Momentum relaxation time 2026-10-14
The momentum relaxation time is the exponential relaxation time of mean directed momentum after the driving electric field is removed. In the simplest Drude model, independent collisions occur with probability during a short time interval and reset the mean velocity of the collided population to zero. The remaining fraction preserves its previous mean momentum. To first order in , averaging gives . This is a population equation: it does not assert that every particle stops at equally spaced instants.[ref]
For real materials, a collision that changes a particle's direction only slightly need not erase its directed momentum, so the momentum relaxation time need not equal the time between all scattering events. This transport time is also distinct from the bulk charge relaxation time : one describes loss of directed motion, the other redistribution of charge density.
Past exam of the mathematical physiology course of the University of Oxford 2011 1 a Solution 2026-10-31
In the Hodgkin-Huxley model, is the membrane potential, the voltage inside the axon relative to outside. The space clamp assumption makes it spatially uniform. The gating variables lie between zero and one: describes sodium activation, describes availability against sodium inactivation, and describes potassium activation. Thus large means channels remain available, not that inactivation is strong.
The left side is capacitive electric current per unit membrane area. The imposed is inward-positive applied electric current. The other terms are outward-positive ionic electric currents: sodium with electrical conductance , potassium with conductance , and a passive leak with conductance . Each current is its conductance times the difference between and the corresponding reversal potential , or . The coefficients are maximal conductances; the gate factors represent independent permissive gates in an ion channel.
For each gate, is the equilibrium opening/availability fraction at fixed voltage and its exponential relaxation time. The equation follows from two-state ion-channel gating: if , thenVoltage feedback couples these otherwise elementary gating equations to the membrane potential and produces action potentials.
The left side is atmospheric heat storage per unit surface area. Incoming solar flux is averaged over the spherical surface by the factor ; albedo reflects a fraction of it. The outgoing term is a reduced Stefan-Boltzmann flux, with effective emissivity representing atmospheric greenhouse trapping. Ice-albedo feedback usually makes decrease as temperature rises through an ice-melting range; greater carbon-dioxide pressure increases infrared opacity and therefore decreases this effective . The simple estimates below hold albedo fixed.
Radiative equilibrium givesDifferentiating gives . A doubling from Pa changes pressure by Pa, henceReference weathering balance requires , so .
For the requested approximate system, take as the reference radiative/weathering equilibrium, set , , and , whereLinearize the radiative loss, retaining terms linear in and . Its two terms are and . The carbon balance scales exactly with . ThereforeNumerically . The time conversion uses seconds for the radiative constants and years for the supplied carbon production.
Because , temperature rapidly approaches , while carbon changes slowly. A sustained has equilibrium determined byIts left side is strictly increasing on positive pressure, giving within this extrapolated toy model. Counting volcanic production as well gives and K instead. An inventory estimate for the rise is years. Linearization near the final equilibrium gives the e-folding timeThus the carbon/weathering response is millennial, despite the short thermal adjustment time.
There are two numerical-reference inconsistencies in the printed setup. The requested expansion treats as its reference equilibrium although earlier labels pair with present-day Pa rather than Pa. Also, the calibrated gives , not the stated hint. That hint instead corresponds to , obtained by calibrating a doubling of Pa. Such a convention gives a pressure around – and a similar rough warming of several tens of kelvin. The displayed results above consistently use the stated Pa doubling calibration and explicitly declared reference-model approximation. A large extrapolation of a linearized radiative law is a property of this exercise, not a quantitative climate projection.
Past exam of the mathematics and the environment course of the University of Oxford 2011 1 Solution 2026-10-31
Balances and meanings. The first equation is conservation of energy per unit area. Here is effective areal heat capacity, is the solar constant, and accounts for the ratio of the Earth's intercepting disc area to its total surface area. The albedo reflects a fraction of that input. The outgoing thermal radiation is the Stefan–Boltzmann law modified by , an effective transmission factor for the greenhouse effect; it normally decreases as atmospheric carbon dioxide increases.
The albedo relaxes towards its temperature-dependent equilibrium on the ice-adjustment time . The atmospheric mass inventory per unit pressure is , using the molar mass ratio of carbon dioxide to air and hydrostatic atmospheric mass. Its sources and sinks are volcanic input , removal by chemical weathering over land area at rate , and the atmosphere-to-ocean exchange . The ocean equation is a molar mass conservation balance: is ocean water mass, division by converts the incoming carbon-dioxide mass to moles, and removes dissolved carbon by burial/export. With in moles per kilogram, has units of kilograms of water-equivalent per year.
