With relativistically normalized one-particle states, Fermi's golden rule becomesIn the parent rest frame, the three-momentum delta function fixes . The energy delta function fixes the common magnitude ; its radial Jacobian converts the remaining phase-space factor intoOnly one momentum magnitude remains because the two final momenta are constrained, not independent. Explicitly,For leptonic W boson decay both final masses are small compared with , including the tau mass at the precision requested, so .
For the longitudinal state,Insert this and into the phase-space formula:Rotational invariance makes the integrated decay probability independent of the orientation of the initial spin. Both transverse polarizations therefore have the same rate. An unpolarized sample averages these three equal rates; it does not add three copies. Hence its width into one specified charged-lepton flavour is also .
The two indistinguishable paths to the same final state must be added as probability amplitudes:Taking the squared modulus gives the time-dependent decay rate, with the common final-state phase-space normalization absorbed into the probability amplitudes:The cross term is the interference between direct decay and decay after flavour conversion. For reference, diagonal propagation gives , where and is proper time. The unfactored expression remains usable if , when the ratio itself is undefined.
In a relativistic two-body decay, four-momentum conservation in the parent's rest frame requires andFor fixed daughter masses, this fixes a unique , independent of direction. In the Lorentz-invariant phase space integral, the Dirac delta distribution enforcing conservation of energy therefore performs the radial momentum integration. Only the solid angle remains to be integrated; the resulting can be taken outside that integral, even if the matrix element depends strongly on direction.
For three or more final particles, four-momentum conservation generally leaves continuously variable daughter energies and momenta, so the decay rate includes integrations over them, or equivalently over independent invariant masses in a Dalitz plot. Integrating over a variable daughter invariant mass is also necessary when an unstable daughter is treated with a finite decay width rather than a fixed mass.
Useful examples with no net quark flavor are the eta c meson and the eta b meson . Examples with nonzero quark flavor are the kaon and the D meson . These are pseudoscalar mesons: in the lowest quark model configuration the constituent spins combine to , the relative orbital angular momentum is , and the total angular momentum and parity are . For the self-conjugate examples, meson parity and charge conjugation also gives . Electrical neutrality alone would not imply zero net quark flavor; for example has strangeness.
Restoring reduced Planck constant, decay width and mean lifetime satisfy . Thus the representative numbers correspond toThe mean lifetimes differ by at least . Hidden-heavy-flavor quarkonium can undergo quark-antiquark annihilation into gluons, followed by hadronization. A color-singlet state can annihilate into two gluons. A lightest open-flavor meson cannot simply annihilate through the strong interaction, which conserves net quark flavor. With no lighter accessible final state carrying that flavor, it must undergo a weak interaction changing a constituent's flavor. The small weak interaction amplitude, CKM matrix factors and available Lorentz-invariant phase space produce a much smaller decay width.
Qualification. A decay width of order tens of MeV is not a universal property of flavor-neutral pseudoscalar mesons. The neutral pion has and decays predominantly by the electromagnetic interaction, a concrete counterexample. Its mass lies below the lightest allowed hadronic final state. The examples above illustrate the intended annihilation-versus-open-flavor comparison; the numerical scale depends on thresholds and selection rules.[ref]
Review of Particle Physics by Particle Data Group (2022). Meson summary tables: neutral-pion width and heavy pseudoscalar properties
At leading order in QED, the electron exchanges one spacelike virtual photon with a charged parton inside the proton.
The two Feynman vertices contribute and , while the photon propagator contributes . Hence the scattering amplitude scales as and its squared absolute value as . Since the fine-structure constant is , the electromagnetic coupling dependence is . The numerical in the stated differential scattering cross-section additionally uses the flux, Lorentz-invariant phase space, azimuthal integration and the convention defining the deep-inelastic structure function; it cannot be deduced from the propagator alone.
For each measured bin form the reduced quantityPlot this against at several fixed values, normally using a logarithmic axis. Bjorken scaling predicts an approximately horizontal curve at each , or equivalently collapse of different- data onto one curve. Raw cross sections do not collapse because their explicit kinematic factors vary. QCD predicts logarithmic scaling violations, so exact independence is only the ideal parton model limit. The stated extraction also assumes negligible longitudinal deep-inelastic structure function, as in the leading massless spin-half parton approximation.
Past exam of the quantum field theory course of the University of Oxford 2023 2 c ii Solution 2026-10-25
Take with the Mandelstam variables of i. The allowed tree-level Feynman diagram is the crossed -channel exchange in panel (c) of b's figure. At one end the incoming particle and outgoing antiparticle transfer charge ; the other end absorbs that charge. The zero-charge - and -channel assignments are forbidden by the interaction vertices. ThusIn the center-of-mass frame with , and . For , both scattering amplitudes approach . The elastic two-body Lorentz-invariant phase space and incident flux agree for the two experiments. Usingfor distinguishable final particles, and an extra factor when integrating the identical-particle final state over the whole sphere, givesThere is no additional division for identical incoming particles in the definition of a beam scattering cross-section. Before taking , the zero-momentum ratio is , provided the threshold is away from the heavy pole.
