The intended setting is with continuous and adapted. These conditions are needed for the requested continuous-semimartingale conclusion; finite variation alone does not supply them. For example, , satisfies the printed deterministic bound and starts at zero, but has a jump for sufficiently large . We use the continuous adapted interpretation throughout this question.
Define . Then , and . The Itô formula gives the canonical continuous semimartingale decompositionThe initial value is zero. The first term is a continuous martingale, since is bounded and the integrand is bounded. The second is continuous adapted finite variation, hence predictable. This decomposition is unique because a continuous finite-variation local martingale is constant. The phrase Doob-Meyer here must mean this semimartingale decomposition: need not be nondecreasing, and the hypotheses do not make a submartingale as required by the Doob-Meyer decomposition theorem. Indeed , so the bounded deterministic drift makes initially decrease, excluding the submartingale property.
The sign process is predictable because it is a Borel function of the continuous adapted, and therefore predictable, process . Its paths need not themselves be left-continuous. Pointwise, including at ,For a fixed horizon , . The dominated convergence theorem for the finite measure on givesThe Itô isometry, extended from simple predictable integrands by their density, and the Doob L2 maximal inequality now implyHence
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 iii Paper 31 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
For , the continuous martingale is . Since has the centered normal distribution of variance ,For , the continuous martingale is . The Gaussian fourth moment givesThis verifies both cases. The time integral in the printed identity is understood with its omitted .
Write . The derivatives of the approximations areThus . The Itô formula gives . This use of the formula is valid despite the two second-derivative discontinuities: mollify the function , whose derivative is Lipschitz. Its smooth derivatives converge boundedly, while the second derivatives are bounded by and converge except at . For every , the normal distribution of assigns those points zero probability. Dominated convergence for the drift integral and the Itô isometry for the stochastic integral pass the smooth formula to . Equivalently, this identifies the martingale in the assumed decomposition and permits its cross-covariances to be calculated.
If , then . The Itô isometry and Doob L2 maximal inequality therefore give, for every fixed ,The Gaussian density is bounded by , soConsequently the processes are Cauchy in the complete space of continuous random paths with norm . They have a continuous-path limit there. Limits obtained for different integer horizons agree on overlaps; choose these versions consistently. Each is adapted, and passing to the limit in shows that is a continuous martingale. Letting in the preceding bound proves the requested convergence, with an explicit rate:The same Itô isometry identifies , with .
There is a genuine factor-of-two error in the last printed conclusion. The stated has second derivative almost everywhere, and the generator in the decomposition is one half of the second derivative. Hence the exact identity isBecause and , this already proves uniform convergence on bounded intervals to . It does not by itself prove almost-sure convergence of the full sequence, so we supply that additional step.
Take . For each fixed integer and each , the maximal-error bound and Markov's inequality implyThe first Borel-Cantelli lemma, applied to rational positive and integer , gives uniform almost-sure convergence of this subsequence on every bounded interval. Therefore uniformly there almost surely.
For , the indicator windows are nested. The ratio-one interpolation for shrinking-window occupation integrals givesBoth ratios tend uniformly to one as . The two bounds converge uniformly to the continuous nonnegative process , so the entire sequence does too. Thus the correct normalized conclusion isand with the factor actually printed in the question the limit isThese are the occupation approximations for Brownian local time. In the Tanaka formula convention, is the local time of a semimartingale at zero. It is not identically zero: for , since starts at zero and is a martingale. Thus the discrepancy cannot be removed by treating the two limits as equal. The standard normalization is also given in Lalley's notes on the Itô calculus and local time.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 iii Paper 29 5 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
A left-continuous adapted process is a predictable process. Define the elementary predictable approximationAt every , its sample time approaches from the left, including when is itself a grid point. Thus pathwise by left continuity.
Use the continuous semimartingale decomposition , with a continuous local martingale and a continuous finite-variation process. Localize so that on a fixed horizon , the integrands are bounded by a deterministic constant, is bounded, and the total-variation process of at is bounded. This is possible using local boundedness and the finite pathwise clock and variation.
For the finite-variation integral, the dominated convergence theorem givesalmost surely. For the martingale integral, the Itô isometry and the Doob L2 maximal inequality giveHere the localized bounds justify dominated convergence also in expectation. Remove localization to conclude that the full elementary integrals converge in uniform convergence on compacts in probability to .
The sum of completed intervals differs from the full elementary integral at time byIts maximum on tends to zero almost surely, by the local bound on and uniform continuity of . ThereforeThis proves left-endpoint approximation of a continuous semimartingale integral, including the unfinished interval convention.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 9 4 ii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
Write , , , and let be the total progeny of a binomial branching process. The preceding binomial branching survival correction gives . For a branching process conditioned on extinction, the offspring probability generating function is , with meanfor sufficiently large . Summing expected generation sizes therefore gives .
Put and let count vertices in graph components of order at least . A breadth-first exploration of a binomial random graph is dominated by . The Markov inequality applied to finite total progeny givesAlways . Since , we have and . Hence . This bound controls the expected value directly, including rare large graph components.
For the lower bound, use the breadth-first exploration of a binomial random graph with unseen vertices, active vertices and explored vertices, starting from , . Let indicate a new root. Conditional on the past, the newly discovered count has a binomial distribution . Put . The unseen-count recursion givesHere is a martingale. Up to , martingale-difference orthogonality gives , since each conditional variance is at most and is bounded.