Times and reduction. Linearize the temperature equation at fixed about radiative equilibrium. Its exponential relaxation time isThe equality uses . A stock-over-flux thermal time, sometimes used as a scale, is four times this, ; both describe a rapid thermal response relative to the other processes.
For pressure in atmospheres, write for the atmospheric carbon-dioxide mass per atmosphere. The factor is essential because is given per atmosphere. The pressure and slow ocean exponential relaxation times areThus . The leading quasi-steady approximation givesSubstitution in the two remaining equations yieldsThe coefficient of remains ; the printed in the reduced equation is a typographical error. Eliminating a fast temperature variable does not replace the ice-response time. The ocean time here is the slow time after atmospheric balance cancels the exchange flux; holding pressure fixed after imposing a carbon-dependent would describe a different conditional relaxation.
Carbon-dioxide levels. Since , the atmospheric balance with givesThis uses the specified present ocean concentration, as requested, rather than replacing it by the model's smaller volcanic-only equilibrium.
After sustained additional input , barely changes during the atmospheric adjustment. At this stageThis is an intermediate balance, approached over several centuries. On the slower ocean time,with pressure following . Since , pressure continues to rise slowly. Its eventual level in this stipulated constant-parameter model isThe two-reservoir carbon adjustment therefore has a rapid rise towards the frozen-ocean balance followed by a much longer increase. The figure solves the coupled linear pressure–ocean equations, retaining their small inventory correction to the reduced time scales.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 ib Paper 3 17D b iii Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-06
For , Newton's second law givesDefine the exponential relaxation time and terminal velocity . Solving the first-order equation for and then integrating givesBoth prescribed initial values hold. The current approaches zero as the bar approaches terminal velocity. If , there is no magnetic force and instead , ; the constant current is .
Past exam of the physics A course of the University of Cambridge 2021 Paper 2 Section A 3 Solution 2026-10-18
Model the room's decaying acoustic waves as a weakly damped resonator. The quality factor from ringdown is related to stored energy bywhere is the pressure wave amplitude and . The measured frequency gives . If the stated is interpreted as an approximate wave amplitude exponential relaxation time,an estimate of order . Taking as an energy exponential relaxation time instead gives .
There is a real convention ambiguity: “heard to die away” gives neither an initial sound level nor an audibility threshold, so it does not determine either exponential relaxation time. More generally, if the energy falls by a factor in ,In room acoustics, a reverberation time usually denotes a decibel drop of , or an energy factor . If means , the corresponding estimate is instead . The simple decay-time estimate and the conventional reverberation time estimate should not be silently equated.
Quality factor from ringdown Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-10-20
For an isolated weakly damped resonator mode, . If , differentiating gives , so . Since energy is quadratic in wave amplitude, the wave amplitude exponential relaxation time is . A decay by an energy factor in a measured interval gives . For a conventional reverberation time, under this exponential single-rate approximation.
Reverberation time Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-10-24
The conventional reverberation time is the time for the level of decaying acoustic energy to decrease by decibels, a factor in energy or in pressure wave amplitude. For exponential energy decay , . It is not the exponential relaxation time itself and cannot be inferred exactly from an unspecified audibility threshold.
Two-reservoir carbon adjustment 2026-10-31
A coupled atmosphere–ocean mass conservation model can have a fast atmospheric exponential relaxation time and a much slower ocean-carbon time. For atmospheric inventory coefficient , exchange coefficient , ocean water mass , removal coefficient and linear surface-pressure relation , atmospheric balance gives . Substitution into the ocean equation cancels the weathering and exchange terms, giving . Sustained extra emissions therefore first raise pressure at nearly fixed ocean concentration and then increase both reservoirs over the ocean removal time.
Velocity relaxation time Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-10-20
For a particle of mass with linear drag , the velocity relaxation time is the exponential relaxation time . Under a constant applied force and zero-mean random forcing, the averaged Langevin equation is . Solving givesThus the initial mean-velocity deviation decays by a factor after time . Since the force-per-velocity coefficient has units , has units of time. If the damping parameter is instead defined as a rate , the same time is . For a sphere obeying Stokes's law, . The fluctuation-dissipation relation for a Langevin particle gives the same decay time for its equilibrium velocity covariance.