Near , the bare -channel scalar propagator makes fixed-order perturbation theory fail: repeated self-energy insertions contain powers of . The channel is open for , giving the leading decay widthResumming the self-energy gives a finite Breit-Wigner resonance cross section, with denominator near the pole, rather than an infinite scattering cross-section. Also, with lies outside the assumed nonrelativistic incoming kinematics; the ratio is not a resonance prediction.
The charged weak current changes one neutron down quark into an up quark:The other two valence quarks are spectators in this tree-level Feynman diagram. The intermediate W boson is highly virtual; the available neutron decay energy is far below its on-shell rest energy. Charge is conserved at each vertex, and the electron's lepton number is balanced by the electron antineutrino.
The reversed quark-level charged current is allowed as an interaction, but a free proton cannot decay as because . Four-momentum conservation leaves no accessible final-state Lorentz-invariant phase space. The absence of this free-proton beta-plus decay is therefore kinematic, not an absence of a weak vertex. Binding-energy differences in a nucleus, or incoming energy in a collision, can change whether the corresponding conversion is possible. Exotic baryon-number-violating proton decay is a separate question and is not generated by this ordinary charged-current diagram.
The charged meson decays proceed through a virtual :The first quark vertex has CKM factor , while the second has . In the simple Cabibbo description these are approximately and , so the strange amplitude carries a suppression relative to the nonstrange one, or in their corresponding squared weak-coupling factors.
For a charged pseudoscalar and a negligibly massive neutrino, the leading leptonic energy width has the formin natural units. The helicity factor is common to these two muon channels, while the threshold factor is much less favorable for the pion. Using the usual masses, its value is about for the pion and for the charged kaon: the pion's threshold factor alone is only about one fifth as large. Including the explicit factor gives a kinematic ratio about . The pseudoscalar decay constants also matter, so Lorentz-invariant phase space and CKM factors alone do not determine the full lifetime ratio.[ref]
Leptonic Decays of Charged Pseudoscalar Mesons by Particle Data Group. leading pseudoscalar leptonic-width formula and pion/kaon discussion
For , one tree topology has the spectator unchanged and followed by . The spectator can combine with to form , and the component supplies . This carries the strangeness-changing weak factor . Hadronization, other quark rearrangements and strong final-state interactions determine the hadronic amplitude; the diagram is not a complete precision width calculation. The small pion–muon energy release suppresses the pion leptonic channel kinematically, whereas the strange weak vertex suppresses the kaon channels through Cabibbo suppression.
Spin-averaged electromagnetic parton tensor 2026-10-14
For an on-shell massless quark with incoming momentum and outgoing momentum , average the initial spin and sum the final spin. The gamma matrix trace identities give . On shell , and defining and yields the displayed transverse decomposition. With the hadronic-tensor prefactor , one-particle Lorentz-invariant phase space gives . The antiquark has the same unpolarized tensor and squared electric charge.
Tau-pair missing-mass teaching model Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-10-20
Choose and purely for illustration. Then each parent has , and . Treat all six daughters as massless, including the charged electron and antimuon, and generate each three-body particle decay with constant squared decay amplitude. Choose the parent direction isotropically and the two decays independently; this omits the physical production angular law and spin correlations.
The Lorentz-invariant phase space factorizes through into a two-body decay to , followed by a two-body decay of :After angular integration the first factor contributes , while the massless second factor is constant. Since , the normalized chosen density is . Drawing with uniform on implements this density. Isotropic directions, followed by a Lorentz boost for the invisible pair and another for the parent, conserve the complete four-momentum of each generated event.
Define transverse acoplanarity by , where is the angle between the two visible momentum projections perpendicular to the beam. A fully visible two-body event with zero initial transverse momentum has and . The toy tau lepton events spread away from that point. These observables are complementary: an angular imbalance asks about directions, while the missing invariant mass also uses the visible energies and longitudinal momenta.
A Lorentz-invariant phase space density supplies allowed configurations and their geometric measure. A physical weak interaction decay amplitude reweights them and correlates spins. Consequently the plotted density is a lesson about conservation and available configurations, not a predicted experimental rate or a fit to the discovery sample. The massless charged-daughter approximation is also unsuitable near the muon rest-energy threshold.
Three-body threshold phase space 2026-10-25
For three massive daughters with a smooth nonzero decay amplitude at the decay threshold, the integrated Lorentz-invariant phase space vanishes as , where is the parent's mass minus the sum of daughter masses. The spatial Dirac delta function leaves six independent momentum coordinates. Rescaling each by contributes , while the conservation of energy Dirac delta function contributes . The factors are smooth nonzero constants at the decay threshold. Thus the decay width also scales as when the decay amplitude has a nonzero constant term. A vanishing decay amplitude, a massless daughter, or a threshold singularity can change this law. In three spatial dimensions the same argument gives for massive daughters.
Uniform three-body Dalitz density 2026-10-25
After integrating the overall orientation of a scalar-parent three-body decay, the Lorentz-invariant phase space is constant in two pairwise squared invariant masses. The two-body factorization and the relative-angle Jacobian give the displayed density. The event density includes and need not be flat: a resonance produces bands. Identical-particle counting supplies its usual global symmetry factor.