Take . Then , and . The Doob L2 maximal inequality impliesThe Taylor expansion, uniformly for , gives . Thus throughout the integer interval for large . The new-root sum is nonnegative, so on the preceding event throughout this interval. No graph component finishes there: all these explored vertices belong to one graph component, of order at least , with high probability. Its expected value is therefore at least . Combining both inequalities provesThe barely-supercritical largest-component expectation uses both a positive exploration window and a finite-progeny bound; a bare convergence-in-probability assertion would not by itself justify this expectation.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2013 iii Paper 25 3 d Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
For every , subtraction of the definitions givesThe difference of the two supplied continuous martingales is a square-integrable martingale on ; for each fixed mesh its finite sums are bounded. For this dyadic quadratic variation of a bounded continuous martingale, the Doob L2 maximal inequality therefore givesThus the dyadic approximations to quadratic variation are Cauchy for the expected squared uniform norm, as required. No monotonicity in time of the partially completed squared-increment sums is needed.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 201 1 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
The discrete-time Doob L2 maximal inequality states that a square-integrable martingale satisfiesEquivalently, the Lp norm of the maximum at is at most . The same assertion holds for a nonnegative square-integrable submartingale. No assumption is required; for a bound in terms of fluctuations from the initial value, apply it to .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 201 1 c Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
Use the natural filtration and define . The increments are centered, independent, and square integrable, so their conditional expectations given the past are zero. Thus is a square-integrable martingale with . Independence givesApplying the Doob L2 maximal inequality yieldsThis includes , when every centered increment vanishes almost surely.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 202 1 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
Write and . The L2 martingale convergence theorem ensures the existence of and yields almost surely. Hence .
For a finite horizon , the Doob L2 maximal inequality for the submartingale givesThe inequality does not require . Send to infinity: the left side increases to by the monotone convergence theorem, and the right side tends to by convergence in the Lebesgue space . Thus the equivalent terminal and maximal norms for L2-bounded continuous martingales satisfyBoth are genuine norms on L2-bounded continuous martingales modulo indistinguishability of stochastic processes: a zero terminal norm gives , first at rational times and then at all times by continuity. This proves that the two norms are equivalent norms.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 202 1 d Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
Fix a L2-bounded continuous martingale . Its quadratic-variation measure on the predictable sigma-algebra isIt is finite, since . The source Hilbert space is : predictable processes with finite , identified when equal -almost everywhere. Its norm is .
The target consists of L2-bounded continuous martingales starting at zero, identified up to indistinguishability of stochastic processes, with norm . It is a Hilbert space: terminal values belong to the closed linear subspace of whose conditional expectation given is zero and whose associated martingales have continuous versions. Closure of that continuous-version subspace follows from the Doob L2 maximal inequality and an almost surely uniformly convergent subsequence.
The Itô isometry says that integration extends uniquely from simple predictable processes to a linear isometry , withFor every finite , the same identity holds with the integral restricted to and the left side . No claim of surjectivity onto all of is needed: that would require an additional Martingale representation theorem.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 202 1 e Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
Put and . The candidate is continuous, adapted, nondecreasing, starts at zero and has integrable terminal value. We prove is a martingale, rather than assuming the desired quadratic variation of a stochastic integral.
The assumed boundedness of also makes a true martingale on every finite horizon. Indeed, apply its local martingale identity at a localizing sequence; bounded stopped squares and the Fatou lemma show that is integrable. The stopped expressions are then dominated by , so the dominated convergence theorem gives the unrestricted conditional identity on that horizon.
First let be a bounded simple predictable process. On each interval with coefficient , an increment of is . The defining quadratic variation identity for , together with the martingale property of , makesa martingale for . Expanding gives a term and the square term above; their conditional expectations yield the desired identity on that interval. Integrability follows because the variables are square-integrable; concatenating the finitely many intervals gives a martingale.
For general bounded predictable , choose bounded simple predictable processes in , which is possible since they generate the predictable sigma-algebra. Set and . The Itô isometry and Doob L2 maximal inequality imply in ; the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality gives in andPass the conditional expectation identity for to the limit. Thus is a martingale. Uniqueness in the defining quadratic variation property now gives
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 iii Paper 202 1 iii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
For deterministic step functions, define directly from Brownian motion incrementswith the left endpoint of the first interval and outside the listed intervals. The printed endpoint list omits ; the intended convention is , usually .
Given finitely many observation times, refine the deterministic partition of an interval to include all observation times and all . Every is a linear combination of the same finite family of independent centered normal Brownian motion increments. Thus every linear combination of is normal, including possibly a degenerate constant: is a Gaussian process. By independence, only increments in the common interval contribute to the covariance, givingThe same calculation for two step functions proves, rather than assumes, the Itô isometryFor , choose deterministic step functions in the L2 space. This identity makes a Cauchy sequence in the L2 space; the Riesz-Fischer theorem defines by mean-square convergence, independently of the approximation. The covariance formula passes to the limit by the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality. For finitely many times and coefficients , the characteristic functions converge toso the extension remains a Gaussian process.
For completeness, the construction has a continuous version. Each approximating is a martingale, directly by the centered independent increments of Brownian motion; the Doob L2 maximal inequality givesTo prove the inequality used here without assuming Itô integral properties, a continuous martingale satisfies , by conditioning at the first crossing on finite deterministic grids and then using continuity; integrating in and using the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality yields . A sufficiently fast subsequence therefore converges uniformly almost surely on every compact time interval, giving the continuous version of the stochastic integral.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 iii Paper 202 5 i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
Let be the quadratic variation and stop at . Its continuity and monotonicity imply and whenever . The standard martingale isometry after stopping by bounded quadratic variation gives ; in particular the stopped local martingale is square-integrable. This criterion follows by localization and the Doob L2 maximal inequality, which bound the second moment of the stopped supremum by and then permit removal of localization.
On one has , so the original and stopped paths agree through time . Therefore the Doob L2 maximal inequality and the Markov inequality giveThus