For a fixed amount of substance and composition of classical ideal gas, internal energy depends only on temperature: , with no independent volume dependence. This does not require constant heat capacity at constant volume. Between equilibrium endpoints,Here is total heat capacity at constant volume, is molar heat capacity, and for sample mass is specific internal energy, whose change is . These endpoint relations apply even when the intervening process is not at fixed volume; they do not say that transferred heat always equals . With constant , the safe statement is . Writing additionally chooses the reference energy; it does not prove that a physical gas remains classical and ideal down to zero temperature. [ref]
https://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/I_45.html#Ch45-S1. Richard Feynman, Robert Leighton and Matthew Sands, §45-1: internal-energy derivatives and heat capacity
A thermodynamic proof outline uses the first law of thermodynamics in equilibrium form, , and the Maxwell relation :The last step uses the ideal gas law and the molar gas constant , with fixed composition and amount of substance. Microscopically, separated ideal gas particles store no intermolecular interaction energy; their translational kinetic energy and any internal molecular energy are determined by temperature. Negligible intermolecular interactions still allow a molecule to have internal vibrational potential energy.
An original analytical model makes the distinction between an ideal gas and constant heat capacity concrete. Assume classical translation, two fully active rotational terms, and one independent quantum harmonic oscillator per diatomic molecule, with fixed angular frequency . Define the vibrational temperature scale , using the reduced Planck constant and Boltzmann constant . Summing its thermal occupations givesThe constant includes the chosen reference and zero-point energy, whose temperature derivative vanishes. When the vibrational contribution to heat capacity is exponentially small; when it tends to per mole. This model assumes rotations remain active throughout the interval and excludes dissociation, electronic excitation and real gas corrections. Its low- edge is not a model of rotational freezing or of an actual substance at absolute zero.[ref]
Temperature-dependent internal energy of an ideal gas, molar heat capacities and heat capacity ratio in a vibrational model
. Analytical illustration with active rotations and one quantum harmonic oscillator per molecule. Left: Mayer's relation keeps the capacity difference equal to . Middle: heat capacity ratio falls from toward . Right: the internal energy change from is an integral of varying heat capacity at constant volume; the dashed line suppresses the vibrational contribution. No measured gas curve or material-specific vibrational frequency is implied. Details.For this stipulated model, heating from to gives . Holding the frozen-vibration value throughout would give , underestimating the required internal energy increase by about of the model's full value. The integral measures all thermal storage activated along the interval. At fixed volume with only heat input, this is also the supplied heat; at fixed pressure, expansion work must be added through Mayer's relation.
Joule's free-expansion experiment tests the independence from volume in a different way: an insulated rigid vessel allows gas into an evacuated compartment, so no external work is delivered and ideally no heat is exchanged. The first law of thermodynamics gives ; positive then predicts equal initial and final equilibrium temperatures for the ideal gas. The apparatus, thermal-capacity controls and limitations of this inference are described in Joule's free-expansion experiment and temperature sensitivity of a free-expansion experiment. This endpoint test differs from the reversible adiabatic expansion of a loaded piston, which delivers work and lowers internal energy.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.
